Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Kesejahteraan Tenaga Pendukung: Perspektif Regulasi Ketenagakerjaan di Sekretariat DPRD Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Reindra, Nanda; Nurlaily
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.401

Abstract

The welfare of support workers plays a crucial role in ensuring efficient public service delivery, particularly within governmental institutions such as the Secretariat of the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) of Riau Islands Province. This study examines the welfare conditions of support workers through the lens of labor regulations, analyzing the extent to which existing policies provide adequate protection, fair wages, job security, and social benefits. By employing a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis, this research explores the alignment between local labor policies and national laws, identifying gaps and challenges in implementation. Findings indicate that while Indonesia's labor regulations provide a legal framework for worker welfare, practical enforcement remains inconsistent, often resulting in wage disparities, contractual employment terms, and access to social security benefits for support staff. The study highlights the need for policy adjustments and stricter regulatory oversight to enhance the welfare of support workers in government institutions. Recommendations include strengthening legal enforcement improving contractual protections, and promoting equitable labor policies to ensure fair treatment and sustainable livelihoods for support workers.
Exploring Kurikulum Merdeka: ELT Practices in an Islamic Secondary School in Batam Nurlaily; Maya Marsevani; Tasya Meylarisman; Iffani Junita Tambunan; Zico Kevin Mamusung; Vriskila Piolawanti
LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies
Publisher : STAIN Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/lets.v7i1.1571

Abstract

Curriculum reforms play a vital role in improving the quality of teaching and learning, particularly in language.  Kurikulum Merdeka introduces a student-centered approach to learning in Indonesia. Yet little is known about how it is implemented in Islamic secondary schools where national and religious goals must be aligned. This study investigates English teachers’ perspectives on the curriculum’s effectiveness, challenges, and best practices in this context. A qualitative case study was conducted through classroom observations, interviews, and field notes. Findings indicate that the curriculum enhances student engagement, particularly when instruction involves real-life themes, technology, and task choice. Teacher 1 noted that even students who “usually sleep in class now want to learn,” while Teacher 2 found learners more active when discussing “issues happening around us.” However, limited training, infrastructure constraints, and unclear assessment practices created implementation challenges. Teachers addressed these issues through differentiated instruction, authentic materials, peer collaboration, and ongoing professional learning. This study contributes context-specific insights into how English instruction adapts to Kurikulum Merdeka in Islamic schooling. It recommends more practical teacher training, improved digital access, and clearer assessment guidelines. Future research should examine diverse regions and track long-term development of learner autonomy under the curriculum.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen atas Pemalsuan Registrasi BPOM Pangan Olahan: Perbandingan Regulasi Indonesia dan Malaysia Simatupang, Revinka; Fitri, Winda; Nurlaily
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i1.13206

Abstract

This study examines the legal issues surrounding the falsification of BPOM (Food and Drug Authority) registration numbers on processed food products through a comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. The main problems analyzed concern the differences in regulatory approaches between the two countries and the need for legal lessons that Indonesia can adopt to strengthen its consumer protection system. The research employs a normative juridical method using a statutory and comparative approach, based on the analysis of legislation, academic literature, and relevant research findings. The results show that legal protection in Indonesia remains indirect, fragmented across various regulations, and primarily focuses on repressive rather than preventive measures. In contrast, Malaysia has implemented a digital supervision system, adopted the principle of strict liability, and established stronger law enforcement through the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA). Normatively, this study concludes that Indonesia needs to establish specific provisions regarding the falsification of distribution permits in BPOM regulations or the Food Law, strengthen BPOM’s authority as the sole supervisory institution, and adopt a digital monitoring system to achieve effective, preventive, and technology-adaptive consumer legal protection.
Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Praktik Overclaim dalam Industri Skincare: perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Salsabilla, Anindya Putri Keisha; Fitri, Winda; Nurlaily
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i1.13300

Abstract

The rapid growth of the skincare industry, particularly through the use of digital marketing, has contributed to the increasing prevalence of overclaim practices that have the potential to mislead consumers. This study aims to examine the forms of legal protection for consumers against overclaim practices in the skincare industry in Indonesia and the United States, as well as to analyze legal principles and mechanisms that can be adopted by Indonesia to strengthen its consumer protection system. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, drawing on primary and secondary legal materials, including the Consumer Protection Law, BPOM regulations, as well as the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) 2022 in the United States. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s consumer protection system remains largely reactive and administrative, as supervision and law enforcement are generally conducted after products have entered the market and violations have been identified. In contrast, the United States applies a preventive and evidence-based consumer protection framework through mandatory pre-market verification, the application of the principle of scientific accountability, and the support of transparency mechanisms and class action procedures, thereby providing more effective consumer protection. These findings are consistent with Philipus M. Hadjon’s Theory of Legal Protection, which emphasizes the importance of preventive legal protection to prevent consumer harm.
Persiapan Hukum Penggunaan/Penerapan Teknologi Blockchain dalam Industri Fintech guna Mencapai SDGs: Isu Global Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Singapura Jayanto, Wen; Tan, David; Nurlaily
Jurnal Fundamental Justice Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026 : In Press
Publisher : Universitas Bumigora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30812/fundamental.v7i1.6167

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesiapan kerangka hukum Indonesia dalam mengakomodasi teknologi blockchain pada industri fintech guna mendukung pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), serta membandingkannya dengan Singapura. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi blockchain di Indonesia masih terbatas pada pengaturan aset kripto, bersifat fragmentaris, dan belum didukung pedoman teknis maupun mekanisme regulatory sandbox yang efektif, sehingga pemanfaatan blockchain bagi layanan publik dan pencapaian SDGs belum optimal. Sebaliknya, Singapura memiliki kerangka regulasi yang adaptif melalui Payment Services Act 2019, pedoman teknis Monetary Authority of Singapore, serta regulatory sandbox yang mendorong inovasi blockchain secara terukur dan memberikan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Indonesia perlu membentuk regulasi blockchain yang komprehensif, adaptif, dan berbasis risiko agar pemanfaatannya selaras dengan tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan.