Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal Multidisciplinary

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE CRIMINAL CASE SETTLEMENT PROCESS AT THE DENPASAR DISTRICT COURT Wiratny, Ni Ketut; Sihotang , Erikson; Prihanta, Kadek Hendhy
International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI)
Publisher : Antis-Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijmi.v3i2.448

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the legal arrangements related to the application of restorative justice in the settlement of criminal cases at the Denpasar District Court. Method: The study uses a legal analysis approach, referencing Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 concerning Guidelines for Prosecuting Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice (PERMA RJ), and examining a specific case decision (No. 1226/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Dps) to assess the application of restorative justice. Results: The implementation of restorative justice is seen through the involvement of victims, their families, defendants, and other related parties, with the aim of recovery instead of mere retaliation, as illustrated in the court decision. Novelty: The interpretation and application of restorative justice as defined in PERMA No. 1 of 2024 in criminal case settlements, especially in the Denpasar District Court, highlighting its goal of restorative rather than punitive outcomes.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION IN THE CASE OF PROTECTED ANIMALS AT THE DENPASAR DISTRICT COURT Wiratny, Ni Ketut; Sihotang, Erikson; Widyatmika , Ida Bagus Ary
International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI)
Publisher : Antis-Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijmi.v3i2.449

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the considerations and inhibiting factors in criminal cases regarding protected animals in the Denpasar District Court, specifically in Decision Number 809/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Dps. Method: The case is analyzed based on the judge's considerations, including elements of intentionality, the defendant's ignorance, incorrect application of cumulative articles, and the use of justice and societal usefulness in decision-making. Results: The judge's considerations focused on intentionality, ignorance of the legal requirement for permits, and the application of the wrong articles. The defendant was not found guilty of committing a criminal act as the judge balanced legal certainty with justice and societal impact. Novelty: The case highlights the impact of outdated legislation, lack of coordination among law enforcement agencies, and the role of social media in facilitating the trade of protected animals.