cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik) (e-Journal)
ISSN : 24601586     EISSN : 24601586     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science,
Kebijakan publik, manajemen publik, otonomi daerah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 281 Documents
Evaluasi Program Mikrotrans Dalam Mendukung Transportasi Terintegrasi di Jakarta Utara Syaida Nafisa; Maulana Yusuf; Nikki Prafitri
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i1.132918

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Mikrotrans Program in supporting integrated transportation in North Jakarta as part of the JakLingko system. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method to describe policy implementation phenomena at the operational level. Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving 16 informants representing government officials, operators, drivers, and service users. The data analysis techniques consisted of data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, following an interactive analysis model. The theoretical framework employed is Leo Agustino’s evaluation theory (2023), which encompasses aspects of human resources, institutional arrangements, infrastructure and technology, finance, and regulation. The findings indicate that the implementation of the Mikrotrans Program has not yet operated optimally. Several constraints were identified, including suboptimal driver competence, limited numbers and unequal distribution of facilities within the fleet, the incomplete provision of supporting facilities for drivers, limited budgetary support affecting route implementation, as well as insufficient public understanding and undisciplined user behavior. This study recommends strengthening supervision of driver competence, increasing and equalizing the fleet, enhancing support facilities and funding, reinforcing the integration of Mikrotrans services with other modes of public transportation, and expanding public socialization regarding public transportation. Overall, the Mikrotrans Program in North Jakarta has not been implemented optimally, particularly in terms of competency development, the availability and condition of infrastructure, the availability of operational funding, regulatory implementation, and public understanding of integrated transportation in North Jakarta.
PEMERINTAHAN HIJAU CERDAS DALAM TATA KELOLA BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI Atiqa Azza El Darman
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133221

Abstract

The growing urgency of environmental challenges and rapid digital transformation has encouraged governments to rethink conventional governance models. This study examines the concept and implementation of smart green government within the framework of technology based governance. Adopting a qualitative research approach with a descriptive analytical design, the study explores how digital technologies are integrated with green government principles to support environmentally sustainable public administration. Data were collected through in depth interviews with key policy actors and complemented by document analysis and limited observation of digital governance practices. The findings reveal that smart green government is primarily understood as an integrative approach that combines digital innovation with environmental sustainability objectives. However, its implementation remains uneven and largely implicit, as digital governance initiatives tend to prioritize administrative efficiency and service delivery over environmental outcomes. Institutional capacity, leadership commitment, inter agency coordination, and policy coherence emerge as critical factors shaping implementation effectiveness. The study also identifies key challenges, including fragmented governance structures, limited resources, and the environmental footprint of digital infrastructure. Despite these constraints, significant opportunities exist to advance smart green government through integrated digital platforms, data-driven environmental monitoring, and capacity building. This study contributes to public administration literature by offering a holistic governance perspective that bridges digital transformation and environmental sustainability, while providing policy-relevant insights for governments pursuing sustainable governance reforms.
Bahasa Inggris Petters Neldy Suyana Feoh; Ester Theresia Clarita Tallo
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133463

Abstract

This study explores the interplay between digital discourse, public sentiment, and ideology in social media discussions surrounding demonstrations in Jakarta. Focusing on major protest hashtags such as #ReformasiDikorupsi and #IndonesiaGelap, the research investigates how online interactions construct, circulate, and contest political meanings in Indonesia’s digital public sphere. This phenomenon points to an underlying public administration problem: as citizens increasingly voice discontent, demand accountability, and negotiate legitimacy through digital platforms, government bureaucracies face growing pressure to become more responsive, transparent, and adaptive in managing public communication, service delivery, and crisis governance. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Advanced Network Analytics (ANA), this study analyzes discourse patterns, sentiment dynamics, and ideological clusters across three major platforms: Twitter (X), Instagram, and TikTok. The findings reveal that Twitter serves as the central arena for political critique and ideological confrontation. Meanwhile, Instagram emphasizes affective solidarity through visual and empathetic storytelling, and TikTok turns protest communication into creative, participatory, and performative activism. Sentiment analysis indicates that negative expressions primarily reflecting frustration toward corruption and governance dominate public discourse, followed by neutral and positive sentiments representing hope and unity. Network mapping identifies three dominant clusters: conflict escalation and accountability discourse, humanitarian and symbolic narratives, and field documentation networks. These clusters illustrate the coexistence of emotional, moral, and informational logics that collectively shape online activism. Overall, the results suggest that Indonesia’s digital public sphere operates as a hybrid ecosystem where discourse, sentiment, and ideology interact dynamically, transforming social media into a constitutive space for political engagement, ideological production, and democratic consciousness in the digital era. These findings carry direct implications for public policy and administrative reform, suggesting that government institutions need to strengthen digital-era governance capacities, including responsive crisis communication, participatory policy dialogue, and adaptive citizen–government engagement strategies, to manage digital public sentiment and sustain institutional legitimacy.
CAN DIGITALIZATION ENHANCE GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS? NONLINEAR EFFECTS AND THE MODERATING ROLE OF REGULATORY QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM ASIA AND EUROPE Saeed Abdulrahman Ali Saif; Shadi Abdu Saeed; Arij Ben Rhouma
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133640

Abstract

Digitalization is widely expected to improve government effectiveness; however, empirical evidence remains inconclusive, particularly regarding the roles of institutional quality and regional heterogeneity. This study examines the relationship between digitalization and government effectiveness, with regulatory quality as a moderating factor, using panel data from 14 Asian and European countries over the period 2007–2023. A fixed-effects panel regression model is employed with a principal component analysis (PCA)-based digitalization index, incorporating both quadratic and interaction terms to capture nonlinear and conditional effects. The study contributes to the digital governance literature by jointly examining the direct, nonlinear, moderating, and regional dimensions of the digitalization–government effectiveness relationship within a unified analytical framework. The findings indicate that digitalization alone does not have a significant linear effect on government effectiveness, while its nonlinear effect is significantly negative. In contrast, regulatory quality significantly strengthens the positive impact of digitalization, with the moderating effect being more pronounced in European countries than in Asian economies. These findings suggest that the governance benefits of digital transformation depend not only on technological advancement but also on strong regulatory institutions that enable digital governance.
GOVERNANCE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DISASTER RISK EARLY WARNING POLICY ON COMMUNITY RESPONSE Rizqi Awaliyah Ramadani; Agus Setio Widodo
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133072

Abstract

The gap between the availability of early warning systems and the quality of community response to disasters in Indonesia shows a fundamental problem in the governance dimension of policy implementation. This study aims to analyze how governance shapes the pattern of community response to early warning by using George C. Edwards III's policy implementation theoretical framework which includes the dimensions of communication, resources, executive disposition, and bureaucratic structure. The Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach is used to systematically identify and synthesize the findings of previous research. The results of the study show that the pattern of community response is not determined by the existence of an early warning system alone, but by the quality of governance in its implementation. Unclear and uncontextual communication, limited and inequitable resources, low commitment of implementers, and a fragmented bureaucratic structure simultaneously form a tendency for public responses to be weak, late, or ignore warnings. Instead, integrated, adaptive, and contextual governance contributes to the formation of faster and more effective responses. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive governance reform by integrating the four dimensions of policy implementation to improve the effectiveness of early warning systems in disaster risk reduction in Indonesia.
Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) dalam Upaya Penurunan Prevalensi Stunting di Desa Noelbaki Kabupaten Kupang Nuraini Kusuma Andriyani
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133105

Abstract

Stunting is a condition in which children do not grow normally. This condition is measured by the weight-for-age (WFA) or height-for-age (HFA) index, with a Z-score below the threshold of -2 to -3 SD for moderate stunting and below -3 SD for severe stunting. As of 2023, 27.4% of toddlers in Noelbaki Village still experienced stunting. This study aims to examine how stunting prevention policies are implemented in Noelbaki Village, Kupang Regency. This study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach and used observation, documentation, and in-depth interviews for data collection. This study involved eight informants: two key informants and six supporting informants. The Noelbaki Village Head and a nutritionist from the Tarus Community Health Center served as key informants, while a mother of a stunted toddler, a pregnant woman, a village resident, and a young woman served as supporting informants. The data analysis process began with data collection from interviews, followed by data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that although the implemented policy is relatively effective, it does not fully meet the requirements of implementation theory. This is due to low education levels, limited human resources, a lack of understanding of stunting among pregnant women and parents, and a lack of infrastructure and facilities. Although communication between village governments and other implementers has been good, communication with target community members remains ineffective. Policy implementers understand the methods and responsibilities of their respective roles. Furthermore, they lack the technical skills necessary to prevent stunting. Based on these findings, it is recommended to increase the knowledge and participation of all parties in the implementation of stunting prevention policies.
TINGKAT KESIAPAN MASYARAKAT DALAM PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DESA (STUDI KASUS DI DESA JAMBEARJO, KECAMATAN TAJINAN, KABUPATEN MALANG) Ardhi Kurniawan; Said Muhammad Zulfitri
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133431

Abstract

Village development planning in Indonesia formally requires community participation, yet participatory forums often fail to generate substantive involvement when communities are not ready to engage. This study assesses the level of community readiness for village development planning in Jambearjo Village, Malang Regency, and identifies the dimensions that support or constrain meaningful participation. A descriptive quantitative design was applied using the Community Readiness Model. Data were collected from 371 respondents through a structured questionnaire and scored across six dimensions: community efforts, community knowledge of development implementation, leadership, community climate, community knowledge of the issue, and issue-related resources. The overall readiness score was 8.50, placing the community at the Initiation stage (Stage 6). However, the readiness profile was markedly asymmetric. Leadership scored highest (12.47; Stage 9), followed by knowledge of the issue (10.68) and knowledge of development implementation (9.75), whereas community climate (6.92) and community efforts (6.89) remained at the Preparation stage and issue-related resources scored lowest (4.28; Stage 3). This pattern reflects leader-driven readiness: planning information circulates effectively through village leaders and social networks, but it has not yet been converted into community-owned initiative because local funding, technical expertise and self-help capacity remain limited. The study contributes to public administration by showing that an aggregate readiness stage can conceal gaps between governmental and social readiness. Progress toward the Stabilization stage requires empowering leadership, capacity-building for residents, diversified local resources, feedback on planning proposals and community-based monitoring.
DIGITAL ELECTORAL RECAPITULATION SYSTEMS AND GOVERNANCE MODELS: COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE Timbul Dompak; Yujitia Ahdarrijal; Iranda Firiansyah
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133538

Abstract

This study compares the management of election recapitulation information systems in Indonesia with those implemented in the Philippines, Brazil, Estonia, and Kyrgyzstan to examine differences in governance, system design, security mechanisms, digital infrastructure, transparency, and public trust. Although these countries have adopted various election technologies, ranging from optical scanning and Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) to Internet voting (i-voting) and optical tabulation, comprehensive comparative studies that position Indonesia within this international context remain limited. This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were collected from the Scopus database and supported by credible reports, while CiteSpace was used to map research trends and identify knowledge gaps. The findings reveal significant differences in the maturity of election recapitulation systems. Estonia and Brazil have achieved advanced digital election management through integrated digital governance, secure verification mechanisms, and high public trust. The Philippines applies a hybrid model combining paper ballots with automated vote counting, whereas Kyrgyzstan continues to rely largely on manual procedures. Indonesia's Sirekap represents an intermediate stage of digital transformation but continues to face challenges related to security, OCR accuracy, infrastructure readiness, and public trust. The theoretical contribution of this study is the development of a Comparative Governance Framework for Election Recapitulation Information Systems, demonstrating that system maturity is determined not only by technological adoption but also by the interaction among governance, security, digital infrastructure, transparency, and public trust. This framework provides a foundation for evaluating and improving election recapitulation systems in emerging digital democracies.
SMART TOURISM GOVERNANCE: A SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT ROLES Iranda Firiansyah; Agung Wicaksono; Yujitia Ahdarrijal; Timbul Dompak
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133551

Abstract

Smart tourism governance has become increasingly important as digital technologies reshape tourism management, public services, and destination development. However, existing studies have predominantly emphasized technological innovation, destination competitiveness, and tourist experiences, while the evolving administrative roles of government remain fragmented. This study aims to examine the intellectual development of smart tourism governance and map the evolving roles of government through a scientometric analysis. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database for the period 2015–2025 and analyzed using CiteSpace through co-citation, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, burst detection, and timeline visualization. A total of 132 publications were included in the final dataset. The findings identify five interconnected government roles: Regulator, Digital Infrastructure Provider, Network Coordinator, Data Steward, and Innovation Enabler. These roles operate through governance mechanisms involving policy integration, stakeholder collaboration, data governance, digital innovation, and institutional coordination. Based on these findings, the study proposes a Government-Centered Smart Tourism Governance Framework that conceptualizes government as a multidimensional governance actor rather than merely a regulator or stakeholder. The framework integrates insights from Collaborative Governance, Network Governance, Digital Governance, and Meta-Governance and demonstrates how government functions are connected to governance mechanisms and smart tourism outcomes. The study contributes to public administration by providing a conceptualization of how governmental authority and administrative functions are reorganized within technology-driven tourism governance.
Tata Kelola Adaptif dalam Pengelolaan Desa Wisata: Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Edelweiss di Wonokitri, Indonesia Mutiara Sufia Sabanindah; I Made Arie Widyasthana Wartana Putra; Dwi Suharnoko; Durratun Nashihah
JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jpap.v12i2.133848

Abstract

Tourism villages are one rural development initiative․ Governance issues affecting tourism villages include low levels of community involvement and government effectiveness and accountability․ This study examines the roles of formal and informal governance initiatives in promoting adaptive governance in the Edelweiss Wonokitri Tourism Village in Pasuruan Regency‚ Indonesia․ Data collection methods included semistructured interviews with 6 key informants: Edelweiss Wonokitri Tourism Village officials‚ members of the Hulun Hyang Farmers Group‚ BUMDes officials‚ other community members‚ and officials from the Pasuruan Regency Tourism Office․ Data collection methods also included field observation and document review․ Findings suggest partially institutionalized adaptive governance in Edelweiss Wonokitri Tourism Village․ Moderate cooperation exists among key village tourism stakeholders‚ though other community members have little role in decision making. Other adaptive practices help village tourism stakeholders meet community needs quickly. These practices depend heavily on the personal knowledge and informal cooperation of village tourism stakeholders․ Some formal accountability mechanisms are in place‚ but public accountability is weak․ Formal and informal governance initiatives both support and compete with each other․ Findings add to the literature on adaptive governance by highlighting the importance of public accountability and other factors in building adaptive capacity alongside formal and informal governance initiatives․