cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rosyidi Hamzah
Contact Email
jkih.almatani@gmail.com
Phone
+628117522626
Journal Mail Official
jkih.almatani@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kantor Lembaga Riset dan Inovasi Al-Matani Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
Location
Kota pekanbaru,
Riau
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Published by Lembaga Riset dan Inovasi Al-Matani
ISSN : 29630630     EISSN : 28291980     DOI : 10.55583/jkih
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum adalah jurnal hukum peer-review yang menyediakan forum untuk karya ilmiah tentang studi hukum. Jurnal ini menerbitkan makalah penelitian asli yang berkaitan dengan beberapa aspek dari penelitian hukum. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum terbit 2 kali setahun pada bulan Januari dan Agustus. Jurnal ini benar-benar membuka akses pintu bagi para pembaca dan akademisi untuk tetap berhubungan dengan temuan penelitian terbaru di bidang hukum. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum melingkupi kajian-kajian ilmiah dalam ranah ilmu hukum, hasil-hasil penelitian yang terbaru dan pemikiran-pemikiran progresif. E-ISSN : 2963-0630, P-ISSN : 2829-1980
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 53 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
HOAXES AND DEFAMATION: LEGAL LIMITATIONS IN ASSESSING NON-MATERIAL DAMAGES Annazali, Ahmad Haqqi; Marsal, Irsyaf; Syarkun, Mufarikha Binti
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Almatani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/jkih.v4i2.1681

Abstract

The rapid spread of hoaxes and defamation in the digital age has become a destructive phenomenon, causing serious consequences that include not only material losses, but also significant non-material damages such as ruined reputations, loss of public trust, and profound psychological suffering for both individuals and corporations. This condition creates a crucial juridical problem because positive law in Indonesia, despite having instruments like the ITE Law, has not yet provided clear boundaries (limitations) or objective, measurable parameters for assessing and quantifying such non-material damages within the judicial system. This research utilizes a normative legal method employing a statute approach and a conceptual approach, qualitatively analyzing primary legal sources such as the Civil Code, Criminal Code, the ITE Law and its amendments, as well as secondary legal sources through a comprehensive literature review. The results and discussion demonstrate that the forms of non-material damage, as recognized in Article 1365 of the Civil Code and legal theory, encompass a broad spectrum ranging from damage to honor (eer) and good name (goede naam) to psychological suffering (trauma and stress); however, the legal boundaries in Indonesia are dominantly penal-centric, focusing only on punishing the perpetrator (deterrence) rather than restoring the victim. This strong penal orientation in the ITE Law is proven to create systemic fragmentation separating the criminal and civil processes and a legal vacuum (rechtsvacuüm) in non-material remediation mechanisms, thereby necessitating a paradigm shift towards restorative justice supported by Supreme Court Guidelines (PERMA) to provide clear parameters for judges to assess non-material damages fairly and proportionally.
LEGAL ADVISORY STRATEGIES IN DEFENDING DRUG DEALERS Aditya, Yudika; Manullang, Herlina
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Almatani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/jkih.v4i2.1732

Abstract

Legal counsel plays a central role in safeguarding the rights of defendants at every stage of the criminal justice process, particularly in narcotics cases that are characterized by high complexity and severe criminal sanctions. This study aims to analyze the defense strategies employed by legal counsel in handling defendants involved in drug trafficking, as well as examine the practical challenges faced in the Indonesian legal system. This research adopts a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that defense strategies generally include refuting the elements of the offense, submitting objections regarding procedural defects, and utilizing humanitarian approaches through rehabilitation and restorative justice. However, the implementation of these strategies often encounters substantial obstacles, including limited access to case files, pressure from law enforcement authorities, social stigma against advocates, and a legal system that remains predominantly repressive. The originality of this study lies in its integrative analysis of legal defense strategies within narcotics cases using a normative.
ULTIMUM REMEDIUM AND THE LEGAL POLITICS OF TAX CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN INDONESIA Abduh, Arridho; Anto, Irma Romi; Abdulghani, Naser Ali
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Almatani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/jkih.v4i2.1700

Abstract

The enforcement of tax criminal law in Indonesia faces a structural dilemma between the principle of ultimum remedium, which emphasizes the recovery of state financial losses, and the tendency to apply primum remedium, which is punitive. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a statutory, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approach to analyze the normative construction of the KUP Law, law enforcement practices, and Supreme Court jurisprudence related to tax crimes. The results show that the ambiguity of the discretionary formulation of Article 44B of the KUP Law, as well as the inconsistency of the ratio decidendi in court decisions, have given rise to legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of taxpayers. As a novelty, this article deconstructs the binary paradigm of ultimum remedium–primum remedium and proposes the Integrative Justice Model as an alternative theoretical framework. This model is designed as a legal triage mechanism that classifies tax crimes based on the level of seriousness of the act and the degree of culpability (mens rea) of the perpetrator, thus allowing for proportional differentiation of settlement paths through: (1) administrative-restorative paths, (2) hybrid restorative-punitive paths, and (3) punitive-preventive paths. The Integrative Justice Model is offered as a normative solution to bridge the interests of state financial restoration with just, effective, and legal certainty-oriented criminal law enforcement.

Page 6 of 6 | Total Record : 53

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum