Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.578
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Musamus Law Review Societas : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial Jurnal Restorative Justice Collegium Studiosum Journal LEBAH Sagu: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Animha Law Journal
Nasri Wijaya
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Musamus
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Animha Law Journal

 1 
PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PILKADA 2024: ANALISIS TERHADAP AMBANG BATAS DAN PELANGGARAN TSM Wijaya, Nasri; Muddin, Ahmad Ali; Pelu, Handika Dwi Ardiansyah; Rado, Rudini Hasyim; Pieter, Salvadoris
Animha Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Animha Law Journal
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/alj.v1i2.71

Abstract

Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) are a form of implementing direct democracy in Indonesia which provides space for the people to choose their leaders. However, in practice, disputes over regional election results often occur, either due to differences in vote results or serious violations that affect the election process. The Constitutional Court (MK) plays a strategic role in resolving regional election results disputes based on the provisions of Law Number 10 of 2016, especially Article 158 which regulates the threshold for vote differences and exceptions for structured, systematic and massive (TSM) violations. This research uses a normative juridical method with an analytical approach to statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and empirical data related to the 2024 Pilkada. The results of the research show that the application of the vote difference threshold provisions provides initial screening for incoming lawsuits, while proving TSM violations remains the main challenge due to the complexity of the evidence and political pressure. The conclusion of this research confirms that the role of the Constitutional Court is very important in maintaining the legitimacy of the regional election results and the integrity of the democratic process in Indonesia.
LEGITIME PORTIE SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERLINDUNGAN HAK AHLI WARIS: STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ADAT PAPUA Zesa, Yuldiana; Azis, Yuldiana Zesa; Rahail, Emiliana B.; Wijaya, Nasri; Muddin, Ahmad Ali
Animha Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2025): Animha Law Journal
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/alj.v2i2.191

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis konsep legitime portie dalam hukum perdata (BW) sebagai perlindungan hak ahli waris, membandingkannya dengan prinsip pewarisan dalam hukum adat Papua, khususnya masyarakat Marind. Legitime portie adalah bagian mutlak warisan yang tak bisa dikesampingkan pewasiat, berlandaskan keadilan distributif dan moralitas hukum. Sebaliknya, pewarisan adat Papua didasarkan pada kolektivitas, kekerabatan, dan nilai spiritual, di mana harta dipandang komunal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif-komparatif, didukung wawancara tokoh adat. Hasilnya, legitime portie menawarkan perlindungan legal formal hak individu, sementara hukum adat Papua memberikan perlindungan sosial-komunal yang berakar pada nilai kekerabatan, sejalan dengan teori hukum responsif. Ketegangan antara individualisme hukum perdata dan kolektivitas hukum adat menyoroti dualisme hukum di Indonesia. Integrasi nilai lokal penting untuk mencapai keadilan substantif dalam konteks multikultural Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ali Muddin, Ahmad Anton Johanis Silubun Azis, Yulidiana Zesa Emiliana Bernadina Rahail Fransiskus Samderubun Handika D. A. Pelu Handika Dwi Ardiansyah Pelu Jaya, Andi Ervin Novara Kamila, Dyana Hesti Muddin, Ahmad Ali Nisa, Syadila Ainun Parera, Zegovia Rudini Hasyim Rado Salvadoris Pieter Sukmawati, Roro Anggi Suradinata, Poetri Enindah Thimon Febby Yuldiana Zesa Azis Zesa Azis, Yuldiana Zesa, Yuldiana