Articles
<![CDATA[Making Of Notary Deeds in An Emergency Period in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LAFADZ JAYA Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54443/sj.v2i1.115
<![CDATA[A notarial deed is authentic, so its manufacture must meet formal requirements such as Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m UUJN. This study aimed to determine whether the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the UUJN can be fulfilled during an emergency such as the Covid-19 pandemic and whether the making of a notary deed can be done electronically. To discuss these problems, normative legal research is used, namely research on secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were collected through a literature study, then processed and analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The study results show that the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m UUJN must be fulfilled even in emergency conditions such as the Covid-19 pandemic because it involves the authenticity of the notary deed. Then, a notarial deed cannot be done electronically because the normative juridical UUJN does not regulate this problem.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI ASAS HUKUM PERJANJIAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Legal Reasoning Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Juni ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35814/jlr.v5i2.4644
<![CDATA[Itikad baik merupakan salah satu asas hukum perjanjian sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Pasal 1338 ayat (3) KUHPerdata. Asas itikad baik mempunyai peranan penting terhadap keberadaan perjanjian yang telah dibuat oleh para pihak. Atas dasar pemikiran tersebut, penelitian bertujuan untuk mengkaji tentang Batasan itikad baik dan keberlakuan asas itikad baik dalam suatu perjanjian. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian terhadap data sekunder yang berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier yang dikumpulkan dengan cara studi Pustaka. Kemudian data sekunder tersebut diolah dan dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa KUHPerdata maupun doktrin tidak memberikan Batasan yang jelas tentang itikad baik sebagai asas perjanjian. Namun umumnya para ahli hukum menafsirkan itikad baik sebagai suatu keadilan dan kepatutan. Begitu pula mengenai ruang lingkup berlakunya asas itikad baik dalam perjanjian tidak jelas pengaturannya. Namun demikian dapat dikatakan bahwa asas itikad baik berlaku pada saat negosiasi, pembuatan kesepakatan dan pelaksanaan perjanjian.]]>
<![CDATA[Theft in the Family Context: An Analysis of Article 367 of the Criminal Code and its Application in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Hanafi]]>;
<![CDATA[Khalid, Afif]]>;
<![CDATA[Wardiansyah, Gusti]]>;
<![CDATA[Hidayatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v18i2.12198
<![CDATA[This study aims to explore the regulation and implementation of family criminal law regarding theft cases within a family context from the perspectives of Indonesia Criminal Codes (KUHP) and the theory of jarimah of the Islamic criminal law. By employing a descriptive qualitative method with a literature review approach, the research analyzes legal sources and relevant literature. The findings reveal that theft is generally regarded as a common crime. However, in specific contexts, such as theft occurring within a family setting, special provisions outlined in Article 367 of the KUHP. This article classifies family theft as a complaint offense (klacht delict), meaning it can only be prosecuted if there is a complaint from the aggrieved party. The study underscores the importance of thoroughly understanding the characteristics of family theft and its implications for the criminal justice system. It also highlights the need for further evaluation of the effectiveness and application of this law in the Indonesian family context, incorporating insights from the theory of jarimah in Islamic criminal law.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Hukum Terhadap Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dan Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank pada Perbankan Syariah ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>;
<![CDATA[Dadin Eka Saputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.1766
<![CDATA[This research discusses the principle of prudence in Islamic banking and the level of health implemented. This research uses normative legal research by examining the research approach used is conceptual approach. This prudential principle must be carried out by banks, not only because it is associated with obligations so that banks do not harm the interests of customers This evaluation aims to enable the public to assess the performance of an Islamic bank. A bank that is considered healthy is a bank that can run its operations smoothly, fulfill its financial obligations, ensure the security of funds placed by the public, and has the ability to develop the resources that have been entrusted by the owner to its management.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis to ownership innovation modern on patents from the perspective of Positive Law and Fiqh Muamalah ]]>
<![CDATA[khalid, Afif]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): July: Law Science ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute Of computer Science (IOCS) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35335/jls.v7i3.6517
<![CDATA[The rapid advancement of science and technology has given rise to various forms of modern innovations that hold significant economic and strategic value. In this context, patent rights function as a crucial legal instrument to protect intellectual creations. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of ownership over modern innovations within the framework of Indonesian positive law and to compare it with the principles of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh muamalah). Utilizing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research reveals that both legal systems recognize intellectual ownership but rest on different epistemological foundations. While Indonesian law emphasizes formal registration and exclusive rights, fiqh muamalah stresses ethical considerations, public benefit (maslahah), and distributive justice. The novelty of this study lies in its proposed integration model that harmonizes national patent law with Islamic legal values. This conceptual synthesis contributes both theoretically and practically by offering a foundation for regulatory reform and the development of a hybrid intellectual property regime that is more just, spiritually grounded, and contextually relevant for Indonesia’s Muslim-majority society.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection Of Trade Secret Owners Through Non Disclosure Agreements To Guarantee Investment Security ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>;
<![CDATA[Yamani Naufal]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): May : International Journal of Sociology and Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v1i2.40
<![CDATA[The protection of trade secrets against non-disclosure agreements is increasingly necessary in every cooperation agreement as a form of intellectual property protection. The purpose of this research is to know and understand the urgency of the inclusion of confidential information in the clause of the cooperation agreement so that it is fundamental to the principle of pacta sunt servanda. This research uses an analytical approach method to examine research materials through analysis of legal materials using normative legal research methods (Legal Research) In the protection of trade secrets, it also has a consequential impact on the abuse of the authority of the trade secret agreement contract because it has the nature of information that must be protected and not informed anywhere.]]>
<![CDATA[Juridic Analysis Of Good Faith Inlimited Company Management ]]>
<![CDATA[Khalid, Afif]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): February 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Inara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.281
<![CDATA[The Board of Directors is one of the organs of the Limited Liability Company in charge of managing the Company. For this reason, Law Number 40 of 2007 stipulates that the board of directors in managing the Company must have good intentions. However, the law does not determine and formulate the meaning of good faith, so legal certainty is needed. This research uses normative legal research, namely research on secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were obtained through literature study. Then the secondary data is processed and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study show that first, the meaning of good faith in the management of the company by the directors based on the opinion of M. Yahya Harahap, among others, is being honest, referring to the aims and objectives of the company, as well as laws and regulations and being loyal to the company. Second, every member of the board of directors who does not have good intentions in managing the company is personally responsible for the company's losses.]]>
<![CDATA[Development of Indicators of Abuse of Statements (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Khalid, Afif]]>
<![CDATA[ Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Ipso Jure - July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT. Anagata Sembagi Education ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62872/hg97ch98
<![CDATA[This article explores the development of the doctrine of abuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) within Indonesian contract law, primarily shaped through judicial decisions rather than explicit statutory regulation. The doctrine serves as a critical mechanism to assess the validity of agreements and prevent injustices arising from one party exploiting unfavorable situations during contractual formation. The study delves into various scholarly perspectives surrounding abuse of circumstances as grounds for contract cancellation, emphasizing three key aspects: the positional relationship of the parties at the time of contract formation, the fairness and formulation of the agreement, and the moral implications involved. Despite its recognized importance, the absence of clear legal provisions creates challenges in consistently identifying and adjudicating such abuses. The article argues for necessary reforms within the Indonesian Civil Code to codify specific indicators and criteria that can reliably distinguish cases of abuse, thereby enhancing legal certainty and fairness. Ultimately, the research underscores the urgent need for strict and clear regulatory frameworks to minimize divergent interpretations that could undermine justice and contractual security in Indonesia's evolving civil law landscape.]]>
<![CDATA[Restorative Justice Principles in Banjar Customary Inheritance Disputes: A Normative Analysis of Out-of-Court Settlement Institutions through Adat Badamai ]]>
<![CDATA[Akhmad Sukris Sarmadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Anwar Hafidzi]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurul Listiyani]]>;
<![CDATA[Tetiana Kolomoiets]]>;
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>
<![CDATA[ El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 2 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10047
<![CDATA[Inheritance disputes in Banjar communities continue to increase as families confront controversies over unwritten norms, generational change, and rising land value, creating a growing need for culturally grounded solutions. These disputes reflect a broader trend in Indonesia where communities prefer non-court settlement when judicial rulings risk disrupting social cohesion. Within this plural legal landscape, families must navigate overlapping expectations from customary norms, Islamic law, and state regulations. This study addressed a key gap by examining how restorative justice principles operate within Banjar inheritance practices. Using a qualitative normative method, the research analyzed primary legal materials, documented customary procedures, court decisions, and academic literature. The findings showed that adat badamai integrated restorative values through open dialogue, inclusive deliberation, and relational repair among heirs. The study concluded that adat badamai provides an effective culturally rooted model of restorative justice and recommends stronger legal recognition and enhanced mediator training.]]>
<![CDATA[Rekonstruksi Normatif Regulasi Zakat Pada Fiskal Indonesia (Transformasi dari Tax Deduction ke Tax Credit Berbasis Maqashid Syariah) ]]>
<![CDATA[Afif Khalid]]>;
<![CDATA[Yamani Naufal]]>
<![CDATA[ QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol 10 No 1 (2026) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FASYA Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12736
<![CDATA[Zakat merupakan pilar fundamental ajaran Islam yang memiliki dimensi spiritual sekaligus sosial-ekonomi sebagai instrumen redistribusi kekayaan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan kesejahteraan umat. Namun, implementasi zakat dalam sistem hukum positif Indonesia menghadapi paradoks normatif yang signifikan antara das sollen dan das sein. Secara filosofis, zakat seharusnya meringankan beban ekonomi muzakki, tetapi regulasi yang berlaku justru menciptakan beban ganda (double burden) melalui skema tax deduction sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dan pendekatan normatif-konseptual. Sumber data primer meliputi Al-Qur'an, Hadis, serta literatur klasik dan kontemporer ekonomi Islam, khususnya pemikiran Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa paradoks normatif yang terjadi bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip maqashid syariah. Prinsip hifz al-mal (perlindungan harta) dan raf' al-haraj (penghilangan kesulitan) terabaikan ketika beban fiskal muzakki berlipat ganda. Kaidah al-masyaqqatu tajlibu at-taysir (kesulitan mendatangkan kemudahan) serta konsep fiqh al-muwazanat (keseimbangan) dan fiqh al-awlawiyyat (prioritas) dari pemikiran al-Qaradawi menuntut harmonisasi yang adil antara kewajiban agama dan kewajiban negara. Merujuk pada keberhasilan Malaysia yang menerapkan tax credit hingga 100%, rekonstruksi regulasi zakat di Indonesia menuju skema tax credit dinilai sebagai langkah yang tepat dan mendesak. Rekonstruksi ini harus mencakup empat aspek terintegrasi: modernitas melalui integrasi data BAZNAS/LAZ dengan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, prioritas dengan memposisikan zakat sebagai instrumen utama keadilan distributif, keseimbangan melalui penerapan tax credit untuk melindungi harta muzakki, serta realitas sebagai respons konkret terhadap kesenjangan potensi dan realisasi zakat nasional. Dengan demikian, zakat tidak lagi dipandang sebagai beban tambahan, melainkan instrumen strategis yang mampu memutus rantai kemiskinan struktural dan mempersempit kesenjangan sosial secara sistemik.]]>
