Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.63
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran dan Keislaman Jurnal Bimas Islam IQ (Ilmu Al-qur'an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam IJouGS: Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an,Tafsirdan Pemikiran Islam QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Rohman, Baeti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir

 1 
The Epistemological Framework of Indonesian Feminist Thought: An Analytical Study of Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir’s Qirā’ah Mubādalah Method in Qur’anic Interpretation Rohman, Baeti; Amin, Arwani
QOF Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v9i1.2669

Abstract

This study examines the epistemological structure of Qirā’ah Mubādalah, an interpretive method formulated by Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir that has gained traction over the past five years, including its adoption within the KUPI Fatwa Methodology. Using qualitative library research—drawing on Faqih’s Qirā’ah Mubādalah as the primary source and theses, dissertations, and scholarly articles as secondary materials—the study maps foundational references, operational logic, and epistemic positioning that undergird its application. Findings indicate that Mubādalah rests on the apparatus of istinbāṭ al-ḥukm within a thematic fiqh framework, supported by maqāṣid (justice, public welfare) and a tawḥīdic ethical horizon (justice, wisdom, compassion, welfare), which together furnish transformative normative force and a three-step workflow. Yet the analysis also exposes methodological vulnerabilities: a blurred boundary between fiqh and tafsīr, the risk of “values preceding the text,” and thematic bias because explicit applications cluster around gender. In response, the article proposes a reordered operative sequence—first securing linguistic–historical meaning, then activating the ethical horizon for application—alongside deliberate cross-theme testing (ritual worship, transactions, environmental ethics, governance, criminal justice) and a clear epistemic positioning (fiqh analytic tool, tafsīr method, feminist hermeneutics, or feminist daʿwah praxis). The study’s contribution lies in clarifying Mubādalah’s epistemic frame and operational protocol, thereby strengthening methodological coherence, scholarly accountability, and social impact.
Co-Authors Abidin Riam , Zaenal Alam, Mufassirul Alwi, Wildan Anggraeni, Novi Anggraeni, Novi Arwani Amin, Arwani Badruddin Fauziah, Erna Fikri Maulana, Fikri Harisa, Arizka Husnul Hotimah, Husnul Jamil Abdul Aziz, Jamil Abdul juraidi, ahmad Mubarok, Muhammad Naelul Muhammad Amin Muhit, Abdul Muqit, Ade Abdul Nurul Hikmah Riam, Zainal Sholichah, Aas Siti