Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.59
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM) JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT CAHAYA MANDALIKA (ABDIMANDALIKA) GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Abdi Bhara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Mandalika Literature INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER)
Noviriska
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Air Minum Isi Ulang Pada Masyarakat Umum Dwi Atmoko; Noviriska
Journal of Mandalika Literature Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jml.v6i2.3805

Abstract

The obstacle for consumers of refill drinking water to obtain legal protection is the low level of legal awareness for refill drinking water business actors regarding the obligation of business actors to provide correct and honest information regarding the conditions and guarantees regarding the refill drinking water they sell. Apart from that, another obstacle for consumers is that consumers do not know about the rights they have and consumers do not know where to complain and demand responsibility for the losses they experience, which is why many consumers do not get legal protection. Consumer rights are related to consumption. Drinking water refills are not working well. Refill drinking water depots do not provide information to consumers about the condition of refill drinking water, namely information about hygiene, valid registration marks, laboratory inspection results regarding the quality of refill drinking water. Business actors have violated the UUPK regarding consumer rights by not providing clear, honest and correct information to consumers. Business actors have a tendency to "harass" consumer rights and take advantage of consumer weaknesses without having to receive legal sanctions. Business actors have the freedom to produce commodities, without having to follow applicable standards. They do not need to compensate for losses experienced by consumers as a result of purchasing/consuming products. which is not quality. Business actors are quite free to promote products, by tricking or taking advantage of consumers' ignorance about the product. There is a need for strict sanctions against naughty business actors as regulated in Law Number 8 concerning Consumer Protection so that there are no more violations in the sale of drinking water.
The Role of Curators in Bankruptcy Legal Issues Between Debtors and Creditors in Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) Noviriska; Dwi Atmoko
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3477

Abstract

In accordance with article 37 of 2004 concerning bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligations (PKPU) Bankruptcy article 1 which explains that a creditor is a person who has receivables due to an agreement or law that can be collected in court. A debtor is a person who has debts due to an agreement or law whose payment can be collected in court. A bankrupt debtor is a debtor who has been declared bankrupt by a court decision. The Curator is the Estate Office or an individual appointed by the Court to manage and settle the assets of the Bankrupt Debtor under the supervision of the Supervisory Judge in accordance with this Law. Debt is an obligation that is stated or can be stated in an amount of money either in Indonesian currency or foreign currency, either directly or which will arise in the future or contingently, which arises due to an agreement or law and which must be fulfilled by the Debtor and if not fulfilled gives the Creditor the right to obtain fulfillment from the Debtor's assets. In the event of bankruptcy, the curator has full authority after the bankruptcy decision is issued by the Judge. The curator's responsibilities are divided into 2 (two), namely the responsibility as a curator in his capacity as a curator, and the responsibility of the curator in his capacity not as a curator. The role of the curator in postponing debt payment obligations is to manage and distribute the debtor's assets to creditors in accordance with the regulations and priorities stipulated in the Bankruptcy Law. The curator also ensures that payments are made fairly and in accordance with the law. The duties and roles of the curator in the bankruptcy process are 1) Managing the debtor's assets after the debtor no longer has the authority to manage the assets. 2) Managing and settling the bankruptcy estate from the date the bankruptcy decision was pronounced. 3) Revealing bank secrets to obtain complete information regarding the debtor's assets. 4) Carrying out execution of all debtor assets that are outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia In carrying out his duties, the curator will be supervised by a supervising judge. The supervising judge is tasked with supervising the authority and implementation of the curator's duties so that he always carries out his authority and duties within the specified limits.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN CRIMINAL MALPRACTICE CASES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2023 ON HEALTH Abdul Musyfiq Al Aytami; Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati; Noviriska
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Providing quality healthcare is a state responsibility as mandated by Article 34(3) and Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. However, malpractice issues in the healthcare sector remain a critical concern. This study aims to analyze the legal protection for medical and healthcare professionals accused of malpractice under Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health. It also examines the role of professional organizations in assisting their members in facing malpractice allegations in accordance with Article 440 of the law. Case studies on three legal matters highlight the importance of adherence to Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to protect patients from medical negligence. The findings reveal that although the law provides legal protection, its practical implementation often falls short. Therefore, public education, enhanced oversight, and regulatory improvements are necessary. Legal protection is not only intended to safeguard healthcare professionals but also to ensure justice and legal certainty for all parties involved.
Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Pengiriman Paket Barang Melalui Jasa Kurir di Indonesia Dwi Atmoko; Noviriska
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss7pp1804-1811

Abstract

Pada umumnya setiap perusahaan yang didirikan bertujuan untuk mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan semaksimal mungkin dengan menggunakan berbagai sumber-sumber ekonomi yang dimiliki. Salah satu tujuan perusahaan adalah mempertahankan kelangsungan hidup perusahaan dengan meningkatkan pendapatan dan penjualan.Perlindungan konsumen pengguna jasa pengiriman barang dalam terjadinya keterlambatan sampainya barang yang dalam hal ini JNE sebagai pihak ekspedisi pengiriman barang yang saling mengikat dengan konsumen karena adanya perjanjian yang telah diatur dalam Pasal 477 KUHD, telah melakukan pertanggungjawaban sesuai dengan Undang-Undang perlindungan konsumen No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Tetapi dengan ketentuan tertentu yang selanjutnya dapat diketahui dari tingkat kesalahan konsumen atau pihak ekspedisi.Peraturan-peraturan telah ditetapkan oleh pelaku usaha jasa pengiriman / jasa kurir dalam dokunen pengiriman. Jika dalam hal terjadi keterlambatan maka itu masuk dalam kategori wanprestasi, maka pelaku usaha harus memberikan ganti rugi akibat wanprestasi dan apabila kesalahan terletak pada konsumen maka pihak perusahaan ekspedisi tidak berhak untuk mengganti kerugian. Hak konsumen dan kewajiban pelaku usaha merupakan kedua hal yang tidak dapat dipisahkan, maka bergantung pada yang membuat kesalahan dengan memperhatikan hak dan kewajiban masing-masing. Pelaksanaan pertanggungjawaban perusahaan dalam perjanjian pengirim barang apabila tidak sesuai waktu estimasi yang telah diperjanjikan dalam hal ini tidak melaksanakan secara mutlak ketika ada complain dari konsumen, pertanggungjawaban dapat dilaksanakan dengan melihat perjanjian itu sendiri. Pada umumnya setiap perusahaan yang didirikan bertujuan untuk mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan semaksimal mungkin dengan menggunakan berbagai sumber-sumber ekonomi yang dimiliki, yang dimana salah satu tujuan perusahaan adalah mempertahankan kelangsungan hidup perusahaan dengan meningkatkan pendapatan dan penjualan.
Perjanjian Kerjasama Jual Beli melalui Sistem E-commerce dengan Asas Itikad Baik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 2014 Tentang Perdagangan cq PP RI No. 80 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik Noviriska; Dwi Atmoko
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss7pp1781-1788

Abstract

The principle of good faith means that agreements made must be carried out with due regard to the norms of propriety and morality. In a buying and selling transaction, there is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the parties not to do anything that does not make sense, that is, does not conflict with the norms of propriety and decency, with the hope of creating justice for the parties and not causing harm to either party. party. Buyers of goods in good faith or otherwise, as opposed to people in bad faith, are in good faith with subjective anarchy. A buyer of goods in good faith is a person who buys goods with full confidence that the seller really owns the goods purchased. He doesn't know at all, if he bought from an unauthorized person, why he would be called an honest buyer, in this case in good faith, honest and clean. An agreement is declared to have arisen when an agreement or agreement is reached between two parties regarding a main matter which is the object of the agreement. Agree here is defined as a conformity of understanding (opinion) and desires between two parties. In this context, there is a meeting of will between two parties to carry out or not carry out an agreement. This also applies to contracts (agreements) that are made electronically. In conventional society, an agreement is simply based on conformity of will. A meeting of wills requires the presence of both parties to agree on what has been agreed. Conformity of wishes can be done verbally or in writing. Then, in modern society which has utilized technology in its business activities, the agreement of wishes does not have to require a face-to-face meeting or the agreement does not have to be made in writing. This means that there is a shift in norms in society in interpreting conformity to will. In conventional society, of course, an agreement (conformity of will) must be made through a direct meeting to express a will. This is not the case in societies that have utilized technology. The emphasis in seeking agreement between the wishes of both parties is based on what one party states, then this statement is approved by the other party.
Penyuluhan Hukum tentang Kreatifitas Siswa Sekolah Sebagai Content Creator pada Media Sosial Ditinjau dari Hukum Bisnis di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN ) 13 Jakarta Selatan Atmoko, Dwi; Noviriska; Baihaki, Ahmad; M. Hutagalung, Jantarda; Nainggolan, Indra Lorenly; Siswanto, Heru; Sugeng
Abdi Bhara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Abdi Bhara : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/htw8rc33

Abstract

The development of digitalization is something that has become a necessity in all levels of society and all fields of activity, including education. The use of technology for society is used to support activities. The dependence of society on the use of social media, through various social media tools such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tik Tok and others, opens up new job opportunities related to technology and digitalization. Digitalization allows for wider relationships, so it is often used in the fields of marketing and production. Social media is a platform that allows its users to create, share, and participate in content. In this case, there is a need for legal recognition through counseling related to protection for content creator business actors. The increase in the use of social media by students then opens up new opportunities in pursuing a profession in the digital era, one of which is becoming a Content Creator. The content created is not only useful for the fields of production and marketing, but can also be useful for Education, where students can use it in relation to learning and Education. Content creation in the layman's view is considered easy, but in fact it is not, because a content creator needs to think about engagement, awareness, personal branding. With this understanding, it is necessary for students of MAN 13 South Jakarta to get an introduction to becoming a content creator and how to get legal protection in running the business, so that they do not experience obstacles in starting to create content.
KEWENANGAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASA KORUPSI (KPK) PADA PEMERIKSAAN LAPORAN HARTA PARA PEJABAT NEGARA Noviriska
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v4i2.1989

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), an institution authorized by law in the Indonesian constitutional system based on the 1945 Constitution to eradicate corruption in a constitutional manner that has duties and authorities independently and is free from the influence of any power based on Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning Corruption Eradication Commission. One of the powers possessed by the Corruption Eradication Commission is the authority to register and examine the wealth reports of state administrators as regulated in Article 7 paragraph 1 letter A of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, which until now in reality has not This is not due to laws that have not regulated, but rather the implementation of these rules which are considered still ambiguous in terms of the authority to give these sanctions and the form of sanctions given to state officials who are not disciplined in reporting their assets is still less firm and has not provided a deterrent effect to state officials both before and after taking office. The report on the assets of state officials (LHKPN) is regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission in conjunction with Article 5 of Law Number 28 of 1999 concerning State Administrators that are Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism. Sanctions will be given to state officials who do not report their assets both before and after serving as state officials. The sanctions are in the form of administrative sanctions. LHKPN is mandatory for all state administrators, whether in the form of movable objects, tangible or intagible or anything owned by state officials that can be valued in money, including wives and children in their dependents as well as property ownership on behalf of other people obtained both before and after. after taking office. This This clearly hinders the KPK from carrying out its authority in conducting LHKPN. The norms and sanctions as regulated in the law are not clear because it is not clear which authority norms are given to full authority in examining and announcing LHKPN.
Co-Authors Abdul Musyfiq Al Aytami Adhalia Septia Saputri Atmoko, Dwi Baihaki, Ahmad Budi Budaya Clara Ignatia Tobing Clara Ignatia Tobing Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Dwi Atmoko Erwin Owan Hermansyah Erwin Owan Hermansyah Soetoto HERU SISWANTO Hotma P. Sibuea Indra Lorenly Nainggolan M. Hutagalung, Jantarda Purnama, Ni Kadek Dian Candra Saimima, Ika Dewi Sartika Setiadi Sugeng Wachid Rowinanto