Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Transaksi Live Shopping pada Platform E-Commerce Tonny Soetrisno; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/eh9nt575

Abstract

The live shopping phenomenon on platforms like TikTok Shop, Shopee Live, and Lazada Live dominates Electronic Commerce (PMSE) in Indonesia, yet its real-time and persuasive transaction characteristics pose new legal risks for consumers, such as misleading information and non-conforming goods. This normative juridical research aims to analyze the legal regulations, forms of consumer protection, and the responsibilities of business actors and e-commerce platforms. The results indicate that the Consumer Protection Law functions as lex generalis, while the Government Regulation on PMSE acts as lex specialis underlying real-time electronic contracts. The liability of business actors is strict (strict liability) or based on unlawful acts (Article 1365 of the Civil Code), whereas platforms are responsible as electronic system providers. However, protective effectiveness is hindered by fast-paced transactions, low digital literacy, and ambiguous streamer status. This study recommends strengthening technical regulations for content archiving and synchronizing policies for a fair digital ecosystem.
Analisis Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Doxxing terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Privasi di Media Digital Richard Anggiat Oloan; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/79mpjr59

Abstract

Doxxing is the unauthorized gathering and dissemination of personal data in digital media to intimidate victims, yet the term remains unregulated under a standalone legal norm in Indonesia. This normative juridical research aims to analyze doxxing as a privacy violation, the perpetrator's legal liability, and regulatory effectiveness using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results indicate that doxxing is qualified as a multi-layered criminal offense scattered across the Criminal Code (defamation), the Personal Data Protection Law (Article 65 juncto Article 67), and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (Article 26). Criminal liability is cumulative-alternative, while victim recovery can be pursued through criminal channels, civil lawsuits for unlawful acts, or administrative sanctions. However, its effectiveness is hindered by fragmented norms, difficulties in digital evidence gathering, and perpetrator anonymity. This study recommends regulatory harmonization and capacity-strengthening for cyber law enforcement to ensure legal certainty for citizens' privacy rights in the digital space.
Penerapan Diversi dan Restorative Justice dalam Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Anak: Kajian Yuridis Moch. Ryan Saiful Bachri; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/cd8ewz72

Abstract

Children's involvement in narcotics abuse in Indonesia places the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak/SPPA) at the intersection of child protection and narcotics law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Diversion and Restorative Justice in resolving juvenile narcotics cases. It employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining primary and secondary legal materials through prescriptive analysis. The findings reveal a lack of harmonization between the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law and the Narcotics Law, particularly for offenses punishable by more than seven years' imprisonment, which limits the implementation of Diversion. Nevertheless, law enforcement officials remain obligated to pursue Diversion by prioritizing the best interests of the child. The application of Restorative Justice through rehabilitation, mediation, and reintegration into parental care provides a more recovery-oriented approach. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and strengthened institutional capacity are essential to ensure effective child protection and social reintegration.  
Menakar Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ganjar Wiyangga; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/ymears70

Abstract

Drug abuse in Indonesia continues to be dominated by a punitive approach that emphasizes retribution rather than rehabilitation, resulting in inadequate legal protection for drug users as victims of addiction. This study aims to analyze the juridical framework of restorative justice, identify the obstacles to its implementation, and formulate a more progressive legal policy for resolving drug abuse cases. This research employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The study relies on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the normative foundation for implementing restorative justice has been established; however, its implementation remains constrained by rigid legal provisions, inconsistent interpretation among law enforcement officers, limited capacity of the Integrated Assessment Team, and inadequate rehabilitation facilities. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, strengthened assessment mechanisms, and the optimization of rehabilitation services are necessary to ensure that restorative justice becomes the primary mechanism for resolving drug abuse cases.
Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak Privasi Pengguna terhadap Pemanfaatan Data Biometrik oleh Platform Digital Roy Andriansah; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/7608b590

Abstract

The increasing use of biometric authentication technologies, including facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, and iris recognition, has become a common feature of digital platforms for identity verification and service security. Biometric data are classified as specific personal data requiring a higher level of legal protection because they are permanent and cannot be replaced if compromised. This study aims to examine the legal framework, forms of protection, and effectiveness of Indonesian law in safeguarding users’ privacy rights concerning the processing of biometric data. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, analyzed through a prescriptive-qualitative method. The findings indicate that the Personal Data Protection Law classifies biometric data as specific personal data requiring explicit consent and a lawful basis for processing. However, its effectiveness remains constrained by weak regulatory oversight, inconsistent implementation of Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), and limited public digital literacy, highlighting the need for stronger technical regulations and independent supervisory institutions.
Kedudukan Hukum Smart Contract dalam Sistem Perjanjian Menurut Hukum Perdata Indonesia Ardina Widya Hapsari; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/2wa08j03

Abstract

The development of blockchain technology has introduced smart contracts as self-executing agreements that operate automatically through computer code without requiring human intervention or intermediaries. This study aims to examine the legal status, validity, binding force, and regulatory challenges of smart contracts within the Indonesian civil law system. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, analyzed through a prescriptive-qualitative method. The findings indicate that smart contracts are capable of fulfilling the legal requirements for a valid agreement under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code and are recognized as electronic contracts under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. However, their immutable, automated, and decentralized characteristics create legal challenges concerning parties' legal capacity, contract annulment, force majeure, and liability arising from code errors. Therefore, a sui generis regulatory framework is required to harmonize the technical characteristics of smart contracts with the principles of Indonesian contract law.
Restorative Justice dalam KUHP Baru: Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Diskresi Aparat Penegak Hukum Heri Purnomo; Aturkian Laia
Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): JUNI-JULI
Publisher : INDO PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/4s9w4q19

Abstract

Restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach to resolving criminal cases, emphasizing the restoration of relationships among the offender, the victim, and the community. The reform of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) presents a strategic opportunity to integrate restorative justice as a new paradigm for criminal case resolution, particularly during the police investigation stage. This study aims to analyze the urgency of embedding restorative justice within the new Criminal Procedure Code to establish a legal basis for police authority and to assess its implications for Indonesia's criminal justice system. The research employs a normative-juridical method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that incorporating restorative justice into the new Criminal Procedure Code is essential to provide clear legal legitimacy for restorative case resolution practices, prevent policy fragmentation among law enforcement agencies, and foster the realization of substantive, restoration-oriented justice.