Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

EGYPTIAN POLICY BASED ON INSIGHTS OF HISTORY OF MUSLIM MOVEMENT AND SALAFI MOVEMENT Jelang Ramadhan
DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 18 No 2 (2020): DEVELOPMENT
Publisher : Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Administrasi, FISIP, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.802 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/dia.v18i2.4352

Abstract

The aftermath of the Arab Spring was leaving a great turnover for many countries as the regime changed, so does Egypt. As one of the most influential countries both in the Middle East and North Africa, Egypt's domestic politics is quite dynamics since immemorial time, from numerous kingdoms, West colonialism until republic under the authoritarian regime in this modern days. For once, the dynamics of politics itself comes from the grass-root level whichever reached the top such as al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun or Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi Movements which caught people’s attention, not only in Egypt but the entire world. Both basically have religious intentions as it is considered Islamic movements except for their differences in political experience, religious interpretation and manners overpower contestation. Although Egypt currently is controlled by a military coup regime that tends to perpetuate the power, the Brotherhood and Salafi Movements which likewise spread to many countries still lurking and it might be consolidating the power to turn back the democracy to Egyptian who suffer from authoritarian style regime ever since the establishment of the nation after independence from British colonialism. This paper is aimed to describe the policy of the Islamic movement in Egypt which is based on religious intention and the interaction with politics and democratic goal from the nature of establishment,  during the Arab Spring and the prospect for Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi Movements as the unrest recently occured.
The Effect of Indonesia Philanthropy’s Regulation Towards the Welfare State Mukhlishin Mukhlishin; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori Absori; Jelang Ramadhan; Dinil Abrar Sulthani
BESTUUR Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.63527

Abstract

Philanthropy has been very beneficial for social welfare. However, the regulation of philanthropy that governs philanthropy management institutions has not been successful in enhancing the welfare of the poor, particularly in post-COVID-19 tourism areas. This research explains the issue from a doctrinal normative perspective. The results indicate that the characteristics of philanthropy norms work as economic capital assistance, the regulation also should be able to identify the objectives and goals to be achieved for human welfare. Moreover, state and private institutions manage philanthropy independently, freely, and responsibly performing economic empowerment is developed with the existence of institutions that manage resources derived from philanthropic activities. These activities are based on the recommendations which are contained in scriptures and hierarchical juridical legitimacy containing transcendent norms.
KETIMPANGAN ANTARA REHABILITASI DAN PEMENJARAAN DALAM PENANGANAN KASUS NARKOTIKA: TINJAUAN DISKRESI Sulistiandriatmoko Sulistiandriatmoko; Eva Achjani Zulfa; Jelang Ramadhan
Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Vol 4, No 01 (2024): January
Publisher : Univeristas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jj.v4i01.3943

Abstract

ABSTRAKMasalah penyalahgunaan narkoba masih menjadi beban besar dalam penanganan kasus kriminal di Indonesia, terutama dengan adanya tuduhan terjadinya penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh aparat kepolisian dalam pelaksanaan penyidikan. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis bagaimana diskresi digunakan oleh Penyidik Polri dalam kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi, dan upaya penataan ulang yang diperlukan agar penggunaan diskresi menjadi lebih baik. Penelitian ini merupakan gabungan dari penelitian hukum empiris dan normatif, sementara analisis datanya menggunakan metodologi kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Kajian empiris dilakukan dengan mewawancarai Penyidik Polri, Klien Rehabilitasi Wajib, dan Anggota Tim Asesmen Terpadu. Sedangkan kajian normatif mengacu pada norma dan tolok ukur batasan diskresi yang diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) dan Undang-Undang Kepolisian, konsep teoritis tentang diskresi dan pendapat ahli hukum. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan diskresi masih kurang tepat karena belum sesuai dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam KUHAP dan Undang-Undang Kepolisian, kondisi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, baik internal maupun eksternal. Untuk mengatasi masalah ini, diperlukan rekonfigurasi yang menyeluruh agar penggunaan diskresi oleh Penyidik POLRI lebih baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor kunci yang menyebabkan kesalahan dalam penggunaan diskresi, serta memberikan rekomendasi untuk perbaikan praktik tersebut. ABSTRACTThe issue of drug abuse remains a significant challenge in handling criminal cases in Indonesia, exacerbated by alleged irregularities among police officers during investigations. This study investigates the discretion exercised by Police Investigators in drug abuse cases, examining influencing factors and proposing reconfiguration efforts for improved discretion usage. Employing a combination of empirical and normative legal research methods, data analysis involves both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Empirical research involves interviews with Police Investigators, Mandatory Rehabilitation Clients, and Integrated Assessment Team Members, while normative analysis refers to legal frameworks such as the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Police Act, alongside theoretical concepts and legal expert opinions on discretion. Findings reveal inadequate discretion in employment, diverging from legal provisions, influenced by internal and external factors. Addressing this, a comprehensive reconfiguration is essential to enhance Police Investigators' discretion usage. The study aims to pinpoint key factors contributing to discretion misuse and offer recommendations for its improvement, emphasizing alignment with legal norms and procedural requirements.
STUDI KOMPARATIF NILAI-NILAI ISLAM DALAM STRATEGI ADVOKASI HAK ASASI MANUSIA OLEH AKTIVIS MUSLIM INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT DARI TAHUN 1964 SAMPAI 2020 Karomah Widianingsih; Muhammad Fuad; Jelang Ramadhan; Raul Gonzales
Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Vol 4, No 02 (2024): July
Publisher : Univeristas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jj.v4i2.4310

Abstract

ABSTRAKStudi tentang hak asasi manusia (HAM) terus berkembang, dengan advokasi yang menjangkau periode sejarah hingga masa kontemporer karena isu-isu HAM yang terus berlanjut di berbagai negara, khususnya Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat (AS). Aktivis HAM Muslim secara signifikan telah memengaruhi kesadaran masyarakat dan pemerintahan untuk menegakkan HAM. Studi ini berfokus pada nilai-nilai Islam yang diterapkan dalam strategi advokasi, kendala-kendala yang dihadapi aktivis HAM Muslim, serta persamaan dan perbedaan prinsip dan strategi advokasi yang ada pada aktivis HAM dari non-Muslim. Tujuan dari studi ini yakni untuk menganalisis cerminan nilai-nilai Islam dalam strategi advokasi aktivis HAM Muslim Indonesia dan Amerika dari tahun 1964 sampai 2020. Menggunakan purposive sampling dan analisis data deskriptif kualitatif, studi ini mengidentifikasi advokasi aktivis Munir Said Thalib, Abdurrahman Wahid, Malcolm X, Muhammad Ali, dan Linda Sarsour. Berdasarkan analisis pendekatan nilai-nilai Islam, maka sebagian besar strategi advokasi aktivis HAM Muslim di Indonesia dan Amerika yang meliputi taktik persuasi, strategi pemodelan, strategi litigasi, dan strategi pendidikan sama-sama menerapkan nilai Islam seperti kejujuran, keadilan, kerja sama, kerja keras, dan ketertiban sosial. Meskipun menghadapi berbagai hambatan, ketekunan para aktivis HAM Muslim pada akhirnya membawa hasil yang positif. Nilai-nilai Islam yang tercermin dalam strategi advokasi para aktivis HAM Muslim tidak bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan dan sosial yang dianut oleh aktivis HAM non-Muslim dan masyarakat secara global. ABSTRACTThe study of human rights continues to evolve, with advocacy spanning historical periods to contemporary times due to persistent human rights issues in various countries, particularly Indonesia and the United States (US). Muslim human rights activists have significantly influenced societal awareness and governance to uphold human rights. This study focused on Islamic values dominate advocacy strategies, obstacles faced by Muslim human rights activists, and the similarities and differences in the principles and strategies of advocacy compared to non-Muslim human rights activists. The study aims to analyze the influence of Islamic values reflected in the advocacy strategies of Indonesian and American Muslim human rights activists from  1964 to 2020. Using purposive sampling and descriptive qualitative data analysis, the study identifies the advocacies of Munir Said Thalib, Abdurrahman Wahid, Malcolm X, Muhammad Ali, and Linda Sarsour. Based on the analysis of the Islamic values approach, most of the advocacy strategies of Muslim human rights activists in Indonesia and America, which include persuasion tactics, modeling strategies, litigation strategies, and education strategies, equally apply Islamic values such as honesty, justice, cooperation, hard work, and social order. Despite numerous obstacles, the perseverance of Muslim human rights activists ultimately leads to positive outcomes. Islamic values reflected in the advocacy strategies of Muslim human rights activists are not contradictory to the humanitarian and social values embraced by non-Muslim human rights activists and society globally.
The Religious Court Trial Of Wali Adhal Cases In The Indonesian Legal System: A Legal Analysis Mardi Candra; Ramlani Sinaulan; Fahadil Al Hasan; Jelang Ramadhan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.77-96

Abstract

Marriage combines the husband-wife relationship and unifies two families of different ethnicities, cultures, and backgrounds. The consent of the wali is a significant function of the family, particularly the prospective bride's family. Marriage requires the permission of the wali because it is null and void without it. In actuality, the wali of the prospective bride may be hesitant to marry off the woman under his supervision for various reasons, both Shar'i and non-Shar'i. As a result, the prospective bride must apply to the Religious Court for wali adhal for the marriage to occur. This qualitative research employs a normative legal approach, which examines legal norms found in laws and regulations, judge judgments, and other legal sources. According to the findings of this study, wali adhal cases are currently evaluated by voluntary trials or unilaterally. However, because it is unilaterally assessed and there is no opponent, fulfilling the legal purpose of building integrative justice in this examination requires considerable effort. Therefore, wali adhal cases must be examined using a contentious trial.
KOREAN WAVE SEBAGAI FENOMENA DIGITAL: STUDI TENTANG RESPON PEMERINTAH İNDONESIA Inayah, Astiwi; Ramadhan, Jelang; Septiani, Winda; Darmaji, Agung
SOSIOLOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): SOSIOLOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Jurusan Sosiologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/sosiologi.v26i2.1313

Abstract

 South Korea has successfully utilized digital media to promote its popular culture as part of its cultural diplomacy strategy. The popularity of South Korean culture in various countries, including Indonesia, emerged in the Korean wave or Hallyu phenomenon. This shows how cultural globalization can shape international relations and social dynamics in the digital era. This research aimed to analyze how the Indonesian government responds to the spread of the Korean wave and what aspects drive the government's response. This research used the concept of intersubjectivity (inter-subject interaction) in the perspective of constructivism according to Alexander Wendt and a qualitative approach with primary data collection techniques through interviews and secondary data through journals, previous research, archival documentation, and websites. The research was analyzed using six main steps according to Bryman. The results showed that the Indonesian government tends to give a positive and open response to the spread of the Korean wave while still paying attention to the regulations that apply in Indonesia. This response when analyzed using the concept of inter-subject interaction is driven by several aspects such as history, interaction, and interests. The results of the study are expected to provide an understanding of how the Indonesian government responds to the rapid development of foreign cultures while at the same time the government is faced with the challenge of maintaining the existence of local culture and popularizing the culture of its own country.
Unveiling the Power of Burhānī Epistemology in Reshaping Islamic Economic Law for a Fair Financial Landscape Mukhlishin, Mukhlishin; Wahyudi, Abdullah Tri; Ramadhan, Jelang
Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v8i2.8482

Abstract

This study aims to explain the concept of burhānī epistemology and its implementation in the development of Islamic economic law formulation. The method used in the research is a thematic literature review with qualitative approach based on empirical normative data to ensure the consistency of the research data. The result of this research is that burhānī epistemology as a logical method or argumentative rationale can be applied to the reality or context analysis of interest-based finance. The practice of imposing interest in the conventional financial system indicates an addition (ziyādah) that can harm one of the parties to the contract (baṭīl). In addition, the implementation of the burhānī method must include the bayānī method in the formulation of Islamic economic law because the reasoning process of the concept of interest must be linked to the concept of usury in the text (naṣ), which must be read and understood textually and contextually. The application of these findings is to review the reality of interest practices in the banking system as a home base in the formulation of Islamic economic laws by eliminating aspects of usury and interest in the financial system. The Burhani method is used to explain banking interest and contractual agreements that incorporate falsehoods like gharār (uncertainty) and injustice (mistreatment) against the parties.
Kultur Strategis Amerika Serikat di dalam Dokumen Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indo-Pacific Strategy 2022 Gaudialmo, Sean; Ramadhan, Jelang
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v9i1.24758

Abstract

Kebijakan luar negeri suatu negara dapat didasarkan pada kultur strategisnya, dan Amerika Serikat tidak terkecuali dengan Indo-Pacific Strategy 2022. Kultur strategis Amerika Serikat mencakup nilai-nilai seperti hak asasi manusia dan kesetaraan, supremasi hukum dan ketertiban, liberalisme, serta American Exceptionalism. Banyak narasi melihat kehadiran Amerika Serikat di kawasan Indo-Pasifik hanya dari aspek keuntungan ekonomi dan keamanan semata, padahal terdapat dimensi kultur strategis di balik kebijakan tersebut. Melalui penelitian kualitatif ini, penulis berupaya menghadirkan pembaruan dengan memperdalam analisis terhadap kultur strategis dalam perumusan dan implementasi Indo-Pacific Strategy 2022. Penelitian ini juga menyoroti bagaimana kultur strategis Amerika Serikat terkadang berbenturan dengan kultur strategis lokal negara-negara Indo-Pasifik, sehingga mempengaruhi efektivitas pelaksanaan kebijakan. Selain itu, pendekatan konstruktivis digunakan untuk menekankan peran identitas, nilai, dan norma dalam membentuk Indo-Pacific Strategy. Temuan penelitian ini turut memperluas pemahaman mengenai kebijakan luar negeri Amerika Serikat melampaui interpretasi berbasis realisme dan liberalisme.