cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
ISSN : 16938437     EISSN : 24609102     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
NURANI merupakan jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Syari'ah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Fatah Palembang. Jurnal NURANI terbit dua kali dalam setahun yaitu bulan Juni dan Desember. Jurnal NURANI pertama kali terbit pada tahun 2001 dengan Surat Keputurusan Rektor IAIN Raden Fatah. Pengelola menyambut baik kontribusi dalam bentuk artikel dari para ilmuwan, sarjana, professional, dan peneliti dalam disiplin syari'ah dan kemasyarakatan untuk dipublikasikan dan disebarluaskan setelah melalui mekanisme seleksi naskah, telaah mitra bebestari, dan proses penyuntingan. Besar harapan kami, artikel-artikel yang terbitkan oleh Jurnal NURANI dapat memberikan kontribusi yang nyata dan berdampak secara luas pada perubahan paradigma positif mengenai syari'ah dan kemasyarakatan. Jurnal NURANI melakukan publikasi karya ilmiah berpegang teguh pada nilai-nilai dan etika publikasi ilmiah serta seluruh proses didalamnya dikelola secara profesional dan akuntabel. Jurnal NURANI berkomitmen akan memberikan sanksi secara tegas apabila selama proses publikasi terdapat hal-hal yang menyalahi aturan dalam etika publikasi serta norma-norma akademik.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 319 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
Sufism and Ulama Networks: Re-examining Islam as Discursive Tradition in South-West Javanese Regions Ridwan Ridwan; M. Wildan Humaidi; Luthfi Makhasin; Jamaluddin Jamaluddin
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31188

Abstract

This article revisits Islam in the south-western region of Central Java, particularly Penginyongan, through Talal Asad's concept of discursive tradition, highlighting Islam as a historically situated and socially negotiated practice. Using a qualitative historical approach, this study examines the formation and transformation of kiai networks in the Penginyongan region of Central Java. The data were collected through archival research and oral history interviews with ten key informants, including direct descendants and individuals with familial ties to historical figures associated with local pesantren. The study explores how Sufism and ulama networks shaped religious authority and local Islamic identity. The article presents three key findings. First, Sufi-based ulama networks cultivated an exemplary Muslim community that contributed to the genesis of Indonesian Islamic nationhood, particularly through the legacy of Diponegoro’s anti-colonial struggle. Second, these networks facilitated the vernacularization of Islam by translating Islamic teachings into local cultural and linguistic forms. Third, they promoted religious purification through localized negotiations of Sharia and Sufi ethics rather than rigid reformism. The study contends that Islam in Penginyongan is neither a fixed tradition nor simply a local adaptation, but a dynamic discursive formation shaped by historical processes, power relations, and cultural mediation.
A Structured Legal Harmonization Model for Digital Integration of Indonesia’s National Logistics Supply Chain in Port Governance Muhammad Akbar; Zulkifli Aspan; Ratnawati Ratnawati; Maskun Maskun; Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis; Gandhi Pharmacista; Hambali Jaili
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31379

Abstract

Indonesia's port-based logistics governance is still shaped by scattered regulations, overlapping institutional authority, and uneven digital integration. This study addresses that gap by formulating a structured legal harmonization model for the digital integration of Indonesia’s national logistics supply chain in port management. Using an empirical legal approach, data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and document analysis involving logistics operators, service users, policymakers, and port authorities in Jakarta and Banten. The findings reveal that Indonesia's logistics inefficiency stems not merely from infrastructure or technological limitations, but from disconnected sectoral regulations, weak inter-agency coordination, uneven digital interoperability, high operational costs, and limited service accountability. This study proposes a four-layer harmonization model consisting of regulatory alignment, institutional coordination, digital interoperability, and service accountability. The model contributes conceptually by repositioning legal harmonization as the central mechanism for integrating logistics regulation, institutional mandates, and digital platforms, and practically by providing a legal basis for strengthening national logistics coordination and port governance reform.
Arab Legal Responses to Colonial Citizenship in Indonesia, 1914–1945: A Siyāsah Sharʿiyyah Analysis Ali Ridho; Apipudin Apipudin; Yon Machmudi; Agus Setiawan; Kaida Fadilah
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31400

Abstract

This article looks at how the Hadhrami Arab community in the Dutch East Indies built Islamic legal responses to colonial citizenship across the 1914 to 1945 period. Using siyāsah syar‘iyyah as the main analytical framework, the study investigates the competing positions of Al-Rabithah al-Alawiyah and the Partai Arab Indonesia (PAI) in defining loyalty, homeland, and civic belonging. This research employs a historical-interpretative approach based on archival documents, colonial legal texts, organizational writings, newspapers, and relevant secondary literature. The findings show that being classified as Vreemde Oosterlingen pushed the Hadhramis toward two major legal-political responses. Al-Rabithah leaned into a transnational Muslim identity and ties to Hadhramaut as a way of holding onto religious autonomy under colonial rule. In contrast, PAI, led by the Peranakan Arab generation and represented by A. R. Baswedan, promoted integration into Indonesia as an Islamic and civic strategy for equality, security, and anti-colonial solidarity. This article adds to Islamic law and citizenship studies by showing that Hadhrami citizenship debates went beyond ethnic or political conflict, functioning instead as juridical negotiations over Islamic loyalty, public welfare, and national belonging.
Codification of Customary Law: Preserving and Strengthening Local Wisdom in the Kepahiang Community Bambang Sugianto; Windi Arista; Siti Rochmiyatun; Arrie Budhiartie; Rusmini Rusmini; Raden Sumanteri Depati Karbaya
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31430

Abstract

The codification of customary law constitutes a strategic legal instrument for preserving and reinforcing local wisdom amid increasingly complex social transformations. However, this dimension has largely been overlooked in previous studies. In response to these limitations, this study focuses on analyzing the significance of customary law codification in the context of preserving and reinforcing local wisdom within the community. This research employs a qualitative descriptive design based on a case study approach. The findings indicate that the codification of Rejang customary law constitutes a strategic and urgent legal measure for safeguarding the sustainability of the legal system while preserving local wisdom. The previously unwritten nature of customary law has led to legal uncertainty, divergent interpretations, and a weakening of its legitimacy within a society that is becoming increasingly rational and critical. Moreover, the strengthening of customary institutions and the establishment of customary courts emerge as key factors in ensuring the effective enforcement of law at the local level. The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform systematic policy development on customary law codification while providing a conceptual foundation for advancing adaptive and sustainable customary law scholarship.
Urgency of Legal Reformulation and Sanction Enforcement on Fiduciary Guarantee Roya in Indonesia Sri Turatmiyah; Rr. Rina Antasari; M. Syaifuddin; Erniwati Erniwati; Conie Pania Putri; Dini Chairani
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31680

Abstract

The cancellation of fiduciary security registration (roya) remains a recurring legal issue in Indonesia due to creditors’ failure to deregister fiduciary guarantees following debt settlement. The lack of effective sanctions for non-compliance generates legal uncertainty and undermines debtor protection. This study aims to analyze the normative weaknesses in the regulation of fiduciary security deletion and to formulate a strengthened legal framework based on legal certainty and debtor protection principles. This study adopts a normative juridical approach employing statutory and conceptual analyses. Legal materials were examined through library research and complemented by interviews with relevant practitioners and government officials to provide contextual insights into the implementation of fiduciary security deletion. The data were analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation and doctrinal analysis.The findings reveal that although the obligation to delete fiduciary security has been regulated by law, its implementation remains ineffective due to the lack of explicit sanction provisions for non-compliant creditors. This study contributes by proposing a reformulation of fiduciary security regulations through clearer creditor obligations, the imposition of administrative and civil sanctions, and stronger supervisory mechanisms. The implications are intended for lawmakers, government agencies, and financing companies to strengthen compliance and legal certainty in fiduciary security practices.
Deconstructing Islamic Thought: Legal Dynamics and the Complexity of Heirs’ Rights in Multireligious Families Daharmi Astuti; Sutomo Sutomo; Nurafidatu Sofiyah Ch; Dewi Oktavia; Mukhamad Hadi Musolin
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31894

Abstract

The deconstruction of Islamic legal thought has gained increasing relevance by facilitating alternative interpretations of inheritance law applicable to multireligious families. However, this context has largely been overlooked in previous studies. In addition to addressing these gaps, this study focuses on explaining the significance of deconstructing Islamic thought in responding to legal dynamics and the complexity of heirs’ rights in multireligious family contexts. This study adopts a qualitative descriptive design based on normative texts, as this approach facilitates an in-depth conceptual and interpretative analysis of Islamic legal thought. The findings indicate that the deconstruction of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia reflects a transformative shift toward a more inclusive, contextual, and substantively just framework in response to evolving social realities. This deconstruction marks a fundamental transition from a predominantly textual approach toward a more adaptive understanding of social conditions, particularly in addressing the increasing complexity of interreligious family relationships. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to religious studies, particularly Islamic legal thought, by reframing law not merely as a normative doctrine but as a dynamic and socially embedded practice.
Horizontal Separation in Marital Property: Legal Implications of Building on Third-Party Land M. Syaefuddin; Ahmadi Miru; Abrar Saleng; Oky Deviany; Anggreany Arief
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31915

Abstract

The division of marital property after divorce in Indonesia presents distinct complexities when jointly owned buildings are constructed on third-party land. While the principle of horizontal separation under Agrarian Law theoretically resolves property ownership, a significant research gap remains regarding how judicial practices reconcile this agrarian concept with family law to ensure equitable distribution. This study utilizes a normative juridical method, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. An analysis of recent Religious Court decisions reveals that although judges pragmatically apply horizontal separation by estimating the building's financial value for distribution, their rulings frequently fail to quantify non-financial domestic contributions and overlook the post-divorce residential security of the weaker party. The enforcement stage further exacerbates this issue, as delays in execution, high procedural costs, and unclear proof of ownership often disproportionately affect women and children. Consequently, the current legal framework struggles to deliver gender justice. This article concludes that existing legal constructions require immediate refinement. To achieve substantive justice in accordance with maqasid al-shari'ah, this study recommends implementing Supreme Court technical guidelines for valuing domestic contributions, execution-sensitive rulings, and the use of Building Rights (HGB) as an alternative compensation mechanism, rather than relying on comprehensive legislative reform.
Jurisprudential Trade-Offs in Muslim Consumer Protection: Reconciling State Coercion and Market Rationality in ASEAN Basyirah Mustarin; Arfin Hamid; Mustafa Bola; Hamzah Halim
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.31916

Abstract

While the global halal food market is expanding rapidly, existing legal frameworks often struggle to balance statutory requirements with operational realities and strict religious compliance. This study addresses the doctrinal friction between state regulatory coercion and field compliance capabilities by comparatively analyzing the legal architectures of halal consumer protection in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam. Employing a qualitative-normative legal approach, this research triangulates primary statutory instruments, including Law No. 33 of 2014 (Indonesia), the Trade Descriptions Order 1975 (Malaysia), and the Halal Meat Act (Brunei), with secondary empirical compliance data. The comparative analysis reveals profound jurisprudential trade-offs: Indonesia’s Coercive Positivist Approach provides comprehensive statutory coverage but triggers severe sociological friction among MSMEs; Malaysia’s Pragmatic-Lex Mercatoria Approach optimizes global market integration yet risks stratifying domestic consumer protection; and Brunei’s Theocratic-Constitutional Approach preserves absolute religious authenticity but remains legally hermetic internationally. As a theoretical novelty, this study conceptualizes the "Triadic Equilibrium of Halal Regulatory Governance," arguing that absolute legal certainty is an illusion without harmonizing Statutory Coercion, Market Rationality, and Epistemic Authenticity. To reconcile these paradigms, the study recommends establishing a “Halal Regulatory Sandbox” to shift MSMEs from punitive to restorative compliance, integrate blockchain for immutable post-market traceability, and move ASEAN regional harmonisation strategies from rigid uniformity towards Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) grounded in legal equivalence.
Reconstructing Universal Jurisdiction in Contemporary International Law: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Approach to Global Justice Ahmad Iffan; Elyana Novira; Maiyestati Maiyestati; Deswita Rosra; Desmal Fajri
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.32116

Abstract

The doctrine of universal jurisdiction is widely recognized as a key legal mechanism for addressing impunity for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious international crimes. However, its contemporary implementation has increasingly been criticized for selective enforcement, political instrumentalization, and inconsistent accountability, thereby generating a significant legitimacy deficit within the international legal order. This study aims to reconstruct the normative foundation of universal jurisdiction through the framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah and classical Siyar (Islamic international law) in order to strengthen its ethical legitimacy and promote a more consistent model of global justice. This research employs normative legal methods, integrating doctrinal, conceptual, comparative, and qualitative content analysis approaches. The findings demonstrate that the current practice of universal jurisdiction is structurally constrained by selective enforcement and geopolitical asymmetries, which undermine its claim to universality. Furthermore, this study clarifies the strict doctrinal divide between municipal universal jurisdiction operating via custom and the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) treaty-based jurisdiction and the study finds that four core maqāṣid principles ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of life), al-ʿadālah (justice), al-musāwāh (equality), and al-maṣlaḥah al-ʿāmmah (public welfare) provide a coherent normative framework for evaluating and reconstructing universal jurisdiction. These principles establish clear ethical criteria for non-selective enforcement, equal protection of victims, and enhanced accountability beyond geopolitical interests. The study concludes that Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah functions not merely as a theological-legal doctrine, but as a universal normative framework capable of reinforcing the legitimacy of international criminal justice. Based on these findings, the article proposes a Maqāṣid-Based Universal Jurisdiction Model to promote a more consistent, impartial, and human-centered system of global accountability.
Legal Protection of Taxpayers Against Hostage Sanctions (Gijzeling) in the Principle of Equality Before the Law Marihot D. Saing; Joni Emirzon; Iza Rumesten; Ridwan
Nurani Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v26i1.32225

Abstract

The implementation of hostage sanctions (gijzeling) in Indonesian tax law remains contentious, as it allows taxpayers' liberty to be restricted without prior judicial determination, raising concerns over fundamental rights and equality before the law. This study aims to evaluate legal protection for taxpayers subject to gijzeling and proposes reforms to align effective tax enforcement with constitutional rights. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, philosophical, interpretative, and case approaches. Legal materials were gathered through library-based research and analyzed systematically using an inductive method. The findings indicate that the current legal framework offers fragmented rather than comprehensive protection of taxpayers' rights. The General Taxation Law (UU KUP) does not explicitly recognize taxpayers' fundamental rights, while the Tax Collection Law (UU PPSP) grants broad coercive powers to tax authorities without sufficient procedural safeguards. Judicial practice further demonstrates that courts primarily emphasize formal compliance with tax collection procedures, resulting in limited protection of taxpayers' rights to legal certainty, information, privacy, and due process. To address these shortcomings, this study proposes reformulating the UU KUP by explicitly incorporating taxpayers' fundamental rights and revising the UU PPSP by clarifying the legal standard of good faith, establishing certainty regarding judicial review, and strengthening compensation and rehabilitation mechanisms. This study contributes to the literature by examining gijzeling from the perspective of equality before the law and taxpayer legal protection, thereby offering a normative framework for balancing state fiscal interests with constitutional rights in tax enforcement.

Page 31 of 32 | Total Record : 319

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 25 No 1 (2025): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 23 No 2 (2023): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 23 No 1 (2023): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 21 No 2 (2021): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 21 No 1 (2021): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 20 No 2 (2020): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 20 No 1 (2020): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 19 No 2 (2019): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 19 No 1 (2019): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 18 No 2 (2018): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 18 No 1 (2018): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 17 No 2 (2017): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 17 No 1 (2017): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 16 No 1 (2016): Vol 16, No 1 Juni 2016 Vol 16 No 2 (2016): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat Vol 15 No 2 (2015): Nurani Vol 15 No 1 (2015): Nurani Vol 14 No 2 (2014): Nurani Vol 14 No 1 (2014): Nurani Vol 13 No 2 (2013): Nurani Vol 13 No 1 (2013): Nurani More Issue