cover
Contact Name
Haisyah
Contact Email
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Phone
+6287774552655
Journal Mail Official
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Blok Kedung Gede RT. 13, RW 003 Desa Bode Lor Kecamatan Plumbon, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by CV. Kalimasada Group
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29887658     DOI : 10.59966
Core Subject : Social,
Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan diterbitkan oleh CV Kalimasada. Yudhistira bertujuan untuk menjadi platform peer-review dan sumber informasi yang otoritatif mengenai studi yurisprudensi, hukum dan peradilan. Ruang lingkup Yudhistira adalah literatur yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, empiris, dan kontributif terhadap dinamika dan perkembangan studi hukum, khususnya di Indonesia. Yudhistira menerima tulisan ilmiah dalam berbagai topik mulai dari studi penelitian, putusan pengadilan, kajian teori, tinjauan pustaka, konsultasi filosofis dan kritis yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, dan sistematis. Namun, dari berbagai macam topik yang dapat dipilih oleh para peneliti, Yudhistira memberikan perhatian lebih pada makalah yang berfokus pada sosiologi hukum, hukum yang hidup, filsafat hukum, sejarah hukum nasional, hukum adat, studi literatur, hukum internasional, interdisipliner, dan studi empiris. JYudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan merupakan media yang didedikasikan bagi insan peradilan, akademisi, praktisi, dan ahli hukum dalam mengaktualisasikan gagasan penelitian, pengembangan, dan analisis hukum dan peradilan. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan terbit empat kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni" : 10 Documents clear
Agrarian Dispute Resolution Institution as a Manifestation of Progressive Legal Transformation Pratama Maulu, Sigit; M Wantu, Fence; Abdussamad, Zamroni
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1788

Abstract

Indonesia continues to face an increasing number of agrarian conflicts that are complex, multidimensional, and rooted in structural inequality in land control and use. The current litigation-based mechanisms, both in the General Court and the State Administrative Court, are often unable to provide quick, fair, and inclusive resolutions due to procedural rigidity, high costs, and public distrust. Nonlitigation efforts led by government agencies such as the National Land Agency (BPN) also tend to be ineffective due to a lack of neutrality and professional mediation capacity. In response, this study proposes the urgent establishment of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS) specifically for agrarian disputes. LAPS aims to institutionalize mechanisms such as mediation, negotiation, and conciliation within a professional, independent, and participatory framework. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research argues that LAPS not only enhances legal certainty and access to justice but also aligns with progressive legal theories, distributive justice, and the sociolegal needs of marginalized communities. The institutionalization of ADR in agrarian law is a transformative step to achieve substantive justice and long-term social stability in land governance in Indonesia. This study found that the current litigation and non-litigation mechanisms are not yet effective in resolving agrarian conflicts fairly and inclusively. Therefore, the establishment of an independent and participatory Agrarian Dispute Resolution Alternative Institution (LAPS) is needed to realize substantive justice and legal certainty in land governance in Indonesia.
The Role of the Police in Controlling the Use of Electric Bicycles in Gorontalo City M. Pasole; Puluhuwa, Moh. RU; Z. Mamu, Karlin
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1789

Abstract

The widespread use of electric bicycles on the highway by the public, including children and teenagers, without complying with legal provisions has the potential for serious traffic accidents. Therefore, the role of the police in law enforcement and enforcement is important to ensure that the use of electric bicycles is in accordance with applicable regulations in the Gorontalo City area. This study aims to analyze the role of the police in handling and regulating the use of electric bicycles on the highway, especially in the Gorontalo City area, within the framework of traffic law enforcement based on Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation and Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number 45 of 2020. Electric bicycles as an alternative mode of transportation that uses battery power and electric motors are increasingly in demand by the public, including children and adolescents. However, the widespread use of electric bicycles that do not comply with legal provisions has the potential for traffic accidents, which is a serious concern for the police. This study uses an empirical legal approach by collecting data through interviews and observations of the Gorontalo City Police Traffic Unit. The results of the study show that the police have an important role in educating the public, conducting outreach, and taking firm action against traffic violations by electric bicycle users. However, limited infrastructure such as special bicycle lanes, minimal technical regulations, and lack of public legal awareness are significant obstacles in the law enforcement process. Therefore, special regulations are needed at the regional level that comprehensively regulate the use of electric bicycles, as well as collaboration between the police, local governments, and the community in building a safe, orderly, and equitable traffic system. This study recommends strengthening the supervision function and improving infrastructure as the main strategy in reducing the risk of traffic accidents due to the use of electric bicycles that do not comply with the rules.
Legalitas Retribusi dan Praktik Pungli terhadap UMKM Street Food di Sekitar Kampus Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Sholeh, Muhammad; W. Badu, Lisnawaty; Towadi, Mellisa
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1790

Abstract

The practice of illegal levies against street food UMKM actors in the campus area of ​​Gorontalo State University has become a serious problem because it is carried out without a clear legal basis and is coercive. In fact, the area is not included in the official retribution zone according to the Gorontalo City Regulation, so a legal study and active role of the police are needed to overcome extortion that is detrimental to small business actors. This study aims to examine the regulation of levies and the practice of extortion against Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the street food model in the Gorontalo State University campus area and to analyze the role of the police in handling these problems. This study uses an empirical method with a normative legal approach. The results of the study show that the Gorontalo State University campus area is not included in the official locations subject to levies based on Gorontalo City Regional Regulation Number 6 of 2020 concerning Business Service Levies, because it is not classified as a place for recreation and sports. However, in practice, MSME actors in the area are subject to levies by parties who do not have legal authority, under the pretext of security and cleanliness. These levies are coercive and are not based on a valid legal basis, thus fulfilling the elements of the crime of extortion as regulated in Article 368 of the Criminal Code. In terms of law enforcement, the Kota Tengah Police as the police in charge in the area have not been able to act actively because there have been no official reports from the public. This shows the weak courage of MSME actors in reporting, which is the main obstacle in eradicating extortion. Therefore, proactive steps are needed from the local government to re-regulate the legal zone of retribution, as well as active involvement of the police in taking a preventive approach to the community in order to prevent and overcome the practice of extortion that is detrimental to small business actors.
Granting of Foundation Management Wage Rights and Dispute Resolution Mechanism Based on Law Number 28 of 2004 Rotinsulu, Indriyawaty; Almoravid Dungga, Weny; Fazri Elfikri, Nurul
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1800

Abstract

This study discusses in depth the legal provisions for the provision of remuneration to Foundation administrators in Indonesia and the related dispute resolution mechanisms, based on Law No. 28 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law No. 16 of 2001 concerning Foundations. As a non-profit legal entity, a Foundation has unique characteristics that emphasize the principle of non-profit, where the use of the Foundation's assets must be fully directed to achieving social, religious, or humanitarian goals. However, in practice, the need for professionalism and high workloads often require Foundation administrators to receive reasonable compensation. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding the provision of remuneration for Foundation administrators in Indonesia and to evaluate the dispute resolution mechanisms that may arise, by referring to Law No. 28 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law No. 16 of 2001 concerning Foundations. This study uses a normative legal approach with a prescriptive analysis method, and finds that remuneration is permitted as long as the administrator is not a founder, patron, or supervisor; carries out his duties directly and fully; and is regulated transparently in the Articles of Association. In the event of a dispute, the resolution can be reached through deliberation, mediation, arbitration, or court. This study also highlights the importance of accountability, internal supervision, and regulatory intervention from the government in maintaining the integrity of Foundation governance. Thus, the law on foundations in Indonesia needs to be continuously strengthened to remain relevant to social dynamics and the practical needs of professional management of non-profit organizations. Remuneration for Foundation administrators is permitted on the condition that the administrators are not founders, advisors, or supervisors, carry out their duties directly and fully, and are regulated transparently in the Articles of Association. Dispute resolution can be carried out through deliberation, mediation, arbitration, or court, with an emphasis on accountability, internal supervision, and the need for government regulation to strengthen Foundation governance.
Strategi Penyelesaian Konflik Pemegang Saham atas Kewajiban Konsolidasi Melalui Penggabungan Bank Perekonomian Rakyat dan/atau Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah Dalam Satu Kepemilikan dan/atau Pengendalian Yang Sama Oktri Defilania, Oktri Defilania; Gunardi Lie; Moody Rizqy Syailendra
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1825

Abstract

Konsolidasi BPR/BPR Syariah dalam satu kepemilikan dan/atau pengendalian yang sama merupakan suatu bentuk kewajiban yang harus dijalankan oleh bank sebagaimana amanat dari Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 7 Tahun 2024. Konsolidasi BPR/BPR Syariah sebagaimana ketentuan yang berlaku dapat ditempuh melalui mekanisme penggabungan/peleburan yang terlebih dahulu perlu mendapatkan persetujuan dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Namun dalam melakukan impelementasi kewajiban konsolidasi ini, tentunya tidak selalu berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan, terkadang terdapat tantangan/hambatan yang ditemui diantaranya Pemegang Saham Pengendali (PSP) telah setuju adanya penggabungan, namun para pemegang saham lainnya tidak menyetujui adanya penggabungan/peleburan sehingga proses permohonan perizinan penggabungan/peleburan menjadi terhambat dan memerlukan strategi penyelesaian permasalahan agar penggabungan/peleburan tetap dapat dijalankan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam proses penyelesaian terhadap pemegang saham yang tidak menyetujui kewajiban konsolidasi melalui penggabungan/peleburan memerlukan peran dari Pemegang Saham Pengendali dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan untuk proses penyelesaian permasalahannya sehingga kewajiban konsolidasi BPR dan BPR Syariah nantinya tetap dapat dijalankan. Kata Kunci: Penggabungan/Peleburan, Kepemilikan/Pengendalian Yang Sama, BPR/BPR Syariah, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Pemegang Saham Pengendali
Tinjauan Konsep Maslahah dan Mafsadah Pernikahan Disabilitas Dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Bin Aly Yahya, Achmad
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1879

Abstract

Marriage is one of the religious orders and also the only way to channel the desires of a person's biological needs that are permitted by religion. Seen from this point of view, then when someone gets married at that time he does not only have the desire to fulfill his biological needs which by nature must be channeled. People with disabilities, both in institutions and outside institutions, have basic rights that must be fulfilled and protected. These basic rights include criminal and citizen rights. Citizen rights include the ability to make employment contracts and get married. The possibility of the desire of people with mental disabilities to get married remains. This study aims to analyze the legal status of marriage of people with disabilities from the perspective of Islamic family law and evaluate its validity based on the pillars and conditions of marriage. In addition, this study also aims to examine the marriage through the approach of the concept of maslahah and mafsadah to see its positive and negative impacts on the household life of people with disabilities. This type of research is qualitative research with a normative approach (normative juridical), namely examining primary and secondary legal materials related to Islamic family law and marriage of people with disabilities. The marriage process carried out by people with disabilities is valid as long as it fulfills the pillars of marriage while still having to adjust to the type of disability inherent in both bride and groom. So that a solution can be found for the process or implementation of the ijab qobul which is the core of the marriage process, either by words, writing or gestures. In marriage of people with disabilities, there are various considerations between the decision to marry or not. Marriage of disabilities is a consideration based on whether there is maslahah or not. In this case, the clear maslahah is to protect a person with disabilities from committing adultery, while on the other hand, there are still doubts about their ability to live a household life.
Perbandingan Fiqih Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Perspketif Zawajir Dan Jawabir Rahman, Aris
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1890

Abstract

The issue of domestic violence is one of the phenomena of various types of violence that occur today. As with other cases of violence that continue to increase, domestic violence is increasing from year to year. The purpose of this writing is to examine kFiqh and Legal Provisions on Domestic Violence in Indonesia Andanalyzing the provisions of Fiqh and Law Number 23 of 2004 reviewed from the theoretical perspectiveZawajir And Speech. The method used is a normative legal method with a qualitative approach that refers to Fiqh and legal norms contained in laws and regulations and legal norms that apply in society. The type of research that will be used is literature, by conducting a study of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study are the Zawajir and Jawabir Theory of Domestic Violence in Islamic law and Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning Domestic Violence are seen as Preventive and Repressive efforts, including in Islamic law as Preventive efforts can be done with Early Religious Education, Marriage as a Sacred Bond, Premarital Guidance, Tarbiyah and Da'wah through sermons. While in Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning Domestic Violence can be done with Education and Socialization, Family Guidance, Training and Capacity Building of Law Enforcement Officers, Increasing Access to Services. As a Repressive effort in Islamic law can be through Advice and Stages of Settlement, Bringing in a Mediator, Divorce as a Last Resort, and Criminal Sanctions in Islamic Law. Meanwhile according to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning Domestic Violence can be done with Reporting and Handling of Cases, Temporary and Long-Term Protection, Prosecution and Criminalization and Rehabilitation of Perpetrators. This study found that the zawajir andjawabir approaches in fiqh and Law Number 23 of 2004 both emphasize preventive and repressive efforts in dealing with domestic violence.
Kesenjangan Hukum Dan Realitas Sosial Dalam Transaksi Tanah Tanpa Sertifikat Bintang Idrus, Muhammad; Ch. Thalib, Mutia; Hidayat Muhtar, Mohamad
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1926

Abstract

Land buying and selling transactions without certificates still occur frequently in society due to limited access to formal land certification processes. This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for buyers in land sale and purchase transactions that have not been certified, and to offer a new approach model in the form of intermediate legal recognition to overcome limited access to the formal land registration process. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach, and refers to primary legal materials such as UUPA No. 5 of 1960 and PP No. 24 of 1997. The results of the study indicate that although land sale and purchase transactions without certificates can be declared valid in civil law, the absence of a certificate weakens the legal position of the buyer, especially in terms of proving ownership rights before the law. The temporary legal recognition model based on village administrative documents is considered to be a transitional solution that provides preventive protection while strengthening the drive to follow the land certification process in full. This approach also reflects the need for land law reform that is more responsive to the social and economic conditions of the community. The results found that the absence of a certificate weakens the legal position of the buyer, so a temporary legal recognition model based on village administrative documents is needed as transitional protection.
Peran Negosiasi dalam Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa: Studi Kasus di Indonesia Rahardja, Tony
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.2002

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis peran negosiasi dalam Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada kedudukannya sebagai salah satu mekanisme non-litigasi yang diakui oleh hukum positif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi literatur. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa negosiasi merupakan bentuk APS yang paling sederhana dan fleksibel, karena memungkinkan para pihak untuk berkomunikasi secara langsung tanpa melibatkan pihak ketiga. Negosiasi tidak hanya menghasilkan solusi yang saling menguntungkan (win-win solution), tetapi juga menjaga hubungan baik antar pihak yang bersengketa, berbeda dengan proses litigasi yang cenderung menghasilkan pihak menang dan kalah. Lebih lanjut, hasil negosiasi dapat memperoleh kekuatan hukum apabila dituangkan dalam akta perdamaian dan disahkan oleh pengadilan, sehingga memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan putusan pengadilan. Dengan demikian, negosiasi memiliki peran strategis dalam menyelesaikan sengketa secara damai, efisien, dan tetap menjaga hubungan jangka panjang antar pihak.
Kedudukan Hukum Tugas Pembantuan Sebagai Instrumen Koordinasi Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Sistem Otonomi Ali Ramdhani, Fahmi; Herdiyansah, Peri; Hardianti Putri, Efsa; Ridwan, Rivia
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i2.1946

Abstract

The implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia faces complex challenges in creating effective coordination between central and regional governments. This study aims to analyze the legal position of co-administration as a coordination instrument in the regional autonomy system, evaluate the effectiveness of coordination mechanisms, and identify juridical and implementative constraints. The research method uses a qualitative approach with library research to examine the legal construction of co-administration based on Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government and its implementing regulations. The results show that co-administration has a strategic position as a bridging mechanism in the regional autonomy system with hybrid characteristics between centralization and decentralization. The juridical construction of co-administration contains four constitutive elements: assignment of partial government affairs, implementation by regional government, not full delegation of authority, and accountability to the assigning party. The effectiveness of coordination through co-administration is hampered by unclear division of authority, normative conflicts between regulations, resource limitations, and vertical-horizontal coordination barriers. The study concludes that optimizing the coordination function of co-administration requires reconstruction of the legal framework through regulatory improvement, strengthening coordination capacity, developing integrated monitoring evaluation systems, and establishing special dispute resolution mechanisms to create sustainable coordination in Indonesia's regional autonomy system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10