Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KEDUDUKAN MAHAR DALAM TAJDI Hamiliani, Maya; Hamliani, Maya; Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin; Norhadi, Muhammad
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/v8397n25

This research is motivated by the differences in the position of dowry in tajdiddun nikah. that occurs in society. In this case, the head of the religious affairs office (KUA) gave several oponions regarding the position of the dowry in the tajdiddun nikah. Therefore, the focus of this research is on the position of dowry in tajdiddun nikah and what arguments are used by the marriage officer regarding the legal position of dowry in tajdiddun nikah in Palangka Raya City. The qualitative method used in this research uses empirical legal research with a sociological juridical type with a socio-legal approach. The results of the research show: 1. There are 4 opinions regarding the position of Mahar in tajdiddun nikah. First, requiring a new dowry at the in tajdiddun nikah on the grounds that the previous dowry was the wife's right and most likely the wife had already used the dowry. Second, the dowry in in tajdiddun nikah uses the old dowry, because in tajdiddun nikah does not cancel the first marriage. Third, the determination of the dowry depends on the condition of the tajdiddun nikah, if the tajdiddun nikah is only for KUA administration or the previous marriage is not invalidated then there is no need to use a new dowry, you can use the dowry from the first marriage. However, if the tajdiddun nikah is due to the words talak being spoken and the iddah period has been completed then it is obligatory to use a new dowry. Fourth, the determination of the dowry is based on the agreement of both parties, meaning that the amount or level of the dowry is determined by the husband and wife who wish to carry out in tajdiddun nikah, may use the old dowry or use the new dowry. 2. Among the arguments given by the marriage officer is that the harmony and conditions of marriage must be fulfilled, then based on the al-quran and the hadith of Rasulullah, KHI, the opinion of Imam Hajar Al-Haitami and the opinion of Imam Yusuf Al-Ardabili.

Integrasi Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah dalam Reformasi Hukum Acara Perdata: Tantangan dan Peluang Suriyadi; Hidayat, Taufik; Addarajat, M. Zakky; Ardi
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/8ze1dx11

This article explores the potential integration of qawă id fiqhiyyah into the reform of civil procedural law in Indonesia. Within a legal system still largely influenced by colonial legacies. Islamic legal values often remain underrepresented, particularly in procedural aspects of litigation. This study aims to identify the challenges and opportunities in adopting these legal maxims as foundational principles of civil procedure. Using a qualitative approach based on literature review of classical Islamic jurisprudence and relevant statutory documents, the study finds that the main obstacles include the limited recognition of gawa id fighiyyah as independent legal sources, gaps in practitioners' understanding, and the need for harmonization across different Islamic legal schools and legal codification. Nonetheless, there is significant potential to align the substantive justice values of Islamic law with the national legal system through institutional strengthening and Islamic legal education. This article recommends a procedural law reform grounded in maqășid syarī ah to promote a more responsive, just, and contextually Islamic legal system in Indonesia.

Fiqih Qada Murafa’at Dalam Hukum Acara Di Peradilan Islam Salsa Alya Noor Zahra; Masyithah Luthfi; Meki Puspa; Zahratun Nabila; Lisnawati Lisnawati
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v4i2.9307

Fikih Qada Murafa’at is a branch of Islamic law that focuses on the judicial process and procedural law in Islamic courts. This study examines the fundamental concepts related to procedural law, including principles of justice, the rights of the parties involved, and fair trial procedures from the perspective of Islamic sharia. This study aims to analyze the application of Fikih Qada Murafa’at in the context of modern Islamic adjudication, with a focus on court procedures, the presentation of evidence, and the rights and obligations of the disputing parties. This study employs a qualitative approach using a case study method through in-depth interviews and analysis of legal documents and court decisions. Furthermore, this article highlights the challenges encountered in harmonizing Islamic legal rules with national legislation. The findings indicate that the principles of Fikih Qada Murafa’at remain relevant in the procedural law process of Islamic courts, although adjustments to the contemporary legal system are necessary. The proper application of these principles can ensure both procedural and substantive justice for all parties involved in legal disputes.

Batumbang Apam: Tinjauan Kaidah Fikih Terhadap Tradisi Masyarakat Kahayan Kuala, Pulang Pisau Muhammad Chafi; Abdul Helim; Syaikhu Syaikhu
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v4i2.10368

Tradition is an essential element of Indonesian society, rich in cultural heritage and local values. One tradition that continues to be preserved by the community in Bahaur Tengah Village, Kahayan Kuala District, Pulang Pisau Regency, is the Batumbang Apam tradition. This practice is carried out as an expression of gratitude following the completion of a significant event, particularly a wedding ceremony, with the hope that the newlywed couple will receive blessings, protection, and be spared from future hardships in their marital life. This study employs an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal approach to explore community perceptions of the Batumbang Apam tradition and examine it through the lens of Islamic legal maxims (Qawaid Fiqhiyyah). The findings indicate that the Batumbang Apam tradition holds strong spiritual, social, and cultural values. It is regarded as a form of prayer, a way to preserve ancestral heritage, and a means to establish a harmonious and blessed family life. From the perspective of Islamic law, this tradition falls under the category of ‘urf fi’li (practiced customs) and ‘urf sahih (valid customs) that do not contradict Islamic principles. Furthermore, it embodies maslahah mursalah—a type of public interest not explicitly supported or rejected by Islamic texts but recognized for its benefits. Therefore, the Batumbang Apam tradition is acknowledged as a legitimate local wisdom in Islamic law, as long as it aligns with shariah values and does not contain elements contrary to Islamic teachings

Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Anak yang Dilakukan oleh Anak Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam Nurul Fajriyah Amini; Rr Rina Antasari; Ikhwan Fikri
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku

This study was motivated by the prevalence of juvenile delinquency, particularly murder committed by children against other children. The objective of this study was to examine the perspectives of positive law and Islamic law on the imposition of sanctions for such acts. This study employed an empirical juridical approach using primary and secondary data, which were analysed descriptively and qualitatively and presented deductively. The results of the study indicate that, based on Article 81(2) of Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, a child may only be sentenced to half the maximum penalty applicable to adults. In the case studied, the child was sentenced to 7 years and 6 months in prison for murder under Article 338 of the Criminal Code. From the perspective of Fiqh Jinayah, the act is classified as jarimah qishash because the perpetrator was 15 years old. However, because the judicial process uses the Indonesian legal system, the child was given a ta'zir punishment in the form of imprisonment.

Implementasi Kepmenpanrb No. 347 Tentang Pengadaan PPPK Tahun 2024 Di Ruang Lingkup Dispora Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Fery; Khairun; Dewi; Hafid; Raihan
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v4i2.10747

The Decree of the Minister of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (KepmenPANRB) Number 347 of 2024 was issued as the main technical instrument to realize the mandate of Law Number 20 of 2023 concerning the State Civil Apparatus (ASN Law), which requires the resolution of the status of non-ASN or contract (honorary) employees no later than December 2024. This research aims to analyze the implementation of KepmenPANRB 347/2024, particularly the procedural framework for the selection of Government Employees with a Work Agreement (PPPK), within the Youth and Sports Agency (DISPORA) of Central Kalimantan Province, as well as to identify and analyze structural gaps related to PPPK rights post-appointment. This study uses a juridical-normative and empirical-qualitative approach. Primary data was obtained through KepmenPANRB 347/2024 and the results of in-depth interviews with appointed PPPK at DISPORA Central Kalimantan. Data analysis was performed using George C. Edward III's Policy Implementation Model (Communication, Resources, Disposition, and Bureaucratic Structure). The research results indicate that DISPORA Central Kalimantan has successfully executed the non-ASN selection and structuring procedurally with high compliance. However, this procedural success is confronted by significant structural challenges post-appointment, especially regarding the rights gap in terms of pension guarantees and career paths that are not equivalent to Civil Servants (PNS), despite the workload being comparable. This structural inequality has the potential to reduce the work motivation of PPPK in the long term, although the positive disposition of regional leadership (the Governor of Central Kalimantan) serves as an important mitigating factor.

Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Akibat Perceraian WNI dan WNA Inggris Tanpa Berdasarkan Asas Choice Of Law Rizki Dwi Putra; Illa Fatikha Syahda; Tazkia Suhail Syafa
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v1i2.9791

Marriages involving two different legal systems often give rise to various problems, especially regarding the division of property when divorce occurs. If the couple does not make a marriage agreement before or during the marriage, then the property is considered as joint property. However, property obtained before marriage is considered as the personal property of each spouse. In resolving the division of joint property, several countries have different legal systems. In international civil law, there is the principle of Lex Rei Sitae, which stipulates that the law applicable to an object is determined based on the location of the object. This provides fair legal certainty for the parties in determining the rights to the property. This research uses the normative juridical method, namely by examining, studying, and interpreting the applicable legal rules. This writing aims to analyze the problem of divorce and the legal principles used in the division of gono-gini property. In conclusion, the Lex Rei Sitae principle is considered capable of providing appropriate legal certainty because it considers the location of the object as the basis for determining ownership. Keywords: Abstrak Perkawinan yang melibatkan dua sistem hukum yang berbeda sering kali memunculkan berbagai masalah, terutama terkait pembagian harta kekayaan saat perceraian terjadi. Jika pasangan tidak membuat perjanjian pernikahan sebelum atau saat perkawinan berlangsung, maka harta kekayaan tersebut dianggap sebagai harta bersama. Namun, harta yang diperoleh sebelum pernikahan dianggap sebagai harta pribadi masing-masing pasangan. Dalam penyelesaian pembagian harta gono-gini, beberapa negara memiliki sistem hukum yang berbeda. Dalam hukum perdata internasional, terdapat asas Lex Rei Sitae, yang menetapkan bahwa hukum yang berlaku atas suatu benda ditentukan berdasarkan lokasi benda tersebut. Hal ini memberikan kepastian hukum yang adil bagi para pihak dalam menentukan hak atas harta tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan mengkaji, mempelajari, dan menafsirkan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis masalah perceraian dan asas hukum yang digunakan dalam pembagian harta gono-gini. Sebagai kesimpulan, asas Lex Rei Sitae dinilai mampu memberikan kepastian hukum yang tepat karena mempertimbangkan lokasi benda sebagai dasar penentuan kepemilikan. Kata kunci: Perkawinan, Harta, Asas Abstract Marriages involving two different legal systems often give rise to various problems, especially regarding the division of property when divorce occurs. If the couple does not make a marriage agreement before or during the marriage, then the property is considered as joint property. However, property obtained before marriage is considered as the personal property of each spouse. In resolving the division of joint property, several countries have different legal systems. In international civil law, there is the principle of Lex Rei Sitae, which stipulates that the law applicable to an object is determined based on the location of the object. This provides fair legal certainty for the parties in determining the rights to the property. This research uses the normative juridical method, namely by examining, studying, and interpreting the applicable legal rules. This writing aims to analyze the problem of divorce and the legal principles used in the division of gono-gini property. In conclusion, the Lex Rei Sitae principle is considered capable of providing appropriate legal certainty because it considers the location of the object as the basis for determining ownership. Keywords: Abstrak Perkawinan yang melibatkan dua sistem hukum yang berbeda sering kali memunculkan berbagai masalah, terutama terkait pembagian harta kekayaan saat perceraian terjadi. Jika pasangan tidak membuat perjanjian pernikahan sebelum atau saat perkawinan berlangsung, maka harta kekayaan tersebut dianggap sebagai harta bersama. Namun, harta yang diperoleh sebelum pernikahan dianggap sebagai harta pribadi masing-masing pasangan. Dalam penyelesaian pembagian harta gono-gini, beberapa negara memiliki sistem hukum yang berbeda. Dalam hukum perdata internasional, terdapat asas Lex Rei Sitae, yang menetapkan bahwa hukum yang berlaku atas suatu benda ditentukan berdasarkan lokasi benda tersebut. Hal ini memberikan kepastian hukum yang adil bagi para pihak dalam menentukan hak atas harta tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan mengkaji, mempelajari, dan menafsirkan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis masalah perceraian dan asas hukum yang digunakan dalam pembagian harta gono-gini. Sebagai kesimpulan, asas Lex Rei Sitae dinilai mampu memberikan kepastian hukum yang tepat karena mempertimbangkan lokasi benda sebagai dasar penentuan kepemilikan. Kata kunci: Perkawinan, Harta, Asas Abstract Marriages involving two different legal systems often give rise to various problems, especially regarding the division of property when divorce occurs. If the couple does not make a marriage agreement before or during the marriage, then the property is considered as joint property. However, property obtained before marriage is considered as the personal property of each spouse. In resolving the division of joint property, several countries have different legal systems. In international civil law, there is the principle of Lex Rei Sitae, which stipulates that the law applicable to an object is determined based on the location of the object. This provides fair legal certainty for the parties in determining the rights to the property. This research uses the normative juridical method, namely by examining, studying, and interpreting the applicable legal rules. This writing aims to analyze the problem of divorce and the legal principles used in the division of gono-gini property. In conclusion, the Lex Rei Sitae principle is considered capable of providing appropriate legal certainty because it considers the location of the object as the basis for determining ownership. Keywords: Marriage, Property, Principal

Rethinking Marriage, Rejecting Parenthood: Childfree Intent in the Fatwas of Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim ‘Allam and Syaikh Ahmad Al-Raisuni Muhammdad Zainuddin Rambe Yusuf; Zulpahmi Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v5i1.11830

The rise of the childfree phenomenon in the modern era has triggered an epistemological clash in contemporary Islamic law, specifically between fulfilling individual reproductive autonomy rights and the collective obligation to maintain the existence of the Muslim population. This polarization creates a strong academic urgency to be investigated due to the legal uncertainty arising from differing istinbāṭ (legal derivation) methods among global fatwa authorities in responding to this social shift. This normative legal research (library research) aims to analyze and compare the views and legal derivation methods of Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim Allam and Syaikh Ahmad al-Raisuni regarding marrying with the intention of being childfree. A conceptual and comparative approach was utilized, with qualitative data analysis conducted through descriptive-comparative methods. The results show that Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim Allam tends to permit childfree under certain conditions based on the principle of al-aṣlu fi al-ashyā’ al-ibāhah (the presumption of permissibility) and mutual consent for the sake of welfare (maṣlaḥah). Conversely, Syaikh Ahmad al-Raisuni disallows permanent childfree choices because they contradict ḥifẓ al-nasl (preservation of progeny) as a primary objective of Sharia, employing fiqh al-maqāṣid (objectives-based jurisprudence), sadd al- żari'ah (blocking the means), and fiqh al-māl (jurisprudence of outcomes) to protect the collective interest. This study concludes that the legal divergence between the two scholars is heavily influenced by their methodological approaches in prioritizing different levels of welfare within Sharia objectives (maqāṣid al-syarīʿah). The implications of this research offer a theoretical contribution to the reconstruction of contemporary Islamic legal methodology, encouraging a more adaptive use of consequential analysis (fiqh al-māl) when addressing modern family issues. This study suggests that Islamic fatwa institutions and family counselors implement balanced and case-by-case legal approaches, while recommending that future researchers expand this study through empirical field research.

Rethinking Marriage, Rejecting Parenthood: Childfree Intent in the Fatwas of Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim ‘Allam and Syaikh Ahmad Al-Raisuni Muhammad Zainuddin; Zulpahmi Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University (UIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v5i1.11830

The rise of the childfree phenomenon in the modern era has triggered an epistemological clash in contemporary Islamic law, specifically between fulfilling individual reproductive autonomy rights and the collective obligation to maintain the existence of the Muslim population. This polarization creates a strong academic urgency to be investigated due to the legal uncertainty arising from differing istinbāṭ (legal derivation) methods among global fatwa authorities in responding to this social shift. This normative legal research (library research) aims to analyze and compare the views and legal derivation methods of Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim Allam and Syaikh Ahmad al-Raisuni regarding marrying with the intention of being childfree. A conceptual and comparative approach was utilized, with qualitative data analysis conducted through descriptive-comparative methods. The results show that Syaikh Syauqi Ibrahim Allam tends to permit childfree under certain conditions based on the principle of al-aṣlu fi al-ashyā’ al-ibāhah (the presumption of permissibility) and mutual consent for the sake of welfare (maṣlaḥah). Conversely, Syaikh Ahmad al-Raisuni disallows permanent childfree choices because they contradict ḥifẓ al-nasl (preservation of progeny) as a primary objective of Sharia, employing fiqh al-maqāṣid (objectives-based jurisprudence), sadd al- żari'ah (blocking the means), and fiqh al-māl (jurisprudence of outcomes) to protect the collective interest. This study concludes that the legal divergence between the two scholars is heavily influenced by their methodological approaches in prioritizing different levels of welfare within Sharia objectives (maqāṣid al-syarīʿah). The implications of this research offer a theoretical contribution to the reconstruction of contemporary Islamic legal methodology, encouraging a more adaptive use of consequential analysis (fiqh al-māl) when addressing modern family issues. This study suggests that Islamic fatwa institutions and family counselors implement balanced and case-by-case legal approaches, while recommending that future researchers expand this study through empirical field research.

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Baihaki

Contact Email
jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Phone
+6281256965122

Journal Mail Official
jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Editorial Address
Building A, Faculty of Sharia IAIN Palangka Raya, Jl. G. Obos, Islamic Centre, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73112

Location
Kota palangkaraya,

Kalimantan tengah

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Baihaki

Contact Email jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Phone +6281256965122

Journal Mail Official jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Editorial Address Building A, Faculty of Sharia IAIN Palangka Raya, Jl. G. Obos, Islamic Centre, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73112

Location Kota palangkaraya, Kalimantan tengah INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Baihaki

Contact Email
jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Phone
+6281256965122

Journal Mail Official
jurnaljisyaku@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

Editorial Address
Building A, Faculty of Sharia IAIN Palangka Raya, Jl. G. Obos, Islamic Centre, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73112

Location
Kota palangkaraya,

Kalimantan tengah

INDONESIA