cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sularno
Contact Email
soelarno@unidha.ac.id
Phone
+6288270875130
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.ittc@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Veteran dalam no.24d, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25112
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik
Published by CV ITTC Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30318882     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47233/jkhkp
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik (JKHKP)(E-ISSN : 3031-8882 ) merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh CV.ITTC INDONESIA. Jurnal ini berfokus kepada kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal ini berbahasa Indonesia dan sifatnya terbuka. Semua makalah yang diterbitkan secara online oleh JKHKP terbuka untuk pembaca dan siapapun dapat mendownload atau membaca jurnal tanpa melanggan maupun membayar. JKHKP diterbitkan Dua Kali dalam Setahun; yaitu pada bulan Januari-Juni dan Juli-Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 464 Documents
 43   44   45   46   47 
Penerapan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Berbasis Good Governance dan Kepuasan Masyarakat Desa Sukaraja Ramona Deti Fitriani; Hermi Yanzi; Ana Mentari
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 4 No. 2 (206): September - Oktober
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v4i2.2448

Abstract

The implementation of good governance is essential to establishing government that serves public interests and democratic principles. This study aimed to examine the implementation of good governance principles and public satisfaction in relation to village budget (APBDes) banners. It employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, then analyzed through data collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that accountability, transparency, participation, and effectiveness and efficiency have been implemented well, although several challenges remain. Accountability is demonstrated through village deliberations and evaluation meetings, while transparency is maintained by displaying annual APBDes banners. Participation is reflected in the involvement of the government and community in village activities. Effectiveness and efficiency are evident in programs that address community needs. The community expressed satisfaction with administrative services, which were considered friendly, free of charge, and responsive to their needs. However, challenges include service delays, limited waiting areas, slow road repairs, low community participation, and the suboptimal implementation of the Smart Village program.  
Perlindungan Hak Anak yang Dipoligami di Bawah Umur Perspektif Hukum Islam dan UU Perlindungan Anak Resinta Maulida Dwi ajidiana; Mangodianak Tesalonika Naibaho; Sovia Indah Agustina; Dayinta Azizah; Annisa Nurhikmah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 4 No. 2 (206): September - Oktober
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v4i2.2476

Abstract

Child marriage remains a serious problem in Indonesia, and it becomes more complex when a minor is married as a second, third, or fourth wife in a polygamous marriage. Such practices often occur through unregistered marriages (nikah siri) and marriage dispensations, which weaken legal protection for the child. This article aims to analyze the protection of the rights of minors in polygamous marriages from the perspectives of Islamic law and the Indonesian Child Protection Law (Law No. 35 of 2014). This study uses normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed using descriptive-analytical qualitative techniques, with Maqasid ash-Shari’ah and the principle of the best interests of the child as analytical frameworks. The findings show that Islamic law, although it sets no explicit minimum marriage age, permits polygamy only on the condition of justice (‘adl) and thus protects religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property; marrying a minor as an additional wife therefore leads to harm (dharar). The Child Protection Law, which defines a child as a person under 18, guarantees the rights to survival and development, reproductive health, protection from exploitation and neglect, and legal identity through preventive, repressive, and rehabilitative protection. Both systems converge on preventing harm and securing children’s welfare, yet unregistered marriage and marriage dispensation remain loopholes that undermine child protection.  
Dari Mazhab Positivisme Ke Hukum Kodrat: Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Sengketa Pajak Muhamad Nur Ismail; Subianta Mandala
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 4 No. 2 (206): September - Oktober
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v4i2.2521

Abstract

This study is motivated by the tension between legal certainty and substantive justice in the resolution of tax disputes, particularly when a tax appeal decision upholds the tax authority’s substantive adjustments, while a judicial review of the relevant regulation is granted in favor of the taxpayer on formal grounds, yet the taxpayer’s application for judicial review (Peninjauan Kembali) based on that decision is subsequently rejected. This situation raises questions concerning the influence of legal positivism on judges’ reasoning, the legal implications of judicial review decisions for substantive tax liabilities, and the relevance of natural law theory and substantive justice in evaluating judicial reasoning. This study aims to examine these issues and develop a reconstructed paradigm for tax dispute resolution that integrates legal certainty and substantive justice. It employs normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical design, using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that legal positivism provides a framework for assessing statutory validity, procedural compliance, and evidentiary requirements; however, its application should be accompanied by comprehensive and rational judicial reasoning. A judicial review decision does not automatically invalidate an individual tax assessment or qualify as novum (new evidence) in subsequent judicial review proceedings, as its legal consequences depend on the object of review, the operative part of the judgment, the relevance of the underlying legal provisions, and the applicable procedural requirements. Natural law theory and substantive justice, integrated with Gustav Radbruch’s conception of legal certainty, justice, and purposiveness, provide an analytical framework for evaluating the consistency and accountability of judicial reasoning without disregarding positive law. Accordingly, this study proposes a reconstructed paradigm based on three parameters: the legal validity of applicable norms and procedures, the substantive relevance of evidence and judicial decisions, and the accountability of judicial reasoning. The study concludes that an effective tax dispute resolution system must balance legal certainty and substantive justice to strengthen taxpayer protection while safeguarding the state’s revenue interests. Future research should examine a broader range of judicial decisions and incorporate interviews with judges, tax authorities, and tax practitioners to empirically assess the applicability of the proposed framework.
Disparitas Putusan Tentang Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Di Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Cahyati Kausi; Herlita Eryke; Wevy Efticha Sary
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): November-Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v4i3.2563

Abstract

Criminal acts of sexual intercourse committed by children within the jurisdiction of the Bengkulu District Court increased from 2 cases in 2023 to 10 cases in 2025, with sentences ranging from 8 months to 3 years in cases of similar characteristics charged under the same provision, namely Article 81 paragraph (2) of Law Number 17 of 2016 on Child Protection, resulting in disparity in court decisions. This study aims to analyze the consistency of judges' considerations and the factors causing disparity in court decisions. The method used is empirical juridical with a case approach and a sociological approach, through interviews and document study, analyzed qualitatively. The results show that judges' considerations are uniform at the level of approach but not yet consistent in the outcomes of decisions due to the absence of sentencing guidelines. The disparity is caused by juridical, non-juridical, and institutional factors. Based on Soerjono Soekanto's theory of law enforcement, the legal factor is the most structural source of disparity. Therefore, harmonization among law enforcement officials in handling cases involving children is needed to achieve fairer,more consistent decisions that are oriented toward the best interests of the child.

Page 47 of 47 | Total Record : 464

 43   44   45   46   47 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): November-Desember Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Juli - Agustus Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari Vol. 4 No. 2 (206): September - Oktober Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): November - Desember Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September - Oktober Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Mei - Juni Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Maret - April Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Januari - Februari Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): November - Desember Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): September - Oktober Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Desember Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Agustus Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Januari - Juni Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik More Issue