Community Preparedness in The Face of Smog Disaster in Taraibangun Village, Mining District, Kampar Regency, Riau Province Fikri Ramadhan Maiyeldi Putra1), Muzani 2), Cahyadi Setiawan 3) 1,2,3, FIS UNJ Geography Education Study Program Jl. Rawamangun Muka, Pulo Gadung, East Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia Email: fikriramadhan1901@gmail.com Abstract This research aims to find out the level of community preparedness in Taraibangun Village in the face of smog disaster. This research was conducted in Taraibangun Village for 5 months from March-July 2020. The research method used is to use descriptive methods with survey approach, as well as data collection techniques by conducting observations and dissemination questionnaires to 100 respondents in 4 hamlets in Taraibangun Village. The result of this study is that in Taraibangun Village fell into the category almost ready with an overall score score of 62.45 for preparedness of hamlet 1 Taraibangun village entered the ready category with an overall score of 65.6, for the villagers 2 entered the category ready with an overall score of 65.9, for the community of hamlet 3 entered into the category of Almost Ready with an overall score of 57.45 and the last for hamlet 4 entered into the category of Almost Ready with an overall score of 60.21. The parameters of knowledge and attitude for all hamlets have good knowledge in understanding smog disasters, emergency response plans look low results, this is because many people are vulnerable to disasters but do not have a plan, the mobility of taraibangun village resources is also equally low because the mobility of resources in the community because the village government has never conducted preparedness training for the villagers. Keywords: Preparedness,Smog, Taraibangun Village Introduction The coordinator of Riau Forest Rescue Work Network (JIKALAHARI) made ali gives an illustration of the smoke disaster that riau people are currently experiencing that this area is like living in a burning firewood stove, nasal congestion, dizziness, sore eyes, such is the life that riau people felt when the smog disaster hit. Community activities also experienced disturbances such as the availability of food staples thinning due to the market being unable to operate, community activity in work was also disrupted, and some communities prone to smog began to make evacuations to the province of North Sumatra (Tirto.id, 2019). Riau province is one of the provinces that is often affected by forest and land fires. Forest fires in Riau Province have been going on since 1997 until now entering 2019. Riau province which is rich in peatland is a supporting factor in the smog disaster. Ineligion from forest fires and peatlands occurs in the dry season, due to very low rainfall and high solar heat intensity. This condition generally occurs between June and October and sometimes occurs from May to November. Fire ineligion is higher if there are symptoms of El Nino (Wetlands, 1999). Taraibangun village is one of the villages affected by the smog disaster in Riau Province, tarai bangun villagers call Tarai Bangun village a quiet and isolated village, this is because Tarai Bangun was very lacking in infrastructure development and attention from local government. This makes the problem experienced by the surrounding community still quite a lot especially regarding the preparedness of the community in the face of disasters. Based on the description done by the author, the author felt the need for an analysis that explained the level of preparedness of the community in the face of the smog disaster in Taraibangun Village. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Time and Place of Research This research was conducted in Taraibangun Village in March-July 2020. Research methods The research method used in this study is a descriptive method using the survey approach. Data Collection Techniques 1) Primary Data In this study to obtain primary data, it was done: Questionnaire The questionnaire used in this research uses "closed polls, which present questions and answer options so that respondents are asked to choose one answer that corresponds to give a tick". Using scale sourced from LIPI-UNESCO/ISDR as follows: YES 1 NOT 0 2) Secondary Data Taraibangun Village Profile Data Analysis Techniques Use index value analysis, with techniques based on score calculation. The collected data is in the form of numbers in the tabulation results, and then explained in the order of information you want to know, and then processed and summed and adjusted to the preparedness index value assessment classification. As for the score obtained will be categorized based on the level of preparedness, here is a table of preparedness categorization based on LIPI-UNESCO/ISDR. Table 1. Level of Preparedness Index Value Category Symbol 80-100 Very Ready V 65-79 Ready Iv 55-64 Almost Ready Iii 40-54 Not Ready Ⅱ Less than 40 Not Ready Ⅰ Source : LIPI-UNESCO/ISDR, 2006 : 44 Data Results Table 2. The Results of Calculating the Value of Knowledge And Attitude Hamlet Name Score scoring Description Hamlet 1 93,4 Very Ready Hamlet 2 96,8 Very Ready Hamlet 3 94,2 Very Ready Hamlet 4 88,5 Very Ready Based on the results of table number 2 on the calculation of the calculation of the value of knowledge parameters and attitude then obtained the result that for hamlet 1 gets a value of 93.4 and entered into a very ready cagoti, hamlet 2 gets a value of 96.8 and enters into the category very ready, hamlet 3 gets a value of 94.2 and enters the category very ready and hamlet 4 gets a value of 88.5 and enters the category very ready. Table 3. Assessment of Emergency Response Plan per Hamlet Hamlet Value Description Hamlet 1 50,5 Not Ready Hamlet 2 48 Not Ready Hamlet 3 39,25 Not Ready Hamlet 4 45,25 Not Ready Based on the results of table number 3 concerning the calculation of the parameters of the emergency response plan perdusun then obtained the result that for hamlet 1 get a value of 50.5 and enter into the category is not ready, hamlet 2 gets a value of 48 and enters the category of less prepared, hamlet 3 gets a value of 39.25 and enters the category is not ready and hamlet 4 gets a value of 45.25 and enters the category less prepared. Table 3. Data Results of Resource Mobility Data of Each Hamlet Hamlet Value Description Hamlet 1 53,1 Not Ready Hamlet 2 53,1 Not Ready Hamlet 3 38,9 Not Ready Hamlet 4 46,9 Not Ready Based on the results of table number 4 concerning the calculation of the calculation of the value of mobility parameters of perdusun resources then obtained the result that for hamlet 1 get a value of 53.1 and enter in the category of less prepared, hamlet 2 gets a value of 53.1 and enters into the category of less prepared, hamlet 3 gets a value of 38.9 and enters the category is not ready and hamlet 4 gets a value of 46.9 and enters the category less prepared. Discussion Table 27. Village Preparedness Hamlet Value Description Hamlet 1 65,6 Ready Hamlet 2 65,9 Ready Hamlet 3 57,45 Almost Ready Hamlet 4 60,21 Almost Ready Based on the results of table number 27 on the preparedness of the perdusun in Taraibangun Village, the researchers will explain the analysis related to the results of preparedness in the perdusun area. Hamlet 1 Dusun 1 in Taraibangun Village scored 65.6, entered the category OF SIAP, and became the hamlet with the second largest value of the four hamlets in Taraibangun Village. Based on the results of tabulation explained that people who have a level of education and a good type of work, will better understand the importance of preparedness for smog disasters, for education levels in the highest to lowest order namely S1/S2, High School and Junior High School, for this type of work based on the tabulation results that researchers do sorted by the highest to lowest namely civil servants, private employees, self-employed and labor. the factors that make hamlet 1 become a hamlet that is ready in the face of smog disaster, namely because of the characteristics of respondents obtained by researchers at the education level and have a good type of work, for the education level of middle school educated respondents numbering 11, for high school number 8 and for s1/s2 which is the number of 6 respondents, for the type of work of respondents from hamlet 1 includes; 10 respondents worked as workers, 12 worked as self-employed, and 3 respondents worked as civil servants. The higher the number of respondents who have education and good work, it will impact the level of preparedness for smog disasters, for the parameters of knowledge and attitude in hamlet 1 get a score of 93.4 and enter the category is very ready, for the emergency response plan gets a score of 50.5 in the category of underprepared, on the mobility of resources in hamlet 1 get a score of 53.1 entered in the category of less prepared , this makes hamlet 1 a hamlet that is ready in the face of smog disaster. Hamlet 2 Dusun 2 scored 65.9 in the SIAP category, this score is the highest score of the overall result of the hamlet in Taraibangun Village, hamlet 2 has characteristics of respondents who are superior to the characteristics of other respondents, characteristics of respondents for the level of education namely 6 respondents who only graduated from junior high school, 10 respondents who graduated from high school, and 9 respondents with the level of education of S1/S2. For the type of work held by the community, namely 6 respondents working as workers, 8 respondents working as self-employed, 5 respondents working as private employees 4 respondents working as civil servants and 2 respondents not working. The characteristics of the respondent are better than hamlet 1, so there is a difference in the preparedness score. Hamlet 3 scored 57.45 and entered the category almost ready, this score is the smallest score of all hamlets in Taraibangun Village. The characteristic factor of the level of education and the type of work of respondents in hamlet 3 makes this hamlet has the least score compared to the scores in other hamlets, while the characteristics of the respondents are 3 that is; at the level of education, the number of respondents who finished junior high school was 12 people, high school education as many as 11 people, and for S1/S2 as many as 2 people. In this type of work is arranged 3 namely; 10 respondents worked as workers, 9 respondents worked as self-employed, 5 respondents worked as private employees and 1 respondent did not work. The following is table number 29 about the characteristics of respondents in hamlets 1,2 and 3. Hamlet 4 Hamlet 4 scored 60.21 and fell into the category almost ready. Hamlet 4 became the number 3 hamlet in the preparedness score in the face of smog disasters. The thing that caused hamlet 4 to be 3rd in preparedness to deal with kabu asap disaster due to the characteristics of the level of education and the type of work that exists in hamlet 4, as well as the characteristics of the respondents of hamlet 4 namely; based on the level of education of respondents who graduated from junior high school of 6 people, for high school graduation of 15 people and for S1/S2 tamatan numbering 4 people. Based on the type of work in hamlet 4 that works as a laborer number 7 respondents, who work as self-employed number 6 people, who work as private employees number 7 people, 3 respondents work as civil servants and 2 respondents do not work. Dusun 4 has the most respondents at the high school education level and for the type of work in hamlet 4 is quite balanced not dominated by one type of work, if noted with the characteristics of respondents in hamlet 1, it is seen that the characteristics of respondents in hamlet 4 are better because junior high school graduates in hamlet 4 are less compared to hamlet 1. However, when viewed in detail, that on the preparedness score in the hamlet 4 parameters of knowledge and attitude have the lowest score compared to other hamlets, and on the parameters of knowledge and attitude based on the level of education concluded that the score for high school graduation is smaller than the junior high school, as has been explained the characteristics of the respondents in hamlet 4 dominated by the level of high school education, this makes the score in hamlet 4 smaller than the score from hamlet 1, as well as plus respondents who finished S1/S2 in hamlet 1 more than hamlet 4. The result of the value of each parameter in hamlet 4 is; for knowledge and attitude parameters get a score of 88.5 in the category of highly prepared, for emergency response plans get a score of 45.25 and enter the category of underprepared, and on the parameters mobility resources have a score of 46.9 entered into the category not ready. Table 34. Taraibang village community preparedness in the face of smog disaster Village Value Description Taraibangun Village 62,45 Almost Ready After seeing the description of the preparedness of taraibangun villagers in the face of smog disaster has been parsed based on the classifications, in closing this discussion, the preparedness of taraibangun villagers in the face of smog disaster that has a value of 63.45 and is classified as almost ready. Conclusion After the researchers conducted the data retrieval stage, data processing and data analysis, it was concluded that the preparedness of the community in the face of the smog disaster in Taraibangun Village fell into the category almost ready with an overall score of 62.45. As for the characteristics of respondents based on the level of education the highest score is obtained the level of education S1 /S2 with an overall score score of 77.7, for the characteristics of the community based on livelihoods with the highest score is Civil Servants with an overall score score of 79.36. For the preparedness of hamlet 1 Taraibangun village entered into the ready category with an overall value of 65.6, for the villagers 2 entered into the ready category with an overall value of 65.9, for the villagers 3 entered into the category of Almost Ready with an overall score of 57.45 and the last for hamlet 4 entered in the category almost ready with an overall value of 60.21. Advice There needs to be preparedness training for the community in the face of disasters, especially smog disasters. Researchers find it difficult to take respondents due to the openness of the surrounding community, so there needs to be further assistance related to the appeal from the head of the hamlet to RT/RW in encouraging the community. The village government should participate in providing a viable evacuation place for people prone to smog. There needs to be further attention from the Provincial Government to the District Government in addressing the preparedness of smog disasters in the surrounding communities, especially taraibangun villagers. Bibliography Akmal, F. M. (2020). Preparedness of High School Communtas In The Face of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster in Tsunami Prone Area in Lebak Regency, Banten Province. Bnpb. (2019). forest and land fires update September 21, 2019. Jakarta. Bnpb. (2020, 5 1). Definition of Disaster. Taken back from https://bnpb.go.id/definisi-bencana Herman, D. (2015). Geography of Natural Disasters. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Heryana, A. (2020, January 1). Understanding and Types of Disasters. Plucked May 1, 2020, from Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338537206 Kodoati. (2006). Integrated Disaster Management. Jakarta: Yasfir watampone. LIPI-UNESCO/ISDR. (2006). Public Preparedness Study in Anticipation of Earthquake and Tsunami Disasters in Indonesia. Jakarta: Lipi Press. Suryana. (2010). Research Methodology. rumusrumus.com. (2019, 12 18). Plucked 07 2020, 17, from https://rumusrumus.com/metode-survey/#Pengertian_Metode_Survey Taraibangun, P. D. (2020). Kampar Regency: Taraibangun Village Government. Tirto.id. (2019). Causes and Consequences of Forest Fires in Kalimantan To Sumatra. Quoted May 15, 2020, from Tirto.id: https://tirto.id/penyebab-dan-akibat-kebakaran-hutan-di-kalimantan-hingga-sumatera-eic3 Trinirmalaningrum. (2016 ). Behind the record smoke tragedy of forest and land fires in 2015. Scale. LAW/NO.24/2007. (2007). DISASTER MANAGEMENT. Wetlands. (1999, November 2). Forest and Peatland Management Series. Quoted March 1, 2020, from Wetlands.or.id: www.wetlands.or.id Wibisono, I. T. (2005). Silvikular Rehabilitation and Engineering Guide in Peatland. Bogor: Wetlands International-IP. Yulianti, N. (2018). Cross-Border Fire and Haze. Bogor: IPB Press