cover
Contact Name
Riyadi
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6281269402117
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen Kab. Demak Jawa Tengah 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
ISSN : 29874866     EISSN : 29881668     DOI : 10.59581
Core Subject : Social,
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik dengan e-ISSN : 2988-1668, p-ISSN : 2987-4866 adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum dan Sosial Politik baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat, politik dan ilmu sosial. Jurnal ini diterbitkan 4 kali setahun (Januari, April, Juli dan Oktober).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 222 Documents
Syarat Objektif dan Subjektif Penahanan dalam KUHAP 2025 Moh. Firda Mb. Husain; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6431

Abstract

This study analyzes the objective and subjective requirements for detention based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, particularly the cumulative relationship between the requirements and the need for standardization of evidence. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively with grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretations. The results of the study indicate that the objective requirements in the form of a criminal threat of five years or more or certain criminal acts are only the initial legal limits. Detention is only valid if supported by at least two valid pieces of evidence, there is at least one concrete situation as stipulated in Article 100 paragraph (5), and is stated in a warrant or judge's decision containing specific reasons. The 2025 Criminal Procedure Code has shifted the basis for detention from abstract concerns to more concrete behavioral indicators. However, some indicators are still evaluative and have the potential to cause differences in interpretation. Therefore, measurable evidentiary parameters, a risk assessment matrix, consideration of non-detention alternatives, documentation of reasons, tiered supervision, and substantive testing through pretrial motions are required. Detention should be considered a measure of last resort that is proportionate, transparent, and testable, and ensures a balance between effective law enforcement and human rights protection. These findings affirm due process of law and respect for the presumption of innocence.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Perbankkan terhadap Kerugian Nasabah Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang di Lakukan Pegawai Bank Ibrahim Alfatha Popa; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6433

Abstract

 This study aims to analyze the form of bank liability for customer losses caused by unlawful acts committed by bank employees, as well as to identify preventive measures that can be implemented to mitigate internal fraud risks. A normative juridical approach is employed, based on statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and case law analysis. Pursuant to Articles 1365 and 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code, banks, as employers, are held jointly liable (joint liability) for unlawful acts committed by their employees in the course of their duties. The findings reveal that banks are obliged to compensate customers as part of their civil liability and may subsequently exercise their right of recourse (regres) against the employee responsible. Furthermore, the research highlights the importance of implementing a comprehensive anti-fraud strategy, including internal control systems, employee integrity training, whistleblowing mechanisms, and technology-based monitoring. Strengthening these preventive and accountability measures can reduce the likelihood of employee misconduct and help maintain public trust. This study is expected to serve as both an academic reference and practical guidance for enhancing consumer protection in the Indonesian banking sector.