Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.716
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jambura Law Review Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Jurnal El-Thawalib Bina Hukum Lingkungan Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Journal of Research and Publication Innovation Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Sains Student Research JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Jurnal Riset Ilmiah MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Padamu Negeri Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi International Journal of Law Analytic Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Citra Multidisiplin Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora NETIZEN (JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS) Punggawa Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Punggawa Global Research
Zul Khaidir Kadir
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 73 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 73 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
KONFLIK KEYAKINAN HAKIM: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN CONVICTION INTIME DI PRANCIS DAN CONVICTION RAISONNÉE DI PORTUGAL Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/5r46m803

Abstract

The criminal evidence systems in France and Portugal reflect two contrasting approaches in the civil law tradition, namely conviction intime and conviction raisonné. However, the fundamental debate between the two triggers dynamics regarding how the evidentiary system balances judicial independence and transparency. This study aims to analyze the philosophical differences and implications between the two principles. This study uses a normative legal research method with a comparative approach. The data collection method is collected using library research, then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that there is no single approach that can fully meet the needs of flexibility, efficiency, and transparency in criminal evidence. Both conviction intime in France and conviction raisonnée in Portugal present unique advantages and disadvantages, but both can complement each other if applied in a balanced manner.
Kejahatan Berbasis Identitas Digital: Menggagas Kebijakan Kriminal untuk Dunia Metaverse Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the challenges of criminal policies related to digital identity in the metaverse using a qualitative method with a conceptual approach. Digital identity, which includes personal information, digital assets, and user interaction patterns, is the main foundation of an individual's existence in the metaverse however, the lack of specific regulations indicates weaknesses in current criminal policies. The results of the study show that the metaverse presents new crime risks that have not been fully accommodated by the existing legal system, such as identity theft, avatar counterfeiting, and digital asset fraud. To overcome this, fundamental reforms of criminal policy are needed that include a cross-border collaborative approach, strengthening the regulation of technology platforms, and developing appropriate legal standards. The success of these policies relies heavily on collaboration between governments, technology companies, and civil society.
Islamisme dan Kriminologi Kritis: Ketegangan antara Moralitas Ilahiah dan Kritik Struktural dalam Kebijakan Kriminal Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 12 No 3 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Islamism frames criminal law as an expression of divine morality and a tool of social control. Unfortunately, critical criminology challenges law as a product of structural domination, but faces an epistemological dilemma when applied to an Islamic state that bases criminal law on transcendent authority. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that the adoption of Islamism as a legal ideology shifts the function of criminal law from a forum of justice to a medium of control over individual expression and beliefs, a configuration that is theoretically rejected by critical criminology that emphasizes the desacralization of power and resistance to structural repression. Dialogue between critical criminology and Islamism becomes possible if both are willing to abandon their hegemonic ambitions, by making maqāṣid al-sharīʿah an ethical framework for re-evaluating criminal law humanistically, and opening the law to criticism that sides with justice and human dignity.
Meruntuhkan Pilar Keadilan: Apakah Sistem Peradilan Dapat Berfungsi Tanpa Standar Pembuktian? Zul Khaidir Kadir
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v3i2.2351

Abstract

The standard of proof is the foundation that keeps the criminal justice system from turning into a repressive tool to prevent state power from imposing arbitrary sentences. However, in the midst of technological developments, it has created an unstable evidence landscape that threatens the continuity of the legitimacy of the law itself without a standard of proof that can be objectively verified. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method is collected using literature studies, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that maintaining the existence of the standard of proof is no longer adequate if it is not accompanied by a responsible and adaptive reformulation to the complexity of contemporary evidence. Exploration of alternative forms of evidence offers opportunities to increase precision and transparency that have been difficult to achieve with traditional mechanisms, but all of these innovations can only contribute constructively if they are placed within a strict legal and ethical framework, given the inherent risks such as algorithmic bias, the reduction of judicial convictions to statistics without context, and gaps in accountability between jurisdictions in the application of forensic technology.
Ketika Retorika Mengalahkan Realita: Kebijakan Kriminal di Era Manipulasi Data Publik Zul Khaidir Kadir
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v2i2.946

Abstract

Manipulation of public data in criminal policy is a strategic practice that selects and frames information to cover up institutional violations, and legitimizes repressive policies that ignore the principle of justice. Unfortunately, the development of communication technology has accelerated the circulation of information, leading to the birth of repressive policies based on popularity and distorted narratives. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that manipulation of public data in criminal policy shifts the orientation of policy from fact-based rationality to biased emotional responses, so that it not only widens inequality and creates selective law enforcement, but also damages institutional legitimacy and erodes public trust in the criminal justice system. A transformative mitigation strategy is needed institutionally and culturally, through the implementation of comprehensive transparency in the entire data management cycle, strict and enforceable regulations, increasing public data literacy as a bulwark against misleading narratives, and the ethical use of digital technology, in order to return policy to a basis of evidence that is fair, accountable, and relevant to the social complexity faced.
Kriminalisasi Tanpa Batas: Mengurai Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan dalam Legislasi Kodifikasi Hukum Pidana Modern Zul Khaidir Kadir
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v2i2.665

Abstract

Criminalization in criminal law should function to limit actions that harm society legally and proportionally, but excessive criminalization can ignore the principles of justice and legality. A striking gap arises when the law is used not to protect rights, but to expand state control over individual freedom through repressive and multi-interpretable articles. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that unlimited criminalization reflects an abuse of power that moves criminal law away from its protective function towards an instrument of repression that exacerbates inequality and weakens legal legitimacy. To return criminal law to its fair function, legislative reform is needed based on transparency, participation, and a non-penal approach that prevents state domination over individual rights.
MEMBONGKAR RELASI TERSEMBUNYI: POLA HUBUNGAN PELAKU DAN KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF KRIMINOLOGI Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Padamu Negeri Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April : Jurnal Padamu Negeri (JPN)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/7fyypb14

Abstract

The pattern of relationships between perpetrators and victims in sexual violence covers a wide spectrum, ranging from close relationships, unclose but known relationships, to anonymous relationships. Unfortunately, there is a lack of attention to certain relationship patterns, which has implications for weak prevention strategies and adaptive legal responses. The purpose of this study focuses on the pattern of relationships between perpetrators and victims that have so far been less explored in depth in academic literature. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. Data collection methods are collected using literature studies and then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that close relationships can involve betrayal of trust and emotional control that worsen psychological trauma, unclose but known relationships create ambiguity in proving the perpetrator's intentions, and anonymous relationships show opportunistic nature. Therefore, a victim-based approach is needed to place the needs and experiences of victims at the center of every legal process.
Reformasi Konsep Heat of Passion: Menuju Pembatasan Provokasi dalam Mengurangi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pembunuhan Kadir, Zul Khaidir
JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): JUSTITIABLE -Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56071/justitiable.v8i1.1293

Abstract

The concept of heat of passion in criminal law has developed as a form of recognition of extreme emotional conditions that can reduce the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, especially in cases of murder. Although this doctrine is historically rooted in the common law system and has been adopted in various legal systems, its relevance in the modern legal context is debatable. Changes in social values, technological advances, and demands for legal certainty and substantive justice challenge the validity of the application of heat of passion as a partial defense. This study aims to review the validity and normative structure of heat of passion, emphasizing the need for reformulation of the elements of provocation and loss of control to be more adaptive to the contemporary context. This study uses normative research using a comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that ambiguity of definition, inconsistency of application, and gender bias are the main weaknesses in the application of this doctrine. Therefore, a new evaluative framework is needed that is more objective, inclusive, and based on restorative justice. This reformulation is expected to ensure that criminal law remains relevant in providing protection for victims, enforcing individual accountability, and reflecting progressive values ​​in a modern legal society.
Populisme Punitif dan Erosi Nilai-Nilai Hukum : Mengupas Kebijakan Kriminal di Tengah Polarisasi Sosial Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.5241

Abstract

Punitive populism is a political-legal phenomenon that replaces legal rationality and corrective justice with a rhetoric of power that negates the protection of human rights and the rehabilitative function of the criminal justice system. In this context, criminal policy tends to be characterized by a repressive approach that prioritizes symbolic punishment for short-term political legitimacy. Social polarization further strengthens the destructive power of punitive populism by making the issue of crime a symbolic instrument in identity conflicts, thereby losing its autonomy and submitting to an emotional, majoritarian logic. This study aims to analyze how punitive populism, as a product of the interaction between populist logic and social polarization, results in the erosion of the basic values of modern law, particularly the principles of proportionality, legal certainty, and human rights protection. Furthermore, this study also identifies structural barriers that hinder efforts to curb its expansion in criminal policy. The study uses qualitative methods with a conceptual approach. Data were obtained through library research of academic literature, legal documents, and policy analysis, then processed using qualitative analysis techniques and presented descriptively. The research findings show that punitive populism has shifted the orientation of criminal policy from a paradigm of justice and rehabilitation to a logic of punishment that is reactive to public emotional distress. The mass media, particularly within a polarized information ecosystem, plays a role in shaping distorted perceptions of crime, thereby reinforcing public demands for harsh and immediate policies. This situation creates legal vulnerability to political instrumentalism, threatens the principle of the rule of law, and deepens social exclusion of vulnerable groups. To address this, strategic steps are needed, including limiting fear-based political rhetoric, strengthening independent legal institutions, and rebuilding a criminal law paradigm based on substantive justice, inclusivity, and respect for human rights.
Dapatkah Otak yang Rusak Bertanggung Jawab? Disrupsi Amigdala–PFC dan Rekonstruksi Moralitas dalam Hukum Pidana Zul Khaidir Kadir
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September : Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v3i3.2770

Abstract

Criminal liability in modern law is built on the assumption that every individual is a rational and autonomous moral agent. However, neuroscientific evidence suggests that structural disruption of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex significantly impairs the capacity to judge actions ethically. This study aims to analyze the influence of neurological disorders on an individual's moral capacity and to formulate legal parameters for assessing criminal liability based on actual capacity. The research method employed normative legal research with a conceptual approach. The results indicate that perpetrators with dysfunction in the amygdala-PFC circuit experience a degradation of moral capacity that weakens the basis for the formation of mens rea in a substantive sense and falls outside the reach of legal systems that still rely on a model of responsibility based on the assumption of universal free will. The criminal legal system, in its current form, lacks a precise evaluative mechanism to distinguish between perpetrators with impaired moral control and those acting deliberatively. In this situation, the construction of criminal liability cannot be standardized, and reformulation of evaluation instruments is necessary to avoid sentencing bias against individuals with structural impairments in ethical capacity.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Abd. Kadir Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah Mappaselleng, Nur Fadhilah Muhammad Basri Muhni, Afif Nadiah Khaeriah Kadir Normiati, Normiati Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng