Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

EVALUATING THE SAMR MODEL FOR ENHANCING ICT INTEGRATION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW Krisbiantoro, Benny; Ahmad Ashari, Imam
FRASA: ENGLISH EDUCATION AND LITERATURE JOURNAL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 5 No. 2 September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47701/frasa.v5i2.4027

Abstract

Significantly impacted education, necessitating effective integration into teaching practices. This study examined the application of the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model to evaluate ICT integration in English Language Teaching (ELT) at the tertiary level. The research aimed to determine whether the SAMR model could enhance pedagogical practices beyond mere technology substitution and how it compared with the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. This study addressed the issue of stagnant ICT integration in ELT, hypothesizing that the SAMR model provided a more robust framework for transformative technology use compared to the TPACK model. The study’s purpose was to assess the SAMR model’s effectiveness in advancing ICT integration in university-level ELT. Objectives included comparing SAMR with TPACK and identifying barriers to effective ICT use. A systematic literature review was conducted using six electronic databases covering the past decade (2013-2023). The review followed PRISMA guidelines with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Preliminary results revealed that while the SAMR model offered the potential for enhancing teaching practices, many educators remained at the substitution stage, mainly replacing traditional methods with technology without significant pedagogical changes. Challenges included insufficient training, institutional resistance, and lack of support. The findings underscored the need for extensive training, supportive policies, and continued research to improve ICT integration in higher education. This study contributes to understanding effective technology integration and provides recommendations for institutions seeking to elevate their teaching practices through meaningful ICT adoption. This research offers insights and practical recommendations for enhancing technology integration in higher education, focusing on overcoming current limitations and advancing teaching methodologies through the SAMR model.
HOW EFFECTIVE IS ECLECTIC METHOD TO TEACH ACADEMIC WRITING? Krisbiantoro, Benny; Pujiani, Tri
J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): DESEMBER
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/j-lee.v2i01.591

Abstract

The Eclectic Method is a combination of several learning methods to accommodate differences in students’ various characteristics, such as learning styles or preferences, experiences, habits, background, and of course learning abilities. The method employed in this research was a quasi-experimental research with post-test-only non-equivalent control group design. The result of the research findings led to the conclusion that eclectic method was more effective than scientific approach to teach writing for the eighth semester students of the Nursing Study Program, Faculty of Health, Harapan Bangsa University. It was proven that the mean score of the students’ writing in experimental class was 78.19 while the mean score of the students’ writing in control class was 72.14. The t-test result in the research was 2.32 and the t-table is 2.02. It meant that t-test score was higher than the t-table. Based on the research findings, it could be concluded that the use of eclectic method was effective to teach writing for the eighth semester students of the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health, Harapan Bangsa University.
Students' Self-Assessment in Writing Class Krisbiantoro, Benny; Soali, Muhammad; Wirasto, Anggit
J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): DESEMBER
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/j-lee.v4i02.979

Abstract

The educational literature has devoted considerable focus to the pedagogical utility of rubrics in encouraging student learning and facilitating instructor feedback on student performance. However, there is little study on students' usage of self-assessment criteria in a context including a second or foreign language, and even less research has looked into the variables that affect the usefulness of the assessment criteria. The study aimed to investigate (1) how students perceive the rubric's function in evaluating their writing skills.; (2) according to the students, what factors affected the rubric's effectiveness for self-evaluation in the writing class? Forty students of the tenth grade of SMK Kesatrian Purwokerto got involved in this study. The researchers employed a self-assessment rubric and students’ reflective journals to collect the data. The findings of this study were that by helping students to set goals, make plans, keep an eye on themselves, and do reflection, rubrics were beneficial in fostering students' self-learning in writing skills. Rubric factors and users impacted the efficiency of the rubric for learner self-evaluation.
The The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (Pjbl) in Enhancing Students’ Writing Skills Ramdania, Nofa Elok; Krisbiantoro, Benny; Soali, Muhammad
Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2025 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SNPPKM 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/snppkm.v4i1.1337

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in enhancing the writing skills of grade XI students at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto. The study used a quasi-experimental design with an experimental group taught using PjBL and a control group using Direct Instruction (DI). The sample consisted of 59 students, and data were collected through pre-test and post-test measuring their argumentative writing skills. The results indicated that the experimental group showed a significant improvement in their writing skills, with an average increase of 10.24 points (Δ = 10.24) compared to the control group's 6.13 points (Δ = 6.13). The independent t-test results demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups at the 0.004 level. These findings suggest that PjBL is more effective than DI in enhancing students' writing abilities, fostering creativity, and encouraging critical thinking. The study highlights the importance of implementing innovative, student-centered approaches in writing instruction.