cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Ali Rusdi
Contact Email
malirusdi@iainpare.ac.id
Phone
+6285257099481
Journal Mail Official
diktum@iainpare.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Amal Bakti 08 Soreang Parepare IAIN Parepare 91132, Kota Parepare Sulawesi Selatan Indonesia
Location
Kota pare pare,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
ISSN : 16931777     EISSN : 25488414     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Family in Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Jurisprudence Studies, Islamic Economy Law, Islamic Political Jurisprudence, Islamic Comparative Law and Islamic Astronomy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 316 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
Transformation of Siyāsah Shar’iyyah: An Islamic Political Ethical Framework for Mitigating the Pathologies of Digital Power Hisbullah Hisbullah; Abdul Syatar; Mowafg Masuwd
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16613

Abstract

Background:  The ongoing digital transformation in global political governance has exacerbated systemic vulnerabilities, including algorithmic manipulation, information asymmetry, and data opacity, which fundamentally challenge the efficacy of conventional public accountability mechanisms and the moral integrity of state officials. Although discourse on Islamic political ethics has expanded significantly, contemporary literature remains confined within theological-moralistic generalizations and often falls short of formulating technical-specific solutions to the complexities of digital disruption that mainstream secular governance theories have yet to address exhaustively. Purpose:   this research analyzes how core Islamic ethical principles—such as justice (‘adl), trust (amānah), accountability (mas’ūliyyah), transparency (shafāfiyyah), and public welfare (maṣlaḥah)—function as binding moral-legal standards for public office. Methods:  This research fills this crucial gap by employing a normative qualitative approach that operationalizes Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah as the primary axiological framework to reformulate digital rights and obligations through the crystallization of the principles of Shafāfiyyah and Amānah within the domain of digital welfare (al-maslahah al-raqmiyyah) Results:   Research findings indicate that Islamic political ethics reconfigures public authority as a divinely witnessed mandate, wherein digital transparency is operationalized as a mandatory manifestation of spiritual and legal accountability or mas’ūliyyah to mitigate the abuse of discretion and structural corruption in cyberspace. Implication:  The study argues that Islamic political ethics offers an integrative governance model capable of addressing structural corruption and restoring public trust in state institutions within contemporary Muslim societies. Originality:  This study concludes that this integrative governance model offers an institutional restructuring framework capable of transforming individual moral values into digital codes of ethics and formal regulations, while simultaneously restoring public trust through the reinforcement of structural integrity in Muslim-majority countries during the digital era.  
Substantive Justice versus Procedural Finality: Constitutional Reconstruction of Judicial Review in Indonesia’s New Criminal Procedure Code Rahman Syamsuddin; Muhammad Ikram Nur Fuady; Hasdiwanti
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16632

Abstract

Abstract Background: Reform of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has reopened a fundamental debate concerning the structure and limitation of criminal case review (Peninjauan Kembali/PK) as an extraordinary legal remedy. The constitutional tension between the Constitutional Court’s decision permitting multiple PK submissions and the Supreme Court’s administrative limitation reflects a deeper conflict between substantive justice and procedural finality. Purpose: This study aims to construct a theoretical framework for evaluating the reformulation of PK in the KUHAP, focusing on constitutional balancing, wrongful conviction theory, and substantive justice. Methods: This research employs a normative juridical method, integrating statute approach, and conceptual analysis. Primary materials include statutory provisions, constitutional decisions, and draft legislation. Secondary materials consist of relevant theories and scientific research results. Results: Pengaturan Peninjauan Kembali (PK) lebih dari satu kali dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang KUHAP pada dasarnya mencerminkan upaya harmonisasi antara perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan asas litis finiri oportet. Ketentuan ini membuka ruang koreksi terhadap kemungkinan wrongful conviction melalui ditemukannya novum atau keadaan luar biasa, sehingga memperkuat orientasi pada keadilan substantif tanpa sepenuhnya mengabaikan prinsip finalitas perkara. Implication: The reform signals a paradigmatic shift toward calibrated constitutionalism. Nonetheless, further normative refinement is required to ensure that procedural limits do not transform into structural barriers against justice. Originality: This article contributes a constitutional-theoretical reconstruction of judicial review reform by integrating substantive justice theory, responsive law, and wrongful conviction scholarship into Indonesia’s criminal procedural discourse.
Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi atas Kekerasan Seksual dari Perspektif Keadilan Andi Maysarah; Ida Hanifah; Faisal
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2027): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v25i1.16640

Abstract

Background:   The recognition of corporations as subjects of criminal law in Indonesia has evolved significantly, yet its application in cases of sexual violence remains a complex legal challenge. Although Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) recognizes corporations as criminal subjects, the absence of judicial precedents imposing criminal liability on corporations indicates a persistent gap between progressive legal norms and enforcement practices, thereby limiting substantive justice for victims. Purpose:    This study aims to analyze the construction of corporate criminal liability in sexual violence cases, examine the implementation of justice in corporate sanctioning mechanisms, and formulate an integrative liability model grounded in theories of justice and Maqashid al-Shari‘ah that strengthens victim protection within the Indonesian legal framework. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical approach supported by conceptual, comparative, and philosophical analyses. The analysis integrates Indonesian positive law, particularly the UU TPKS and corporate criminal liability doctrine, with fiqh jinayah and Maqashid al-Shari‘ah to examine the normative basis, limitations, and possible reconstruction of corporate liability for sexual violence Results:     The study finds that, although the UU TPKS recognizes corporations as criminal subjects, the enforcement framework remains constrained by unclear attribution standards, difficulties in establishing corporate mens rea, and the absence of effective victim-centered mechanisms. The analysis further shows that the principles of mas’uliyyah jama‘iyyah, diyat, ta‘zir, and Maqashid al-Shari‘ah provide a normative basis for strengthening collective responsibility, compensation, structural reform, and the restoration of victims’ dignity. On this basis, the study proposes an Integrative Corporate Criminal Liability Model that combines an extended liability basis, a Corporate Mandatory Victim Fund, a Mandatory Structural Reform Order, and Victim Dignity Restoration. Implication  The findings support the reconstruction of corporate criminal liability under Indonesian law toward a more victim-centered and substantively just framework by integrating modern criminal law doctrine with the objectives of Maqashid al-Shari‘ah, particularly the protection of life, dignity, and human integrity.riginality:   This study offers a distinctive contribution by developing an integrative model of corporate criminal liability for sexual violence grounded in theories of justice and Maqashid al-Shari‘ah. O
Family Resilience and the Reconstruction of Sakinah among Couples with Disabilities: A Socio-Legal Study from Indonesia Muh. Reski
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16899

Abstract

Background:   This article examines how Muslim couples with disabilities reconstruct the meaning of sakinah family within the everyday realities of marriage in Palu, Indonesia. Rather than treating sakinah merely as a normative religious ideal, the study approaches it as a lived socio-legal practice shaped by bodily limitations, emotional negotiation, social stigma, economic vulnerability, and religious meaning-making. Purpose: The article argues that couples with disabilities do not simply reproduce conventional models of Islamic family life, but actively reinterpret marital roles, responsibilities, and expectations through resilience practices. Methods: Using a qualitative socio-legal approach, the study draws on field observation, interviews, and documentation to explore how couples manage domestic responsibilities, communication, emotional support, and social exclusion. Results: The findings show that family resilience emerges through four interconnected processes: reconstructing sakinah beyond physical perfection, negotiating marital roles under disability, transforming hardship into religious meaning, and relying on inclusive community support while confronting structural barriers. These processes demonstrate that sakinah is not a fixed condition achieved through ideal bodily capacity, but a relational and adaptive achievement produced through mutual care, patience, communication, and shared responsibility. Implication: The article contributes to Islamic family law, disability studies, and socio-legal scholarship by proposing the concept of inclusive sakinah as a framework for understanding how marginalized Muslim families transform normative legal-religious ideals into lived practices of justice, dignity, and resilience. Originality: repositioning marriage registration as a site of legal pluralism and ethical governance in a Muslim-majority legal system. It contributes to broader debates on how the state recognizes religious marital status through administrative authority, legality-based governance, and civil rights protection.
Digital Consumer Vulnerability and and Legal Pluralism: Reconstructing Digital and Muslim Consumer Protection in Indonesia's Fragmented Legal System Yuyut Prayuti; Happy Yulia Anggraeni; Erna Listiawati; Hadi Baku Pangestu
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.18150

Abstract

Background: Indonesia's e-commerce transaction value reached Rp134.67 trillion in Q3 2025, reflecting rapid digital economic growth. This growth exposes a structural paradox: the principle of equality justifying state intervention against negotiating imbalances is undermined by three overlapping frameworks, the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), which define protected legal subjects differently, enforce rights through separate institutions, and were never designed to interact. Because Indonesia's state legal order is itself religiously and normatively plural, this fragmentation is compounded, for the country's Muslim-majority consumer base, by a further, largely uncoordinated layer of halal-assurance and shariah-compliance regulation that intersects with, but is not integrated into, the UUPK–ITE–PDP triad.   Purpose:  This study addresses three questions: how fragmentation among the UUPK, UU ITE, and UU PDP, read together with Indonesia's pluralistic legal architecture, including the halal product assurance regime, produces overlapping protections while leaving gaps in composite digital harm combining economic loss, data breach, and reputational damage; how enforcement institutions under these regimes interact, or fail to interact, in practice; and how substantive equality can be reconstructed, as fragmented equality, to restore institutional coherence for all Indonesian digital consumers, including the specific religious-identity interests of Muslim consumers. In answering these, the study formulates a conceptual and institutional model for integrated consumer protection enforcement.   Methods: This study adopts a socio-legal approach, combining normative-doctrinal analysis of the UUPK, UU ITE, and UU PDP with documentary analysis of institutional practice, including live-commerce disputes, the Constitutional Court's review of UUPK and UU PDP (2025–2026), and secondary evidence of enforcement gaps including BPKN's jurisdictional limits and the absence of an independent data protection authority.   Results:  The three laws define disparate legal subjects, "consumers," "users," and "data subjects," creating enforcement gaps in composite digital harm, illustrated by live-commerce transactions. Applying Fredman's substantive equality framework, Fineman's vulnerability theory, and a legal-pluralism lens attentive to the coexistence of state law with religiously grounded shariah-compliance norms, the study finds this dysfunction stems not from an absence of norms but from fragmented institutional design and uneven enforcement authority, particularly BPKN's limited cross-border jurisdiction, the absence of an independent data protection authority, and the unintegrated position of the halal-assurance regime administered by BPJPH.   Implication: Drawing on the European Union's model of horizontal regulatory integration (GDPR, DSA, CRD), the study proposes a "Coherent Digital Consumer Gateway" as an integrated enforcement mechanism, alongside an independent data protection authority, substantive modernization of the Electronic Commerce Law, and formal inclusion of the halal-assurance and shariah-compliance regime within the Gateway's coordination mandate. Originality: Unlike prior studies examining the UUPK, UU ITE, and UU PDP separately, this study centers on their interaction and dysfunction as its primary object, introduces "fragmented equality" as a framework linking institutional fragmentation to the doctrine of substantive equality, and is among the first to read that fragmentation through Indonesia's legal pluralism, extending the analysis to the position of Muslim consumers whose protection needs combine economic, informational, and religious-identity dimensions    
Deconstructing the State’s Penal Authority: A Contemporary Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Appraisal of the Controversial Clauses in the New Indonesian Criminal Code Ahmad Agus Ramdlany; Ahmad Musadad; Baihaqi Baihaqi; Saiful Abdullah; Misno Misno; Moh. Irfan
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2027): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code) represents a pivotal moment in decolonizing Dutch colonial criminal law in Indonesia. Yet, this reform raises fundamental philosophical questions regarding the boundaries of state penal authority. This dilemma reflects a broader transnational paradigm shift across Muslim-majority nations facing the challenge of reconciling penal restraint, constitutional democracy, and Islamic legal philosophy. The criminalization of ideology, public order, religion, and morality heightens concerns over overcriminalization. This reveals a deeper tension between positive law, constitutional rights, international human rights treaties (ICCPR and UDHR), and the Islamic principle of legality (tasyrī’ī). Purpose: This study evaluates the legal legitimacy of the New Criminal Code’s controversial provisions through contemporary maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, demonstrates the organic harmonization between Pancasila and Islamic law, and formulates a normative model for state penal boundaries. Methods: Utilizing normative legal research, this study integrates statutory, conceptual, comparative, and maqāṣid approaches. Primary legal materials, Constitutional Court rulings, and maqāṣid literature were analyzed qualitatively, complemented by purposive expert interviews (Prof. Moh. Mahfud MD and Prof. Topo Santoso) serving as communis opinio doctorum (tertiary sources). Data were evaluated through content analysis, normative interpretation, and legal reasoning. Results: Findings show that while controversial provisions pursue legitimate state aims, several clauses compromise legal certainty and sanction proportionality. The analysis unveils a tension between maṣlaḥah ʿammah and maṣlaḥah fardiyyah in public order clauses, establishes operational judicial parameters to distinguish criticism (ḥifẓ al-ʿaql) from insult (ḥifẓ al-karāmah), and highlights an epistemological shift in ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ from classical punitive enforcement toward contemporary privacy and personal autonomy protection. Implication:  This research provides legislative guidelines, offers an urgent analytical framework for the Constitutional Court during judicial review, and prevents penal state overreach. Transnationally, it serves as a theoretical contribution to criminal law reform in Muslim-majority jurisdictions Originality: This study establishes the Contemporary Maqāṣid-Based Penal Legitimacy Framework (CMPF) as its core intellectual brand, comprising five principles: justice, necessity (ultimum remedium), proportionality, public welfare (maṣlaḥah), and human dignity. Unlike prior studies, it conceptualizes maqāṣid as a limiting theory on state power organically harmonized with Pancasila and global human rights standards

Page 32 of 32 | Total Record : 316

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2010 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 25 No. 1 (2027): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (Inpress) Vol 23 No 2 (2025): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 23 No 1 (2025): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 22 No 2 (2024): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 22 No 1 (2024): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 21 No 2 (2023): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 21 No 1 (2023): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 20 No 2 (2022): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 20 No 1 (2022): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 19 No 2 (2021): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 19 No 1 (2021): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2020): DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 18 No 1 (2020): DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 17 No 2 (2019): DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 17 No 1 (2019): DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 16 No 2 (2018): Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 16 No 1 (2018): Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2017): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 15 No 1 (2017): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 14 No 2 (2016): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2016): Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2015): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2015): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2014): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2014): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 11 No 2 (2013): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2013): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2012): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 10 No 1 (2012): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2011): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 9 No 1 (2011): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2010): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Vol 8 No 1 (2010): DIKTUM : JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM More Issue