cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
Published by Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
Core Subject : Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 128 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
Legal Protection of Secured Creditors in PKPU Homologation: Balancing Collective Debt Restructuring with Individual Creditor Rights Jonathan Marpaung; Parulian P. Aritonang
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.110

Abstract

Background: In insolvency restructuring under PKPU, a fundamental tension exists between the collectivity principle and the protection of secured creditors’ proprietary rights. The Indonesian Insolvency Law lacks explicit mechanisms such as the best-interest-of-creditors test, adequate protection, or differentiated creditor classification, mechanisms proven effective in comparative legal systems (Germany, Netherlands, United States). Objective: This article examines the legal implications of a homologation decision in Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) on separatist creditors who reject a principal debt reduction. Methods: This research uses a doctrinal legal research methodology, focusing on the examination of norms, principles, legislation, and legal doctrines through interpretation and systematic analysis. Results: The analysis focuses on three issues: (1) the juridical legitimacy of including a principal debt haircut in a homologation decision against non-participating separatist creditors; (2) the tension between the principle of collectivity in PKPU and the principle of consensualism in contract law; and (3) a model of balanced legal protection for separatist creditors within the framework of Indonesian insolvency law. The case studies used are the Homologation Decision of PT Bahtera Niaga Indonesia (Number 408/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst) and the Supreme Court Judicial Review Decision Number 10 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022. Conclusion: Although a homologation decision is normatively binding on all creditors based on the principle of lex specialis under insolvency law, the application of a haircut to separatist creditors is limited by the best-interest-of-creditors test principle and must not result in the separatist creditor receiving a value lower than the realization value of their collateral.
Corporate Environmental Responsibility at Every Stage of Mining Business According to Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara Rama Wibawa
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.114

Abstract

Background: Mining sector plays an important role in the Indonesian economy, it also poses significant risks to environmental sustainability. The main legal issue concerns the inadequacy of enforcement mechanisms under Law No. 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, which involves weaknesses in corporate liability for environmental obligations at every stage of mining activities, from exploration to post-mining reclamation. Objective: This study aims to explain the importance of corporate responsibility in ensuring that mining business activities are carried out in accordance with environmental protection principles and relevant laws and regulations. Methods: This study refers to the provisions of Law No. 4 of 2009 of the Republic of Indonesia concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, particularly those governing the stages of mining activities, including exploration, production operations, and post-mining activities. The study uses a normative legal approach. Result: There is a gap in law enforcement under the Mineral and Coal Mining Law and its implementing regulations. Environmental assessment requirements remain largely formalistic, monitoring remains ineffective, approximately 40% of Mining Business Permit (Izin Usaha Pertambangan or IUP) holders do not comply with legal obligations, and criminal sanctions are rarely applied as a primary enforcement measure. The clear link between corporate environmental responsibility and criminal liability under the 2023 National Criminal Code has not been fully utilized. Conclusion: To strengthen corporate environmental responsibility in mining, effective reforms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan or AMDAL) system are needed to reduce chronic non-compliance, improve compliance with reclamation and post-mining safeguards.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Marketplace atas Pemblokiran Akun Penjual dalam Perdagangan Elektronik Pardomuan Pardosi; Yeni Triana; Miftahul Haq
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.118

Abstract

Latar belakang: Pertumbuhan e-commerce meningkatkan ketergantungan penjual terhadap akun yang dikelola platform. Namun, kajian hukum e-commerce di Indonesia masih lebih banyak menyoroti perlindungan konsumen, keabsahan kontrak elektronik, dan sengketa pembeli-penjual, sedangkan implikasi hukum perdata atas pemblokiran akun penjual belum banyak dikaji. Tujuan: Penelitian ini menganalisis tanggung jawab perdata platform e-commerce atas pemblokiran akun penjual, khususnya apakah tindakan tersebut dapat dikonstruksikan sebagai wanprestasi, perbuatan melawan hukum, atau pelanggaran asas itikad baik dalam perjanjian elektronik. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan dokumen. Bahan yang dianalisis meliputi KUHPerdata, regulasi sistem dan transaksi elektronik, regulasi perdagangan elektronik, literatur hukum, konsep tata kelola platform, serta aduan publik mengenai penonaktifan akun pada Tokopedia TikTok sebagai dokumen kontekstual. Hasil: Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa hubungan platform dan penjual didasarkan pada perjanjian elektronik dan syarat layanan baku. Akun penjual berfungsi sebagai akses ekonomi karena berkaitan dengan pengelolaan toko, reputasi, komunikasi dengan pembeli, data transaksi, dan pencairan dana. Pemblokiran akun menimbulkan persoalan hukum apabila dilakukan tanpa pemberitahuan, alasan yang jelas, kesempatan klarifikasi, atau mekanisme keberatan efektif. Kesimpulan: Kewenangan platform memblokir akun penjual tidak bersifat absolut dan hanya dapat dibenarkan apabila dijalankan secara transparan, proporsional, dan beritikad baik. Tanggung jawab perdata dapat timbul apabila pemblokiran melanggar prosedur yang disepakati, tidak menyediakan mekanisme keberatan memadai, atau menimbulkan kerugian ekonomi yang dapat dibuktikan.
Mixed Marriages Under Indonesian Law and Its Legal Implications on Citizenship, Property, and Inheritance Maria Pranatia; Anne Gunadi Martono Widjojo
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.126

Abstract

Background: Mixed marriages have become an increasingly significant legal phenomenon in line with the growing cross-border mobility of individuals. Such marriages give rise to complex legal consequences, particularly in relation to the citizenship status of children, the classification of marital property, and inheritance rights. Objective: This study aims to examine the legal framework governing mixed marriages in Indonesia and to analyze the legal implications arising from such unions. Methods: The research employs a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach, focusing on relevant laws and regulations. Results: The findings indicate that mixed marriages are recognized under Indonesian law, provided that they fulfill the legal requirements for a valid marriage. However, these marriages generate specific legal consequences that require special regulatory attention, especially in the areas of citizenship, land ownership, and inheritance. Conclusion:  Accordingly, a thorough understanding of applicable legal provisions, combined with proactive legal instruments such as marital agreements and dual-jurisdiction wills, is essential to ensure legal certainty and protection for all parties. This study contributes a cross-regime analysis integrating citizenship, property, and inheritance law—an integrated normative framework that has not previously been synthesized in Indonesian legal scholarship.
Normative Reconstruction of Blacklists in Government Procurement as an Instrument for Building Legal Awareness and Preventing the Practice of ‘Flag Borrowing’ Anggara Rawijayadi; Martitah Martitah; Ristina Yudhanti
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.130

Abstract

Background: Government procurement of goods and services is a strategic instrument in state financial management that must be implemented based on the rule of law, fair competition, and integrity. However, flag-borrowing practices (manifested in bid rigging, the use of falsified documents, and contract management by parties outside the official corporate structure) reveal distortions in the legal identity of business entities within the procurement system. Objective: This article examines the alignment between the conception and practice of blacklists and the principle of the rule of law, and formulates a normative reconstruction based on responsive regulation to sustainably prevent flag-borrowing practices. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, enriched by a socio-legal perspective through a case study of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Results: The analysis shows that the absence of a limitation period, the lack of an explicit obligation for proportionality review, and issues of enforcement temporality create disharmony between the objective of regulatory guidance and the principle of legal certainty. Conclusion: The reconstruction of blacklists should be directed toward five pillars: affirmation of a system-integrity orientation, temporal limitation of sanctions, proportionality review, beneficial ownership transparency, and a compliance-based rehabilitation mechanism. Through this approach, blacklists can be repositioned as a responsive, constitutional, and effective legal guidance instrument for preventing flag-borrowing practices in Indonesian public procurement.
The Urgency of Digital Forensics in Investigating the Criminal Offense of Disseminating False News at Cirebon City Police Resort Nur Abida Yasvin; Waluyadi Waluyadi
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.131

Abstract

Background: The rapid advancement of information technology has transformed communication and information dissemination, particularly through digital platforms and social media. However, this progress has also increased the risk of cybercrime, including the spread of false news. Objective: This study analyzes the urgency of digital forensics in investigating the criminal offense of disseminating false news, or hoax, through digital platforms at the Cirebon City Police Resort (Polresta Cirebon), with a specific focus on investigative capacity and constraints under the framework of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law). Methods: This study employs a normative juridical approach supplemented by empirical field interviews. It analyzes the role of digital forensics in collecting and examining electronic evidence under Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the ITE Law. Primary data were obtained through structured interviews with two investigators at Polresta Cirebon, while secondary data were derived from legal literature and statutory regulations. Results: Digital forensics is critically needed to trace digital footprints, verify the authenticity of hoax content, reconstruct dissemination chains, and strengthen the admissibility of electronic evidence in court. The key challenges include limited access to overseas servers, perpetrator anonymity through encryption, rapid changes in digital content, a shortage of trained investigators at the Polres/Polsek level, and insufficient forensic laboratory infrastructure. Conclusion: This study recommends the establishment of specific digital forensic regulations, grassroots forensic investigation teams, ISO/IEC 17024- and ISO/IEC 17025-certified personnel and laboratories, and cross-platform international cooperation mechanisms to enhance ITE.
Advocate Assistance for Witnesses and Suspects in Criminal Investigation: A Due Process Perspective Jhon Sahap Edward Panggabean; Mompang Lycurgus Panggabean; Aartje Tehupeiory
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.138

Abstract

Background: Examination practices in criminal investigations continue to raise human rights concerns, including intimidation, restricted access to legal counsel, and changes in witness status to suspect without adequate legal protection. Objective: This study analyzes the role of attorney assistance for witnesses and suspects during criminal investigations within the framework of due process principles and examines legal protection issues for witnesses who may potentially be designated as suspects. Methods: This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches by analyzing the Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana [KUHAP]), the New Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana [New KUHAP]), Constitutional Court decisions, and due process principles. Results: The findings reveal that the New KUHAP strengthens the rights of witnesses and suspects to receive attorney assistance; however, several obstacles remain, including law enforcement officers’ repressive paradigms, witnesses’ limited awareness of their legal rights, and inadequate protection of the right against self-incrimination. Conclusion: Strengthening regulatory frameworks, transforming law enforcement paradigms, and optimizing the role of attorneys during criminal examinations are essential to realizing a fair and humane criminal justice system grounded in due process principles.
From Moral Threshold to Measurable Parameter, Reconstruction of Extremely Unjust Law (Gustav Radbruch) Through the Layered Justice Index Ulhaq Ulhaq; Isis Ikhwansyah; Tri Handayani
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.112

Abstract

Background: Modern law reveals a persistent tension between legal certainty and justice, particularly when positive law legitimizes outcomes that contradict human values, as illustrated by Indonesia’s insolvency law practice. Gustav Radbruch’s three fundamental values of law and the Radbruch Formula remain relevant for assessing the limits of validity of positive law. Objective: This study analyzes Radbruch’s conceptual framework of law’s three fundamental values, examines the function of the Radbruch Formula in determining legal validity, and formulates operational parameters for extremely unjust law. Methods: This research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive-analytical approach through library research, drawing on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data were collected through document analysis and analyzed qualitatively to synthesize concepts into parameters for identifying extremely unjust law. Results: The results show that law reaching an extreme level of injustice loses its normative legitimacy and binding force; therefore, justice must take precedence over legal certainty in such cases. Indicators include human rights violations, systematic discrimination, denial of due process, inconsistency with constitutional principles, and violations of proportionality, operationalized through the Layered Justice Index as a systematic tool for measuring legal injustice. Conclusion: This research bridges Radbruch’s theory with contemporary legal practice, offering policymakers and judges a measurable, human-value oriented framework for assessing legal validity.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 128

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics More Issue