cover
Contact Name
Fuad Mustafid
Contact Email
fuad.mustafid@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281328769779
Journal Mail Official
asy.syirah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
ISSN : 08548722     EISSN : 24430757     DOI : 10.14421/ajish
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
2nd Floor Room 205 Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Marsda Adisucipto St., Yogyakarta 55281
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 601 Documents
Syari'ah - Fiqih - Hukum Islam : Studi tentang Konstruksi Pemikiran Kontemporer Syafaul Mudawam
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 46, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2012.46.2.%p

Abstract

Islamic terminology, according to contemporary Islamic studies, has led to serious confusion, if Sharia terminology studied in the narrow sense, and the proportion of study Law. Sharia is built in the classical period, even up to the contemporary period substantively unchanged, ie as the basis for determining the rules of Islamic legal norms from authentic sources (al-Quran and as-Sunnah). Norma managed Shariah law has symmetry relations with other Islamic values (ethics and theology), it's all equally reduced from the original sour ces of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, then externalized in action for religious entities. In this case, the Shariah, Fiqh and Islamic Law is located on the same ordinate point and not on the same precision, because each has been studied and developed by different professions and disciplines, them were the Ulama, Fuqaha, Qadi and Legal Expert .
Tinjauan Sistem Hukum dalam Penerapan Peraturan Daerah (Perda) Syari’ah di Tasikmalaya Lindra Darnela
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 50, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2016.50.1.259-285

Abstract

Tasikmalaya is an area that strives to formalize the  Shari'ah in  the  form  of  regional  regulation.  Some  rules  are  made  in order  to support  such  efforts.  In  looking  at  the  effectiveness  of  the enforcement of the law, the legal system is used as a perspective in this study.  The  paper  looked  at  the  implementation  of  the  Regional Regulation  Sya'riat  Islam  in  the  three  elements  of  the  legal  system. Based on the substance of the law, there are several provisions of the regulations that contain bias and allow violence against minorities, such as  the  word  Muslim  and  misleading.  In  terms  of  legal  structure, authorities in charge of ensure the entry into force of these regulations, do not seem to serious in performing their duties. Whereas in the case of the legal culture of society Tasikmalaya provide enormous support in the implementation of the Regulation of Islamic Shari'ah. However this issue is reaping the pros and cons.
Inkonstitusionalitas Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Barat Nomor : 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Larangan Kegiatan Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia Di Jawa Barat Nurainun Mangunsong
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 48, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2014.48.2.526-547

Abstract

This writing studies on West Java Governor rule No. 12 /2011 on banning Ahmadis activities examined with Law No. 12/2011 and article 28 E and J 1945 amandement of constitution, Law No. 23/2014 jo Law No. 32/2004, Law No. 9/1999 on Human Rights, and Law No. 12/2005 on legalization of International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights. The result of this research showed that formally or materially the West Java Governor rule is not a good product of law and many contradiction in it.
Dinamika Fikih Pola Mazhab: Kontekstualisasi Bermazhab dalam Fikih NU Ahmad Arifi
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 43, No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v43i1.96

Abstract

Pemikiran fikih pola mazhab yang diikuti NU pada dekade 1990-an hingga sekarang mengalami perkembangan yang cukup dinamis. Kedinamisan ini sebagai buah dari munculnya pandangan-pandangan kritis dari para ulama (intelektual) NU, terutama berkenaan dengan sikap penerimaan mereka terhadap alturts al-qadm berupa kitab-kitab fikih mazhab. Di antaranya adalah perlunya kontekstualisasi kitab fikih mazhab yang dimunculkan oleh Sahal Mahfudh, pengembangan metodologi fiqhnya (istinbat hukum yang ditempuh), dan perluasan cakupan tentang al-kutub al-mutabarah yang menjadi sumber/rujukan keputusan hukum, sehingga wacana pemikiran fikih NU semakin dinamis.
Restorasi Hukum Di Indonesia Abu Bakar
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2013.47.2.%p

Abstract

The history shows that the collapse of a country does not occur suddenly. There is a long process that preceded it. The collapse as a process could be prevented when supported by a strong, responsive, and authoritative state leadership. Therefore, the collapse of law in a country can be regarded as the most valid sign of deteriorated leadership quality of the ruling regime in the country. A big, strong, and democratic country is always busy making the laws as commander (ahk?m al-h?kim). If the laws are consistently enforced as the commander, they would appear to be stone, sand, and cement for the robust state building. Conversely, when the laws are treated as a tool of power, they will be present as coal, oil, and fire for the destruction of the entire buildingstructures of the country itself.
Kontroversi Status Hukum Nikah Mut'ah (Analisis terhadap Pendapat Para Ulama) Asmal May
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 46, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2012.46.1.%p

Abstract

There are two issues that always actual in Islamic Marriage/Family Law (Munakahat), which until now has always discussed by scholars, because no matter how much people need a clear legal status, ie Marriage Mut'ah and Sirri. Such controversies are appropriately addressed with no preconceived notions, so that it can be studied with a critical attitude and well mannered (no blasphemy). Marriage mut'ah a variant in which marriage is governed by the contested legitimacy of Islam between Sunnis and Shi'ites. In general, the Sunnis consider mut'ah marriage is a type of marriage is not legitimate or illegitimate based on the testimony of hadith, Umar ibn Khattab fatwa and ijma 'Sunni clerics. As for the Shiites, particularly the Shiite Istna 'Ash'arite, consider mut'ah marriage is allowed or lawful, although in practice they diffe r on some of the implementation. This paper presents the analysis about the formulation of opinions about the scholars on the legal status of marriage mut'ah.
Hukum Keluarga Islam ala Negara: Penafsiran dan Debat atas Dasar Hukum Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Kalangan Otoritas Agama dan Ahli Hukum Euis Nurlaelawati
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 50, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2016.50.1.199-222

Abstract

This  article  explores  the  reaction  to  and  criticism  of  the reform  aspects  introduced  in  the  kompilasi  which  have  arisen  among Indonesian Muslim, the ulama of two biggest Muslim organizations in particular and the legal apparatus and scholars. It addresses the issue by looking at specific questions relating to the rationales ofthe reforms. Deploying  socio-historical  legal  approach,  it  displays  the  reform aspects, the arguments and the tendency in their criticism and debate, as well as the key concepts and interpretations of Islamthey have used. It argues that these ‘ulama have distinct and differentways of looking at the reforms, which is intersected with the general attitude of these two organizations in deducting the laws of Islam. Thisarticle stresses that  the  reforms  have  always  not  been  accepted  in  their  whole  by Muslim  society  and  that  the  Islamic  rationales  of  the  reforms  have often  been  deemed  inappropriate,  demonstrating  in  this  sense  the harsh debate between the use of fiqhand Qur’anand between the use of Islamic classical law and the incorporation of  adatlaw as their sources and bases. Further it shows that, although the proposal of reforms was proclaimed  to  be  based  on  the  societal  growing  needs  and demands, they remained to be objects of criticism and debates from such certain groups of Muslims and legal apparatus who argued to also base their criticism on the needs of society.
IstishabSebagai Dasar Penetapan Hukum Islam: Sebuah Tinjauan Historis Saidurrahman Saidurrahman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2011.45.1.%p

Abstract

Syariat Islam adalah penutup semua risalah samawiyah, yang membawa petunjuk dan tuntunan Allah untuk ummat manusia dalam wujudnya yang lengkap dan final. Dengan posisi seperti ini, maka Allah pun mewujudkan format Syariat Islam sebagai syariat yangabadi dan komperhensif. Hal itu dibuktikan dengan adanya prinsip-prinsip dan kaidah-kaidah hukum dalam Islam yang membuatnya dapat memberikan jawaban terhadap hajat kebutuhan manusia yang berubah dari waktu ke waktu, seiring dengan perkembangan zaman. Secara kongkrit hal itu ditunjukkan dengan adanya dua hal penting dalam hukum Islam: (1) nash-nash yang menetapkan hukum-hukum yang tak akan berubah sepanjang zaman dan (2) pembukaan jalan bagi para mujtahid untuk melakukan ijtihad dalam hal-hal yang tidak dijelaskan secara sharih dalam nash-nash tersebut. Jika kita berbicara tentang ijtihad, maka sisi rayu (logika-logika yang benar) adalah hal yang tidak dapat dilepaskan darinya. Karena itu, dalam Ushul Fiqih sebuah ilmu yang mengatur proses ijtihad- dikenal beberapa landasan penetapan hukum yang berlandaskan pada penggunaan kemampuan rayu para fuqaha. Salah satunya adalah istishhab yang akan dibahas dan diuraikan dalam tulisan ini.
Kegentingan Memaksa Atau Kepentingan Penguasa (Analisis Terhadap Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPPU)) Muhammad Siddiq
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 48, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2014.48.1.%p

Abstract

The arguable on explanation of circumstances of compelling crisis in making PERPPU (emergency law), has a possibility to create abuse of power. President, as an executive possessors in Indonesian constitutional law, has fully given absolute subjective rights in creating PERPPU. President is the only one person who has authority to interpret circumstances of compelling crisis regarding on government condition, whether it is in a good condition or not. Due to PERPPU characteristics is very subjective, it has possibility to mislead from its main meaning and purpose. It could be possible that president personal interest might be accommodated in a PERPPU, because of his authority in making PERPPU. For the time being, there is no regulation which interpret clearly circumstances of compelling crisis and its requirement, to explain whether the situation is in emergency or not. Because of that, if it does not have special regulation, PERPPU might have possibility to abuse by irresponsible person as a tool to achieve his personal purposes.
Dimensi Keadilan Pada Penetapan Ahli Waris Hajar M
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2013.47.1.%p

Abstract

Allah the Almighty is convinced as the judge and law maker who are the Most Just. Every law, includes inheritance law is created by Him very justly. To determine the values of justice, it is necessary to do a research and deep observation. This article explores justice dimension of inheritance law, especially to heir. Justice dimension on determining heirs involves three things, namely descent, priority level, and inheritance obstacle. The descent on heir is started from birth which causes blood relationship that responsibilities between inheritance owner and heir appear. It also includes rights and duties on marriage relationship. Priority level among heirs is based on responsibility intensity so the justice on rights of heirs which fits status and relatives power to inheritance owner appears. To give the other heirs chances receiving equal rights, there are some rights of heirs are reduced. Inheritance obstacle owns justice values because of no responsibilities among of them. Thus, mutual commitment for implementing Islamic law of inheritance is needed.

Page 7 of 61 | Total Record : 601