cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DAN NHT PADAPOKOK BAHASAN RELASI DAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU PROVINSI LAMPUNG Rahayu, Siti; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.303 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at finding out: (1) which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type TAI, NHT, or conventional; (2) which one has better  mathematics learning achievement among students with AQ categories; (3) at each of  learning models, which students has better mathematics learning achievement with AQ categories; (4) at each of AQ categories, which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type learning models. This study was quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was all students in grade VIII SMP Pringsewu, Lampung. The sampling technique was done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data analysis tecnique was used to test the hypothesis was  two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell as a 3x3 factorial design.The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Cooperative learning type TAI results better mathematics learning achievement than type NHT and conventional, and the achievement  of student mathematics learning by NHT is the same as the achievement conventional.  (2) The achievement  of student mathematics learning in climbers is the same as the achievement campers, students with climbers have better mathematics learning achievement than those with quitters, and the achievement  of student mathematics learning in campers is the same as the achievement quitters; (3)  in each learning models, the students mathematics learning achievment is in constancy with  result of AQ categories, (4) in each of AQ categories, students mathematics learning achievment is in constancy with result of learning models.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Numbered Head Together (NHT), conventional,  Adversity Quotient (AQ)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BEKERJA SAMA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Anggraini, Nindia Elisie; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (265.859 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-GNT learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Surakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of this research consisted of 288 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 193 students whereas group 3 consisted of 95 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; and (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work,  the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; (4) in each learning model, the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, was as good as that of those.Keywords: TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, direct learning model, team work and learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION PADA MATERI POKOK PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINIER SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-K Wijayanti, Septiana; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (274.854 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning models of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, Teams Games Tournament (TGT) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient,  (3) in each learning model, the level of Adversity Quotient which one hve better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning models of TGT with RME approach, TGT or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Grobogan. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model TGT with RME approach provided better learning achievement than TGT and conventional, learning TGT provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers, campers, and quitters had equally mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers, campers, and quitters had equally mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model TGT with RME approach provided better learning achievement than TGT and conventional, learning TGT provided better learning achievement than conventional.Keywords: Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)
ANALISIS BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI GENDER SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI 1 KOTA BANJARBARU KALIMANTAN SELATAN Nurmasari, Nina; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (197.415 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research used qualitative approach which aims to describe the factors of student’s creative thinking in mathematical problem solution on probability for male students and female students. The methods used in this study were interviews and tests. The data validation has done by triangulation. The data was obtained from interviews and tests of creative thinking skills in mathematics learning. This tests was composed of five categories: fluency, flexibility, originality,  elaboration, and redefinition which are the factors of the creativity. The research was conducted in SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan in October until November 2013. The task-based interviews and tests were conducted to collect data from the 11th grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan grade XI Program IPA. Selection of subjects was based on male student and female student. Snowball method was used to determine subject research. Subjects were seven students grade XI Program IPA on SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan academic year 2013/2014. The result showed that the male students had the factors of creative thinking ability on fluency, flexibility, originality, and redefinition. The male students did not have enough the factor of creative thinking ability on elaboration. The female students had the factors of creative thinking ability on fluency, flexibility and originality. The female students did not have the factors of creative thinking ability on elaboration and redefinition.Keywords:  student’s creative thinking, factors of creative thinking, gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TS-TS) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA Pramugarini, Dwi Yuni; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.873 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to find out: (1) which one gave better mathematics learning achievement, learning model TS-TS with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, TPS with RME approach or conventional learning; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement, students having high, medium or low mathematics learning activity; (3) in each students’ levels of mathematics learning activity which one gave better mathematics learning achievement, learning model TS-TS with RME approach, TPS with RME approach or conventional learning; (4) in each learning model, the levels of mathematics learning activity which one had better mathematics learning achievement, students having high, medium or low mathematics learning activity. The research was a quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Karanganyar. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 288 students. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data was examined by using one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. It showed that three populations had balance in prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research showed as follows. (1) Learning model TS-TS with RME approach provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS with RME approach and conventional learning, learning model TPS with RME provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional learning. (2) The students having high mathematics learning activity had better mathematics learning achievement than the students having medium and low mathematics learning activity. The students having medium mathematics learning activity had better mathematics learning achievement than the students having low mathematics learning activity. (3) In each category of mathematics learning activity, learning model TS-TS with RME approach was better than learning model TPS with RME approach and conventional learning, learning model TPS with RME approach was better than conventional learning. (4) In each learning model, learning achievement of students with high mathematics learning activity was better than learning achievement of students with medium and low mathematics learning activity, learning achievement of students with medium mathematics learning activity was better than the learning achievement of students with low mathematics learning activity.Keywords: TS-TS with RME approach, TPS with RME approach, mathematics learning activity, mathematics learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAPPS DAN TSTS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN Astuti, Robia; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (292.646 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models toward the ability to solve mathematical word problem viewed from the personality types. This research used the quasi-experimental research method by 3 x 4 factorial design. The population of this research was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High School of Tanggamus Regency in the 2013/2014 Academic Year. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 283 students, and they were divided into three groups, 96 students in TAPPS class, 95 students in TSTS class, and 92 students in direct instruction class. The data was analyzed by using analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research showed as follows. (1) The students exposed to the TAPPS and TSTS learning models have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems. However, the students exposed to the both models have the ability to solve a better mathematical word problems than the students exposed to the direct instructional model. (2) The students with idealist type have the ability to solve a better mathematical word problems than artisan type. However, guardian type, artisan type and rational type, they have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems, as well as guardian type, idealist type and rational type, they also have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems. (3) At group of rational type, the students exposed to the TAPPS learning model have the ability to solve a better mathematical word problems than the students exposed to the direct instructional model. However, the students exposed to the TAPPS and TSTS learning models have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems, and the students exposed to the TSTS and direct instructional models have the same ability to solve mathematical word problem. At group of guardian type, artisan type, and idealist type, all models (TAPPS, TSTS, and direct instructional) have provided the same ability to solve mathematical word problems. (4) In the class that using the cooperative TAPPS learning model, rational type have the ability to solve a better mathematical word problems than guardian type, while artisan type, idealist type, and rational type, they have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems, as well as guardian type, idealist type, and artisan type, they also have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems. In the class that using the cooperative TSTS and direct instuctional models, guardian type, artisan type, idealist type, and rational type, they also have the same ability to solve mathematical word problems.Keywords:  word problem, TAPPS, TSTS, personality type. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Daeka, Dalud; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (317.712 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT or TPS or conventional learning model, (2) in the student creativity level, which one having better mathematics learning achievement, high or medium or low creativity, (3a) in each learning model (NHT, TPS and Conventional) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, high or medium or low student learning creativity, (3b) in each student creativity level (high, medium, and low) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT or TPS or conventional learning model.This study was a quasi-experimental research. The research design used was a 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all VII graders of Junior High Schools throughout Pacitan Regency in the school year of 2012/2013. Meanwhile the sample was taken using stratified random sampling. The sample consisted of 275 students: 92 students for experiment I class, 92 for experiment II class and 91 for control class. The instruments used to collect the data were learning creativity questionnaire and mathematics learning achievement test. From the result of research, it could be concluded that: (1) NHT learning model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as the TPS learning model did and better than the conventional learning model did, while TPS learning model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as the conventional learning model did. (2) The learning achievement of the students with high creativity was better than that of those with medium creativity, the learning achievement of the students with high creativity was better than that of those with low creativity, and the learning achievement of the students with medium creativity was as good as that of those with low creativity. (3a) On each learning model, the learning achievement of the students with high creativity was better than that of those with medium and low creativity, while the learning achievement of the students with medium creativity was as good as that of those with low creativity. (3b) On each creativity level whether high, medium or low, the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with NHT learning model was as good as that of those taught with TPS learning model but was better than that of those taught with conventional model. And the learning achievement of the students taught with TPS learning model was as good as that of those taught with conventional model.Keywords: NHT, TPS, Conventional, Learning Creativity.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Kusuma, Fitriana Anggar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (199.74 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of research was to find out: (1) which learning models provided the better mathematics learning achievement, Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think Pair Share (TPS) or direct learning, (2) which category of thinking pattern characteristics provided the better mathematics learning achievement, concrete sequential (SK), abstract sequential (SA), random concrete (AK) or abstract concrete (AA), (3) in each learning model, which category provided the better mathematics learning achievement SK, SA, AK or AA thinking patterns, and (4) in each category of student thinking pattern characteristics, which learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement, TSTS, TPS or direct learning models. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x4 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Pacitan Regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 237 students 81 students for experimental class 1 and 77 students for experimental class 2 and 79 students for control class.  Considering the hypothesis test, the following conclusions could  be drawn. (1) The learning using TSTS model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the one using TPS, and the TSTS and TPS models provided learning achievement as good as the direct learning model did in one-variable equation and disequation material. (2) The learning achievement of the students with SK type of thinking pattern characteristics was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK type was as good as that of those with AA type, that of those with SA type as good as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (3) In TSTS, TPS and direct learning models, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with SK type was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK was as good as that of those with AA, that of those with SA was as same as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (4) In the thinking pattern characteristics of SK, SA, AA, and AK types, the TSTS learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the TPS model and the TSTS and TPS provided better learning achievement than direct learning model in one-variable linear equation and disequation material.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Student’s Thinking Pattern Characteristics. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIKA DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA SMP SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI Utami, Novia Fajar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.791 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aims of the research were to determine: (1) which one that give better achievement, learning with TTW with RMA, TTW, or conventional, (2) which one  that give better achievement, the students having high, medium, or low mathematics reasoning ability, (3) which one that give better achievement, the students having high, medium, or low creativity, (4) in each learning model, which one category of mathematics reasoning ability that give better achievement, the students having high, medium, or low mathematics reasoning ability, (5) in each learning model, which one  that give better achievement, the students having high, medium, or low creativity, (6) in each category of mathematics reasoning ability, which one that give better achievement, the students having high, medium, or low creativity, (7) in each learning model for each category of mathematics reasoning ability, which one that give better achievement better, the students having high, medium, or low creativity. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It shows that three classes have balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was three-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TTW with  RMA provided better achievement than TTW and conventional, and also TTW provided better achievement than conventional, (2) the students having high and medium mathematics reasoning ability had same achievement, and also than the students having high and medium mathematics reasoning ability had better  achievement than those having low mathematics reasoning ability, (3) the students having high, medium, and low creativity had the same achievement, (4) in each learning model, the students having high and medium reasoning ability had the same achievement, and also than the students having high and medium mathematics reasoning ability had better achievement than those having low mathematics reasoning ability, (5) in each learning model, the students having high, medium, and low creativity had the same achievement, (6) in each category of mathematics reasoning ability, the students having high, medium, and low creativity had the same achievement, (7) in each learning model for each category of mathematics reasoning ability, the students having high, medium, and low creativity had the same achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Realistic Mathematics Approach (RMA), mathematics reasoning ability, learning creativity, mathematics achievement.
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) BERBANTU VIDEO CAMTASIA PADA MATERI PELUANG UNTUK SISWA SMA/MA NEGERI KABUPATEN CILACAP TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Retno, Eli Widoyo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.486 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) the process and result of the development of the GI learning model; (2) the effectiveness of the modified GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and character of social responsibility in the topic of discussion of Probability. This research used the Research and Development (R&D) method. It consisted of two phases, namely: (1) research and development phase and (2) effectiveness test phase of the modified GI learning model. The former, with some modifications, referred to the ones claimed by Borg and Gall. The latter used the quasi experimental research method. The results of the research were as follows: 1) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is a valid, effective, and practical learning model. In addition, it also matches 2013 curriculum so that it was applicable in Senior Secondary Schools/Islamic Senior Secondary Schools of Cilacap. 2) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is more effective than the GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and the character of social responsibility on the topic of discussion of Probability. Keywords: Learning model, GI, Camtasia Video, Learning achievement, and Social responsibility

Page 11 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue