Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.614
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Unes Law Review KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Interdisciplinary Social Studies Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal of Social Research Jurnal Hukum Pelita Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Sains JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin AL-SULTHANIYAH SASI Jurnal KIK-AK
Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pidana Mati Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Nasional Hakim, Lukman; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4578

Abstract

This study aims to explain the Islamic legal perspective on the implementation of the death penalty in relation to the principles of human rights. The research employs a library-based method with a normative juridical approach and a prescriptive analysis. The focus of the study lies in the concept of al-maṣlaḥah al-mursalah as the foundational principle of Islamic law in determining capital punishment, particularly within the context of qishash. The findings indicate that the death penalty in Islam is not intended as an act of revenge but rather as an instrument for upholding justice and protecting human life in accordance with the maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, namely the preservation of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. Islam also provides space for forgiveness and reconciliation, reflecting a balance between justice and compassion. Thus, the death penalty in Islamic law possesses strong theological and sociological foundations and remains consistent with humanitarian values and the overarching goal of law to promote public welfare.
Relevansi Filsafat Hukum Islam dan Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah dalam Menjawab Isu Modern Prayiani, Herlian Janu; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4579

Abstract

Islamic law is understood as a manifestation of divine will that is normative and transcendent, while also being realized through revealed texts, scholarly interpretation, social practice, and legal institutions. The concept of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah emphasizes that the objectives of Islamic law are to preserve five fundamental human interests: religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property, as well as secondary and complementary goals aimed at enhancing the moral and ethical quality of society. This teleological approach allows Islamic law to remain flexible, adaptive, and responsive to social, political, and cultural dynamics. Islamic legal philosophy is also relevant in addressing contemporary issues, including human rights, democracy, and the development of digital technology, through the integration of ethics, the principle of public interest (maṣlaḥah), and maqāṣid-based ijtihād. Accordingly, Islamic legal philosophy functions as both a conceptual and practical guide that bridges divine values, rationality, and contextual needs, ensuring that law remains ethical, progressive, and relevant in the construction of a just and civilized society.
Konsep dan Sistem Pemerintahan dalam Perspektif Islam: Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan dalam Negara Modern Wianto, Edi Tulus; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4587

Abstract

This study examines the concept and practice of statehood in Islamic thought by exploring the historical, theological, and philosophical foundations that shape the idea of an Islamic state. The discussion covers the characteristics of an Islamic state, its system of governance, and its relevance to modern political systems, particularly within the Indonesian context based on Pancasila. The findings indicate that Islam does not prescribe a fixed form of government but emphasizes universal principles such as justice, consultation (shura), trust (amanah), and public welfare (maslahah) as the foundation of governance. These values are contextual and adaptable, allowing their implementation within modern state systems that uphold pluralism and democracy. Therefore, the ideal state in Islam is not defined by its formal structure but by the extent to which Islamic values are manifested in governance to achieve justice and societal well-being.
Legalitas Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan oleh Debt Collector dan Implikasinya terhadap Hukum Pidana: Studi Kasus Kematian Mata Elang di Kalibata Wandita, Nanda Putra; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin (ACCEPTED)
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v4i1.981

Abstract

Praktik penarikan paksa kendaraan oleh debt collector dalam pembiayaan konsumen masih kerap terjadi di Indonesia dan sering menimbulkan konflik di ruang publik. Fenomena tersebut menjadi semakin relevan untuk dikaji setelah terjadinya kasus kematian mata elang di Kalibata yang berawal dari praktik penagihan kredit kendaraan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis legalitas penarikan paksa kendaraan oleh debt collector menurut hukum positif Indonesia serta mengkaji implikasi hukum pidana yang timbul dari kasus kematian mata elang di Kalibata terhadap praktik penagihan kredit kendaraan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia tidak memberikan kewenangan kepada kreditur maupun pihak ketiga untuk melakukan eksekusi secara sepihak, dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 menegaskan bahwa eksekusi jaminan fidusia hanya dapat dilakukan berdasarkan kesepakatan wanprestasi dan penyerahan sukarela debitur atau melalui mekanisme pengadilan. Selain itu, praktik penarikan paksa kendaraan yang disertai paksaan atau kekerasan berpotensi menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHP. Kasus kematian mata elang di Kalibata menunjukkan bahwa praktik penagihan kredit yang melanggar hukum tidak hanya menimbulkan persoalan perdata, tetapi juga dapat berimplikasi serius terhadap hukum pidana dan keselamatan jiwa.
Disparitas putusan hakim atas tindak pidana pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak Afifah, Fanny; Hakim, Lukman; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum (In progress)
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i4.1901

Abstract

Dalam menjatuhkan hukuman, hakim harus mengikuti aturan hukum yang berlaku, namun tetap memperhatikan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan, manfaat dari hukuman, efektivitas pemidanaan, dan harapan agar pelaku dapat berubah setelah menjalani hukuman di penjara. Jika dalam putusan hakim tidak memperhitungkan faktor-faktor tersebut, maka hal ini bisa menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidakadilan, yang pada akhirnya berpotensi menimbulkan disparitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penyebab utama terjadinya disparitas dalam putusan hakim dalam kasus tindak pidana pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan analisis dokumen, yang melibatkan sumber hukum seperti perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, kontrak, teori hukum, serta pendapat para ahli sebagai dasar analisis. Disparitas dalam putusan hakim pada kasus pencurian yang dilakukan anak bisa terjadi karena hakim memiliki pertimbangan yang berbeda dalam menentukan hukuman. Meskipun hakim berwenang menegakkan keadilan, dalam praktiknya, ketentuan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana mengenai tindak pidana pencurian tidak mencantumkan batas minimum hukuman, sehingga tidak ada pedoman yang jelas bagi hakim. Oleh karena itu, meskipun ketiga putusan yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini memiliki kesamaan dalam hal kasus, pelaku, dan pasal yang dikenakan, masih ada kemungkinan terjadinya disparitas atau ketidakadilan bagi pelaku, khususnya anak.
Nilai Keadilan Sebagai Landasan Pembuktian dalam KUHAP Nasional Hartati, Tutut; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.4925

Abstract

This study examines the concept of justice as the foundation of proof in the indonesian criminal procedure code (KUHAP) with a focus on the paradigm shift from procedural justice to substantive justice. Proof is understood not merely as a technical mechanism to fulfill formal evidentiary requirements but as an ethical and constitutional process that determines the realization of justice in criminal adjudication. Using a normative legal research approach combined with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical analyses, this study finds that the new kuhap, enacted under law no. 20 of 2025, affirms the principles of substantive justice through the recognition of electronic evidence, an open system of evidence, and the exclusionary rule for unlawfully obtained evidence. However, the implementation of substantive justice still faces cultural and structural challenges within judicial practice. Therefore, the internalization of substantive justice is essential to ensure that the system of proof not only guarantees legal certainty but also embodies justice that is humane and civilized.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA BADAN HUKUM KORPORASI DALAM PERJUDIAN ONLINE DARI PENDEKATAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Prahara, Rivo Rizky; Sriwidodo, Joko; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i2.1999

Abstract

Criminal liability for online gambling is regulated in the provisions of Article 45 paragraph (3) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. If a criminal act is committed by the Company, it is linked to the provisions of Article 52 paragraph 4 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, with a prison sentence plus two-thirds of the principal penalty. The objectives of this research are: first, to examine and provide legal solutions regarding criminal regulation of corporations in carrying out online gambling approaches from the criminal justice system in Indonesia; secondly, examining criminal responsibility for corporations in online gambling, the approach of the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The results of the research show that the prison sentence provisions in Article 45 paragraph 3 of Law Number 1 of 2024 are more severe than the criminal provisions in Article 45 paragraph 1 of Law Number 11 of 2008. There is a maximum limit of 10 (ten) years in Article 45 paragraph 3 of Law Number 1 of 2024, and 6 (six) years in Article 45 paragraph 1 of Law Number 11 of 2008. Despite this increase in prison sentences has increased, but the additional prison sentence period has not been maximized. The prison sentence should be increased further, so that it has a deterrent effect in enforcing the criminal law on online gambling. In fact, legislators should set a minimum limit for criminal perpetrators of online gambling.
Kekuatan Normatif Gelar Perkara Khusus dan Tantangan Penerapannya dalam Penilaian Kualitatif Praperadilan Penyidikan Pidana Syahputra, Rifky Pradana; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v12i1.4679

Abstract

Gelar perkara khusus merupakan instrumen kontrol internal Polri yang memiliki kekuatan normatif mengikat bagi penyidik untuk memastikan bahwa proses penyidikan dilakukan secara objektif, profesional, dan akuntabel. Akan tetapi, dalam praktiknya, rekomendasi gelar perkara khusus tidak selalu ditaati oleh penyidik meskipun sifatnya wajib, sehingga menimbulkan potensi penyimpangan prosedural yang dapat berpengaruh pada keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Permasalahan ini menjadi penting terutama setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menegaskan bahwa penetapan tersangka tidak dapat dinilai hanya berdasarkan terpenuhinya jumlah alat bukti secara kuantitatif, tetapi juga harus diuji melalui standar kualitatif yang menggambarkan proses penyidikan yang sah dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Meskipun demikian, praperadilan dalam praktik sering kali masih berfokus pada aspek formal dan kuantitatif tanpa menilai apakah penyidik telah mematuhi hasil gelar perkara khusus sebagai bagian dari proses kualitatif tersebut. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan kekuatan normatif gelar perkara khusus, mengidentifikasi tantangan penerapannya dalam forum praperadilan, serta menawarkan urgensi harmonisasi antara kontrol internal dan kontrol yudisial. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui analisis peraturan, aturan internal Polri, putusan praperadilan, dan doktrin pascaputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa belum terdapat keselarasan antara standar internal Polri dan parameter penilaian praperadilan. Kontribusi ilmiah artikel ini terletak pada argumentasi bahwa hasil gelar perkara khusus perlu dijadikan parameter evaluatif dalam praperadilan agar penyidikan tidak hanya sah secara formal, tetapi juga akuntabel secara substantif.
Co-Authors Afifah, Fanny Atmoko, Dwi Clara Ignatia Tobing Edi Saputra Hasibuan Gae, Kosma Kaju Hamonangan, Alexsander Roy Happy Hartati, Tutut Ida Ayu Putu Sri Widnyani Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima Joko Widodo Lukman Hakim MUHAMMAD FAHMI Perdana, Libria Gita Prahara, Rivo Rizky Prayiani, Herlian Janu Salsiah, Lia Setiawan, Waras Sibuea, Hotma P Sitompul, Ariman Sofyan, Ramadhan Syahputra, Rifky Pradana Wandita, Nanda Putra Wianto, Edi Tulus Widodo, Joko Sri Wong, Novita Irene