Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Restrictive use of interpretation of language actions in legal construction Romadhon, Ahmad Heru; Lapasere, Fachria; Wardantik, Yuli Endah
Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : SAINTIS Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (388.586 KB) | DOI: 10.33122/ejeset.v3i1.34

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the essence of language action in legal construction as a means of communication that should rely on language grammar in interpreting the meaning of sentences. Such a method is an attempt to avoid the different interpretations of the multiple interpretations of the meaning of language. The simplification of legal language must be linked to the content of the rules, where there are two arguments regarding "intentions and extensions", before carrying out legal interpretation, then interpretation is generally understood as a process, action, series of interpreting and explaining the meaning of something that is less clear or opinion, view of the context in which it is interpreted. This study uses a normative juridical method that explains the interpretation of manuscripts, legal principles and principles, legal rules, theories and legal doctrines that apply as a tool to understand the meaning of legal language communication and to understand the substance of a statutory regulation. The research approach uses a conceptual approach to examine and examine the subject matter. The consequences of blurred inter-connections result in a disparity in the factual application of the law which is correlated with a “policy during decision-making” in a formulaic policy which is a “policy” context. Based on these aspects, especially in language action, it is essentially an "effort in realizing clarity of meaning in laws and regulations so that they are in accordance with current and future implementation and conditions.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Sistem Pengupahan Bagi Pekerja Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Zamroni, Zamroni; Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi; Yahya, Dhofirul; Romadhon, Ahmad Heru
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5505

Abstract

Legal protection of wages for workers with certain employment contracts is a crucial topic in the field of employment in Indonesia. Law = Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation and Government Regulation Number 51 of 2023 concerning Wages serve as a legal basis for regulating workers' salaries with certain employment contracts. Despite the regulations that have been set, there are still challenges in their implementation, especially in terms of providing adequate salaries. This study applies a normative juridical method with a prescriptive approach to analyze legal protection in the payment system for workers with certain employment contracts. The findings of the study indicate that weak supervision and low awareness from employers cause many workers to receive salaries that do not meet standards. Effective legal protection is needed to ensure fairness in employment relations and ensure welfare for workers. It is hoped that increased supervision and enforcement of sanctions for those who violate the provisions can improve this situation, increase productivity, and create a harmonious working atmosphere.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Hukum Akibat Sound Horeg Melalui Restoratif Justice Parikesit, Dhana Harliza Putri; Romadhon, Ahmad Heru; Gunawan, Bambang Panji
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11654

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effectivenessof legal settlements regarding the nouise disrtubances caused by sound horeg through  a restorative justice approach . sound horeg refers to high-decibel audio devices used in community events such as birthdays, circumcisions, and carnivals. Excessive and unregulated use of these devices often disturbs public comfort and order. This can be considered an unlawful act, as it violates established noise level thresholds and infringes on the public’s right to a peaceful and healthy environment. The research adopts a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data sources include literature review of relevant regulations such as the Criminal Code, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, and Ministerial Regulations on noise level standards. Secondary data were obtained from articles, news reports, community complaints, and scientific journals. The findings show that a restorative justice approach is more effective in resolving legal issues related to sound horeg compared to repressive methods. Restorative justice emphasizes deliberation, restoration of social relations, education for offenders, and continuous supervision. This approach helps minimize social conflict, enhances legal awareness in the community, and supports the creation of sustainable public order.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Apartemen Paragon Square Akibat Wanprestasi Kusumawati, Marissa; Zamroni, M.; Romadhon, Ahmad Heru
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i4.12156

Abstract

Apartments are included in the Commercial Apartment category as regulated in Article 1 number 10 of Law Number 20 of 2011 concerning Apartments (UURS), which are organized for commercial purposes to gain profit. In practice, developers as business actors often conduct promotions by offering various facilities and advantages of apartment units to consumers. However, it is not uncommon for the promised facilities to be not fulfilled, or the units are not handed over on time as stated in the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), resulting in default. This study aims to analyze the forms of default committed by developers in the delivery of apartment units and examine the form of legal protection for consumers who are harmed. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and literature study. The results of the study indicate that defaults committed by developers cause material losses and legal uncertainty for consumers, and place consumers in a weaker legal position in sales and purchase transactions. Legal protection for consumers should be sought through fair and balanced agreements, but in reality the PPJB has not provided adequate legal certainty. In the event of a default, consumers have the right to demand compensation as regulated in Articles 1238, 1243, and 1249 of the Civil Code, and can seek dispute resolution as regulated in Article 105 of the UURS through litigation in court.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERKAIT KEPASTIAN HUKUM HAK PERTANAHAN DAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA BAGI PEMEGANG IZIN PEMAKAIAN TANAH DI KOTA SURABAYA Dewi, Elysia Arianti; Suyatno, Suyatno; Dwi Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad; Zamroni, M.; Romadhon, Ahmad Heru
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.751

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to: (1) determine the best course of action for the Municipality of Surabaya's Ijo Letter owners in terms of legal certainty so that they can transfer land rights in the future with minimal formalities and at market rates; and (2) conduct a legal analysis pertaining to the terms of fiduciary guarantees and their relationship to the position of IPT as collateral for immovable tangible objects. This kind of study employs normative legal research. The data analysis used is qualitative analysis, which entails examining data derived from legal sources in accordance with doctrines, theories, rules and regulations, laws and principles, expert opinions, or the researchers' own ideas. The study's findings revealed that: (1) IPT (Land Use Permit) or Letter Ijo are permits unrelated to agrarian reform, and in accordance with national land law, which upholds the principle of horizontal separation, the Surabaya City Government is legally in possession of land rights with management rights from the State, while IPT holders are the owners of buildings that have been built on the land. (2) Only the building is authorized as a fiduciary assurance on property having IPT status and complying to the horizontal separation concept. This is in accordance with Surabaya Regional Regulation 3/2016 article 7 letter (c) and the evaluation of structures erected on land with assured IPT status based on their legal standing and future market potential
PERBANDINGAN SUBSTANSI DAN FILOSOFI ANTARA KUHP LAMA DAN KUHP BARU Rochma, Sofiatus Zahra; Setyawan, Eka Wahyu; Gani, Muhammad Zidan; Romadhon, Ahmad Heru
DEDIKASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, Hukum, Budaya Vol 26, No 2 (2025): DEDIKASI
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/ddk.v26i2.9274

Abstract

Pengesahan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 merupakan langkah strategis dalam pembaruan hukum pidana nasional Indonesia. KUHP Lama yang bersumber dari Wetboek van Strafrecht peninggalan kolonial Belanda telah lama menuai kritik karena dinilai tidak lagi selaras dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, serta perkembangan sosial masyarakat Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan substansi pengaturan dan landasan filosofis antara KUHP Lama dan KUHP Baru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa secara substansial KUHP Baru menghadirkan perubahan mendasar, terutama dalam tujuan pemidanaan, jenis dan sistem sanksi pidana, pengakuan terhadap hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat, serta penguatan prinsip perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Secara filosofis, KUHP Baru berlandaskan pada nilai-nilai Pancasila yang menekankan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan, serta mengedepankan pendekatan humanistik dan keadilan restoratif. Sebaliknya, KUHP Lama lebih mencerminkan filosofi hukum pidana kolonial yang bersifat retributif dan berorientasi pada kepastian hukum formal. Dengan demikian, perbandingan antara KUHP Lama dan KUHP Baru menunjukkan adanya pergeseran paradigma hukum pidana Indonesia menuju sistem hukum yang lebih berdaulat, konstitusional, dan berkeadilan sosial.