cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MENGHADAPI TES SISWA KELAS VII SMP KABUPATEN BREBES TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Santosa, Budi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.302 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model approach, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement; (2) which students of those with the high anxiety, those with medium anxiety level, and those with the low anxiety level to deal with test have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in the students with the low, medium, and high anxiety levels to deal with test, which learning model of the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model, and the direct learning results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) In the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model, and the direct learning model, which students of those with the high anxiety, those with medium anxiety level, and those with the low anxiety level to deal with test have a better learning achievement in Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. It was conducted at Class VII of Junior Secondary Schools of Brebes regency in Semester II in Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test and questionnaire anxiety level to deal with test. The data were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of α = 0.05. The results of the research are as follows: 1) The Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than both the TGT type learning model and the direct learning model, and the TGT type learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement of the students with the low anxiety level is better than those with those with high anxiety level and those with the medium anxiety level, but the learning achievement of the students with the high anxiety level is the same as that of the students with the medium anxiety level. 3) In the students with the high anxiety level to deal with test, the Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than the TGT learning model. In the students with the medium anxiety level to deal with test, the Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. Other than those, in each anxiety level, the three learning models result in the same learning achievement. 4). In the TGT learning model, the learning achievement of the students with the low anxiety level to deal with test is better than that of those with the high anxiety level. Other than those, in each learning model, the students with the high, medium, and low anxiety levels have the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: Anxiety to deal with test, TGT learning model, Jigsaw, and realistic Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI POKOK DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA SMA KELAS X DI KABUPATEN MAGETAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012 Prabawanti, Estu Hari
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (327.113 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one has a better learning achievement between cooperative learning STAD, TGT, and conventional learning, (2) which one has a better learning achievement; the students having high, medium, or low learning activity, (3) which one gives a better learning achievement based on their high, medium, and low learning activity between cooperative learning STAD, TGT and conventional learning. The population of the research was the whole students of tenth grade of senior high school in Magetan. The sampling technique was done withstratified cluster random sampling. Based on the result of data analysis, it can be concluded: (1) The cooperative learning STAD gave a better learning achievement than TGT, TGT gave a better achievement than conventional learning, and STAD gave a better learning than conventional learning. (2) The students with higher learning activity had a better learning achievement than the students with lower learning activity. (3) For studentshaving high learning activity, cooperative learning STAD had a better learning achievement than TGT and conventional learning, and cooperative learning TGT and conventional learning had the same learning achievement.For students having medium learning activity, cooperative learning STAD and TGT had the samelearning achievement and so didTGTand conventional learning, however, cooperative learning STAD had a better learning achievement than conventional learning. For students havinglow learning activity, cooperative learning STAD, TGT, and conventional learning had the same learning achievement.Keywords: Student Teams Achievement Division, Team Games Tournament,conventional , activity.
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SISWA SMP KABUPATEN LAMPUNG TIMUR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Hariyati, Endang; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.406 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI), Problem Based Learning (PBL) and conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research using  factorial design. The populations of the research were all students of Junior High School (SMP) on Lampung Timur Regency. The samples of the research were the eight grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Pekalongan, SMP Negeri 2 Pekalongan, and SMP Negeri 3 Batanghari containing 282 students (94 students for first experimental class, 93 students for second experimental class, and 95 students for control class). The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. In collecting the data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. Test was used to get the students’ learning achievement data and questionnaire was used to get multiple intelligences data. The technique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The result of the research are as follows  (1) Cooperative learning model TAI provides better mathematics achievement than  the conventional model of learning and PBL, PBL learning model produces better performance over the conventional learning. (2) Multiple intelligences with mathematics logic types provide better math achievement than other types of multiple intelligences linguistic and interpersonal, the type of multiple intelligences linguistic providing academic achievement as well as the type of multiple intelligences interpersonal. (3) The students with LI multiple intelligences type, cooperative learning model TAI has the same mathematics achievement with the PBL model, PBL model has better performance than conventional models, and cooperative learning model TAI has the same mathematics achievement with conventional learning models. The students with multiple intelligences mathematics logic type, TAI cooperative learning model provides a better learning achievement than learning model PBL, PBL learning model provides academic achievement as well as conventional learning models, cooperative learning model TAI provide significantly better learning achievement than with conventional learning models. The students with multiple intelligences type interpersonal, TAI cooperative learning model, PBL and conventional provide similar good performance. (4) The students use cooperative learning model TAI, the type of multiple intelligences linguistic provide better learning achievement than the interpersonal category of multiple intelligences, linguistic multiple intelligences category provides academic achievement as well as multiple intelligences mathematics logic category, the category of multiple intelligences significantly provide that mathematic logic achievement as well as multiple intelligences interpersonal category. The students use PBL and conventional learning models, the type of linguistic multiple intelligences, the mathematics logic type of multiple intelligences and type the interpersonal produces similar good performance. Keywords: TAI, PBL, multiple intelligences  
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) YANG DIMODIFIKASI PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PONOROGO Suharyanto, Suharyanto; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.853 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which of the NHT modified model, the NHT model or the direct learning model promoted the students? better achievement on mathematics, (2) which one is better, the students with visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetics learning style, and (3) in various learning style, which one having better achievement on mathematic, the NHT modified model, the NHT model or the direct learning model. This research was a quasi-experiments research with factorial design 3x3. The population of this research was the eight grade students of State Junior High Schools in Ponorogo. The sample was taken by the use of stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data collecting made use the documentation, questionnaire, and test methods. The documentation method was used to collect the data of the second-semester students? achievement on mathematics in the academic year 2011/2012 as found in their report books. This finding was further applied to check the balance of the students of the two exsperiment classrooms and one control classroom. The questionnaire was used to find the type of learning style mostly owned by the students. Whiles, the test was used to determine the students? achievement on mathematics in the straight line equation topic. Examination of hypothesis used an unbalanced two way analysis of variances at significance levels 5%. The results of the research was as follows: (1) the students? achievement on mathematics due to NHT modified model was equally due to NHT model, while the two models above was better than due to direct learning model, (2) there was no distinction among visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetics learning style based on the students? achievement on mathematics, and (3) in various of learning style, the students? achievement on mathematics due to NHT?s modification model was equally due to NHT model, while the two models above was better than due to direct learning model.Keywords: the NHT Modified, the Direct Learning Model, the Learning Style
PROFIL POSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA KONTEKSTUAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT-INDEPENDENT DAN GENDER N, Atik Fitriya; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.22 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research was a qualitative descriptive that aims to describe the critical thinking process of male and female senior high school students with dependent and independent cognitive style in solving contextual mathematics problems using Polya steps. Classification of students cognitive styles used group embedded figures test (GEFT). The subjects of this research were 4 students of XI year of SMA Negeri 1 Kartasura selected by purposive sampling. Validity of the data used time triangulation and the technique of data analysis were done by: (1) classifying the data into four problem solving steps: (a) understand the problem, (b) make a plan, (c) carry out the plan, and (d) look back at the completed solution, (2) presenting the data in narrative text, and (3) concluding the thinking process of students in each problem solving steps. The results show as follows: (1) Male students with a field dependent cognitive style in understanding: students are able to organize and analyze information or aspects of a problem. In making a plan: students are able to identify the material that is needed in formulating steps or solutions. In carrying out the plan: students are able in the rational thinking and be able to make a valid conclusions. In looking back: students are able to think rationally. (2) Male students with field independent cognitive styles in understanding: students are able to organize and analyze information or aspect of a problem, capable of conceptualizing, understanding an attitude and thinking rationally. In making a plan: the students were able to identify the material that is needed in formulating steps or solutions. In carrying out the plan: students are able to think rationally, to make a valid conclusions, reflective thinking and understanding an attitude. In looking back: students are able to think reflectively. (3) Female students with a field dependent cognitive style in understanding: students are able to organize and analyze information or aspect of a problem. In making a plan: students are able to identify the material that is needed in formulating steps or solutions. In carrying out the plan: students are able in the rational thinking and be able to make a valid conclusions. In looking back: students are able to think rationally. (4) Female students with field independent cognitive styles in understanding: students are able to organize and analyze information or aspect of a problem, capable of conceptualizing, understanding an attitude and thinking rationally. In making a plan: the students are able to identify the material that is needed in formulating or solutions. In carrying out the plan: students are able to think rationally, to make a valid conclusions, reflective thinking and understanding an attitude. In looking back: students are able to think reflectively and rationally. Keywords: Critical thinking Process, Problem Solving, Cognitive Style, Gender
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN MOOD UNDERSTAND RECALL DETECT ELABORATE REVIEW (MURDER) PADA MATERI POKOK LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI MINAT BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMK SE KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Mustaqim, Burhan; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (319.028 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at knowing (1) the effectiveness of TPS, MURDER and Direct Instruction model to the students achievement on mathematics, (2) which learning model TPS, MURDER and Direct Instruction, having better achievement on mathematics viewed from students’ interest, (3) students’ achievement viewed from students’ interest on each learning model. This research is experimental research using factorial design 3x3. The population is students of SMK on technique program in Karanganyar. Sampling is stratified cluster random sampling. The sample is 300 students, 100 is first experimental class, 100 is second experimental class and 100 is control class. Collecting data has been done through multiple choice test to know students’ achievement and questionnaire to know students interest in learning. Instrument test and questionnaire were tested before it is used to take data. Instrument validities test and questionnaire were carried out by validator, reliability test was tested by formula KR-20 and reliability questionnaire was tested with formula Cronbach Alpha while its data analysis technique uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. From the result was concluded that: (1) Students who are taught using cooperative learning model, MURDER, have better achievement than TPS and Direct Instruction. Those taught by using TPS have better achievement than Direct Instruction. (2) Viewed from students’ interest, high, mid, and low, taught by using learning MURDER have better achievement than TPS and those taught by using TPS have better achievement than Direct Instruction. (3) Viewed from learning model MURDER, TPS, and Direct Instruction, students having high interest have better achievement than those students having mid interest and students having mid interest have better achievement than those students having low interest.Keywords: MURDER, TPS, Interests Learning, Students Achievement on mathematics.
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PMR DAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE GI DENGAN PMR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Ardiawan, Yadi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.278 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research are to know: (1) which one gives better students’ mathematics achievement, cooperative model of NHT type with RME, cooperative model of GI type with RME or conventional model, (2) which one has better students’ mathematics achievement, student having high creativity, medium or low, and (3) for any level of creativities, which one gives better students’ mathematics achievement, cooperative model of NHT type with RME, cooperative model of GI type with RME or conventional model and for any kind of models which one has better students’ mathematics achievement, student having high creativity, medium or low. The type of this research was a quasi experimental by 3x3 factorial design.The population in this research was the seventh grade students of junior high school in Pontianak in the academic year 2012/2013. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The instrument of research using mathematics achievement test and verbal creativity test. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) There is an influence of the learning model toward students’ mathematics achievement. Cooperative model of NHT type with RME provides  students’ mathematics achievement better than the cooperative model of GI type with RME and conventional model. Cooperative model of GI type with RME provides students’ mathematics achievement better than the conventional model. (2) There is an influence of the student’s creativity level toward students’ mathematics achievement. Students having high creativity have better mathematics achievement than students having medium and low creativity. Students having medium creativity have better mathematics achievement than students with low creativity. (3) For any level of creativities that the cooperative model of NHT type with RME gives better student’s mathematics achievement than cooperative model of GI type with RME and conventional model, and cooperative model of GI type with RME gives better students’ mathematics achievement than conventional model. For any kind of models, students having high creativity have better mathematics achievement than students having medium and low creativity, and students having medium have better mathematics achievement than students having low creativity. Keywords: Cooperative Model of NHT (Numbered Heads Together) type, Cooperative Model of GI (Group Investigation) type, RME (Realistic Mathematics Education) Approach, Student’s Creativity
EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Vahlia, Ira
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (385.373 KB)

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student creativity. The learning model compared were discovery, group investigation and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of Junior High School in Surakarta city on academic year 2012/2013. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consist of 281 students who were divided into 94 students in the first experiment class, 94 students in the second experiment class, and 93 students in the control class. The results of this research are as follows: (1) the discovery learning model results in better learning achievement than the group investigation and conventional learning model. The group investigation learning model results in an equal learning achievement to the conventional learning model, (2) the students having high level of creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity, (3) on the discovery learning model, students having high creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity and students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low creativity. On the group investigation model, students in each level of creativity have the same learning achievement, (4) the students who were tought with the discovery learning model have better learning achievement than those taught with the group investigation and conventional learning model in the category of having high level of creativity. The students who were tought group investigation and conventional model results in an equal learning achievement in the category of having high level of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity in each learning model.Key words: discovery, group investigation, learning achievement, and creativity
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE CONCEPT MAPPING GROUP RESUME(CMGR) DAN CONCEPT MAPPING (CM) DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI PESERTA DIDIK Astriyani, Arlin
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (248.717 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate: (1) which type more effective, a CMGR type, a CM type, or a Direct Instruction, (2) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had high, middle or low motivation students, (3) in each CMGR type, a CM type or Direct Instruction model, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had high, middle, or low motivation (4) in each motivation students (high, middle and low), which one more effective, students taught by a CMGR type, a CM type, or a Direct Instruction. We used the fifth grade students of elementary school in Nusawungu Subdistrict as the population. This study was a quasi experimental research by 3 x 3 factorial design. The instruments used to collect data are prior ability test in mathematics, a motivation questionnaire and achievement test in mathematics. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analyzed, it was concluded that: (1) a CMGR type had better mathematics achievement than a CM type and a Direct Intruction, and a CM type had better mathematics achievement than a Direct Instruction, (2) the high motivation students had better mathematics achievement than the middle and low motivation students, and the middle motivation students had better mathematics achievement than the low motivation students, (3) for all types of learning model, high motivation students had better mathematics achievement than middle and low motivation students, (4) for high and middle motivation students, a CMGR type more effective than a CM type and Direct Instruction, and for low motivation students, a CM type more effective than a CMGR type and Direct Instruction.Keywords : Concept Mapping Group Resume (CMGR), Concept Mapping (CM), Direct Instruction, Motivation, Mathematics Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MISSOURI MATHEMATICS PROJECT (MMP) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DISERTAI ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING MELALUI TEMAN SEJAWAT DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN Nugroho, Purna Bayu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.112 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with the AfL through peers, or students who were given direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (3) on each learning model, which one has the better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (4) in each learning independence category, which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers or students who given direct learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study populations were all of grade X students of Senior High School in Bantul. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 214 students with the details of 72 students for experiment 1 and 70 for experiments 2 and 72 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of student’s learning independence. Based on the hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students’ learning achievement treated by MMP learning model with the AfL better than students treated by STAD models with AfL and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD model with AfL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model. (2) Students’ learning achievement which has high learning independence better than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the MMP learning model with the AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model, the students’ learning achievement who have high learning independence better than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the students’ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate and low, the students’ learning achievement treated by MMP with the AfL through peers better than students treated by STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD with AFL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model.Keywords: Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP), Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD), Assessment for Learning (AfL), Peers, Student’s Learning Independence

Page 5 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue