cover
Contact Name
Arikha Saputra
Contact Email
dinamikahukum@edu.unisbank.ac.id
Phone
+6224-8451976
Journal Mail Official
dinamikahukum@edu.unisbank.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Tri Lomba Juang No 1 Kota Semarang 50241
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Dinamika Hukum
Published by Universitas Stikubank
ISSN : 14123347     EISSN : 27465772     DOI : 10.35315//dh
Core Subject : Social,
FOKUS Fokus JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM adalah menyediakan artikel ilmiah hukum sesuai tema yang dikembangkan yang disajikan melalui publikasi artikel, laporan penelitian, dan resensi buku. CAKUPAN JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM adalah jurnal terbitan Program Studi Ilmu Hukum UNISBANK Semarang Indonesia, yang dimaksudkan untuk meningkatkan kontribusi dalam perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan khususnya dalam kajian ilmu hukum. JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM terbuka untuk kontribusi para ahli penulisan dari disiplin ilmu terkait. Artikel-artikel yang dikirim antara lain topik-topik pokok dalam: Hukum Pidana, Hukum Perdata, Hukum Bisnis, Hukum Kriminal, Hukum Internasional, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Hukum Islam, Hukum Agraria, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Acara Pidana, Hukum Acara Perdata, Hukum Lingkungan
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 133 Documents
EFEKTIVITAS YURISDIKSI MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM HUMANITER TERKAIT KEJAHATAN PERANG DAN PEMINDAHAN PAKSA DI GAZA Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin; Yuhandra, Erga; Fathurrahman, Fathur; Akbar, Satria
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 2 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v26i2.10407

Abstract

The effectiveness of the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in enforcing international humanitarian law related to war crimes and forced displacement in Gaza faces complex challenges. Although the ICJ has international legal authority to adjudicate violations of international obligations, the implementation of ICJ decisions, in particular provisional measures that have been issued regarding Gaza, are often ignored by Israel. This non-compliance is further complicated by global political factors, especially the United States' support for the temporary relocation policy of Gazans which exacerbates patterns of forced displacement. This research uses a normative juridical method, with a focus on studying international legal norms, such as the 1945 Statute of the International Court of Justice, the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, and the 1998 Rome Statute. A conceptual approach is used to dissect the concept of the effectiveness of the ICJ's jurisdiction, while a case approach is applied in analyzing the application of the ICJ's jurisdiction to the post-2023 Gaza conflict. political domination of big countries. Therefore, strengthening the ICJ's jurisdiction requires effective compliance system reform and firmer political support from the international community so that the ICJ does not simply become a normative symbol.
KAJIAN PENGALIHAN HAK MORAL TERHADAP KARYA CIPTA LAGU YANG DIBELI MELALUI PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI DITINJAU DARI KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA Jo. UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 Naiborhu, Yoshua Putra Dinata
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 2 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v26i2.10422

Abstract

The absolute nature of moral rights creates practical legal issues. Under the concept of a sales agreement, the ownership of the sold object is transferred from the seller to the buyer. Conversely, the concept of moral rights, as stipulated in Law Number 28 of 2014, dictates that moral rights cannot be transferred for any reason whatsoever as long as the creator is alive. The conceptual and juridical ambiguity arises from the contradictory nature of a copyright and/or copyrighted work sales agreement versus the absolute status of moral rights. The research methodology employed in this study is the normative juridical method. This method focuses on analyzing legal norms related to moral rights and sales agreements, specifically referencing Law Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Law) and the Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata). Normatively, the creator's moral rights are perpetual and non-transferable to other parties, in accordance with the mandate of Law Number 28 of 2014, Articles 5 and 57. Nevertheless, within the context of private law, Article 5 of Law Number 28 of 2014 grants the creator the freedom to either maintain or waive these rights. If the agreement is reached consensually, the principle of pacta sunt servanda is applicable between the contracting parties. A clause involving the assignment of moral rights can render the agreement voidable (vernietigbaar) if it involves a violation of the subjective requirements (consent and legal capacity). This is particularly true if the consent was obtained through an abuse of circumstances (penyalahgunaan keadaan). A violation of this requirement indicates that the consent provided by the creator was not free and consensual.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN KERJA LAUT ANTARA PERUSAHAAN PELAYARAN DENGAN NAHKODA ATAS PENGOPERASIAN KAPAL Sabardin, Sabardin; Rahman, Muhammad Sabir; Syahril, Muh. Akbar Fhad; Wiwin, Wiwin; Tijjang, Bakhtiar
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 2 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v26i2.10424

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal position of the captain in the structure of maritime employment relations with a case study at PT. Kembang Mekar Indah, which highlights the gap between the normative provisions in the Commercial Code (KUHD), Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping, and the Maritime Labor Convention (MLC) 2006 with the implementation practices in the field. This study uses a normative-empirical legal method through literature studies and interviews with captains and company representatives, analyzed qualitatively-descriptively to compare legal norms and empirical reality. The results of the study indicate that maritime employment agreements still place captains on an equal footing with ordinary workers even though the legislation confirms their position as the highest leader on board and the legal representative of the ship owner. Empirical findings show that the fulfillment of the captain's rights to salary is 80%, work facilities 60%, legal protection 40%, and regulatory socialization only 20%, indicating an imbalance in legal protection and weaknesses in the substance of the employment contract. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate the shipping legal system by improving maritime work agreements, strengthening the role of harbormasters, and harmonizing national regulations with the 2006 MLC standards in order to create maritime work relations that are professional, fair, and adaptive to international maritime law.