cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 983 Documents
 74   75   76   77   78 
Hukum Internasional dalam Konflik Kepentingan Ekonomi Negara Berkembang dan Negara Maju hikmahanto yuwono
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss18.art8

Abstract

According todeveloping states perspective, international law'as It stand is essentially the product of Western States and accommodating the developed countries better than the developing ones. This attitudes toward international law could be analyzed with some theories, e.g. Critical Legal Studies. The essence of this theory explains the political power beyond the law making. To strengthen developing countriesin reconstructing the international law, the education in law discipline should prepare many skilled lawyers,legislators, lobbyist etc from the third world.
Tanggung Jawab TNCs Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Lingkungan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional Dan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional Sri Wartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art8

Abstract

International Human Rights Law and International Environmental Law is not able to protect efectively the violation of human rights and the righ to fenviromental protection exercised by TNCs, because TNCs is not subject of international law. The establishing and exercising soft-law such as code of conduct, global compactand OECD guide lines is expected to change the attude of TNCs In the future.
Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Cipi Perdana
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss4.art8

Abstract

The issues taken in this research include first, the base of policy justification for the criminal sanction of terrorism; second, the formulation of the accurate criminal sanction of terrorism in the draft of positive law in Indonesia; Third, the forms of criminal sanction that can be offered as a form of reconstruction of criminalization for the terrorists. This is a juridical-normative research in which the result of the research concluded that: first, the justification in the implementation of sanction for criminal act of terrorism is based upon the philosophical sanction implementation supported by the positivism based upon the determinism and philosophically in line with the values as stated in Pancasila and the values of justice as a purpose of the mono-dualistic teachings in criminal law.  Theoretically, the implementation of criminal sanction is in line with a number of legal theories such as the modern/combination criminalization theory (Vereningings Theorien), Restorative Justice Theory and double Track System theory. Second, regarding the following regulation revision of the terrorism, there is a need of limitation and conditions of the implementation of criminal sanctions in terms of crime and criminal. Third, the form of criminal sanctions can be done in two ways: The normative form through the Brainwashing program and deradicalization program. Whilst, the social form is done by the way of: correlational separation and the establishment of special institution for the implementation of criminal sanction that is an institution under the Attorney General as the executor of court verdict.  
Konsep Perlindungan Tawanan Perang Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan Hukum Islam Hanung Hisbullah Hamda
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol12.iss30.art2

Abstract

Generally, there isno fundamental contradiction between concept of International Humanitaraian Law and Islamic Lawin protecting prisoners of war. But there arestili differences in operationalfield. Both intemational Humanitaraian Law and Islamic Law protect the rights of prisoners ofwar in medical support, their human values and their right to getprotection guarantee. Both concepts also have a mutual dependence, because some West scholars admitted that treatment concept of prisoners of war in Intemational Humanitarian Law adopted from Islamic concept
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Buruh Perempuan Pada Malam Hari mukmin zakie
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss9

Abstract

Both Act No. 13 on the year of 2003 and the Ministery Degree No. 244 on the Year 2003 have already regulated the protection of female workers in the night. Act No. 13 on the Year 2003 emphasizes sanction ifthere Is infrigements.
Perselisihan Perburuhan dan Penyelesaiannya marbun SF
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol1.iss3.art6

Abstract

Mengobarkan pihak pekerja, adalah cara yang paling sering digunakan untuk menyelesaikan konflik dan sengketa perburuhan.Padahal, beberapa cara penyelesaian yang lebih baik sebenarnyabisa dilakukan. Menurut SR Marbun, penyelesaian dengan secarabipartite, tripartite, yang dilakukan oleh arbitrator, mediator,P4D atau P4P, adalah merupakan penyelesaian yang dijiwaisemangat kekeluargaan.
Revisiting the Balkan Crisis: AUn Question; The European Connection and the Us Solution Jackson Nyamuya margoto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss21.art11

Abstract

The more fundamental decision for the States of the international community, however, was whether to make the concessions necessary to create an effective internationalmechanism against the background of States insisting upon preserving the totality of their sovereign prerogatives, if such aview had held sway, no effective international criminal tribunal could have been created.
Menyinergikan Aturan Prudensial Dan Aturan Kepatuhan Syariah Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia Agus Triyanta
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art6

Abstract

Besidesbeing  generally  bound  by  prudential  principles  in  banking  regulations,  Islamic  banking  in Indonesia is also bound by sharia principles. In reality, there are several contradictions between these two  jurisdictions  (conventional  banking  and  Islamic  banking).  This  article  aims  to  discuss  why  the contradictions between these two jurisdictions can occur. Furthermore, how the possibilities are to make harmony or adjustment among the various different elements, so that these two different jurisdictions can synergistically play a role in driving the development of Islamic banking in Indonesia. The research method in this article is normative legal research with a qualitative analysis model. The conclusion of this article showed that the set of regulations related to the prudential principle of banking in two banking models  (conventional  and  sharia)  in  fact  were  the  same.  It  was  because  this  regulation  related  to banking  prudential  was  originally  designed  for  conventional  banking,  and,  when  applied  to  Islamic banking, various adjustments were needed, for example in the collateral case. This article recommends that sharia-based prudential principles should be immediately integrated into the regulation of banking prudential principles in general to prevent any problems arose from the application of Islamic banking.
Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Berlandaskan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Penggunaan Diskresi Muhammad Aziz Zaelani; I Gusti Ketut Ayu Rachmi Handayani; Isharyanto Isharyanto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art2

Abstract

This study aims to answer two problems: first, classifying and describing the antinomy of discretionary regulation in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and secondly, carrying out the construction on AUPB that has been filtered with Pancasila. Antinomy is the root of the conflict between freedom and responsibility. In this paper, antinomy is used as a way of thinking to examine the legality of limiting discretion. This is a doctrinal legal research. The sources information used in the study are primary legal materials (relevant regulations and documents) to be further analysed in a qualitative manner. Conceptual, historical and comparative law approaches are used to help solve problem formulations. The results showed that first, the antinomy that is governed under Law No. 30 of 2014 is irrelevant to the rule of law principles, thus creating confusion in the praxis realm of of the government; Second, the construction of a regulation is needed to formulate AUPB based on Pancasila as the basis for regulating discretion.
Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand Rika Ratna Permata; tasya safiranita safiranita; Biondy Utama
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art1

Abstract

Theuse  of  well-known  brands  without  any  license,  in  practice,  often  intentionally  or  unintentionally occurs that not only leads violations but also confusion for the public. The use of a brand without any license -but  not  creating  any  public  confusion -is referred  to  as  brand  dilution.  This  article  aims  to examine the brand dilution case occurred in Indonesia and Thailand by concerning with two issues: first, to  study  the  case  of  IKEA  vs.  IKEMA  occurred  in  Indonesia  and  the  case  of  STARBUCKS  vs. STARBUNG inThailand including in the brand dilution. Second, to study the protection of well-known brands from brand dilution in Indonesia and Thailand. The research used was normative juridical method by means of the statute approach, case approach, analytical approach and comparative approach. The results of this study indicated that first the case of IKEA vs. IKEMA occurred in Indonesia and the case of STARBUCKS vs. STARBUNG is categorized as the brand dilution in consideration to the brand use that has a similarity to well-known brands. Though it has a different class of goods and/or services, it can  eliminate  the  uniqueness  of  the  famous  brand.  Second,  both  Indonesia  and  Thailand  have  not specifically regulated the brand dilution. Indonesia is only based on the overall protection on equality and/or equality in principle, while Thailand is only based protection on confusion.

Page 76 of 99 | Total Record : 983

 74   75   76   77   78 

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 1: JANUARI 2026 Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue