cover
Contact Name
Rifqi Muhammad
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jiu.fu@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
ILMU USHULUDDIN
ISSN : 20878265     EISSN : 25027530     DOI : 10.15408/tjems
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Ilmu Ushuluddin specializes in U??l al-D?n which concern to Qur’an and ?ad?th, Religious, Islamic Philosophy studies, and Islamic studies in general, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 218 Documents
Islam Di Eropa: Mendayung Di Antara Debat dan Negosiasi M. Amin Nurdin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 5, Nomor 2, Juli 2018
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (189.725 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v5i2.12779

Abstract

For 30 years the practice of multicultural ideology is a ‘success story’ in European migrant countries in managing multicultural societies, but in the last 10 years there has been a very heated debate among governments, politicians, and people who consider that this ideology has failed to unite (integration) immigrants, especially Muslim minorities in the mainstream of European way of life. The debate was triggered by the rise of the radical Islamic movement marked by the events of September 11, 2001 at the WTC New York, the bombing at the London Railway Station on July 7, 2005, a caricature of insulting Prophet Muhammad in Charlie Hebdo magazine in France, the Brussels case in 2016, terrorist attacks in Germany, and so on. The ideological failure factor is considered not only rooted in Western countries’ fear of the rise of militant groups that discredit the practice of multiculturalism, but also fosters Huntington’s thesis on the ‘clash of civilizations’ between Islam and the West. Islamic civilization is considered as an internal enemy against Western civilization (internal enemy). Whether we realize it or not, the above theory has a social political impact. This thesis has become a seed for the growth of the institutionalization of Islamophobia in the midst of society aimed directly at Muslims. To answer the above fear, the question arises, whether the application of the multiculturalism ideology will continue or return to the old concept of ‘monoculturaslime’ which is racist and conservative? In this case there are two opinions between rejecting and agreeing that need to be negotiated, in addition to the Muslims themselves seeking a form of Islam that is in accordance with European values (Euro-Islamic Norm) as is the case with the Archipelago Islam in Indonesia.
Kedudukan Agama dan Negara: Perspektif Pemikir Muslim Abad Pertengahan Ibn Taymiyyah Sirojudin Aly
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 2, Nomor 3, Januari 2015
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (468.184 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/jiu.v2i3.2803

Abstract

This articleis trying to discover the political opinion—in terms of relations of religion and state—of an Islamic thinker, Ibn Taymiyya, within the era of Middle Age in the history of Islam.  The government experiment in accordance to Islamic teaching had begun since the time of Muḥammad p.u.h. governed the society of Madīna. The leadership then was continued by Khulafā’ al-Rāshidīn after the Prophet Muḥammadpassed away. The system of al-khilāfa then no longer existed and soon changed becoming the monarchy, beginning from the era of Umayyad. This situation could be easily seen in the system of electing the head of the state or the leader of the governmentthrough direct pointing by the on going khalīfa to the candidate who had beenprepared as a prince long before the changingtime.This system of changing the leader of the goverment would be much different from the system in the era of Khulafā’ al-Rāshidīn, where a khalīfa should be selected by a kind of committee consisting of outstanding persons of the society and the men around (saḥāba) the Prophet Muḥammad.  In the modern era and contemporary world like nowadays, the goverment model and its system are varied.Religions and politic in the perspective of Islam is integrating in the Classic and Middle Age, while in the modern era there has been emerged the idea to separate the Islamic teaching from the political field.
Relevansi Diskursus Kesetaraan Jender Pada Pemikir Muslim Indonesia di Era Post-Reformasi Jauhar Azizy; Muhammad Sairi
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 6, Nomor 2, Juli 2019
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (367.838 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v6i2.13897

Abstract

This article will decipher a re-reading of the Qur’anic verses on gender equality that arestill understood by gender bias, especially women bias. The authors see that there are still many behaviors and thoughts that lead to gender bias, especially women bias. The re-readings of Islamic doctrines, especially those of the Qur’an and ḥadīth, are important as a counterweight to gender biased understandings, especially those those found in classical religious texts. The conclusions of this article emphasize that Islam recognizes gender equality between men and women, especially in termsof role and public domain. Men and women have the same opportunity and potential as God’s representatives (khalifatullāh) of the earth who govern and manage the earth’s resources. Only spiritual aspects (piety) distinguish them as human beings in the presence of Allah swt.
SUMBANGAN HANS KÜNG DAN EMMANUEL LEVINAS TERHADAP KONSEP KERUKUNAN UMAT BERAGAMA Rosmaria Sjafariah Widjajanti
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 3, Nomor 2, Juli 2016
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.122 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v5i2.11402

Abstract

Hans Küng stated that peace between religions to be a prerequisite for world peace. In this life there will be no peace without peace between religions. There is no peace between religions without dialogue between religions, and there is no dialogue between religions without accurate knowledge of each other. According to Levinas, interfaith dialogue occurs because people must be able to appreciate religious pluralism, cultural diversity, and attention to conflicts between religions and cultures. Each religion and culture has had a uniqueness that must be recognized and accepted.
Waḥdah al-Wujūd dan Pelestarian Alam: Kajian Tasauf Tentang Lingkungan Hidup Wiwi Siti Sajaroh
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 2, Nomor 1, Januari 2014
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5091.193 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v2i1.1036

Abstract

This article explains a perspective of waḥda al-wujūd in creating the universe as a union which cannot be separated from the three connected elements: God, man and universe. Therefore, the adherents of waḥda al-wujūd conception, especially Ibn ‘Arabī, interprets the universe as a unison with God, in which this means that whoever ruins the universe, in fact he ruins God as well. Apart from waḥda al-wujūd perspective, this writing also describes other Sufi schools like illumination (ishrāqī), manifestation (tajallī), ḥikma muta‘āliyya, and atomistic, as a comparison towards waḥda al-wujūd school.
Falsafat Politik Wilāyah al-Faqīh Husein Ja'far Al-Hadar
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 2, Nomor 2, Juli 2014
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (12032.856 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v2i2.1006

Abstract

Relation between religion and state is an ultimate theme in the philosophy of Islamic politic. The theme has colored whole eminent Islamic philosophers, since al-Fārābī until Khomeini, and has given various concepts from Al-Madīna al-Fādila written by al-Fārābī to Khomeini’s Wilāya al-Faqīh. Actually, there are three views in the Islamic political philosophy. First, a secular concept, in which it has existed and found its reference after the Prophet’s era. Second, the concept undertakes religion in a limited way, in which the religion is adopted for morality corridor, and is used just to maintain the politic running within the moral ways. Third, integrality between religion and state, in which this becomes the very discussion in this article. The last thesis is proposed by Khomeini, who uses a terminology wilāya al-faqīh admitted by Iranian people through referendum 1979. By tracing the history of Islamic political philosophy, this writing will examine the concept of wilāya al-faqīh, from its conceptions till its implementation in the Republic of Iran.
Resolusi Konflik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Aceh: Studi tentang Eksistensi dan Peran Lembaga Adat dalam Membangun Perdamaian di Kota Lhokseumawe Fajri M. Kasim; Abidin Nurdin
ILMU USHULUDDIN VOLUME 3, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 2016
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (205.688 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/jiu.v3i1.4855

Abstract

This study examines the conflict resolution based on local wisdom in Aceh, focusing on the existence and role of traditional institutions in building peace and a frame of reference in banning conflicts in the city of Lhokseumawe. Local wisdom can be a resolution of the conflicts in society on the one hand, while on the other hand, it can bring a better impact than the formal justice. Local wisdom is laden with religious values that become a way of life of the Acehnese, ss mentioned in hadih majah (Aceh proverb): hukom ngon adat lagee zat ngon sifeut (religion and customs like substance and nature, in which they can not be separated.) This tradition is a very democratic conflict resolution without bloodshed between the two sides of the conflict, both vertically and horizontally. This research was conducted in the city Lhoksumawe using a qualitative approach and analyzed with the theory of structural functionalism. In this regard, we undertake the data collection method: in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and document research. The results show that local wisdom still exists to resolve conflicts or disputes in society, such fighting between residents, lightweight theft (stealing) and land boundaries. While the role of traditional institutions in resolving conflicts or disputes is significant, and such traditional institutions, among others are: keuchik, tuha peut, imeum meunasah and other public figures.
Herbert Marcuse Tentang Masyarakat Satu Dimensi Agus Darmaji
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 6, Juli 2013
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (7384.562 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i6.1027

Abstract

As an inspirator of the new left movement, Marcuse’s doctrine on socio-political system is considered more radical than orthodox communist. His admirers even give to him a nickname ‘a prophet’: prophet who became inspirator for student revolution in 1968; prophet for hippy and flower generation; prophet who voiced their opinion; prophet who advanced phenomenon which emerged and threatened the world and human race. History has noted that man in the modern industrial community has opportunity to fulfill his needs. In fact, he is really hampered by repressive condition. The measure of rationality in the society is technological rationality. Man and society are within technological trap, domination and manipulation. Technology can replace man’s power not just in industrial field, but in whole life chain. Technology which was previously made to be emancipatorical tool from the natural wildness, now is used to coerce and repress human being. As such, the most dominant view in the modern industrial society is ‘repressive toleration,’ i.e. toleration that is impressed as giving great freedom, in fact it is coercive.
Abraham Joshua Heschel dan Filsafat Yahudi Kontemporer Iqbal Hasanuddin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 4, Nomor 2, Juli 2017
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.953 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v4i2.15373

Abstract

This paper tries to analize Abaraham Joshua Heschel’s contribution to the Contempprary Jewish Philosophy. In his philosophical works, Heschel tries to formulate the philosophical foundations on the scope and nature of human existence. At this point, the Jewish identities are not only recognized but also integrated as a basic principle: child of agreement. It is about the special relation between the Jewish People and Yahwe in the mode of relation between the Thou (heteronomy, transcendence) and the I (autonomy, immanency). So, as Jewish philosophy, Heschel thought is an effort to make explicit the nature of all Jewish human beings: the agreement with Yahweh. Here, Heschel philosophy has characteristics which belong to All Jewish philosophy in general: defending theological motives to solve the philosophical problems. At this context, Heschel gives the scope and deepness of the Jewish theology and philosophy. Heschel philosophy is full of insights that make the Jewish doctrines very real. Heschel thought can make the modern people aware about the highest problems. Here Heschel has tried to make the bridge between the Jewish philosophy and the modern world view.
Dikotomi Sunnī-Syī‘ī: Teologis atau ‘Asabiyyah Zainal Abidin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (11359.961 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1018

Abstract

Sunnite (Sunnī) and Shi‘ite (Shī‘ī) are two Islamic schools which emerged after the death of the Prophet. Basically, the Sunnī-Shī‘ī dichotomy cannot be separated from pre-Islamic Arab history, which culturally adored tribal loyalty (asabiyya.) At the beginning of its appearance, in socio-cultural historical perspective, the dichotomy emerged because of the tribal-political interest, particularly, after the battle of Siffīn. This Sunnī-Shī‘ī dichotomy in the early days was actually the rivalry between the Umayyad clan and Banū Hashimite (Hāsyimiyya) clan, and served as the legacy of pre-Islamic Arab history. In the next period, to justify its existence, each of these groups looked for nass (Qur’ānic text) to strengthen its view. Consequently, the problem formerly served as the only tribal-political issues developed into a theological issue, and hence inherited conflict beyond the context of its period. The conflict that had become the part of long history of the two schools automatically established a certain paradigm and reason to their adherents, in which such paradigm also brought about different concept of epistemology. Therefore, it is difficult to reconcile the two schools, even though is not impossible at all to do conversely; let alone when a dialogue established to reconcile the two school employs phenomenological or brotherhood (ukhuwwa) approaches, and avoids apologetic approach.

Page 2 of 22 | Total Record : 218