Articles
375 Documents
<![CDATA[KEABSAHAN SMART CONTRACT BLOCKHAIN ETHEREUM UNTUK TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DENGAN ALAT PEMBAYARAN CRYPTOCURRENCY ]]>
<![CDATA[Ainul Mardhiyah Al Arafah]]>;
<![CDATA[Suraji - -]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v13i1.55147
<![CDATA[AbstractThis article aims to know the validity of smart contract of Ethereum blockchain for electronic transaction in terms from legality of cryptocurrency as means of payment in Indonesia. This normative legal study is a prescriptive by using statutory approach. The types and sources of legal material in the form of secondary legal material which consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal material collection techniques with library studies. Qualitative analysis techniques with deductive methods. The results of the study indicate that smart contract of Ethereum blockchain that uses for electronic transaction is invalid and null and void because it does not meet the fourth condition for agreement to be valid that stipulated in article 1320 Indonesian Civil Code, which is a legal cause. This is because the payment instrument used for transactions is cryptocurrency which violates the provisions of the legislation. However, the smart contract concept itself can be applied and considered valid in Indonesia as an agreement, namely in the form of an electronic contract based on the principle of freedom of contract and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and its implementing regulations, with one provision which is parties do not use cryptocurrency as a means of payment.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan penggunaan smart contract blockchain Ethereum untuk transaksi elektronik yang dikaji dari legalitas cryptocurrency sebagai alat pembayaran di Indonesia. Kajian ini merupakan kajian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Jenis dan sumber bahan penelitian dengan data sekunder yang terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan penulis merupakan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa smart contract blockchain Ethereum yang digunakan untuk transaksi elektronik menjadi tidak absah dan batal demi hukum karena tidak memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian keempat yang tertulis pada Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata yaitu sebab yang halal. Hal ini dikarenakan alat pembayaran yang digunakan untuk transaksi adalah cryptocurrency yang berarti melanggar ketentuan perundang-undangan. Akan tetapi konsep smart contract itu sendiri dapat diterapkan dan dianggap sah di Indonesia sebagai sebuah perjanjian yakni dalam bentuk kontrak elektronik dengan didasari asas kebebasan berkontrak dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dan peraturan pelaksananya, dengan syarat tidak menggunakan cryptocurrency sebagai alat pembayarannya.]]>
<![CDATA[PERANAN LEMBAGA PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA DI INDONESIA DALAM MEMBANTU PENEGAKAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Adryan Rizky Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Hernawan Hadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 13, No 2 (2025): JULI-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v13i2.53264
<![CDATA[This article aims to examine the role of copyright protection institutions in Indonesia, regarding the relevance of law enforcement and legal protection that applies to a musical copyrighted work. The method used in this research is normative (legal research). This legal writing uses a statute approach by reviewing the latest legislation that is still effect until now as the legal basis for copyright, namely Law Number 28 of 2014 in depth the content inside the law it. Copyright as a personal ownership rights to a work that was born due to human intellectual abilities really needs to be enforced, there is very little public awareness about copyright law, one of which is caused by the minim of knowledge of the community who underestimates the cpyright issUndang-Undange, therefore efforts are needed from law enforcement and institutions that regulate in more detail about copyright law, this is very needed as a means of distribution to creators of work or creators or copyright holders. Given the relevance of copyright law in Inodonesia which not yet strong enough to regulate violations of the law as well as the effectiveness of the distrubution of economic rights and moral rights that should be distributed to creators, further researche is needed to find out how the existence of copyright law in the digitalization era in Indonesia and further study of the problems that occur today are needed. The result of research and studies show the enforcement of copyright law that is sought by LMKN includes outreach to the public as well as what the agency does the law enforcement parties to further strengthen the effectiveness of copyright law, and reduce the occurence of piracy of works which still very common in Indonesia until now.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK CIPTA ATAS FILM YANG DIPUBLIKASIKAN MELALUI WEBSITE (Studi Kasus website Rebahin) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurul Husna Khoirani Rozannah]]>; Hernawan Hadi
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v13i1.53922
<![CDATA[AbstractEase of access to enjoy movies turns out to be a gap to commit copyright infringement because there are many websites that publish movies without permission from the creator. This article aims to analyze the legal protection to copyright for Films published through website. This research is an empirical research conducted at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. The types of data used are primary and secondary data. Primary data obtained through the interview method conducted through the application zoom meeting while secondary data obtained from literature study. The results of the study indicate that the legal protection of copyright on Film has been regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. In order to support this protection, the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia facilitates the Creator or Copyright Holder to report the website that has been distributed their Film without obtaining permission from Author. And cooperating with the Ministry of Communication and Infromation to block some weebsite that proven to have violated Copyright.Keywords: Copyright; Creator; Film; Legal Protection; Website.AbstrakKemudahan akses untuk menikmati Film ternyata membuat celah untuk melakukan pelanggaran terhadap Hak Cipta karena banyaknya website yang mempublikasikan Film tanpa izin dari Pencipta. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap hak cipta atas Film yang dipublikasikan melalui website. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris yang dilakukan di Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. Jenis data yang digunakan merupakan data primer dan sekunder. Data primer didapat melalui metode wawancara yang dilakukan melalui aplikasi zoom meeting sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelrindungan hukum terhadap Hak Cipta telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Kemudian untuk mendukung perlindungan tersebut Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia memfasilitasi Pencipta untuk melakukan laporan terhadap website yang apabila karya ciptanya dipublikasikan melalui website tanpa adanya izin. Serta melakukan kerja sama dengan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika untuk melakukan blokir terhadap website yang terbukti melakaukan pelanggaran Hak Cipta.Kata Kunci: Film; Hak Cipta; Pencipta; Perlindungan Hukum; Website]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP TESTIMONI PALSU DALAM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA DAN UPAYA PREVENTIFNYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Joane Yunizar]]>; Suraji .
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v13i1.55285
<![CDATA[This articles aims to analyze preventive measures that can be taken to prevent losses from fake testimonials on Indonesian e-commerce. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research. The research approach used is the statutory approach. Sources of legal materials are obtained from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials by means of literature studies and analyzed using deduction method. The results of the study show that the regulation related to consumer legal protection against fake testimonials on e-commerce activities in Indonesia has not been implemented optimally. The existence of fake testimonials violates the obligations of sellers who are requires to have good intentions in advertising. Therefore, preventive efforts in preventing fake testimonials can be carried out from various parties such as: 1. carrying out verification steps before or after publishing testimonials (for e-commerce parties), 2. being more careful and thorough in making online transactions (for consumers), and making new regulations regarding fake testimonials (for the government).]]>
<![CDATA[DAMPAK BAGI WANPRESTASI SEBAGAI AKIBAT DARI PERLUASAN MAKNA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Adina Mutiara Tirta]]>;
<![CDATA[Pranoto Pranoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI - JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v14i1.58215
<![CDATA[This article aims to analyze about the effect of broaden comprehension of tort on breach of contract, hence it aims to give its explanation to public. This study uses doctrinal methods with the nature of prescriptive and applied research. The approach used is the statute approach and conseptual approach using sources in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. While some of legal materials collection technique in this research is by using the method of browsing through the internet media which is then followed by analysis techniques using grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. The result of this study indicates that broaden of torts’ definition does affect breach of contract, it shows breach of contract is part of torts. It does indicate one who fails to take action of agreement could be considered as a violation of others’ subjective rights and violation of the norms.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 TERHADAP HAK EKSEKUTORIAL JAMINAN FIDUSIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Safitri Saraswati]]>;
<![CDATA[Pranoto Pranoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 13, No 2 (2025): JULI-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v13i2.53167
<![CDATA[This article aims to knowing the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the executorial rights of fiduciary guarantees. This research is normative legal research or literature law research with a statute approach and a case approach. The nature of this research uses analytical descriptive, namely a method that serves to describe a picture of the object under study through the data that has been collected. The data used are secondary data. The technique used in the collection of legal materials in this study is to collecting or collect legal material and download legal material. This study uses the method of analysis of legal materials by interpretation.Based on this research, it is found that the existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/ PUU-XVII/2019 implications for the existence and executorial rights of fiduciary guarantees; debtors become more arbitrarily in using collateral and creditors will think again in providing loans with fiduciary guarantees.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK BATIK PADA PENGRAJIN BATIK GIRILAYU, MATESIH, KARANGANYAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Zuliana Ayu Sholihah]]>;
<![CDATA[Pranoto Pranoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI - JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v14i1.58556
<![CDATA[Legal writing aims to find out the obstacles, solutions, implementation of trademark registration and legal protection among Girilayu Batik Craftsmen. The empirical research is descriptive in nature with the location of Girilayu village, Matesih district, Karanganyar regency. Data collection techniques used interviews and collection of legal materials. Qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of the study explain the obstacles for Girilayu Batik Craftsmen, namely non-normative barriers, the absence of information on brand rights and limited funds; normative barriers, long registration process. While the legal protection that the Girilayu Batik Craftsmen get is when they have registered and have issued a trademark certificate. Solutions for non-normative barriers, empowering SMEs of the Karanganyar Regional Government in the form of KI socialization, assisting the legalization of IP and brand consulting services. The solution to normative barriers is the revision of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications so that trademark registration is shorter.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIHAK BANK DALAM KASUS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KERUGIAN BAGI NASABAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahayu Sulistyaningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI - JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v14i1.59694
<![CDATA[This article examines the liability of the bank in cases of personal data leakage that results in losses for customers. This research uses normative legal research. The research approach used is the Legislative Approach and the conceptual approach. The types and sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is the study of documents or library materials. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses the deduction method. The results of research and discussion show that the implementation of Personal Data Protection in banking activities until now there is no regulation that codifies it into one law and Leakage of personal data poses various risks including information being stolen and then sold to the Darkweb so that customers are worried about legal uncertainty regarding legal protection. of his personal data and the current regulation that describes the protection of personal data is still sectoral and partial. The form of bank accountability for cases of personal data leakage by replacing customer losses and Banks need to apply legal protection to customer personal data based on Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/6/PBI/2005 concerning product transparency, especially internet banking services by providing correct and honest information to customers.]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP IDEAL DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PRINSIP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGGUNA FINTECH LENDING BERDASARKAN PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR77/POJK.01/2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Annisa Fidela Shanti]]>;
<![CDATA[' Pranoto]]>;
<![CDATA[Kukuh Tedjomurti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.64960
<![CDATA[AbstractThis article aims to find out the ideal concept to realize the principle of user dispute resolution in accordance with the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 77/POJK.01/2016. The research method used is normative legal research. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, with legal material analysis techniques using the syllogism method and interpretation using deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research conducted by the author, it is known that there are several ways of resolving disputes intransactions Fintech Lending, but the Financial Services Authority whose function is to organize an integrated regulation and supervision system for all activities in the financial services sector has not yet formed an Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution in the field of Fintech Lending. Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 is also considered not effective in resolving disputes in technologybased money lending and borrowing transactions. The Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01 /2016 Is considered not effective because in Article 29 letter e only explains that the settlement of user disputes is simple, fast, and affordable, there is no clear mechanism related to the settlement of the user dispute Fintech Lending, So that the Organizers Fintech Lending do not yet have guidelines for resolving disputes that result in the Operator Fintech Lending being initials of theable to elect the Registrar’s Office Of the South Jakarta District Court To settle disputes with users, especially Lenders. The importance Of the Financial Services Authority to establish an Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution In the field of Fintech Lending So that Users ofservices Fintech Lending especially the Lender Get clarityKeywords: Fintech Lending; Ideal Concept; Dispute resolution AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui konsep yang ideal untuk mewujudkan prinsip penyelesaian sengketa pengguna sesuai dengan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang penulis lakukan, diketahui bahwa terdapat beberapa cara menyelesaikan sengketa dalam transaksi Fintech Lending, namun Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yang berfungsi untuk menyelenggarakan sistem pengaturan dan pengawasan terintegrasi terhadap keseluruhan kegiatan di dalam sektor jasa keuangan belum membentuk Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam bidang Fintech Lending. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 juga dinilai belum efektif untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dalam transaksi pinjam meminjam uang berbasis teknologi. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tersebut dinilai belum efektif karena dalam Pasal 29 huruf e hanya menjelaskan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa pengguna secara sederhana, cepat, dan biaya terjangkau, tidak ada mekanisme yang jelas terkait penyelesaian sengketa pengguna Fintech Lending tersebut, sehingga para Penyelenggara Fintech Lending belum memiliki pedoman untuk menyelesaikan sengketa yang mengakibatkan Penyelenggara Fintech Lending berinisial dapat memilih Kantor Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dengan pengguna khususnya Lender. Pentingnya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan untuk membentuk Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam bidang Fintech Lending tersebut agar para Pengguna layanan Fintech Lending khususnya Lender tersebut mendapatkan kejelasanKata Kunci: Fintech Lending; Konsep Ideal; Penyelesaian Sengketa]]>
<![CDATA[KEKOSONGAN HUKUM DAN IMPLEMENTASI KEWAJIBAN KERAHASIAAN AKTA OLEH CALON NOTARIS MAGANG (TINJAUAN PASAL 16A AYAT (2) UUJN-P) ]]>
Immanuela Christy Asa Suhir Sakri Putri; Athiyah Nurul Izza Rosyada;
<![CDATA[Jasmine Valery]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI - JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v14i1.118598
<![CDATA[The provisions of Article 16A paragraph (2) of the UUJN-P regulate the obligation of prospective notaries to maintain the confidentiality of deeds, but without being accompanied by strict sanctions for violations of this obligation in the UUJN-P. This study aims to identify the implementation of this article by prospective notaries. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, as well as qualitative data analysis. The research found a legal vacuum in Article 16A paragraph (2) of the UUJN-P, namely the absence of concrete limitations regarding the scope of confidentiality of deeds that must be maintained by prospective notaries and the absence of juridical sanctions for violations of this obligation. In addition, the implementation of this article shows the application of a subjective confidentiality standard by prospective notaries due to the absence of limitations and strict sanctions, thus affecting prospective notaries in carrying out their obligations. ]]>
