Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Bullying from a Legal Perspective Suharti, Eni; Hamdani, Hamdani; Zatira, Dhea; Mutiara, Upik; Ahmad, Ahmad; Rohaya, Nizla; Warsito, Warsito
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bestari Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): August 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jpmb.v3i8.6258

Abstract

This study aims to increase knowledge about the legal consequences for bullying perpetrators and to raise awareness among students and teachers about bullying in schools. The outreach was conducted in person at SMAN 7 in South Tangerang City using a survey method, involving both students and teachers. Information was delivered directly through presentations and discussions, and data was collected on students' initial knowledge of the legal implications of bullying before and after the outreach. The results showed that most students were unaware that bullying by minors could lead to criminal charges, although the legal treatment differs from that of adult criminal cases. These findings highlight the importance of legal education in schools to enhance understanding of the legal consequences of bullying, and the need for ongoing education to ensure that everyone in the school environment is adequately aware of the legal implications of bullying, thereby creating a safe and conducive learning environment.
Analysis Of A Judge’s Progressive Decision In The Pretrial Examination On The South Jakarta District Court Decision No.04/Pid.Prap/2015pn.Jkt.Sel Weldy Jevis Saleh; Upik Mutiara
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1321

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide an analytical review of the judicial progressive thoughts in the pretrial process in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. Methodology: This legal research used a normative juridical approach. The writers used the literary approach by studying books and legal regulations related to this research. Results: The judges’ basis of thought delivered in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was part of the judicial authority to make laws (judge-made laws). This is so that the law can provide the value of justice or certainty. But in this context, the method used by the judges was legal interpretation due to "other actions" in Article 95 of the Criminal Code that has an ambiguous meaning. Meanwhile, the stipulations that discussed the authority of indictors have not been regulated in the Criminal Code that is categorized as a pretrial object. The arrival of Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was a form of a legal update that makes indictors and prosecutors more professional. It makes them increase the quality of their human resources in carrying out indictment and prosecution; thus, no parties experience loss in the examination carried out by the law enforcing apparatus. Applications of this study: This analysis can be used to motivate judges to make more progressive decisions. Novelty/Originality of this study: This writing analyzed the judicial progressive thoughts in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel that has never been done before. Keywords: pretrial; progressive judges; indictment warrant; the eradication of corruption.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan tinjauan analitis terhadap pemikiran hukum progresif dalam proses praperadilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.  Metodologi: Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative dengan pendekatan studi pustaka dengan mempelajari buku-buku dan peraturan hukum yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini.  Hasil: Dasar pemikiran hakim yang tertuang dalam Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bagian dari kekuasaan kehakiman untuk membuat undang-undang. Hal ini dimaksudkan agar hukum dapat memberikan nilai keadilan atau kepastian. Namun dalam konteks ini, metode yang digunakan hakim adalah interpretasi hukum karena “perbuatan lain” dalam Pasal 95 KUHP yang memiliki makna ambigu. Sedangkan ketentuan yang membahas tentang kewenangan penyidik belum diatur dalam KUHP yang dikategorikan sebagai obyek praperadilan . Hadirnya Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bentuk pembaharuan hukum yang menjadikan para jaksa dan penuntut lebih profesional. Hal itu membuat mereka meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia dalam melakukan dakwaan dan penuntutan; dengan demikian, tidak ada pihak yang dirugikan dalam pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Kajian ini dapat digunakan untuk memotivasi para hakim dalam membuat keputusan yang lebih progresif.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tulisan ini menganalisis pemikiran progresif peradilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel yang belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya.  Kata kunci: praperadilan; hakim progresif; surat dakwaan; pemberantasan korupsi.
Legal protection for personal data security and muzakki financial transactions on digital zakat platform Insani, Nur; Rohaya, Nizla; Mutiara, Upik; Maguchu, Prosper
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a27200

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The implementation of digital zakat has become a popular trend for zakat practices in Indonesia, allowing the muzakki to make their payments swiftly and easily online. However, there are several challenges faced in the adoption of digital zakat in Indonesia, including concerns on the security of personal data and financial transactions. The potentials for hacking or misuse of muzakki's personal data may hinder the development of digital zakat.Purpose/Study Objective: This paper examines the legal protection of the personal data of zakat payers who use digital platforms as the means for distributing their zakat.Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this study is qualitative through normative legal research. The data obtained is analyzed with conceptual approach to formulate specific regulations governing digital zakat platform in detail.Findings: The existence of digital zakat is considered a technological innovation that has increased the accessibility of zakat for the people, thereby improving the welfare of those underprivileged. However, confusion and uncertainty regarding the rules and procedures of digital zakat remain in Indonesia. Digitising zakat brings along its own risks and challenges, including the potential for the misuse of funds, data security issues, and the lack of monitoring and accountability. To ensure the appropriate use of zakat funds in accordance with Islamic law and the relevant regulations, both the zakat institutions and the government must strengthen their supervisory and control over the collection and distribution of zakat through digital platforms. Additionally, it is important to note that not all levels of society in Indonesia have access to digital technology. A significant portion of the population, particularly those in remote areas, may not be able to fully participate in digital zakat practices due to lack of internet access or other necessary equipment.Paper Type: Research Article
UU No. 6 Tahun 2023 dan Iklim Investasi Indonesia Karim, Abdul; Mutiara, Upik; Jiriadana, Teenu Chandra; Swastika, Kadek; Hartanto, Erlin Veronica
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Februari - Maret 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i6.1606

Abstract

UU No. 6 of 2023 merepresentasikan sebuah terobosan deregulasi dalam kebijakan investasi Indonesia. Artikel ilmiah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas UU ini sebagai instrumen reformasi regulasi dalam memperbaiki iklim investasi nasional. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan statuta, menganalisis materi muatan UU serta data sekunder dari Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa UU ini berperan sebagai katalis signifikan yang salah satu terobosannya adalah mengenalkan sistem Online Single Submission (OSS), yang mentransformasi layanan perizinan dari model birokratis konvensional menuju digital terintegrasi. Inovasi ini berhasil memangkas waktu dan biaya perizinan, serta menciptakan kepastian hukum yang lebih baik bagi investor. Secara empiris, reformasi ini berkontribusi pada peningkatan realisasi investasi dan peringkat kemudahan berusaha Indonesia. Namun, studi juga mengidentifikasi tantangan implementasi, terutama terkait kapasitas kelembagaan di tingkat daerah, koordinasi antarinstansi, dan konsistensi penafsiran aturan. Disimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan UU No. 6 Tahun 2023 terletak pada kemampuannya menciptakan fondasi hukum bagi tata kelola investasi yang lebih efisien, meskipun efektivitas jangka panjangnya bergantung pada konsistensi implementasi dan harmonisasi regulasi di tingkat teknis.
Community-Based Responsive Legal Transformation: A Legal Sociology Innovation to Eliminate Structural Poverty in Indonesia Sumantri, Ibnu Imam; Mutiara, Upik; Sihombing, Rahmat; Wijaya, Putri Regina; Arking, Septra Risda
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v7i2.2218

Abstract

Poverty in Indonesia remains structural and enduring despite constitutional commitments to social justice. Viewing law as a social practice within a stratified society rather than merely a written standard, this article examines structural poverty from a sociological perspective. Based on a review of academic literature, relevant public policy studies, and laws and regulations, this research employs a juridical-sociological approach with qualitative methods. The results show that structural poverty in Indonesia is not only caused by financial constraints but is also created and perpetuated by the ways in which laws are written, implemented, and accessed. Law often operates administratively and procedurally rather than functioning fully as a tool for social transformation, owing to the gap between law in books and law in action, limited access to justice, and an elite-dominated legal culture. This article argues that, without institutional and cultural reforms, the inherent limitations of law within an unequal social system may actually exacerbate inequality rather than redress it. The distinctive conceptual contribution of this paper lies in reframing structural poverty as a failure of law to operate as a social practice, rather than merely a failure of economic or social policy. In addition to offering a critical perspective for developing community-based responsive legal reform aimed at substantive social justice in Indonesia, this study theoretically advances the sociology of law by establishing law as a constitutive component of the system that reproduces inequality.
Resolution of Digital Technology Patent Disputes in Indonesia: Case Analysis of Nokia and PT Bright Mobile Dwi Azzahra, Regita; Regita Dwi Azzahra; Upik Mutiara; Amiludin
Paulus Law Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

he rapid development of digital technology has increased the economic value of inventions based on software, algorithms, and information technology systems, while simultaneously leading to a rise in patent disputes in Indonesia. Digital patents possess unique characteristics, as they are intangible, easily replicated, and frequently involve cross-border licensing arrangements, which complicates legal enforcement. This study aims to analyze the urgency of resolving digital patent disputes and to evaluate the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms under Indonesian positive law. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, examining Law Number 13 of 2016 on Patents and its practical implementation. The analysis focuses on the patent dispute between Nokia Technologies OY and PT Bright Mobile Telecommunication. The findings indicate that litigation through the Commercial Court faces significant procedural and technical evidentiary challenges, resulting in ineffective dispute resolution. This study concludes that alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, particularly mediation and arbitration, are more suitable for digital patent disputes due to their efficiency, speed, and ability to preserve the economic value of inventions. Therefore, stronger legal policies and adaptive dispute resolution mechanisms are necessary to ensure legal certainty and support the development of digital technology in Indonesia.