Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.884
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum Unram Law Review DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Yuridika Literasi Hukum Notaire KRTHA BHAYANGKARA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Hutabarat, Sylvana Murni Deborah
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Rechtsidee

 1 
Comparative Legal Analysis of Indonesian and South Korean Consumer Protection in Cosmetic Safety Regulations Supardi, Reisha Rizkia Sabila; Hutabarat, Sylvana Murni Deborah
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i1.1052

Abstract

General Background: The rapid growth of the cosmetics industry and new product innovations challenge businesses to remain competitive while meeting consumer expectations and legal standards. Specific Background: Given their direct application to the human body, cosmetic product safety is crucial, as non-compliance can pose health risks. Knowledge Gap: Despite existing regulations, hazardous cosmetic products still circulate. Understanding the production limits of business actors is essential to ensure consumer safety.Aims: This research uses normative legal analysis to compare cosmetic safety regulations in Indonesia and South Korea, focusing on consumer protection through comparative, statutory, and case approaches. Results: Both countries incorporate consumer protection principles in their cosmetic regulations. However, South Korea is more advanced with specific cosmetic laws. Novelty: The study presents a comparative analysis of cosmetic safety laws in Indonesia and South Korea, supported by international references. Implications: The findings offer insights into regulatory frameworks and suggest Indonesia adopt a more specific law, akin to South Korea’s Cosmetics Act, to improve consumer safety standards. Highlights: South Korea’s Cosmetics Act offers a more specific and advanced regulatory model. Unsafe cosmetics still circulate in Indonesia despite existing laws. Comparative legal analysis reveals the need for regulatory reform in Indonesia. Keywords: Comparative Law, Consumer Protection, Cosmetic, Regulation, Safety Standards
Co-Authors Akmal, Khalif Ardiana, Oktavia Dwi Awalin, Hanif Fil’ Azzahra, Dinda Cahyani, Nadzira Arrum Febriani, Risma Dwi Firdaus, Muhammad Bintang Himawan, Chairunnas Latri, Akhdan Adityo Muhammad Syahrul Ramadhan Nugroho, Andriyanti Adhi Rahmawitri, Mita Rizkianti, Wardani Supardi, Reisha Rizkia Sabila Taupiqqurrahman Tesalonika, Beatrice