cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Khairuddin
Contact Email
khairuddinazka15@gmail.com
Phone
+6282286180987
Journal Mail Official
hrj@abdurraufinstitute.org
Editorial Address
Jl. Perjuangan Tanah Bara,No. 14, Gunung Meriah, Aceh Singkil- Aceh, 24784, Indonesia
Location
Kab. aceh singkil,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Human Rights et Justicia
Published by Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara
ISSN : 31237886     EISSN : 31242383     DOI : 10.70742/hrj
Core Subject :
Human Rights et Justicia (p-ISSN: 3123-7886; e-ISSN: 3124-2383) is a peer-reviewed academic journal that provides a critical and interdisciplinary platform for the dissemination of scholarly works on human rights and justice within diverse legal systems. The journal is dedicated to advancing rigorous discussions on the protection of human dignity, the realization of justice, and the development of legal norms in both domestic and international contexts. In an increasingly interconnected global environment, legal developments in one jurisdiction inevitably influence and intersect with others. Human Rights et Justicia responds to this reality by encouraging comparative and transnational legal analyses that explore how human rights principles and concepts of justice are interpreted, implemented, and contested across different legal traditions and socio-cultural settings. The journal seeks to strengthen comparative legal scholarship while maintaining a clear focus on human rights law and justice-oriented legal reasoning. The scope of Human Rights et Justicia encompasses public law, constitutional law, international human rights law, legal theory, legal philosophy, and justice studies, including engagements with Islamic law and other normative legal traditions. The editorial board particularly welcomes interdisciplinary contributions that integrate law with social sciences, humanities, and policy studies, as well as manuscripts that employ comparative methods in legal analysis and adjudication. Human Rights et Justicia is an open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed journal committed to high ethical standards in academic publishing. Emphasizing originality, analytical depth, and contemporary relevance, the journal aims to contribute meaningfully to global scholarly debates on human rights and justice, and to serve as a reputable reference for academics, researchers, and legal practitioners worldwide. Manuscripts submitted to Human Rights et Justicia must strictly adhere to the journal’s author guidelines and formatting standards. Submissions that do not comply with these requirements will be returned without review.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Integrating Cultural Rights into Human Rights Frameworks: Re-Regulating Tourism and Copyright Law in Indonesia Hari Sutra Disemadi
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i1.501

Abstract

The recognition of cultural rights as an integral component of human rights has gained increasing attention in contemporary legal discourse, particularly in multicultural and tourism-oriented countries such as Indonesia. This study examines the integration of cultural rights into human rights frameworks through the re-regulation of tourism and copyright law in Indonesia. The research aims to analyze how existing legal instruments accommodate the protection of cultural expressions while simultaneously responding to the commercialization of culture within the tourism industry. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes national regulations on human rights, tourism, and copyright, as well as relevant international human rights instruments. The findings indicate that although Indonesian law formally acknowledges cultural rights as part of human rights, sectoral regulations governing tourism and copyright remain fragmented and often prioritize economic interests over cultural sustainability and community rights. This regulatory gap has led to the commodification of cultural heritage without adequate legal safeguards for indigenous and local communities. The study argues that integrating cultural rights into human rights frameworks requires a reorientation of tourism and copyright law toward a rights-based approach that emphasizes participation, consent, and equitable benefit-sharing. Such integration is essential to ensure that cultural preservation and economic development proceed in a balanced and just manner within Indonesia’s pluralistic society. Pengakuan terhadap hak budaya sebagai bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari hak asasi manusia semakin memperoleh perhatian dalam diskursus hukum kontemporer, khususnya di negara multikultural dan berbasis pariwisata seperti Indonesia. Penelitian ini mengkaji integrasi hak budaya ke dalam kerangka hak asasi manusia melalui pengaturan ulang hukum pariwisata dan hukum hak cipta di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis sejauh mana instrumen hukum yang ada mampu melindungi ekspresi budaya sekaligus merespons praktik komersialisasi budaya dalam sektor pariwisata. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, dengan menelaah regulasi nasional di bidang HAM, pariwisata, dan hak cipta, serta instrumen HAM internasional yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun hukum Indonesia secara normatif telah mengakui hak budaya sebagai bagian dari HAM, regulasi sektoral di bidang pariwisata dan hak cipta masih bersifat terfragmentasi dan cenderung mengedepankan kepentingan ekonomi dibandingkan keberlanjutan budaya dan perlindungan hak masyarakat lokal. Kondisi ini berimplikasi pada terjadinya komodifikasi warisan budaya tanpa perlindungan hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi hak budaya ke dalam kerangka HAM menuntut reorientasi hukum pariwisata dan hak cipta menuju pendekatan berbasis hak yang menekankan partisipasi, persetujuan, dan pembagian manfaat yang adil.
Electoral Democracy and the Justice Imperative: Protecting Citizens’ Political Rights as a Human Rights Concern Muhammad Mas Davit Herman Rudiyansah
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i1.509

Abstract

Electoral democracy is widely regarded as a fundamental mechanism for realizing popular sovereignty, yet its substantive quality is often undermined when justice and political rights are inadequately protected. This article examines electoral democracy through the lens of the justice imperative by positioning citizens’ political rights as an integral concern of the human rights regime. The study aims to analyze how principles of justice operate within electoral processes and to assess the extent to which elections function as instruments for the effective protection of political rights. Employing a normative-analytical approach grounded in human rights theory and democratic justice, the article critically engages with international human rights instruments, contemporary democratic theory, and relevant scholarly discourse. The analysis demonstrates that electoral democracy cannot be reduced to procedural compliance or periodic voting alone, but must be evaluated based on its capacity to ensure equal participation, non-discrimination, legal certainty, and meaningful representation. The findings reveal that deficiencies in electoral justice directly translate into violations of political rights, thereby weakening the legitimacy of democratic governance. This article argues that reframing electoral democracy within a human rights framework provides a more robust normative foundation for assessing electoral integrity and for strengthening the protection of citizens’ political rights. Such a perspective is essential for advancing justice-oriented democratic practices in contemporary constitutional and socio-political contexts. Demokrasi pemilihan umum sering dipahami sebagai instrumen utama perwujudan kedaulatan rakyat, namun kualitas substansialnya kerap melemah ketika prinsip keadilan dan perlindungan hak politik tidak dijalankan secara optimal. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis demokrasi elektoral dengan menempatkan imperatif keadilan sebagai fondasi normatif serta memposisikan hak politik warga negara sebagai bagian tak terpisahkan dari rezim hak asasi manusia. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif-analitis dengan bertumpu pada teori keadilan, demokrasi, dan hak asasi manusia, serta menelaah instrumen HAM internasional dan wacana akademik kontemporer yang relevan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa demokrasi elektoral tidak dapat direduksi semata-mata pada kepatuhan prosedural atau pelaksanaan pemungutan suara secara periodik, melainkan harus diukur dari kemampuannya menjamin kesetaraan partisipasi, non-diskriminasi, kepastian hukum, dan representasi politik yang bermakna. Ketimpangan dalam keadilan pemilu terbukti berdampak langsung pada terlanggarnya hak politik warga negara dan pada akhirnya menggerus legitimasi demokrasi itu sendiri. Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa perumusan ulang demokrasi elektoral dalam kerangka hak asasi manusia memberikan dasar normatif yang lebih kokoh untuk menilai integritas pemilu sekaligus memperkuat perlindungan hak politik warga negara dalam konteks demokrasi kontemporer.
Conditional Release for Convictors of Narcotics Crimes From The Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law Henny Saida Flora; Henry Aspan
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i1.518

Abstract

Parole is one of the rights of prisoners granted for the purpose of social development and reintegration, as stipulated in the Indonesian correctional system. However, granting parole to prisoners convicted of drug offenses remains controversial, given that drug offenses are categorized as extraordinary crimes with far-reaching impacts on society and the nation's future generations. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions for parole for prisoners convicted of drug offenses and their implementation from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The research method used is normative legal research with both legislative and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that parole for prisoners convicted of drug offenses is regulated in the Corrections Law and its implementing regulations, with stricter requirements than for prisoners convicted of general crimes, particularly regarding sentence length, behavioral assessment, and the obligation to participate in rehabilitation and correctional programs. However, in practice, obstacles remain, including differences in interpretation, weak oversight, and public concerns about the potential for recidivism. Therefore, regulatory strengthening, procedural transparency, and optimized oversight are needed to ensure that the implementation of parole for prisoners convicted of drug offenses balances the objectives of punishment, legal certainty, and a sense of public justice. [Pembebasan bersyarat merupakan salah satu hak narapidana yang diberikan dalam rangka pembinaan dan reintegrasi sosial sebagaimana diatur dalam sistem pemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Namun, pemberian pembebasan bersyarat kepada narapidana tindak pidana narkotika masih menimbulkan kontroversi, mengingat tindak pidana narkotika dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan luar biasa yang memiliki dampak luas terhadap masyarakat serta masa depan generasi bangsa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum mengenai pembebasan bersyarat bagi narapidana tindak pidana narkotika serta pelaksanaannya dalam perspektif hukum pidana Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembebasan bersyarat bagi narapidana tindak pidana narkotika telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan beserta peraturan pelaksanaannya, dengan persyaratan yang lebih ketat dibandingkan dengan narapidana tindak pidana umum, khususnya terkait dengan lamanya masa pidana yang telah dijalani, penilaian perilaku, serta kewajiban mengikuti program rehabilitasi dan pembinaan. Namun demikian, dalam praktiknya masih terdapat berbagai kendala, antara lain perbedaan penafsiran, lemahnya pengawasan, serta kekhawatiran masyarakat terhadap potensi residivisme. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi, transparansi prosedural, dan optimalisasi pengawasan guna memastikan bahwa pelaksanaan pembebasan bersyarat bagi narapidana tindak pidana narkotika dapat menyeimbangkan tujuan pemidanaan, kepastian hukum, dan rasa keadilan masyarakat.]
Justice as the Fundamental Principle in the Fulfillment of Human Rights Khairuddin Khairuddin
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i1.526

Abstract

Justice constitutes a fundamental principle in the fulfillment of Human Rights, functioning not merely as a moral value but also as a normative foundation within legal systems. This article aims to examine the role of justice as a core principle in the realization of human rights and its implications for state responsibility in ensuring the protection and fulfillment of fundamental rights. This study employs a normative-conceptual approach by analyzing theories of justice, international human rights instruments, and national legal frameworks. The findings indicate that procedural fulfillment of human rights without substantive justice may result in inequality and discrimination. Substantive justice is therefore essential to ensure that human rights are not only formally recognized but also effectively implemented in an equitable manner. The article concludes that the integration of justice into human rights fulfillment is a crucial prerequisite for establishing a rule of law that upholds human dignity.
Hak Asasi Manusia dan Relasi Keluarga dalam Islam: Tafsir Kontekstual terhadap Teks-Teks Hukum Keluarga Rahmad Setyawan; Muhammad Asyrofudin
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i1.533

Abstract

Social developments and modern family dynamics demand an understanding of Islamic family law that is responsive, humanistic, and in line with human rights principles. However, several provisions in family law texts still reflect normative constructions that are potentially discriminatory, particularly regarding husband-wife relations, divorce, and the protection of women’s and children’s rights. This study aims to analyze family relations in Islam through contextual interpretations of family law texts, emphasizing their relationship to human rights principles. This study is a normative-qualitative study with a multidisciplinary approach that combines various interpretations, the maq?sid as-Syar?‘ah framework, and a human rights perspective as a normative-critical instrument. Data were collected through a literature review of primary legal materials, namely the Qur’an and hadith related to family relations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of classical and contemporary interpretations, human rights literature, and scientific journal articles relevant to the research issue. Then, they were analyzed thematically and hermeneutically contextually. The research findings show that a contextual interpretation based on human rights has significant implications for establishing just and equal family relations, particularly regarding husband-wife relations, divorce, and the protection of women’s and children’s rights. This interpretation encourages the development of partnership-based family relations, where husband and wife are positioned as legal subjects with equal rights and obligations, and ensures that divorce procedures are implemented fairly and responsibly. Furthermore, a contextual interpretation based on human rights also strengthens the guarantee of protection for the rights of women and children as groups often in vulnerable positions, both in the domestic sphere and in judicial practice. This emphasizes that the principles of justice, equality, and protection for all family members, especially groups often in vulnerable positions, are fundamental principles that must be the foundation of family law practice.
Energy Governance, Economic Development, and Human Rights Protection in Resource-Rich Regions: Evidence from Indonesia Teguh Permana; Andriani Puspitaningsih
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.585

Abstract

Energy governance has become an increasingly important issue in resource-rich regions where economic development driven by energy extraction often intersects with concerns about human rights protection. In many developing countries, including Indonesia, the expansion of energy projects has generated significant economic benefits while simultaneously raising questions regarding the protection of local communities’ rights, the equitable distribution of economic benefits, and the effectiveness of legal institutions in regulating energy resources. This article examines how energy governance frameworks influence economic development and human rights protection in resource-rich regions. The study adopts a socio-legal perspective that positions energy governance within broader institutional and regulatory structures shaping the relationship between economic growth and community rights. Using a qualitative approach, the research employs descriptive analysis and content analysis of relevant legal frameworks, policy documents, and governance practices related to energy resource management. Through this analysis, the article explores how governance arrangements mediate the interaction between economic development objectives and human rights obligations. The findings indicate that although energy development contributes to regional economic growth, governance challenges, including weak regulatory enforcement and limited community participation, often hinder the effective protection of economic and social rights. Strengthening governance accountability, enhancing institutional coordination, and integrating human rights principles into energy policy are therefore crucial for ensuring more equitable and sustainable development in resource-rich regions. [Tata kelola energi telah menjadi isu yang semakin penting di wilayah kaya sumber daya, di mana pembangunan ekonomi yang didorong oleh ekstraksi energi sering kali beririsan dengan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Di banyak negara berkembang, termasuk Indonesia, ekspansi proyek energi menghasilkan manfaat ekonomi yang signifikan sekaligus menimbulkan pertanyaan terkait perlindungan hak masyarakat lokal, distribusi manfaat ekonomi yang adil, serta efektivitas institusi hukum dalam mengatur sumber daya energi. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana kerangka tata kelola energi memengaruhi pembangunan ekonomi dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia di wilayah kaya sumber daya. Penelitian ini menggunakan perspektif sosio-legal yang menempatkan tata kelola energi dalam struktur kelembagaan dan regulasi yang lebih luas, yang membentuk hubungan antara pertumbuhan ekonomi dan hak-hak masyarakat. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini menerapkan analisis deskriptif dan analisis isi terhadap kerangka hukum yang relevan, dokumen kebijakan, serta praktik tata kelola terkait pengelolaan sumber daya energi. Melalui analisis tersebut, artikel ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana pengaturan tata kelola memediasi interaksi antara tujuan pembangunan ekonomi dan kewajiban perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun pembangunan energi berkontribusi terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah, tantangan tata kelola—termasuk lemahnya penegakan regulasi dan terbatasnya partisipasi masyarakat—sering kali menghambat perlindungan efektif terhadap hak-hak ekonomi dan sosial. Oleh karena itu, penguatan akuntabilitas tata kelola, peningkatan koordinasi kelembagaan, serta integrasi prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia ke dalam kebijakan energi menjadi langkah penting untuk memastikan pembangunan yang lebih adil dan berkelanjutan di wilayah kaya sumber daya.]
Rekonstruksi Historis Relasi Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia: Analisis Komparatif Perspektif Barat dan Islam Jamaludin Jamaludin; Tata Eliestiana Dyah A; Andi Mulyan
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.586

Abstract

Human rights are fundamental rights inherent in every individual and constitute a core element of the rule of law. However, despite their formal recognition within the Indonesian legal system, persistent human rights violations continue to occur, indicating a gap between legal norms and their practical enforcement. In addition, existing studies on human rights in Indonesia tend to be partial, as they often examine either Western legal perspectives or Islamic perspectives separately, without integrating them within a comprehensive historical framework. This study aims to reconstruct the historical relationship between law and human rights in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of Western and Islamic perspectives. This research employs normative legal methods using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The findings reveal that the development of human rights in Indonesia is shaped by the interaction between Western legal traditions rooted in natural law theory and Islamic traditions based on divine values. Although these perspectives differ in their philosophical foundations, they converge in emphasizing human dignity as a fundamental value. This study contributes by offering an integrative framework that bridges these two traditions in understanding the relationship between law and human rights in Indonesia, and highlights the importance of aligning legal norms, moral values, and law enforcement practices in achieving a substantive rule of law. [Hak asasi manusia merupakan hak-hak mendasar yang melekat pada setiap individu dan merupakan unsur inti dari supremasi hukum. Namun, meskipun telah diakui secara formal dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, pelanggaran hak asasi manusia terus terjadi yang menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma-norma hukum dan penegakannya dalam praktik. Selain itu, berbagai studi yang ada mengenai hak asasi manusia di Indonesia cenderung bersifat parsial, karena hanya mengkaji perspektif hukum Barat atau perspektif Islam secara terpisah, tanpa mengintegrasikannya dalam kerangka sejarah yang komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi hubungan historis antara hukum dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia melalui analisis komparatif antara perspektif Barat dan Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis, konseptual, dan historis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perkembangan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia dipengaruhi oleh hubungan antara tradisi hukum Barat yang berakar pada teori hukum alam dan tradisi Islam yang didasarkan pada nilai-nilai ilahi. Meskipun kedua perspektif ini memiliki landasan filosofis yang berbeda, keduanya memiliki kesamaan dalam menekankan martabat manusia sebagai nilai fundamental. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi dengan menawarkan kerangka integratif yang menjembatani kedua tradisi tersebut dalam memahami hubungan antara hukum dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia, serta menegaskan pentingnya menyelaraskan norma-norma hukum, nilai-nilai moral, dan praktik penegakan hukum dalam mewujudkan supremasi hukum yang substantif.]
Trial by Social Media: An Analysis of Human Rights Violations and Injustice in The Phenomenon of Public Trials Linda Novianti; Raudlatul Muhasanah
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.591

Abstract

Advances in information technology have propelled social media into a dominant space in the formation of public opinion, including in responses to legal cases. This situation has given rise to the phenomenon of ‘trial by social media’, namely the practice of public judgement against individuals prior to a final and binding court ruling. This study aims to examine the implications of this phenomenon for the protection of human rights and the principle of justice. This research is situated within a normative legal framework, employing a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach through a literature review. The analysis examines legal norms, legal principles, and relevant academic literature concerning the issues of freedom of expression, the protection of individual rights, and due process of law. Research findings indicate that trial by social media has the potential to violate the principle of the presumption of innocence, the right to privacy, and the right to dignity and reputation. Furthermore, this phenomenon contributes to an increase in digital bullying, the dissemination of personal data, and social stigma with long-term consequences. From a justice perspective, public opinion pressure on social media has the potential to influence the independence and objectivity of law enforcement, thereby creating tension between procedural justice and social expectations. These findings confirm a shift from normative legal authority towards socially constructed legitimacy in the digital sphere. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulations, improve digital literacy, and ensure consistent law enforcement to maintain a balance between freedom of expression and the protection of human rights. [Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mendorong media sosial menjadi ruang dominan dalam pembentukan opini publik, termasuk dalam merespons perkara hukum. Kondisi ini melahirkan fenomena trial by social media, yaitu praktik penghakiman publik terhadap individu sebelum adanya putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji implikasi fenomena tersebut terhadap perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan prinsip keadilan. Penelitian ini diposisikan dalam kerangka yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis melalui studi kepustakaan. Analisis dilakukan terhadap norma hukum, asas-asas hukum, serta literatur ilmiah yang relevan dengan isu kebebasan berekspresi, perlindungan hak individu, dan due process of law. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa trial by social media berpotensi melanggar asas praduga tak bersalah, hak atas privasi, serta hak atas kehormatan dan nama baik. Selain itu, fenomena ini turut mendorong meningkatnya praktik perundungan digital, penyebaran data pribadi, dan stigma sosial yang berdampak jangka panjang. Dari perspektif keadilan, tekanan opini publik di media sosial berpotensi memengaruhi independensi dan objektivitas penegakan hukum, sehingga menimbulkan ketegangan antara keadilan prosedural dan ekspektasi sosial. Temuan ini menegaskan adanya pergeseran dari otoritas hukum normatif menuju legitimasi yang dibentuk secara sosial di ruang digital. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan literasi digital, serta konsistensi penegakan hukum guna menjaga keseimbangan antara kebebasan berekspresi dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.]
Analysing Bullying as a Human Rights Violation: A Phenomenological Study of Law Students’ Perspectives in Higher Education Nazla Audilla; Tafri Itsbatul Hukmi; Mulyana Mulyana; Ummi Hani
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.594

Abstract

Every individual is entitled to a sense of security within their academic pursuits; however, bullying continues to threaten safety in educational environments, including higher education institutions. Despite its prevalence, research on bullying at the university level remains relatively limited compared to other educational settings. This study aims to explore students’ perceptions of bullying from a human rights perspective. Employing a qualitative approach with Creswell’s phenomenological method, data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with five law students selected using purposive sampling. The findings reveal that bullying is perceived as a complex phenomenon involving not only physical and verbal abuse but also power imbalances between perpetrators and victims, with impacts on psychological, social, and academic aspects. Moreover, students view bullying as a violation of human rights, particularly the rights to security, protection, and human dignity. These findings highlight the need for higher education institutions to establish preventive and educational strategies to address bullying, as well as to encourage active student involvement in creating a safer academic environment. [Setiap individu berhak memperoleh rasa aman dalam menjalani aktivitas akademiknya. Namun, bullying masih menjadi ancaman terhadap keamanan di lingkungan pendidikan, termasuk di perguruan tinggi. Meskipun fenomena ini cukup prevalen, kajian mengenai bullying di tingkat perguruan tinggi masih relatif terbatas dibandingkan dengan jenjang pendidikan lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi persepsi mahasiswa terhadap bullying dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi Creswell. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan panduan semi-terstruktur terhadap lima mahasiswa hukum yang dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bullying dipersepsikan sebagai fenomena kompleks yang tidak hanya melibatkan kekerasan fisik dan verbal, tetapi juga ketimpangan kekuasaan antara pelaku dan korban, dengan dampak pada aspek psikologis, sosial, dan akademik. Selain itu, mahasiswa memandang bullying sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, khususnya terhadap hak atas rasa aman, perlindungan, dan martabat manusia. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya perguruan tinggi untuk mengembangkan strategi preventif dan edukatif dalam menangani bullying, serta mendorong keterlibatan aktif mahasiswa dalam menciptakan lingkungan akademik yang aman.]
Human Rights-Based Correctional Rehabilitation in Juvenile Development: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of Law No. 22 of 2022 in Banda Aceh Awaluddin Awaluddin; Siti Rahmah; Fazzan Fazzan; Dede Suhendra; Muhammad Nur; Cut Megawati
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.984

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Law Number 22 of 2022 on Corrections in the development of juvenile inmates at LPKA Class II Banda Aceh, which still reveals a gap between legal norms and empirical practices. The objective of this research is to analyze the effectiveness of a human rights–based correctional approach in enhancing the personality and independence of juvenile inmates. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method with an empirical approach, utilizing primary data obtained through in-depth interviews and observations, as well as secondary data derived from relevant literature and official documents. The findings indicate that the fulfillment of fundamental rights, such as education, healthcare, spiritual guidance, and vocational training, significantly contributes to positive transformations in mindset, attitudes, and behavior. Furthermore, cross-sectoral collaboration strengthens the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. However, implementation remains constrained by limited resources and external social factors. This study concludes that a human rights–based approach is effective in supporting juvenile rehabilitation, yet requires institutional strengthening, capacity building, and sustained inter-agency collaboration. [Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan dalam pembinaan narapidana anak di LPKA Kelas II Banda Aceh, yang masih menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma hukum dan praktik empiris. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis efektivitas pendekatan pemasyarakatan berbasis hak asasi manusia dalam meningkatkan kepribadian dan kemandirian narapidana anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan empiris, memanfaatkan data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi, serta data sekunder yang diambil dari literatur dan dokumen resmi yang relevan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan hak-hak dasar, seperti pendidikan, layanan kesehatan, bimbingan rohani, dan pelatihan kejuruan, berkontribusi signifikan terhadap transformasi positif dalam pola pikir, sikap, dan perilaku. Selain itu, kolaborasi lintas sektor memperkuat efektivitas program rehabilitasi. Namun, implementasi masih terkendala oleh keterbatasan sumber daya dan faktor sosial eksternal. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pendekatan berbasis hak asasi manusia efektif dalam mendukung rehabilitasi remaja, namun memerlukan penguatan kelembagaan, pengembangan kapasitas, dan kolaborasi antarlembaga yang berkelanjutan.]

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Human Rights et Justicia