cover
Contact Name
Saipul Ambri Damanik
Contact Email
ambridamanik@unimed.ac.id
Phone
+6281397918123
Journal Mail Official
pjkrfik@unimed.ac.id
Editorial Address
Lt. 1 Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan Universitas Negeri Medan JL. Willem Iskandar Pasar V Medan - 20221
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION, HEALTH AND SPORTS RECREATION
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29878438     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24114/jpehsr
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Jurnal JPEHSR fokus pada hasil konseptual dan kebijakan di bidang pendidikan jasmani, kesehatan dan rekreasi, manajemen olahrga, pendidikan olahraga dan sebagai wadah untuk menuangkan hasil penelitian dan gagasan terkait.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 51 Documents
DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF CIRCUIT TRAINING AND INTERVAL TRAINING ON IMPROVEMENTS IN 50-METER BREASTSTROKE SPEED AMONG ATHLETES AT THE XANDRIA SWIMMING CLUB Evlyne Keriahenta Br Brahmana; Saipul Ambri Damanik; Muhammad Yan Ahady
Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sports Recreation Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sports Recreation
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/g1bqr657

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the difference in effect between circuit training and interval training on increasing 50-meter breaststroke swimming speed in Xandria Swimming Club athletes. This research used a quasi-experimental method with a two-groups pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 20 athletes selected through purposive sampling and divided into two groups using ordinal pairing technique. Group A received circuit training while Group B received interval training for 16 sessions. The instrument used was a 50-meter breaststroke swimming test. Data analysis employed t-test at a significance level of . The results showed: circuit training had a significant effect with p < 0.001 and an average time reduction of 5.704 seconds; interval training also had a significant effect with p < 0.001 and an average time reduction of 5.761 seconds; however, there was no significant difference between the two methods (Sig. 2-tailed 0.955 > 0.05). In conclusion, both training methods have an equivalent level of effectiveness in improving 50-meter breaststroke swimming speed.