Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Bullying from a Legal Perspective Suharti, Eni; Hamdani, Hamdani; Zatira, Dhea; Mutiara, Upik; Ahmad, Ahmad; Rohaya, Nizla; Warsito, Warsito
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bestari Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): August 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jpmb.v3i8.6258

Abstract

This study aims to increase knowledge about the legal consequences for bullying perpetrators and to raise awareness among students and teachers about bullying in schools. The outreach was conducted in person at SMAN 7 in South Tangerang City using a survey method, involving both students and teachers. Information was delivered directly through presentations and discussions, and data was collected on students' initial knowledge of the legal implications of bullying before and after the outreach. The results showed that most students were unaware that bullying by minors could lead to criminal charges, although the legal treatment differs from that of adult criminal cases. These findings highlight the importance of legal education in schools to enhance understanding of the legal consequences of bullying, and the need for ongoing education to ensure that everyone in the school environment is adequately aware of the legal implications of bullying, thereby creating a safe and conducive learning environment.
Analysis Of A Judge’s Progressive Decision In The Pretrial Examination On The South Jakarta District Court Decision No.04/Pid.Prap/2015pn.Jkt.Sel Weldy Jevis Saleh; Upik Mutiara
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1321

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide an analytical review of the judicial progressive thoughts in the pretrial process in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. Methodology: This legal research used a normative juridical approach. The writers used the literary approach by studying books and legal regulations related to this research. Results: The judges’ basis of thought delivered in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was part of the judicial authority to make laws (judge-made laws). This is so that the law can provide the value of justice or certainty. But in this context, the method used by the judges was legal interpretation due to "other actions" in Article 95 of the Criminal Code that has an ambiguous meaning. Meanwhile, the stipulations that discussed the authority of indictors have not been regulated in the Criminal Code that is categorized as a pretrial object. The arrival of Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was a form of a legal update that makes indictors and prosecutors more professional. It makes them increase the quality of their human resources in carrying out indictment and prosecution; thus, no parties experience loss in the examination carried out by the law enforcing apparatus. Applications of this study: This analysis can be used to motivate judges to make more progressive decisions. Novelty/Originality of this study: This writing analyzed the judicial progressive thoughts in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel that has never been done before. Keywords: pretrial; progressive judges; indictment warrant; the eradication of corruption.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan tinjauan analitis terhadap pemikiran hukum progresif dalam proses praperadilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.  Metodologi: Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative dengan pendekatan studi pustaka dengan mempelajari buku-buku dan peraturan hukum yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini.  Hasil: Dasar pemikiran hakim yang tertuang dalam Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bagian dari kekuasaan kehakiman untuk membuat undang-undang. Hal ini dimaksudkan agar hukum dapat memberikan nilai keadilan atau kepastian. Namun dalam konteks ini, metode yang digunakan hakim adalah interpretasi hukum karena “perbuatan lain” dalam Pasal 95 KUHP yang memiliki makna ambigu. Sedangkan ketentuan yang membahas tentang kewenangan penyidik belum diatur dalam KUHP yang dikategorikan sebagai obyek praperadilan . Hadirnya Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bentuk pembaharuan hukum yang menjadikan para jaksa dan penuntut lebih profesional. Hal itu membuat mereka meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia dalam melakukan dakwaan dan penuntutan; dengan demikian, tidak ada pihak yang dirugikan dalam pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Kajian ini dapat digunakan untuk memotivasi para hakim dalam membuat keputusan yang lebih progresif.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tulisan ini menganalisis pemikiran progresif peradilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel yang belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya.  Kata kunci: praperadilan; hakim progresif; surat dakwaan; pemberantasan korupsi.
Legal protection for personal data security and muzakki financial transactions on digital zakat platform Insani, Nur; Rohaya, Nizla; Mutiara, Upik; Maguchu, Prosper
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a27200

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The implementation of digital zakat has become a popular trend for zakat practices in Indonesia, allowing the muzakki to make their payments swiftly and easily online. However, there are several challenges faced in the adoption of digital zakat in Indonesia, including concerns on the security of personal data and financial transactions. The potentials for hacking or misuse of muzakki's personal data may hinder the development of digital zakat.Purpose/Study Objective: This paper examines the legal protection of the personal data of zakat payers who use digital platforms as the means for distributing their zakat.Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this study is qualitative through normative legal research. The data obtained is analyzed with conceptual approach to formulate specific regulations governing digital zakat platform in detail.Findings: The existence of digital zakat is considered a technological innovation that has increased the accessibility of zakat for the people, thereby improving the welfare of those underprivileged. However, confusion and uncertainty regarding the rules and procedures of digital zakat remain in Indonesia. Digitising zakat brings along its own risks and challenges, including the potential for the misuse of funds, data security issues, and the lack of monitoring and accountability. To ensure the appropriate use of zakat funds in accordance with Islamic law and the relevant regulations, both the zakat institutions and the government must strengthen their supervisory and control over the collection and distribution of zakat through digital platforms. Additionally, it is important to note that not all levels of society in Indonesia have access to digital technology. A significant portion of the population, particularly those in remote areas, may not be able to fully participate in digital zakat practices due to lack of internet access or other necessary equipment.Paper Type: Research Article