cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 974 Documents
 94   95   96   97   98 
Paradoks Hukum Rekayasa Sosial Pig Butchering Scam Dalam Investasi Digital Aset Kripto Ashibly, Ashibly
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art4

Abstract

The phenomenon of social engineering in the world of digital crypto asset investment has become an increasingly pressing concern in Indonesia, where investors are often trapped in fraudulent schemes that claim to offer high opportunities with low risk. The Pig Butchering Scam is one form of fraud that is currently occurring. The purpose of this study is to analyze the pig butchering scheme through the function of law as a social engineering tool designed to form policies to create new conditions. The research method used is Normative Legal Research, using a conceptual approach. Data sources include primary legal materials consisting of laws and regulations related to the research and secondary legal materials consisting of law books and so on. Data collection was carried out through a study of legal norms, legal regulations, and the legal system in general, as well as qualitative data analysis techniques, with a focus on interpretation. The research findings indicate that the legal paradox of the pig butchering scam social engineering in digital crypto asset investment in Indonesia, when faced with cross-border legal regulations, is not yet supported by a strong international framework. Mutual legal assistance (MLA) can be a solution, but in practice, it also has weaknesses, such as Indonesia's limitations in bilateral agreements. In conclusion, the government is obliged to cooperate and establish regulations bilaterally and multilaterally to protect the interests of its citizens from cybercrime. With international regulations, participating countries can align uniform legal standards and provide global protection, particularly in the case of crypto-asset investment crimes.
Perspektif Ulama Hadis Dan Fikih Terhadap Hadis Dhaif: Analisis Hadis Dhaif Dalam Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia Tsalis, Khodijah Nur; Mujib, Abdul; Bariki, Yusril; Tohir, Abdul Illah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art1

Abstract

This study examines the standards and provisions of fuqaha and muhaddisun in the use of daif hadith as a legal basis, as well as its application in the fatwa of the DSN-MUI with a focus on the sulh hadith and its implementation in the fatwa on Musyarakah Sharia Current Account Financing. This study highlights the lack of clear criteria and transparency in the use of daif hadith in the DSN-MUI fatwa which impacts the credibility and legal force of the fatwa . The purpose of the study is to describe the standards for the use of daif hadith according to the views of hadith and fiqh scholars, while also evaluating its application in the practice of DSN-MUI fatwas. The method used is normative legal research with textual and content analysis, including takhrij sanad and matan hadith as well as comparison with other valid evidence and established fiqh rules. The results of the study indicate differences of opinion between fuqaha and muhaddisun regarding the criteria and use of daif hadith as evidence. In the DSN-MUI fatwa , the frequently used hadith sulh has a weak sanad due to problematic narrators, but the text remains relevant and in accordance with sharia principles that encourage peaceful dispute resolution. In the fatwa on Sharia Musyarakah Current Account Financing, the implementation of the hadith sulh and other hadiths , some of which are weak, indicates the need for increased methodological accuracy and transparency in the inclusion of hadith status to maintain the credibility and accountability of fatwas , especially in facing the dynamic needs of contemporary sharia.
Dekonstruksi Pengawasan Hakim Melalui Aliansi Strategis Komisi Yudisial dan Mahkamah Agung Zamroni, Mohammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art3

Abstract

The dual oversight of judges conducted internally by the Supreme Court and externally by the Judicial Commission has not yielded the expected results but has instead given rise to conflicts of interest between institutions that not only reduce the quality of oversight of judges, but also reduce the quality of judges. Therefore, it is important to examine the system of oversight of judges involving two independent state institutions within the scope of judicial power. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. Research materials were collected through literature studies and analysed critically and systematically to reach conclusions. This study offers a solution for a collaborative system of oversight of judges in the form of a strategic alliance. The purpose of this study is to analyse two issues: (1) the urgency of a strategic alliance between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges; and (2) the strategic alliance model between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges. The results of this study found that the urgency of a strategic alliance is based on the fact that there is an institutional conflict which is a logical consequence of the dual oversight carried out by two independent institutions separately, the disharmony of laws and regulations governing the oversight of judges, and limited resources. The Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court should collaborate using a strategic alliance model to oversee judges, integrating the judicial oversight system without compromising their respective independence.
Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesian Legislation: Towards Participatory and Transparent Smart Law-Makin Wardana, Dodi Jaya; Setiyawan, Deni
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art5

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has opened significant opportunities for reforming Indonesia's legislative system. The urgency of this research stems from the pressing need to enhance the quality, transparency, and public participation in the legislative process, which has long been perceived as slow, bureaucratic, and unresponsive to the rapidly evolving social dynamics. The presence of AI offers innovative solutions to these challenges through the application of analytical technologies, natural language processing, and legislative automation, which are capable of supporting faster and more accurate data-driven decision-making. The objective of this research is to examine the urgency of AI implementation in Indonesia's legislative process and to identify the opportunities and challenges of its integration, particularly concerning aspects of democracy, accountability, legitimacy, and personal data protection — which aims to safeguard individuals' privacy rights and ensure that data collection, storage, use, and deletion are conducted securely, transparently, and in compliance with the law. This study employs a juridical-normative method, incorporating statutory, artificial intelligence, and comparative conceptual approaches, to achieve a comprehensive understanding. The findings suggest that the application of AI has the potential to enhance participation by involving more stakeholders, particularly the public, in decision-making and policy formation processes, thereby making the outcomes more representative, democratic, and responsive to public needs, while also increasing the accuracy of participation. In conclusion, the integration of artificial intelligence into Indonesia's legislative process holds the potential to foster the creation of laws that are more participatory, transparent, and of higher quality — provided clear supporting regulations, guarantees of privacy protection, and the strengthening of institutional capacity within the state accompany it.

Page 98 of 98 | Total Record : 974

 94   95   96   97   98 

Filter by Year

1994 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue