cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dyan Franciska Dumaris Sitanggang
Contact Email
dyanfranciska@unpar.ac.id
Phone
+62222033097
Journal Mail Official
vejustitia@unpar.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University/Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Jl. Ciumbuleuit No. 94 Bandung 410141, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Veritas et Justitia
Published by Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
ISSN : 24600555     EISSN : 24604488     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25123/zxw7n840
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Veritas et Justitia is a law journal, managed and published under the auspices of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan/Parahyangan Catholic University (UNPAR). The first edition was published in June 2015 and was meant to replace “Pro Justitia”, a law journal which ended its publication four years earlier. Veritas et Justitia is a media outlet that publishes articles on current national and international legal issues, as well as legal research, written by legal scholars and practitioners. Veritas et Justitia is a member of Asosiasi Pengelola Jurnal Hukum Indonesia/Indonesian Law Journal Association (APJHI). Veritas et Justitia is periodically published twice a year, every June and December. Articles accepted and compiled within each issue will be published online and can be accessed in full for free on the Journal’s website. Authors and readers may request a hard copy of the journal by covering the printing cost. Articles published reflect solely the opinions and arguments of their respective authors and are not representative of the views or beliefs of the Editorial Board or the Faculty of Law, UNPAR. Manuscripts submitted and to be published covers the broad spectrum of law, i.e. Civil Law, Administrative Law, Indonesian Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Islamic Law, Legal Philosophy, Customary Law, Economic Law, and Human Rights and Law. All submitted articles must be original with sources used properly cited, may be written either in Bahasa Indonesia or English, unpublished elsewhere, and not under consideration for any other publication. Veritas et Justitia screens for plagiarism using Turnitin, and the similarity index must be below 30%. Authors submit their draft articles to the editorial board at no cost. No fees are required for the review process or for publication, unless authors fail to submit their revisions after the review. Since December 2017, articles submitted shall be reviewed by two reviewers. Editor also added information about author’s affiliation. All process regarding online journal system shall be reviewed and improved from time to time. Since June 2016, Veritas et Justitia is a proud member of CROSSREF. Veritas et Justitia DOI prefix is 10.25123. Therefore, all articles published by Veritas et Justitia will have unique DOI number. Veritas et Justitia has been accredited SINTA 2 by DIKTI under the Decree Number 177/E/KPT/2024, effective until 2027.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia" : 9 Documents clear
MEMAKNAI KEKHILAFAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 308 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018 Mustika Prabaningrum Kusumawati
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.5671

Abstract

These days, the industrialization era is rapidly developing and has impacted industrial relations disputes that are becoming increasingly complex and unavoidable. In the case of industrial relations disputes, difference in the decision between the first instance and the cassation level (there is no appeal for industrial relations disputes) occurs frequently. As such is the case between Siti Harini and PT Batik Danar Hadi, in which the verdicts of the first instance and cassation (Case Number: 37/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg and Case Number: 308 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018) and the results of the previous first instance decisions (Case Number: 19/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg) differed from one another. In Case Number: 37/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg, Siti Harini's lawsuit was granted; in Case Number: 308K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/PN.Smg, PT Batik Danar Hadi's cassation application was granted; howeverin Case Number: 19/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg, Siti Harini's lawsuit was dismissed. If the lawsuit is filed while the case at hand is still in the middle of examination at the cassation level, it can be said that the suit is too early (premature) and consequently should be declared inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard), but in fact it was granted instead. Hence, it can be concluded that there is an error in the judgment making. Conclusively, it can be stated that the implication of an error in the judgment in the first instance creates legal uncertainty and injustice in the decision.
PROSPEK PENGATURAN KOMISI KHUSUS PENYUSUN DAERAH PEMILIHAN DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Hantoro, Bimo Fajar
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.5837

Abstract

Electoral redistricting institution has a critical role in determining whether a proportional arrangement of electoral districts can be achieved. In Indonesia, there has been a disparity between electoral districts established by the House of Representatives (DPR) and the General Elections Commission (KPU), especially during the 2019 DPR Election. Using doctrinal and socio-legal approaches, this paper aimsto evaluate the prospect of establishing a separate boundary commission in accordance with the 1945 Constitution. The findings suggest that the establishment of a boundary commission as part of electoral management bodies is normatively feasible. However, it must meet the institutional requirements of being national, permanent, and independent. Independency has to be construed as the institution being impartial. By conferring the boundary delimitation authority to a boundary commission, not only would KPU's burden be reduced, it could also better ensure that the delimitation process adheres to the delimitation principles.
KRISIS DAN REFORMASI: EKSPROPRIASI DALAM PERJANJIAN INVESTASI BILATERAL DI NEGARA DUNIA KETIGA Syahrul Fauzul Kabir
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.6249

Abstract

Since its inception, expropriation has always been controversial. In the present time, amidst the crisis and reform of bilateral investment treaties (BIT), expropriation has become increasingly complex in theory and practice. Theoretically, for instance, there is no clear boundary between expropriation that requires compensation, and the right to regulate similar to expropriation but does not require compensation. This situation becomes more complicated due to the problem of inconsistency and incoherence of arbitral awards. Therefore, it is important to understand how the concept of expropriation is understood by experts and interpreted by the arbitration tribunal; while also comparing how the global south use that concept within their BITs (in this case, India, Brazil, South Africa) to find best-practices. The method used in this research is juridical-normative and comparative. Amidst the BIT’s crisis particularly regarding expropriation, the global south has made various attempts to reform its BIT model. Exceptions forexpropriation are included within the right to regulate. Expropriation and the right to regulate indeed have similar legal requirements (i.e.: pursuance of a public interest, non-discriminatory manner, due process of law) yet different legal effect regardingthe payment of compensation as another condition for expropriation vis-à-vis the absence of compensation inthe right to regulate. In general, taking into account the respective adjustments, the global south is relatively balancing the investment interest vis-a-vis public interest by modernizing the concept of expropriation in their BITs.
MENELISIK DAMPAK PERKEBUNAN KELAPA SAWIT BAGI HUTAN ADAT, HAK ULAYAT, DAN VISI EKOLOGIS MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DI KALIMANTAN BARAT Samho, Bartolomeus; Slamet Purwadi, Yohanes
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.6476

Abstract

According to the result of a research conducted in 2016 entitled "Changes in the Mindset of Dayak Indigenous Peoples in Sanggau Regency towards Customary Forests as a Result of Palm Oil Plantations", this article aims to describe the impact of oil palm plantations on indigenous forests, customary rights, and the ecological vision of Adat communities in West Kalimantan. The research method used is a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The findings of this research indicate that economic benefits obtained from oil palm plantations are not proportional with the ecological and social losses resulting from the impacts, both directly and indirectly. It is also found that Adat communities living around oil palm plantations often face the threat of horizontal conflicts due to competition over cultivated land and ecological threats in the form of floods and landslides. The findings within thisis useful to strengthen the understanding of the importance and necessity of developing oil palm plantations with due regard to the local wisdom and constructive ecological vision to maintain the existence of indigenous forests as customary rights. Therefore, land clearing for oil palm plantations must pay attention to local wisdom, preserving nature so that the sustainability of ecosystems and communities is guaranteed.
KEKUASAAN MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT: PROBLEMATIK DAN PENATAAN Efendi, A'an
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.6763

Abstract

People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) is an autonomous institution between the House of Representatives (DPR) and the Regional Representatives Council (DPD) but its powers are limited because it is periodic and incidental. Using doctrinal legal research with a statute and comparative approach, this research concludes, first, the problematic power of MPR from its position as an autonomous state institution that is attached to the state secretariat and budget but limited in authority because the exercise of its power is periodic and incidental, such as the power to change the Constitution or other powers which MPR may not implement within five, ten, or fifteen years and beyond during the term of office of MPR members, and secondly, how to restructure the powers of MPR by changing the position of MPR from an autonomous state institution to a joint session of the DPR and DPD by revising Article 2 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which was originally "MPR consists of members of the DPR and members of DPD" to "MPR consists of the the DPR and DPD". It is found that the repositioning of MPR from an autonomous institution to a joint session may serve to balance its periodic and incidental powers.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN MEREK “PIERRE CARDIN” Irawan, Vania; Budiningsih, Catharina Ria
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.6959

Abstract

Well-known trademarks are crucial to be protected because they are susceptible to infringement by third parties. Disputes concerning well-known trademarks are quite prevalent in Indonesia. One case involving a well-known trademark in Indonesia that is the focus of this research is the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark case. Therefore, this research aims to investigate and analyze the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark case based on Decision Number 15/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Decision Number 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, and Decision Number 49 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018. The research methodology employed is descriptive-analytical, involving an examination of legal documents and literature in the field of law. The analysis results indicate that there were inaccuracies in the judge's decision-making. The judge ruled that there was no evidence of bad faith in an individual's registration of the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark, even though the registered trademark was the same as another individual's name and well-known trademark. The judge also made an inaccurate decision regarding the distinctiveness of the trademark. This inaccuracy in the decision could have implications for trade and investment due to the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of protection for famous trademarks in Indonesia.
URGENSI PENDAFTARAN PERALIHAN PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN PASCA MERGER MENJADI BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA Palawa, Eventy Velly; Hartini
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.7083

Abstract

The merger of three Islamic state-owned enterprises into Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI) has impacted the Mortgage Rights execution post-merger. This is partly due to the change in the name of the bank holding the Mortgage Rights before and after the merger. This study examines the obstacles in executing post-merger Mortgage Rights of three state-owned Islamic banks into BSI and the importance of registering the transfer of Mortgage Rights holders post-merger. This research is done with a normative juridical method through document and field studies at the BSI branch in Palangka Raya, which had experienced obstructions in executing Mortgage Rights when the auction application files was returned by the State Wealth Service and Auction Office. The data is analyzed descriptively and obtained from document and field study. It is found that first, one of the obstacles in executing Mortgage Rights by BSI is the difference in the bank’s name on the Mortgage Rights certificate before and after the merger. Secondly, the registration of the transfer of Mortgage Rights is important because a merger is considered as a cause for the transfer of Mortgage Rights due to "other reasons" (Article 16 of the Mortgage Rights Law). There are priorities to be taken into account in the transfer of Mortgage Rights post-merger includes customers who are due, Non-Performing Financing customers, and customers with Write-Off status.
GUGATAN ACTIO PAULIANA TERHADAP DIREKSI DAN KOMISARIS ATAS PENOLAKAN PENGEMBALIAN DIVIDEN INTERIM PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS Yusuf, Chandra
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.7199

Abstract

Distribution of interim dividends distributed before the end of the financial year by the Director with the approval of the Commissioner. This distribution can be made if the company's finances are in a profitable condition based on the year-end audit carried out by a Public Accountant. Companies that experience losses in their reports at the end of the year, shareholders are obliged to return interim dividends based on Law Number: 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Likewise, companies experiencing bankruptcy based on Law Number: 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The curator in bankruptcy based on Auctio Pauliana with other claims can request the return of the company's interim dividends in the Commercial Court. However, the Curator can only ask for responsibility for the return of interim dividends to the Director and Commissioner jointly and severally. The obligation of the Directors, whose authority has been taken over by the Curator, is to sue the shareholders in the District Court based on Law Number: 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The problem is, cases in District Court are complicated cases, not simple cases. This research uses normative juridical methods. In the discussion, the Director whose authority has been taken over by the Curator, if the shareholders reject the return of the interim dividend, will file a lawsuit in the District Court. However, a case at the District Court will take a long time, therefore the dividend return case must be submitted to the Commercial Court. In conclusion, to make it easier for the Director to file a lawsuit for the return of interim shareholder dividends in the Commercial Court, the Curator will provide a power of attorney and the case for the return of interim dividends will be made simple.
PEMAKNAAN DAN IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP EX AEQUO ET BONO DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MELALUI BASYARNAS Umam, Khotibul; Nasution, Muhammad Guntur Hamonangan Nasution
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.7303

Abstract

The dispute resolution mechanism in BASYARNAS, an Islamic economics arbitration institution, is based on the principle of ex aequo et bonowhich still raises questions regarding its interpretation and implementation. This research aims to comprehend the meaning, limitations, and implementation of the ex aequo et bono principle in the decisions of BASYARNAS. This study uses a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings show that the interpretation of the ex aequo et bono principle correlates with Sharia principles in terms of rules and principles, prohibition of ultra petita, and arbitrator's capability. Meanwhile, the limitations of the application of ex aequo et bono are closely related to the consensual principle of the parties, primary petitum demands, Sharia principles, pacta sunt servanda, and the principle of good faith. These concepts will be taken into account in reviewing the nullity of a contract and its consequences thereafteer. In addition, the implementation, as seen in the Decision of BASYARNAS Case No. 01/Year 2010/BASYARNAS, shows that fair and propriety assessment of the panel does not solely arise from the phrase ex aequo et bono. The decision also negates the elements of the agreement and the good faith of the parties as a basis for continuing an existing contract.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): Veritas et Justitia Vol 1, No 2 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia More Issue