cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 983 Documents
 73   74   75   76   77 
Eksistensi Viktimologi dalam Penyelesaian Ganti Rugi sri suhartati astoto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss18.art15

Abstract

Victim those person who are thereatenedor destroyed by an act or ommision of another (man, structure, organization or institusion) and consequently, a punishible act (not only criminal act but also other punishable acts as misdemeanors, economic offeneses, non fuifiiment or work duties) or from an accident (accident at work, at home, traffic accident, etc). Suffering may becaused by anbotherman (man-made victim) not her structure wherepeople are also invoied.
Konsep Meminta Maaf Sebagai Hukuman Dalam Perkara Pidana Yusi Amdani; Liza Agnesta Krisna
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art4

Abstract

Criminalization  is  an  act  against  a  criminal,  but  many  criminal  cases  are  completed  as  a  result  of  theimplementation  of  peace  by  apologizing.  This  research  focuses  on  the  following  problems:  first,  how  the reconceptualization of apologizing as the part of the punishment is reviewed in accordance with the positive law and Islamic law, and second, how the realization of the concept of apoligizing as a punishment in a criminal case is. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that, first, the concept of apologizing is known in criminal law and Islamic law. Regarding the virtue of Islamic law, the concept of apologizing is able to eliminate the criminal acts; thus, the value of the apologizing concept in Islamic law can be applied in criminal law. In national criminal law, the concept of apologizing is implicitly accommodated in the peace process, which in certain criminal acts, especially in the category of minor criminal  offenses,  is  permitted  to  make  peace.  Second,  some  cases  that  can  be  given  peace  are  also determined for certain cases such as accidents in traffic, crimes committed by underage child, and other acts constituting the minor crimes by the category of complaint offenses.
Disfungsi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Indonesia Lego Karjoko; Josephine Santosa; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art5

Abstract

This study is aimed to analyse various Indonesian national regulations that govern about the implementation of social and environmental responsibility (SER) in the actualisation of its objectives for the equitable distribution of natural resources in Indonesia. The analysis is undertaken in terms of the phrases used, the subjects who are obliged to perform SER, the funding sources, the allocation of the funds, the instructed programs, as well as the course of the SER itself. By using normative legal research, this study concludes that the existing regulations have not consistently governed the implementation and standards of SER as expected by the Government. Additionally, according to Fuller, this kind of multi-interpretation will result in the malfunction of legal products, and ultimately frustrate the achievement of the SER objectives. On this matter, it is proposed that the Indonesian government needs to formulate a regulation that comprehensively and specifically govern about the SER to become a guideline for all the existing stakeholders.
Euthanasia dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Aroma Elmina Martha
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Euthanasia adalah perbuatan untuk mengakhiiri hidup seorang pasien, yang menurut ilmu kedokteran dan pengalaman tidak akan mungkin sembuh lagi. Tapi dalam ajaran agama Islam yang menghargai kehidupan manusia bagaimana kedudukan euthanasia itu sendiri. Apakah Islam akan membiarkan atau melarangnya secara tegas; dan tulisan ini akan memberikan sebuah pembahasan.
Mencermati Isi dan Visi Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Anti Monopoli Badriyah Rifa'i
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Monopoly is a problem of business and trade in the world. The effect of monopoly causes: the price determination with an inclination to produce ineffecien source alloca tion and to make the higherpace than the normal one. How to manage arrangement and behaviour for market players orderly, justice and profitable in order that continous busi ness activities can develop. This article is going to accurafe vision and mission ofantimonopolyrules number 5in the year of1999.
Kepailitan Terhadap Anak Perusahaan dalam Holding Company Badan Usaha Milik Negara Chintya Dewi Restyana S; Nikmah Mentari; Sri Eka Wulandari
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art7

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a risk that can occur to both a subsidiary or a parent company in a state-owned holding enterprise. It is not a trivial matter for the state-owned holding company if its subsidiary suffers from bankruptcy, considering the position of the subsidiary and the parent company are separated, yet in some cases, the subsidiary is instead treated equally as a state-owned enterprise. The first issue would be, what is the legal relationship between the parent company and its subsidiary in the state-owned holding company; and second, how is the responsibility towards the bankrupted subsidiary. This research uses the normative juridical method. In which, it is concluded that first, as separate and independent entities, both the parent company and its subsidiary are restricted by the nature of separate legal entities and limited liabilities in carrying out their respective activities, even though they are bound under the same holding company. Second, the bankruptcy of a subsidiary of the state-owned holding company can occur and the responsibility of the parent company is limited to the shares that it owns, and if it is discovered that in its financial management, the parent company contribute in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary, then the responsibilities can expand.
Politik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Tentang Kebebasan Beragama Pasca Orde Baru Suparman Marzuki
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art1

Abstract

This research aims to uncoven and describe: first, the policy of state regulation in order to fulfil the right to religious freedom. Second, the concrete actions of state in taking legal steps against violations of religious freedom. This research utilizes a normative juridical method where data is collected from documents. The outcome of this research concludes that: first, Political Human Rights on the freedom of religion in Indonesia following the new order at the level of fulfilment in the form of legislation is relatively more advance and protective. Second, the strengthening of Political Human Rights at the regulatory level is not followed by changes in the legislation below it such as PNPS Law No.1 of 1965 and Article 156(a) of the Indonesian Criminal Code regarding blasphemy. Therefore, it can be concluded that Political Human Rights in Indonesia, particularly relating to the freedom of religion is a paradox. On one side it supports the products of laws and regulation which further strengthen the rights to the freedom of religion and beliefs, but on the other hand, realistically, the State actually fails to protect various forms of violations of the right to the freedom of religion and beliefs. This research aims to uncoven and describe: first, the policy of state regulation in order to fulfil the right to religious freedom. Second, the concrete actions of state in taking legal steps against violations of religious freedom. This research utilizes a normative juridical method where data is collected from documents. The outcome of this research concludes that: first, Political Human Rights on the freedom of religion in Indonesia following the new order at the level of fulfilment in the form of legislation is relatively more advance and protective. Second, the strengthening of Political Human Rights at the regulatory level is not followed by changes in the legislation below it such as PNPS Law No.1 of 1965 and Article 156(a) of the Indonesian Criminal Code regarding blasphemy. Therefore, it can be concluded that Political Human Rights in Indonesia, particularly relating to the freedom of religion is a paradox. On one side it supports the products of laws and regulation which further strengthen the rights to the freedom of religion and beliefs, but on the other hand, realistically, the State actually fails to protect various forms of violations of the right to the freedom of religion and beliefs.
Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum Ainun Najib
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art7

Abstract

This study examines two main problems which are, firstly, to describe the juridical construction of granting the authority to execute and to annul an sharia arbitration award in the perspective of legal policy. Secondly, to provide the better alternatives for the development of national law in the future. This is a normative legal research, which studies the written legal sources to be analyzed by using both the statutory and conceptual approach. Through this study, it was concluded that first, legally, the granting of authority to carry out the execution and the annulment of the sharia arbitration award is still affected with dualism, which could lead to legal uncertainty. Second, it is necessary to synchronize the legislation regarding the authority to execute and to annul the sharia arbitration award to ensure the legal certainty, so that it will not conflict with one another. In the future, the execution and annulment of sharia arbitration should be placed in the Islamic Court, as they both apply the sharia principles.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Lembaga Adat (Sarak Opat) Achmad Surya; Suhartini Suhartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art5

Abstract

Thisstudy aims firstly to observe the effectiveness of minor criminal acts settlement through Sarak Opat in Central Aceh District. Second, it is to find out what constraints being faced by Sarak Opat are in settling the minor criminal acts in Central Aceh District. The method used in this study was empirical legal research or sociological legal research. The types and sources of data used in this study included library research and field  research.  The  data  analysis  technique  was  conducted  through  a  descriptivequalitative  method  by analysing the data obtained from the primary and secondary data sources. This was then continued with a thorough discussion and a conclusion, based on the discussion, was drawn in response to the problems studied. The results of the research showed first that it was still ineffective now that the people becoming the victims of criminal acts more believed in the police as the law enforcement officials rather than the settlement through the traditional institution of Sarak Opat. Second,the constraints faced by Sarak Opat in the settlement of minor crimes in Central Aceh Regency, included 1). The lack of understanding of the traditional institution of  Sarak  Opat;  2).  Customary  sanctions  not  giving  any  deterrent  effects  on  the  perpetrator;  3).  No documented  dispute  settlement  by  traditional  institution  Sarak  Opat;  4).  Lack  of  coordination  between traditional institution Sarak Opat and Police Department.
Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi Ibnu Sina Chandranegara
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art1

Abstract

Since the reformation era, the number of laws and regulations has continued to increase. In the period 2000-2017 there have been 35,901 regulations. The highest number is Regional Regulation (Perda), which has reached 14,225 Perda. Followed by Ministerial Regulation (Permen) as many as 11,873 regulations. While on the third place, sit 3,163 non-ministerial regulations. This research has the main objective of finding the best alternative policy to simplify and rearrange the regulations as an agenda for the law reform. This is a normative juridical research. The data used are secondary data that includes primary and secondary legal material in the form of relevant laws and regulations used as samples as examples of regulations that are out of sync, incoherent, and potentially overlapping. The results concluded that the arrangement of the regulations can be carried out on three sectors, which are the simplification of regulations, reconceptualization in order to understand the regulatory requirements, and creating synergies amongst the the law-makers.

Page 75 of 99 | Total Record : 983

 73   74   75   76   77 

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 1: JANUARI 2026 Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue