cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreviewuph@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 14122561     EISSN : 26211939     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Law Review is published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Pelita Harapan and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. Law Review was established in July 2001 and is published triannually in July, November, and March. Law Review provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 226 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK ANAK ATAS PENDIDIKAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 [The Legal Protection of Children's Right to Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic] Cynthia Phillo; Hessa Arteja; M Faiz Rizqi
Law Review Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.2735

Abstract

Children as the forerunners of the successor to the future Indonesia nation make children individuals who become priorities in holding the right to education. The law itself has governed the rights that a child must have, including the right to get a proper education. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the government finds it difficult in providing legal protection for a proper education rights of children. By using normative legal method, this paper will explain how the legal protection of children’s rights  over education during the COVID-19 Pandemic that’s happening and how the government’s role is in fulfilling childern’s rights in getitng an education.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Anak sebagai cikal bakal penerus bangsa Indonesia menjadikan anak sebagai individu yang menjadi prioritas dalam memegang hak pendidikan. Undang-undang sendiri telah mengatur tentang hak-hak yang harus diteirma oleh anak, termasuk hak dalam pendidikan. Karena Pandemi COVID-19 yang terjadi, menambah kesulitan bagi pemerintah untuk memberikan perilundungan hukum bagi hak anak atas pendidikan. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, tulisan ini akan menjelaskan bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak anak atas pendidikan pada masa Pandemi COVID-19 yang sedang tejadi dan bagaimana peran negara dalam memenuhi hak anak dalam mendapat pendidikan.
PELAKSANAAN HAK EKSEKUSI KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM KEPAILITAN [Implementation of the Right to Execute by Separated Creditors in Bankruptcy] Grace Iskandar Darmawan
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2481

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to understand and analyze the implementation of the right to execute of the separated creditors from the perspective of Law on Bankruptcy, and the implementation of the time limitation set by Article 59 paragraph (1) dan (2) Law on Bankruptcy. It was normative legal study, using primary, secondary and tertiary materials. The data were collected by documentation method using the document study tools and was analyzed qualitatively. The study has found that the collateral rights on the property hold by the separated creditors, are considered as bankruptcy estate at the time of the bankruptcy declaration, so the execution implementation is affected by the process of bankruptcy. The separated creditors must have started to implement the rights within no more than two months since the commencement of insolvency. If the execution has been completed, the separated creditors are required to provide the accountability report to curator. If there is remaining after the sale, the separated creditors should hand it over to the curator to be distributed to other creditors. The beginning and completion of the right to execute are firmly stipulated in the Law on Bankruptcy. However, the action of the separated creditors which could be considered as stop or no longer carry out the rights, do not have a definite measurement. In conclusion, 1) the collateral rights on the property hold by the separated creditors, are considered as bankruptcy estate at the time of the bankruptcy declaration, so the execution must be implemented with regard to the Law on Bankruptcy, and 2) the time limitation of the right to execute is not relevant to be set since there is a mechanism to protect the right of concurrent and preferred creditors though the bankruptcy process has been ended.Keywords: The Right to Execute, Separated Creditors, Bankruptcy AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis dalam perspektif UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, serta penerapan pembatasan jangka waktu pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis berdasarkan Pasal 59 ayat (1) dan (2) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Data dikumpulkan studi kepustakaan, yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa objek jaminan kebedaan yang dipegang oleh kreditor separatis merupakan bagian dari harta pailit terhitung sejak putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan, sehingga pelaksanaan eksekusinya tidak tak terpengaruh proses kepailitan. Kreditor separatis harus sudah mulai dilaksanakan dalam waktu dua bulan sejak insolvensi. Apabila eksekusi telah selesai, maka kreditor separatis wajib memberikan laporan pertanggungjawaban kepada kurator. Jika terdapat sisa hasil penjualan objek jaminan kebendaan, maka bagian tersebut harus diserahkan kepada kurator untuk dibagikan kepada kreditor lainnya. Penentuan mulainya dan selesainya hak eksekusi kreditor separatis diatur secara tegas dalam UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, namun kapan kreditor separatis dianggap berhenti atau tidak lagi melaksanakan haknya, belum memiliki tolok ukur yang pasti. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah: 1) terhitung sejak putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan, seluruh harta kekayaan debitor termasuk objek jaminan kebendaan yang telah diagunkan secara otomatis menjadi harta pailit, sehingga pelaksanaan eksekusinya wajib dilaksanakan dengan mengindahkan UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, dan 2) pembatasan jangka waktu pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis tidak relevan untuk diatur mengingat sudah ada perlindungan terkait pelunasan piutang bagi kreditor preferen dan kreditor konkuren meskipun kepailitan telah berakhir.Kata kunci: Hak Eksekusi, Kreditor Separatis, Kepailitan
PELINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI DI INDONESIA: IUS CONSTITUTUM DAN IUS CONSTITUENDUM Glenn Wijaya
Law Review Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v19i3.2510

Abstract

AbstractCases of leakage and misuse of personal data continue to increase in Indonesia along with the increasing activity of the digital economy, especially in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the existing laws and regulations, or what is called as the ius constitutum relating to the protection of personal data are still sectoral in nature so that they are not centralized and there are no regulations at the level of law, so that criminal sanctions are not maximally applied to criminals in this sector. Now, the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) is drafting a Personal Data Protection Bill (“PDP Bill”), which in general follows the standards set out in the GDPR, which in the near future is expected to become an ius constitutum that can solve problems related to the protection of personal data in Indonesia. In this article, the author will discuss what are the shortcomings of the existing ius constitutum and also discuss new things and criticisms of the provisions in the ius constituendum, namely the PDP Bill. The research method used by the author is normative legal research by examining, primarily, the existing laws and regulations in Indonesia relating to the protection of personal data along with the PDP Bill. The author then also provides several recommendations to the Government, Electronic System Administrators, and also the general public regarding the development of the PDP Bill and the status quo of personal data protection in Indonesia. Keywords: Personal Data Protection, Ius Constitutum, Ius Constituendum AbstrakKasus kebocoran dan penyalahgunaan data pribadi terus meningkat di Indonesia seiring dengan meningkatnya aktivitas ekonomi digital, terlebih di era pandemi COVID-19. Namun, peraturan perundang-undangan yang sudah ada, atau disebut ius constitutum terkait pelindungan data pribadi masih bersifat sektoral sehingga belum terpusat dan tidak ada pengaturan di setingkat undang-undang, sehingga sanksi pidana pun masih belum maksimal diterapkan kepada para pelaku kejahatan di sektor ini. Kini, DPR sedang menyusun RUU Perlindungan Data Pribadi (“RUU PDP”), yang secara garis besar mengikuti standar yang ada dalam GDPR, yang dalam waktu dekat diharapkan akan menjadi ius constitutum yang dapat mengatasi permasalahan terkait pelindungan data pribadi di Indonesia. Dalam artikel ini, Penulis akan membahas apa saja yang menjadi kekurangan dari ius constitutum yang ada dan juga mengupas apa saja hal-hal baru beserta kritik terhadap pengaturan dalam ius constituendum, yaitu RUU PDP. Metode penelitian yang dipakai Penulis adalah penelitian hukum secara normatif dengan mengkaji, terutama, peraturan perundang-undangan yang sudah berlaku di Indonesia terkait dengan pelindungan data pribadi beserta draf RUU PDP. Penulis lalu juga memberikan beberapa rekomendasi kepada Pemerintah, Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik, dan juga masyarakat umum terkait perkembangan RUU PDP dan status quo pelindungan data pribadi di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Pelindungan Data Pribadi, Ius Constitutum, Ius Constituendum
PERAN INSPEKTORAT DALAM SISTEM PENGAWASAN DAN PENGENDALIAN PENGELOLAAN DANA DESA: STUDI INSPEKTORAT KABUPATEN GORONTALO UTARA [The Role of the Inspectorate in the Supervision and Control Systems of Village Funds: A Study of the Inspectorate of the North Gorontalo Regency] Irwan Polidu; Arifin Tumuhulawa; Ramdhan Kasim; Yusrianto Kadir; Roy Marthen Moonti
Law Review Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i2.2682

Abstract

This research aims at investigating the the effectiveness of the role of the Inspectorate Role of the in the Supervision and Control Systems of Village Funds Management on Inspectorate of Gorontalo Utara Regency, factors which hampers the role of the Inspectorate Role of the in the Supervision and Control Systems of Village Funds Management, and what efforts which can be done to strengthen the role of the inspectorate in the supervision and control systems of village fund management. This research was conduct in the regional organization of North Gorontalo regency, where this research is an empirical juridical research, using interview methods and data analysis using descriptive techniques. The findings reveal thatthat the implementation of the effectiveness of the role of the Inspectorate Role of the in the Supervision and Control Systems of Village Funds Management on Inspectorate of Gorontalo Utara regency is already done based on SOPs and statutory provisions, but stil not effective. The factors which the effectiveness of the role of the Inspectorate Role of the in the Supervision and Control Systems of Village Funds Management On Inspectorate of Gorontalo Utara Regency was less of human resources, inadequate infrastructure, and efforts to strengthening the APIP and SPIP, in making good governance. The recommendation in this research are, the key to realizing good governance is by creating quality human resources, fulfilling adequate facilities and infrastructure, strong legislation and sense of self-awareness for the executors of government administration activities in Gorontalo Utara regency.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas Peran Inspektorat dalam Sistem Pengawasan dan Sistem Pengendalian terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi Inspektorat Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara), dan mengetahui faktor-faktor apa yang menghambat peran inspektorat dalam sistem pengawasan dan sistem pengendalian terhadap pengelolaan dana desa, serta upaya-upaya apa yang dapat dilakukan dalam memperkuat peran inspektorat dalam sistem pengawasan dan sistem pengendalian terhadap pengelolaan dana desa. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di organisasi perangkat daerah Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara, di mana penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris, dengan menggunakan metode wawancara dan analisis data menggunakan teknik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan efektivitas peran inspektorat dalam sistem pengawasan dan sistem pengendalian terhadap pengelolaan dana desa Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara sudah dilaksanakan berdasarkan SOP dan ketentuan perundang-undangan, tetapi belum efektif. Faktor yang menghambat efektivitas peran inspektorat dalam sistem pengawasan dan sistem pengendalian terhadap pengelolaan dana desa Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara, yaitu kurangnya sumber daya manusia dan sarana prasarana yang kurang memadai, upaya yang dilakukan melalui penguatan APIP dan SPIP, dalam mewujudkan pemerintahan yang baik (good governance). Kontribusi yang dapat dipetik dalam penelitian ini adalah, kunci mewujudkan pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) dengan cara menciptakan sumber daya manusia yang bermutu, memenuhi sarana dan prasarana yang memadai, penguatan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta menumbuhkan rasa kesadaran diri bagi para pelaksana kegiatan penyelenggaraan pemerintah daerah di Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA MELALUI HARMONISASI PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT DAN PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT [Competition Law Enforcement in Indonesia through the Harmonization of Public Enforcement and Private Enforcement] Carissa Christybella Wijaya; Micheline Hendrito; Monica Patricia Aripratama; Udin Silalahi
Law Review Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.2963

Abstract

KPPU (Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition) as the authority for business competition law in Indonesia still has many shortcomings. This is related to the KPPU’s failure to accommodate compensation payments to victims of business competition law violations. This can happen because Indonesia has only provided room for public enforcement to be implemented. In public enforcement, compensation payments are not paid directly to consumers who have suffered losses but instead come into the state treasury. This article discusses the compensation mechanism that should be received by victims of competition law violations through private enforcement, which is a mechanism for enforcing competition law by using the regulations of the Competition Law in civil courts to demand compensation. This research was conducted with the aim of creating a healthy business competition climate through the enforcement of private enforcement in Indonesia by implementing harmonization between public and private enforcement. In this article, the Authors used normative juridical method and refers to statutory and comparative approaches. The research method used is juridical normative with a statute approach, a case approach, and a comparative legal approach. The results and conclusions of this study are that the KPPU's failure to provide compensation for compensation to victims of business competition violations encourages the need to implement private enforcement in Indonesia which is harmonized with the previous mechanism, namely public enforcement.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: KPPU (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha) sebagai lembaga otoritas dalam hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia masih memiliki banyak kekurangan. Salah satunya terkait dengan kegagalan KPPU dalam mengakomodir pembayaran ganti rugi kepada korban pelanggaran hukum persaingan usaha. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena selama ini Indonesia hanya memberikan ruang bagi public enforcement untuk diterapkan. Dalam public enforcement, pembayaran ganti rugi tidak dibayarkan langsung kepada konsumen yang dirugikan melainkan masuk ke dalam kas negara. Oleh sebab itu, terdapat sebuah urgensi untuk mengalihfungsikan fungsi kompensasi dari KPPU kepada pelaku usaha melalui private enforcement, yaitu sebuah mekanisme penegakan hukum persaingan usaha dengan menggunakan regulasi UU Persaingan Usaha di peradilan perdata untuk menuntut ganti rugi. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk menciptakan iklim persaingan usaha yang sehat melalui ditegakkannya private enforcement di Indonesia dengan menerapkan harmonisasi antara public enforcement dan private enforcement. Metode penelitian yang digunakan, yaitu yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan komparatif hukum. Hasil dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah kegagalan KPPU dalam memberikan kompensasi ganti rugi kepada korban pelanggaran persaingan usaha mendorong perlu diterapkannya private enforcement di Indonesia yang diharmonisasikan dengan mekanisme sebelumnya, yaitu public enforcement.
PANCASILA SEBAGAI ETIKA POLITIK DAN HUKUM NEGARA INDONESIA [Pancasila as Political Ethics and Indonesian State Law] Thomas Tokan Pureklolon
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2549

Abstract

AbstractPancasila is not only a source of derivation of legislation, but also a source of morality, especially in relation to the legitimacy of power, law and various policies in the implementation and administration of the state. The existence of the first precept of "The Almighty Godhead", and the second precept of "Fair and Civilized Humanity" is the source of moral values for national and state life. The state of Indonesia which is based on the first precept of "The Almighty God" is not a "theocracy" state which bases state power and state administration on religious legitimacy. The power of the head of state is not absolute based on religious legitimacy but based on legal legitimacy and democratic legitimacy. Therefore, the principle of the principle of "Godhead of the Almighty" has more to do with moral legitimacy. This is what distinguishes the Almighty God from theocracy. The writing method in this journal is a qualitative method, with an interdisciplinary approach. Although in the Indonesian state it is not based on religious legitimacy, morally the life of the state must be in accordance with the values derived from God, especially the law and morals in the life of the state.Keywords: Political Ethics, Law, Pancasila AbstrakPancasila tidak hanya merupakan sumber derivasi peraturan perundang-undangan, melainkan juga merupakan sumber moralitas, terutama dalam hubungannya dengan legitimasi kekuasaan, hukum serta berbagai kebijakan dalam pelaksanaan dan penyelenggaraan negara. Eksistensi sila pertama “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa”, serta sila kedua “Kemanusiaan yang Adil dan Beradab” merupakan sumber atas nilai-nilai moral bagi kehidupan kebangsaan dan kenegaraan. Negara Indonesia yang berdasarkan sila pertama “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” bukanlah negara “teokrasi” yang mendasarkan kekuasaan negara dan penyelenggaraan negara pada legitimasi religius. Kekuasaan kepala negara tidak bersifat mutlak berdasarkan legitimasi religius, melainkan berdasarkan legitimasi hukum serta legitimasi demokrasi. Oleh karena itu asas sila “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” lebih berkaitan dengan legitimasi moral. Hal inilah yang membedakan negara yang Berketuhanan Yang Maha Esa dengan negara teokrasi. Metode penulisan dalam jurnal ini adalah metode kualitatif, dengan pendekatan interdisipliner. Walaupun dalam negara Indonesia tidak mendasarkan pada legitimasi religius, secara moralitas kehidupan negara harus sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang berasal dari Tuhan, terutama hukum serta moral dalam kehidupan negara.Kata kunci: Etika Politik, Hukum, Pancasila
PENERAPAN PEMBATASAN SOSIAL BERSKALA BESAR (PSBB) AKIBAT PANDEMI CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SEBAGAI FORCE MAJEURE DALAM KONTRAK [Implementation of Large-scale Social Restrictions due to Coronavirus Disease-19 (Covid-19) Pandemic as Force Majeure in Contract] Velliana Tanaya; Jessica Angeline Zai
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3805

Abstract

A contract is an agreement made by the parties in written form. An agreement is a binding agreement between two or more people. This incident resulted in a legal relationship between the parties, which in the agreement included the rights and obligations of each party. In a contract, there is always a force majeure clause, the arrangements are made to protect the debtor when carrying out his obligations there has been an unexpected event beyond his fault. Since the end of 2019 until now the spread of Covid-19 has been very widespread and has had an impact on slowing economic growth, resulting in the fulfillment of contract achievements executed by the parties. This article was made to examine the classification of force majeure in contracts in connection with the widespread spread of Covid-19 which resulted in the contract relationship not going well, but it was not automatically used as an excuse to cancel a contract. The research method used is normative legal research with a legal and conceptual approach. The result of the research is that the force majeure clause can be an attempt to restructure or change the contents of the agreement while taking into account the agreement of the parties through the negotiation process. The concept of force majeure in the context of non-natural disasters as regulated in Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020, which is the discharge of responsibility and the release of fulfillment of one party's achievements for a while or is called relative force majeure. The parties' discretion is needed to carry out business contract negotiations such as rearranging the fulfillment of achievements as stated in the contract.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Sebuah perjanjian adalah persetujuan yang dibuat oleh para pihak dalam bentuk tertulis. Perjanjian tersebut kemudian mengikat dua pihak atau lebih. Hal ini menimbulkan hubungan hukum di antara para pihak, di mana di dalamnya terdapat hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak. Dalam sebuah perjanjian akan selalu ada klausul force majeure, yang ditujukan utnuk melindungi debitur jika pada saat melaksanakan kewajibannya terdapat kejadian di luar kesalahannya. Sejak akhir tahun 2019 hingga sekarang, penyebaran Covid-19 semakin meluas dan berdampak pada kelesuan pertumbuhan ekonomi, dan pemenuhan kewajiban dalam perjanjian oleh para pihak. Artikel ini bertujuan meneliti klasifikasi force majeure dalam kontrak dalam hubungannya dengan penyebaran Covid-19 yang berdampak pada hubungan kontraktual menjadi tidak lancar, namun tidak otomatis membatalkan perjanjian tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ialah klausul force majeure dapat menjadi upaya untuk merestuktur atau mengubah isi perjanjian dengan tetap memperhitungkan kesepakatan para pihak melalui proses negosiasi. Konsep force majeure dalam konteks bencana non-alam yang diatur dalam Keputusan Presiden No. 12 Tahun 2020, melepaskan tanggung jawab pemenuhan perjanjian untuk sementara waktu, atau yang disebut dengan force majeure relatif. Keputusan para pihak dibutuhkan dalam bernegosiasi untuk melangsungkan pemenuhan prestasi yang diatur dalam perjanjian.
KEWAJIBAN NOTIFIKASI PENGAMBILALIHAN ASET PERUSAHAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA [Mandatory Notification for Company's Asset Acquisition in the Perspective of Competition Law] Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3263

Abstract

The Indonesian business competition supervisory agency, KPPU, issued KPPU Regulation No. 3/2019 which regulates the control system for merger, consolidation, and acquisition of company shares (P3S). This regulation was established to address the development of supervisory issues, including the expansion of the term expropriation, which includes the takeover of assets. Although it is not explicitly regulated in Law no. 5/1999 and PP No. 57/2010, the facts on the ground show that the enactment of the KPPU Regulation has been complied with by business actors within a period of more than a year since its stipulation. This article presents two research issues regarding the reasons behind KPPU's issuance of the regulation, and the legal implications of the enactment of new regulations for business actors and practitioners. This article is the result of normative research supported by secondary data in the form of legal regulations in the field of competition, comparisons with several countries, examples of the takeover of Uber assets by Grab, and also using interviews with two KPPU sources. The data was then analyzed qualitatively and concluded by using a deductive method. The conclusion drawn is that the purpose of KPPU in drafting the regulation is to prevent monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, by conducting benchmarking which results in the finding that the takeover of assets can also potentially give a chance to a concentrated market and anti-competitive behavior. The formation of the regulation also has juridical and sociological implications, namely fulfilling the legal aspect and being obeyed by business actors by notifying the takeover of shares and assets.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Lembaga pengawas persaingan, KPPU, menerbitkan Perkom No. 3/2019 yang mengatur tentang sistem pengendalian atas penggabungan, peleburan dan pengambilalihan saham perusahaan (P3S). Peraturan ini dibentuk untuk menjawab perkembangan isu pengawasan, antara lain perluasan istilah pengambilalihan, yang meliputi pula pengambilalihan aset. Meskipun tidak diatur secara eksplisit dalam UU No. 5/1999 maupun PP No. 57/2010, fakta di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa pengundangan Peraturan KPPU tersebut telah dipatuhi oleh pelaku usaha dalam kurun waktu lebih dari setahun sejak ditetapkannya. Artikel ini mengemukakan dua masalah penelitian tentang hal-hal yang melatarbelakangi KPPU menerbitkan peraturan tersebut, dan implikasi hukum pemberlakukan peraturan baru terhadap pelaku usaha maupun praktisi. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian normatif yang didukung data sekunder berupa peraturan hukum di bidang persaingan, perbandingan dengan beberapa negara, contoh pengambilalihan aset Uber oleh Grab, dan juga menggunakan wawancara dengan dua narasumber KPPU. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dan menyimpulkannya dengan metode deduktif. Kesimpulan yang dihasilkan adalah bahwa maksud KPPU menyusun peraturan tersebut adalah melakukan pencegahan terjadinya praktik monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat, dengan melakukan benchmarking yang menghasilkan temuan, bahwa pengambilalihan aset juga dapat berpotensi melahirkan pasar yang terkonsentrasi dan perilaku antipersaingan. Pembentukan peraturan tersebut juga berimplikasi secara yuridis maupun sosiologis, yakni memenuhi aspek legalitas dan dipatuhi pelaku usaha dengan melakukan notifikasi pengambilalihan saham maupun aset.
TANGGUNG JAWAB KORPORASI FINTECH LENDING ILEGAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN [Corporate Liability of Illegal Fintech Lending in the Perspective of Consumer Protection Law] Suseno Adi Wibowo; Yeti Sumiyati
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3544

Abstract

The complexity of fintech lending practice has resulted in two problems: first: the regulation of illegal fintech, and second: the corporate liability of illegal fintech lending in terms of consumer protection in the case of PT Vega Data Indonesia. This research uses normative judicial methods by analyzing the laws related to the practice of fintech lending and aimed at illegal fintech lending corporates. The research has found that: first, rules and regulations on illegal fintech lending corporate cannot be found in any Indonesian laws. There has been no sufficient rules and regulations to settle illegal fintech lending problems and this disadvantages consumers. Therefore, special regulations on illegal fintech lending corporation must be set up immediately. Second, both civil and penal liability were imposed on illegal fintech lending corporate PT Vega Data Indonesia through systematic legal interpretation method based on corporate criminal liability doctrine. It is expected that this research may contribute to the efforts to handle illegal fintech lending cases through corporate liability in order to support the attempts of legal protection for customers.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Kompleksitas penyelenggaraan fintech lending menimbulkan permasalahan, yaitu: pertama, pengaturan korporasi fintech lending ilegal dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Kedua, tanggung jawab korporasi fintech lending ilegal dalam perspektif perlindungan konsumen pada kasus PT Vega Data Indonesia. Metode penelitian secara yuridis normatif dengan menganalisa peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan penyelenggaraan fintech lending serta dihubungkan dengan kasus korporasi fintech lending ilegal. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan: pertama, dalam hukum positif Indonesia tidak ada yang mengatur mengenai korporasi fintech lending ilegal. Aturan-aturan terkait fintech lending belum cukup mengakomodir dan menyelesaikan permasalahan penyelenggaraan fintech lending ilegal yang mengakibatkan lemahnya perlindungan terhadap konsumen, sehingga perlu pembentukan undang-undang secara khusus yang mengatur korporasi fintech lending ilegal. Kedua, selain tanggung jawab secara perdata, tanggung jawab pidana juga dibebankan kepada korporasi fintech lending ilegal PT Vega Data Indonesia melalui metode penafsiran hukum sistematis dan mengacu pada doktrin pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan memberi kontribusi terhadap upaya penanganan perkara fintech lending ilegal melalui penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi agar dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum yang berkeadilan bagi konsumen.
KUALIFIKASI DAN IMPLIKASI MENGHALANGI PROSES PERADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI [Qualifications and Implications of the Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Judicial Process] Ade Mahmud
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3323

Abstract

The rule of law of the criminal obstruction of the judicial process raises the debate because it has the flexibility and is applied selectively by law enforcers resulting in injustice. This study aims to determine the qualifications of criminal acts of corruption that hinder the judicial process and analyze the implications of the modus operandi of corruption that hinders the judicial process. This research method using the normative law approach because studying norm, principles relating to Obstruction of Justice offense. The qualification of the offense of Obstruction of Justice may be limited by the method of grammatical interpretation, which implies the word (a) “prevent” is interpreted as restraining, prohibiting the meaning of acts aimed at corruption criminal proceedings unfulfilled; (b) “blocking” interpreted to obstruct, interfere, disturbing, meaning the act aimed to prevent the judicial process from being obstructed and whether the objective is achieved or not is a requirement; and (c) “thwarted” is interpreted as unsuccessful/failed means that the judicial process against corrupt perpetrators is unsuccessful and the business succeeds. The modus operandi of the Obstruction of Justice offense through the power of the community, legal counsel, and political channels implies (a) inhibition of law enforcement efforts; (b) difficulties in the development of cases; and (c) causes high-cost law enforcement.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Aturan hukum tindak pidana menghalangi proses peradilan (Obstruction of Justice) menimbulkan perdebatan karena memiliki kelenturan dan diterapkan secara tebang pilih oleh penegak hukum, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan kualifikasi tindak pidana korupsi yang menghalangi proses peradilan dan menganalisis implikasi modus operandi tindak pidana korupsi yang menghalangi proses peradilan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif karena mengkaji kaidah, asas-asas yang berkaitan dengan delik Obstruction of Justice. Kualifikasi delik Obstruction of Justice dapat dibatasi dengan metode penafsiran gramatikal yang memaknai kata (a) “mencegah” dimaknai sebagai menahan, melarang artinya perbuatan yang bertujuan agar proses peradilan tindak pidana korupsi tidak terlaksana; (b) “merintangi” dimaknai menghalang-halangi, mengganggu, mengusik, artinya perbuatan yang ditujukan agar proses peradilan terhalang dan apakah tujuan tersebut tercapai atau tidak bukan merupakan syarat; dan (c) “menggagalkan” dimaknai tidak berhasil/menjadi gagal, artinya proses peradilan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi tidak berhasil dan usaha tersebut berhasil. Modus operandi delik Obstruction of Justice melalui kekuatan masyarakat, kuasa hukum dan jalur politik yang berimplikasi pada (a) terhambatnya upaya penegakan hukum; (b) kesulitan dalam pengembangan kasus; dan (c) mengakibatkan penegakan hukum berbiaya tinggi.

Page 15 of 23 | Total Record : 226

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2001 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025) Volume 24 Issue 2 (November 2024) Volume 24 Issue 1 (March 2024) Volume 23 Issue 2 (November 2023) Volume 23 No. 2 (November 2023) Volume XXII, No. 3 - March 2023 Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023 Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022 Volume XXII, No. 2 - November 2022 Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021 Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021 Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020 Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020 Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020 Volume XVIII, No. 3 - March 2019 Volume XIX, No. 2 - November 2019 Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019 Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 2 - November 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 1 - July 2018 Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 3 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) Vol 4, No 3 (2005) Vol 4, No 2 (2004) Vol 4, No 1 (2004) Vol 3, No 3 (2004) Vol 2, No 3 (2003) Vol 2, No 2 (2002) Vol 2, No 1 (2002) Vol 1, No 3 (2002) Vol 1, No 2 (2001) Vol 1, No 1 (2001) More Issue