cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Riyadi
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6281269402117
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen Kab. Demak Jawa Tengah 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Published by International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers
ISSN : 29874866     EISSN : 29881668     DOI : 10.59581
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik dengan e-ISSN : 2988-1668, p-ISSN : 2987-4866 adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum dan Sosial Politik baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat, politik dan ilmu sosial. Jurnal ini diterbitkan 4 kali setahun (Januari, April, Juli dan Oktober).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 229 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Syarat Objektif dan Subjektif Penahanan dalam KUHAP 2025 Moh. Firda Mb. Husain; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6431

Abstract

This study analyzes the objective and subjective requirements for detention based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, particularly the cumulative relationship between the requirements and the need for standardization of evidence. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively with grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretations. The results of the study indicate that the objective requirements in the form of a criminal threat of five years or more or certain criminal acts are only the initial legal limits. Detention is only valid if supported by at least two valid pieces of evidence, there is at least one concrete situation as stipulated in Article 100 paragraph (5), and is stated in a warrant or judge's decision containing specific reasons. The 2025 Criminal Procedure Code has shifted the basis for detention from abstract concerns to more concrete behavioral indicators. However, some indicators are still evaluative and have the potential to cause differences in interpretation. Therefore, measurable evidentiary parameters, a risk assessment matrix, consideration of non-detention alternatives, documentation of reasons, tiered supervision, and substantive testing through pretrial motions are required. Detention should be considered a measure of last resort that is proportionate, transparent, and testable, and ensures a balance between effective law enforcement and human rights protection. These findings affirm due process of law and respect for the presumption of innocence.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Perbankkan terhadap Kerugian Nasabah Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang di Lakukan Pegawai Bank Ibrahim Alfatha Popa; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6433

Abstract

 This study aims to analyze the form of bank liability for customer losses caused by unlawful acts committed by bank employees, as well as to identify preventive measures that can be implemented to mitigate internal fraud risks. A normative juridical approach is employed, based on statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and case law analysis. Pursuant to Articles 1365 and 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code, banks, as employers, are held jointly liable (joint liability) for unlawful acts committed by their employees in the course of their duties. The findings reveal that banks are obliged to compensate customers as part of their civil liability and may subsequently exercise their right of recourse (regres) against the employee responsible. Furthermore, the research highlights the importance of implementing a comprehensive anti-fraud strategy, including internal control systems, employee integrity training, whistleblowing mechanisms, and technology-based monitoring. Strengthening these preventive and accountability measures can reduce the likelihood of employee misconduct and help maintain public trust. This study is expected to serve as both an academic reference and practical guidance for enhancing consumer protection in the Indonesian banking sector.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Pelecehan Seksual di Indonesia: Analisis Efektivitas dan Hambatan Penegakan Hukum Daniel Hagana Bangun; Gunawan Widjaja
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6437

Abstract

Sexual violence represents a fundamental infraction of human rights, generating profound physiological, psychological, and social ramifications for the victims. This study aims to critically evaluate the efficacy of current legal protections designated for victims of sexual harassment in Indonesia, while simultaneously mapping the institutional impediments within the prosecution of perpetrators. Employing a doctrinal legal methodology (normative juridical), this research relies exclusively on secondary legal sources, specifically conducting a comparative analysis between the legacy Penal Code (KUHP Lama) and the newly enacted National Penal Code (KUHP Nasional). The analytical framework is constructed through a statutory and conceptual approach. The empirical findings elucidate that despite substantial legislative updates, the practical adjudication of sexual offenses consistently encounters multi-dimensional bottlenecks spanning substantive law limitations, deep-rooted cultural biases, and lack of gender-sensitive law enforcement. Although the newly codified Penal Code introduces expanded definitions and enhanced victim safeguards, its ultimate success remains heavily contingent upon systemic implementation at the operational level.
Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Praktik Kawin Tangkap dalam Masyarakat Adat Sumba Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perkawinan Rossita Khairunnisa
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6450

Abstract

The recognition of legal pluralism in Indonesia frequently gives rise to normative conflicts between customary law provisions and national positive law. The phenomenon of the "kawin tangkap" (Piti Rambangu) tradition on Sumba Island has become a crucial debate as it involves an element of coercion that disregards the element of consent in marriage. This study aims to analyze the validity of the capture marriage practice from the perspective of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, as amended by Law Number 16 of 2019, and to examine the compatibility of the capture marriage practice with the applicable national law in Indonesia. The method employed is normative-juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a literature study on marriage regulations, customary law theories, and related literature. The research findings indicate that the practice of capture marriage is fundamentally invalid because it contains a defect of will, which violates Article 6 Paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The conclusion of the study emphasizes the importance of harmonization between national law and existing customary traditions through the revitalization of cultural values by stakeholders, ensuring alignment with humanitarian principles, the protection of women's rights, and the supremacy of marriage law in Indonesia.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Korporasi Atas Kematian Gajah: Komparasi Hukum Indonesia dan Paradigma Ekosentrisme Abdullah Azzam Alhudhaibi; Artaji Artaji
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6494

Abstract

The tragic death of a Sumatran elephant in a corporate concession area raises important questions about civil responsibility and environmental fairness. This article looks at the legal methods available in Indonesia to hold corporations accountable for the harm suffered by protected wildlife and compares this with the ecocentric perspective. Using a normative legal method with a comparative and conceptual approach, this study reviews how Indonesian law, which is grounded in human-centered views, treats elephants as state assets or legal objects. This setup requires the government or NGOs to sue for ecological or administrative losses. In contrast, the ecocentric model used in places like Ecuador and New Zealand recognizes nature as a legal entity with inherent rights to life and repair. The findings indicate that including ecocentric principles in Indonesia's civil law could change liability. This would allow guardians to sue specifically for restoring the elephant's habitat and addressing the inherent loss suffered by the species, rather than seeking only state financial compensation.
Mosalaki dalam Mobilisasi Pemilih pada Pilkada Ngada Tahun 2024: Studi di Desa Naruwolo II, Kecamatan Jerebu'u, Kabupaten Ngada Maria Anjelina Meo; Frans B.R Humau; Philips Y.N Ndoda
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6496

Abstract

This study analyzes the position and role of Mosalaki in the social structure and their influence on political behavior in Naruwolo II Village, Ngada Regency. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving Mosalaki and community members. The analysis applies elite theory and political broker theory. The findings indicate that Mosalaki occupy a strategic position as local elites, deriving authority from customary legitimacy, lineage, and community recognition. They serve as guardians of customary values, mediators in social conflicts, and leaders in traditional decision-making. From the perspective of elite theory, Mosalaki possess significant authority in shaping social norms and collective decisions. Meanwhile, political broker theory explains their role as trusted intermediaries who influence community perceptions and political preferences through informal communication, customary symbols, and close social relationships. Their influence is generally indirect, embedded in cultural values and traditions respected by the community. The study concludes that Mosalaki continue to play a significant role as both local elites and political brokers, demonstrating that customary authority and community trust remain important factors in shaping local social and political dynamics.
Peraturan tentang Kurikulum dan Otonomi Sekolah di Kabupaten Temanggung: Batasan Hukum dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan Muhammad Zulfikar Amien
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6575

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic interaction between central and regional education regulations, particularly in defining the legal boundaries of school autonomy. In Temanggung Regency, implementing the national curriculum often faces challenges in accommodating local contextual needs. Unclear regulatory boundaries may limit educational institutions’ autonomy in developing adaptive policies, including the integration of local wisdom rooted in regional culture. This study aims to analyze curriculum management and the scope of authority of the Temanggung Regency Government based on the applicable legal framework. The research employs a qualitative approach using normative legal analysis through an in-depth literature review of primary and secondary legal sources. The findings indicate that synchronizing central regulations with local policies requires adjustments to derivative regulations at the regency level to ensure legal certainty while preserving schools’ creative freedom. Essential aspects of school autonomy, including developing instructional materials, adjusting class schedules, and managing learning strategies, are prerequisites for improving local education effectiveness. Adaptive policies should therefore be implemented through technical guidelines for an integrated, flexible, and region-specific local curriculum responsive to local characteristics. In conclusion, effective school autonomy requires clear legal boundaries and synergy between national standards and regional needs. The study recommends that the Temanggung Regency Government develop a supportive regulatory framework ensuring legal certainty, managerial flexibility, and sustainable educational innovation across educational institutions
Kekuatan Pembuktian Hibah di Bawah Tangan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2681 K/Pdt/2015 Natannael Lakaoni; Maria Teresa Wensen
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6724

Abstract

This study examines the evidentiary strength of an underhand (unnotarized) grant deed disputed before the courts, using Supreme Court Decision Number 2681 K/Pdt/2015 as the object of analysis. A grant deed drawn up without the involvement of an authorized public official is commonly practiced in Indonesian society for its simplicity, yet it carries structural weaknesses in legal certainty compared to an authentic deed made before a Notary or a Land Deed Official. The dispute in this decision originated from a Land Transfer Letter dated 30 November 1901, which was contested nearly a century later by the heirs of the original grantor. This research applies a normative juridical method with a case approach, focusing on the legal reasoning of the panel of judges across three levels of the judiciary. The findings show that an underhand deed can attain the evidentiary force equivalent to an authentic deed once its signature and content are acknowledged or not denied by the opposing party, and when it is corroborated by supporting evidence such as customary ratification documents and decades of undisturbed physical possession. Its strength nevertheless remains conditional and heavily dependent on the judge's assessment of material truth at trial. This study contributes to the development of civil evidentiary doctrine, particularly regarding historical documents that predate modern land registration formalities, and offers practical guidance for legal practitioners handling similar land disputes.
Problems in the Implementation of Small Claim Procedures in Civil Procedural Law Practice Before District Courts Mukhidin Mukhidin; Moh. Taufik; Soesi Idayanti; Selviany Selviany
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6745

Abstract

The small claims procedure (small claims court) is a civil dispute resolution mechanism introduced through Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for the Settlement of Small Claims, which was subsequently amended by PERMA Number 4 of 2019. This mechanism is intended to realize the principle of simple, expeditious, and low-cost justice in resolving civil disputes involving relatively low monetary claims. Despite the establishment of a clear regulatory framework, the implementation of small claims procedures before district courts continues to encounter significant challenges, particularly regarding examination procedures, evidentiary processes, and the enforcement of judgments. These challenges may affect the effectiveness and efficiency of dispute resolution and the realization of accessible justice for the parties involved. This article employs normative juridical and empirical approaches to examine the implementation of small claims procedures and identify the principal problems arising in practice. The analysis focuses on procedural implementation, evidentiary mechanisms, and judgment enforcement. Based on these findings, the article formulates recommendations for improving policies and civil procedural law practices in Indonesia to strengthen the effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of small claims procedures.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 229

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Oktober : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Oktober : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April :Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Oktober : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Juli : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): April : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Januari : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik More Issue