Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.195
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EGALITA Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith SUHUF: Jurnal Pengkajian Al-Qur'an dan Budaya Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis Indonesian Gender and Society Journal Acta Islamica Counsenesia: Counselling Research and Applications Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion At Tahfidz Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Al-Ihtiram: Multidisciplinary Journal of Counseling and Social Research
Isnaini, Subi Nur
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Polemical Exegesis and Hermeneutical Analysis in Misbah Mustofa’s Tafsir Al-Iklīl Pratama, Aunillah Reza; Baidowi, Ahmad; Isnaini, Subi Nur; Sayhbana, Moch Nur Syahruz
Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18784/analisa.v10i2.3449

Abstract

This article analyzes the polemical character of KH. Misbah Mustofa’s Qur’anic interpretation in Tafsir Al-Iklīl, emphasizing his critique of socio-religious authority. The study investigates how a pesantren-based scholar could produce confrontational interpretations and how this attitude is shaped by his pre-understanding of taqlid. Employing a qualitative textual analysis informed by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, this research demonstrates that Misbah conceptualizes taqlid not as blind imitation but as adherence to established opinions of qualified mujtahid imams. This pre-understanding becomes a hermeneutical horizon that leads him to reject non-mujtahid authorities whose fatwas dominate public practice. As a result, his tafsir articulates polemical critiques toward religious leaders, institutions, and popular practices, including the ritual use of loudspeakers, exaggerated veneration of scholars, and the Musabaqah Tilawatil Qur’an (MTQ). Misbah’s interpretation thus reflects a fusion of horizons between the Qur’anic text and the dynamics of Javanese Islamic society, producing a critique rooted in the legitimacy of madhhab authority. Theoretically, this research offers a Gadamerian perspective on taqlid as a productive pre-understanding in Nusantara tafsir studies. Practically, it highlights the role of Qur’anic exegesis as an instrument of socio-religious critique and reform.
Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Teologis dalam al-Muharrar al-Wajiz: Studi Kritis Atas Tuduhan I’tizal terhadap Ibnu Athiyyah Isnaini, Subi Nur
Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 17 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : Islamic Religious Education Departement

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/JSQ.017.2.03

Abstract

This paper discusses the Ibn Athiyyah positions towards the concept of Muktazilah theology in his exegesis al-Muharrar al-Wajiz. Although Ibn Athiyyah is an interpreter who has Asy'ariyah school of thought, some scholars such as Ibn Taimiyyah (d. 728), Ahmad bin Hajar al-Haitami (d. 973) and Ibn 'Arafah (d. 803 H) have stated that Ibn Athiyyah interpretation has included the concept of Muktazilah theology. More over, al-Haitami also quoted Ibn 'Arafah's comment that the interpretation of Ibn Athiyyah was more worrying for beginner students than al-Kasysyaf, because al-Zamakhsyari, the author of al-Kasysyaf, was already known as a Mu’tazili, different with Ibn Athiyyah. This research is a type of qualitative research with a library research approach. By using a descriptive analysis, this paper explores Ibn Athiyyah‘s interpretation of the verses which are the evidence for the concept of Muktazilah theology or what is often referred to as al-Ushul al-Khamsah. The results of this study shows that the accusation of i'tizal aimed to Ibn Athiyyah is not true, because his interpretation of theological verses shows that Ibn Athiyyah always approves and justifies the Ash'ariyyah opinions. More over, on several occasions Ibn Athiyyah has refuted the opinions and arguments that used Muktazilah to affirm their theological concept.
Co-Authors Abrori, Hosnul Ahmad Baidowi Ali, Rijal As’ari, Jamaludin Casmini, C Firda Rodliyah Kholis, Nor MZ, Ahmad Murtaza Pratama, Aunillah Reza Pratiwi, Haniefa Ayunafa Rosalnia, Rika Leli Dewi Khusaila Saputro, Nurul Fitrian Eko Sayhbana, Moch Nur Syahruz Sholihah, Husna Amalina syahputra, Satria tenun Yumna, Atikah Nur Aini