cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
judgehukum@gmail.com
Phone
+6285359150140
Journal Mail Official
judgehukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna (CDF) Marindal 1, Pasar IV Jl. Karya Gg. Anugerah Kecamatan. Patumbak, Medan - Sumatera Utara
Location
Kab. deli serdang,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum
Published by Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27754170     DOI : https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v2i02.122
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Judge : Journal of Law on Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna is accepts related writings: Prinsip Dasar Yurisprudensi Hukum Pribadi Hukum Kriminal Hukum Acara hukum Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administratif Hukum dan Masyarakat Ilmu Pemerintahan Judge : Journal of Law also accepts all writings in various disciplines in accordance with the above rules
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 757 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
The Validity of Settlement Agreements That Override Final and Binding Court Decisions According to Article 1320 of the Civil Code Bryan Eunico
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1682

Abstract

Legal disputes between legal entities in the realm of civil law can be resolved through litigation in a district court or through non-litigation outside of court based on an amicable agreement between the parties. This study aims to discuss the legal issue of the validity of a settlement agreement made by the disputing parties, whereby the contents of the settlement agreement override a court decision that has permanent legal force, based on the interpretation of Article 1320 of the Civil Code regarding the validity requirements of an agreement. In researching this issue, a normative legal research method was used. The results of the study conclude that a settlement agreement that overrides a final and binding court decision by the parties who agree to it, when viewed based on the provisions of Article 1320 concerning the validity of agreements, does not conflict with the validity of agreements and can be interpreted as a breakthrough in the settlement of disputes arising from judicial proceedings. A settlement agreement that has executory power and can be requested for execution is a settlement agreement agreed upon by the parties before the case is decided at the first level of legal proceedings, confirmed by a Settlement Agreement by the panel of judges, and if agreed upon after the court decision at the first level of legal proceedings, submitted in writing to the Examining Judge at the appeal level, appeal, or review to be decided by a Settlement Deed.
ONLINE POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS REGARDING PUBLIC OPINION MANIPULATION FROM A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE [HTN] Yuliana Menai; Adensi Timomor; Meiske M. W. lasut
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1683

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought about major changes in the way political campaigns are conducted. Campaign activities that were previously carried out conventionally have now shifted to the online realm. This change has had a significant impact on the democratic process, particularly in the context of public opinion manipulation. This study focuses on analyzing law enforcement and the role of constitutional law regulations in regulating and preventing manipulative practices in digital-based political campaigns. The research method used is a normative legal approach by examining various laws and regulations, such as the Election Law, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE), and regulations issued by the General Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu). The findings show that manipulation of public opinion is often carried out in various ways, including the spread of disinformation, the use of fake identities or anonymous accounts, the use of bots, and the application of deepfake technology. In practice, law enforcement efforts against these acts still face various obstacles, such as weak regulations specifically governing digital manipulation, limited law enforcement resources, and difficulties in tracking perpetrators operating in cyberspace. Therefore, it is necessary to update regulations that are responsive to technological developments, improve the competence of election supervisory agencies, and strengthen digital literacy in society. These steps are expected to serve as preventive strategies to realize healthier, more transparent, and democratic political campaigns.
THE ROLE OF NOTARIES IN PREVENTING TAX AVOIDANCE IN THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF NON-LAND ASSETS BETWEEN PARTIES IN RELATIONSHIPS Prisilia Permata Putri; Edy Gunawan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1692

Abstract

This study examines the strategic role of notaries in preventing tax avoidance practices in non-land asset sale and purchase transactions between parties with special relationships. Using a normative legal research method through a conceptual and legislative approach, this study analyzes how the notary's understanding and prudence can prevent the use of deeds as a means of tax avoidance, particularly in determining transaction prices. Notaries, as public officials authorized to draw up authentic deeds, have an important role in ensuring that transactions are legally valid, reasonable, and in accordance with tax regulations. The application of the Know Your Customer (KYC) principle and the arm's length principle (ALP), as stipulated in Minister of Finance Regulation No. 172 of 2023, is crucial for notaries to assess indications of special relationships and record transaction values accurately and objectively. Thus, notaries can contribute to creating transparency and tax compliance.
Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Data Privasi Terhadap Kebocoran Data Oleh Instansi Pemerintah Moh. Anshar Hiola
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 08 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i08.1693

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi di era digital memunculkan tantangan baru, terutama terkait perlindungan data pribadi. Data pribadi merupakan aset bernilai tinggi yang rentan terhadap penyalahgunaan, seperti penipuan, pencurian identitas, dan kejahatan siber lainnya. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi merupakan langkah strategis pemerintah Indonesia untuk memberikan landasan hukum dalam melindungi privasi masyarakat. Namun, implementasinya menghadapi hambatan, terutama terkait absennya lembaga pengawas independen yang berfungsi untuk memastikan pengelolaan data pribadi sesuai standar keamanan yang memadai. Artikel ini meninjau aspek yuridis perlindungan data pribadi terhadap kebocoran data oleh instansi pemerintah, dengan fokus pada kewajiban negara, hambatan pelaksanaan UU PDP, dan pentingnya pembentukan lembaga pengawas independen. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan doktrinal dan analisis literatur. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan lembaga pengawas yang independen sangat diperlukan untuk mengawasi pengelolaan data oleh instansi pemerintah dan pihak swasta, serta mencegah penyalahgunaan data. Selain itu, peraturan pelaksana yang belum lengkap menjadi kendala dalam penerapan UU PDP, sehingga menciptakan celah hukum yang melemahkan perlindungan data pribadi.Artikel ini merekomendasikan langkah strategis berupa percepatan pembentukan lembaga pengawas independen, edukasi publik mengenai risiko kebocoran data, dan penguatan regulasi pelaksana untuk mendukung perlindungan data secara optimal. Dengan upaya ini, diharapkan hak privasi masyarakat dapat terlindungi sesuai amanat konstitusi dan standar internasional.
Penataan Kewenangan dan Hubungan Kelembagaan dalam Pembentukan Pengadilan HAM AD HOC untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM yang Berat di Masa Lalu Rommy Patra; Muhammad Badarul Husna; SY. Arifin Habib
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i05.1695

Abstract

Dalam tulisan ini dikaji persoalan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan terkait pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc untuk penyelesaian kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu. Permasalahan: Pertama, faktor-faktor apa saja yang menyebabkan belum optimalnya pelaksanaan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc sehingga menyebabkan kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu tidak jelas penyelesaiannya? Kedua, Bagaimana upaya penataan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan terkait pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc dalam menyelesaikan kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu? Metode penelitian adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil: Pertama, belum optimalnya pelaksanaan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc disebabkan ketidakjelasan mekanisme pembentukannya dan begitu banyak lembaga yang punya wewenang dalam pembentukannya, seperti Presiden, DPR, Komnas HAM dan Kejaksaan Agung. Implikasi yang terjadi adalah overlapping antar lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan. Kedua, penataan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc dengan penegasan hasil penyelidikan Komnas HAM harus ditindaklanjuti penyidikan dan penuntutan oleh Jaksa Agung. Serta hasil penyelidikan juga diserahkan kepada Presiden yang dalam jangka waktu tertentu wajib menetapkan Keppres pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc.
Kepemimpinan Trump dan Nasionalisme Sumber Daya: Refleksi terhadap Kemandirian Doktrin Pertahanan Indonesia Didik Iwan; Ali Isnen Pasaribu; Tarsisius Susilo; Budiman Marpaung; Bambang Budi Kuncoro
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1705

Abstract

Dinamika geopolitik global saat ini menunjukkan kompleksitas persaingan sumber daya dan kekuatan strategis antarnegara besar, di mana gaya kepemimpinan para tokoh dunia memainkan peran penting dalam orientasi nasional dan doktrin pertahanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis gaya kepemimpinan Donald Trump yang menekankan America First, kemandirian industri pertahanan, dan pengelolaan energi sebagai instrumen strategis, serta menilai implikasinya terhadap pengembangan doktrin pertahanan Indonesia yang berlandaskan Pancasila, nilai kejuangan TNI, dan visi Indonesia Emas 2045. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi literatur, analisis kebijakan, dan teori kepemimpinan transformasional, adaptif, dan strategis militer, dilengkapi analisis doktrin pertahanan, logistik, energi, dan kesiapan multi-domain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemandirian sumber daya, proteksionisme industri, dan kesiapan logistik yang menjadi ciri kepemimpinan Trump dapat diadaptasi untuk Indonesia, namun harus disesuaikan dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan kejuangan TNI agar tetap inklusif, etis, dan berorientasi kesejahteraan rakyat. Rekomendasi strategis mencakup pembangunan industri pertahanan domestik, penguatan cadangan energi, pengembangan SDM dan teknologi, serta modernisasi doktrin multi-domain yang adaptif, mandiri, dan tanggap terhadap ancaman modern. Penerapan strategi ini diharapkan memperkuat kedaulatan nasional sekaligus mendukung pembangunan pertahanan yang berkelanjutan menuju Indonesia Emas 2045.
ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS MEKANISME PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA BULLYING DI SEKTOR PENDIDIKAN achmad adi surya guntur silam
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1706

Abstract

Penelitian ini meneliti tentang faktor keluarga, faktor teman sebaya, dan faktor media massa sebagai penyebab bullying di kalangan peserta didik Sekolah Kota Palangkaraya. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif, dan jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus. Peneliti mengambil data dengan teknik wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti memperoleh data: (1) faktor keluarga menjadi penyebab timbulnya perilaku bullying di kalangan peserta didik salah satunya karena keluarga yang kurang harmonis, (2) faktor teman sebaya menjadi penyebab timbulnya perilaku bullying di kalangan peserta didik salah satunya karena tingginya intensitas komunikasi antar teman sebaya yang memungkinkan peserta didik ini terhasut oleh teman-temannya yang berorientasi negatif, (3) faktor media massa menjadi penyebab timbulnya perilaku bullying di kalangan peserta didik, karena adanya penyalahgunaan media sosial sebagai media untuk melakukan bully dalam bentuk non-verbal (teks).
APPLICATION OF ADDITIONAL CORRECTIVE CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES ( CASE STUDY OF BALIGE DISTRICT COURT DECISION NO. 28 /PID.SUS/201 5 /PN .BLG ) Tabroni
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1709

Abstract

The background of this research is the increasing threat to environmental sustainability due to human activities. Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) serves as the legal basis, which allows for the imposition of principal and additional criminal sanctions on business entities committing environmental crimes. The case in question involves PT. Gorga Duma Sari (PT. GDS), where its president director, JONNI SIHOTANG, was accused of environmental damage through tree felling and land clearing without permits and valid environmental documents, causing damage to the river ecosystem. Although the Public Prosecutor did not demand additional remedial penalties, the Panel of Judges at the Balige District Court in its decision imposed additional penalties on PT. GDS to repair the environmental damage. This decision was based on the consideration that the crime was committed for the benefit and profit of PT. GDS, as well as the application of the principles of "Polluter Pays" and "In Dubio Pro Natura" through judicial activism. This research highlights the differences in views between the demands of the Public Prosecutor and the judge's decision, which was ultra petita in applying additional remedial criminal sanctions. The conclusion of the research shows that the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing additional penalties is because the crime was committed for and on behalf of PT. GDS which received the profits, based on Article 116 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 118 in conjunction with Article 119 of the UUPPLH and the principles of "Polluter Pays" and "In Dubio Pro Natura". This research also suggests optimizing the demands for additional criminal improvements by the public prosecutor in environmental crime cases.
IMPLEMENTATION NOODWEEREXCESS IN PROVING EVIDENCE IN CASES OF ASSAULT (CASE STUDY OF THE DECISION AT THE MALILI DISTRICT COURT NO: 40/PID.B/2019/PN MLL) Jodhi Kurniawan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1710

Abstract

This study examines the application of the concept of noodweerexcess (excessive forced defense) in proving criminal cases of assault in Indonesia. The case study focuses on the Malili District Court Decision Number: 40/PID.B/2019/PN MLL. The background of this study is the importance of law enforcement based on justice, certainty, and legal benefits, as mandated by Pancasila as the philosophical basis of the Indonesian state. This article highlights the differences in views between the public prosecutor and the panel of judges regarding the application of Article 49 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code regarding noodweerexcess in this case. The author analyzes the legal facts revealed in the trial and the judge's considerations , and provides a critical view of the judge's decision that stated the defendant could not be convicted for using excessive forced defense. This study concludes that the application of Article 49 of the Criminal Code in this case is considered inappropriate because one of the elements of the article is not supported by the facts of the act as stated in the case file. The author also provides suggestions regarding improving coordination between law enforcement officers and accuracy in the application of the article
CRIMINAL DECISIONS BELOW THE MINIMUM CRIMINAL SENTENCE LIMIT IN CASES OF SEXUAL ABOUT MINORS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL LAW (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 18/PID.SUS/2019/PT.PAL) Cintya Maharani Putri Muharnis
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1711

Abstract

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of sentencing below the minimum limit stipulated in Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, specifically Article 81 which stipulates a minimum criminal sanction of 5 years imprisonment for perpetrators of sexual intercourse with children. The focus of this research is an analysis of Decision Number 18/PID.SUS/2019/PT.PAL jo. 219/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Lwk, where the defendant in a case of sexual intercourse with a minor who was his teacher, received a sentence below the minimum threat. The Palu High Court even revised the Luwuk District Court's decision to a suspended sentence, considering that the defendant had married the victim, the victim was pregnant with her second child, and the defendant was a civil servant teacher whose services were needed by the community. This research examines how judges use their freedom in finding the law and making judgments, as well as considering aspects of justice (gerechticheit), certainty (rechtssicherheit), and expediency (zwachmatigheit). The relevance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2017, which allows for the imposition of sentences below the minimum in certain cases with special considerations such as reconciliation or marriage between the perpetrator and victim, is also discussed. However, the SEMA excludes cases involving teachers and their students. The study concludes that judges can ignore the minimum sentence limit if deemed too harsh, prioritizing justice over legal certainty, particularly through a restorative justice approach and non-juridical considerations.

Page 55 of 76 | Total Record : 757

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 12 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 11 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 10 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 09 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 08 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 07 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 01 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 04 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 03 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 02 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 01 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 4 No. 02 (2023): Judge Vol. 4 No. 01 (2023): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 3 No. 02 (2022): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022): Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2 No. 02 (2021): Judge : Jurnal Hukum More Issue