Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Fakultas Ekonomi Jurnal Akta Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi SIGn Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan (Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship) FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Fransisco, Fransisco
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pidana Mati dan Hak Hidup Sebagai Non derogable rights Di Indonesia Yang Berkepastian Hukum Kristanto, Kiki; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Nugraha, Satriya; Fransisco, Fransisco; Mugopal, Undang
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i1.624

Abstract

Ketentuan Pasal 4 UU No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang HAM yang di dalamnya menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup merupakan non derogable rights secara horizontal bertentangan dengan KUHP dan sejumlah UU di luar KUHP yang mencantumkan ancaman pidana mati. Konflik norma ini mencerminkan tidak adanya relevansi di antara aturan yang memberlakukan pidana mati dengan aturan yang menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup adalah non derogable rights. Menanggapi adanya konflik norma tersebut, perlu dikaji pengaturan pidana mati dan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights dalam perspektif ius constituendum. Jenis penelitian ini yakni penelitian Hukum normatif dengan metode pendekatan statute approach, historical approach, dan conceptual approach. Hasil dan pembahasan bahwa kedepan tentang pidana mati masih dipertahankan, sehingga perlu melakukan perubahan UUDN RI Tahun 1945 dengan menambahkan ketentuan pasal yang menyatakan bahwa pidana mati tidak bertentangan dengan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights. Selain itu, dalam KUHP baru eksistensi pidana mati tetap dipertahankan, tetapi pengaturannya dilakukan secara khusus (eksepsional).
Absolute Jurisdiction Of Arbitration Institutions According To Indonesian Positive Law: Analysis Of The Decision Of The South Jakarta State Court Number 420/Pdt.G/2020 Tambunan, Desima; Fransisco, Fransisco; Wulandari, Vicka Prama
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2436

Abstract

Arbitration is an interesting manner to resolve trade issues because it is final and binding. Article 30 of law quantity 30 year 1999 on Arbitration and opportunity Dispute decision explains that the courtroom isn't always legal to just accept a case among  events who've selected arbitration as a method of dispute decision, as said within the arbitration clause. but, within the discipline there may be a violation of the authority of the district court docket, specifically the courtroom nevertheless accepts and manages cases that ought to be resolved via arbitration. The reason of this examine is to investigate the regulations of absolute authority of arbitration institutions in the Indonesian felony device and assessment the suitability of. District court docket choice variety 420/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Jkt Sel. The method used is normative criminal research with statutory, case, and conceptual strategies. in the case, the panel of judges stated that the District court had the authority to pay attention the case. even though there was an settlement among the events worried to clear up the dispute via arbitration. The judge's reasoning changed into that the issue rely of the case became an act of tort and no longer a breach of settlement, and not all parties inside the case had been certain by means of the arbitration clause. The outcomes of the evaluation display that the selection violates the regulations of absolutely the authority of arbitration, and isn't always according with the ideas stipulated in Article three of regulation quantity 30 of 1999 which states that the courtroom isn't always legal to just accept cases which have been certain with the aid of an arbitration settlement.
Handep Hapakat and the Future of Fair Labor Dispute Resolution Fransisco, Fransisco; Hermon, Hermon; Susilowati, Eny
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.51244

Abstract

This study aims to examine the feasibility and normative design of integrating the Dayak philosophy of Handep Hapakat—solidarity, deliberative consensus, and social harmony—into industrial relations dispute resolution, especially at the pre-litigation stage. The research method used is normative legal research employing statutory (legislative), conceptual, and historical approaches. Primary legal materials consist of labor and industrial relations dispute settlement regulations, while secondary materials include scholarly works on Dayak customary law, local wisdom, restorative justice, and legal pluralism. The analysis is descriptive-analytical to construct an integration framework compatible with positive law. The novelty in this research is the formulation of a conceptual integration model that translates Handep Hapakat values into three operational pathways within the existing PPHI structure: (i) customary deliberation-based bipartite settlement (“bipartite plus”), (ii) culturally informed mediation, and (iii) customary arbitration oriented toward restorative outcomes while maintaining legal safeguards. Based on the research, it is concluded that embedding Handep Hapakat can strengthen pre-litigation dispute settlement by promoting faster, lower-cost, participatory resolutions that prioritize relationship repair and reinforce Indonesia’s legal pluralism. Implementation nonetheless requires local regulatory support, systematic stakeholder socialization, and capacity-building for customary leaders to ensure alignment with labor-law standards and rights protection.
Co-Authors Adriana, Erica Akbar, Faris Alfarizy, Tomy Endar Nirmala Hayati, Mulida Hermon, Hermon Hibban, Muhammad Ibnu Kristanto, Kiki Kristhy, Mutia Evi Kurniasari, Sischa Lindayadia, Lindayadia Maddolangan, Doaa Risma Diputra Mawarni, Mira Mugopal, Undang Natania, Elsa Beatris Rut Nugroho, Any Pebrianto, Pebrianto Saputra, Fandra Satriya Nugraha Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Suriansyah Murhaini Susilowati, Eny Sutikno, Arron Yonas Tambunan, Desima Teti Desyani Wulandari, Vicka Prama Yusyanto, Yusyanto