Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Implementasi Konsep Qath’i dan Dzanni dalam Jarimah Pencurian: Relevansi Hukuman Potong Tangan di Era Modern Setyawan, Rahmad; Muslih, Muslih
Abdurrauf Law and Sharia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Abdurrauf Law and Sharia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/arlash.v1i2.82

Abstract

Abstract: The concepts of qath'i (definitive) and dzanni (speculative) in Islamic law continue to generate differing opinions among scholars of ushul fiqh in determining whether the texts of the Qur'an or Hadith are qath'i or dzanni. This paper aims to deconstruct the concepts of qath'i and dzanni and their implementation in the crime of theft. Methodologically, this research is a library study (library research) using a normative-textual approach. Data collection was conducted by reviewing various library sources such as the Qur'an, Hadith, laws, journals, articles, books, works of scholars, and various references related to the issue being studied. The results indicate that the concepts of qath'i and dzanni, as utilized by classical scholars of ushul fiqh, are regarded as a final and commonly accepted understanding. However, with the progression of modern times, contemporary scholars of ushul fiqh have criticized and expressed concerns over the method of relying solely on textual sources without considering their essences. Therefore, the stipulation of hand-cutting punishment for theft, as described in the Qur'an or Hadith, should not be interpreted textually as a qath'i legal provision. The implementation of hand-cutting punishment in the modern era, when associated with the values and principles of the Qur'an known as maqasid al-Shariah, becomes less relevant. This means that the hand-cutting punishment is not the ultimate goal to be applied to thieves but rather an intermediary to achieve the objective of providing a warning and deterrence to prevent theft, as the meaning of 'hand' can also be interpreted as power, opportunity to steal, etc. Thus, the punishment for the thief can be modified according to the surrounding situation and conditions, such as imprisonment, fines, or removal from their position Keywords: Qath’i; Dzanni; Crime of Theft. Abstrak: Konsep qath’i dan dzanni dalam hukum Islam masih menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat di kalangan ulama ushul fikih untuk menetapkan nash al-Qur’an dan hadis apakah bersifat qath’i atau dzanni. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendekonstruksi konsep qath’i dan dzanni dan implementasinya dalam jarimah pencurian. Secara metodologi penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan metode pendekatan normatif-tekstual. Pengumpulan data penelitian dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji berbagai literatur kepustakaan seperti al-Qur’an, hadis, undang-undang, jurnal, artikel, buku-buku, kitab-kitab karya ulama, dan berbagai sumber referensi yang berkaitan dengan isu yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep qath’i dan dzanni yang digunakan oleh ulama ushul fikih klasik dianggap sebagai suatu pemahaman umum yang final dan wajar digunakan. Namun, seiring dengan perkembangan zaman yang semakin modern, ulama ushul fikih kontemporer mengajukan kritik dan menunjukkan kegelisahan terhadap metode yang hanya berpegang pada nash tanpa mempertimbangkan substansinya. Oleh karena itu ketentuan hukuman potong tangan bagi pelaku pencurian sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam al-Qur’an atau hadis tidak harus dimaknai secara tekstual sebagai ketentuan hukum yang bersifat qath’i. Pemberlakuan hukuman potong tangan di era modern, jika dikaitkan dengan nilai dan prinsip al-Qur’an yang dikenal dengan maqasid al-Syari’ah, maka menjadi kurang relevan. Artinya, hukuman potong tangan bukanlah tujuan akhir yang harus diterapkan bagi pelaku pencurian, melainkan sebagai perantara untuk mencapai tujuan yaitu memberikan peringatan dan efek jera agar tidak melakukan tindakan pencurian, karena makna tangan bisa saja diartikan sebagai kekuasaan, kesempatan untuk mencuri, dan lain-lain. Dengan demikian, hukuman bagi pelaku pencurian dapat dirubah sesuai dengan situasi dan kondisi yang melingkupinya, seperti dipenjarakan, denda, atau pencopotan dari jabatannya.
Reconstruction of Legal Subjects in Ushul Al-fiqh: Development and Interconnectivity Analysis in the Contemporary Era Sodik, Nur; Setyawan, Rahmad; Khairuddin, Khairuddin; Adnani, Fahlul Ulum Ahmad
Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah UIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v7i2.9875

Abstract

In general, legal subjects refer to entities that have rights and obligations in the legal system. This study aims to reconstruct legal subjects in ushul al-fiqh and their development in the contemporary era. Methodologically, this study is a library research with an interconnective approach. Data was collected from various literature sources, such as laws, court decisions, books, works of scholars, the Qur'an, hadith, encyclopedias, dictionaries, journals, magazines, and other relevant sources. The results of the study show that, in line with the times, the scope of legal subjects in ushul al-fiqh has undergone development. Previously, legal subjects only included individuals who met the requirements of being ‘aqil and baligh, but now they also include legal entities. The reconstruction of legal subjects in ushul al-fiqh and its development in the contemporary era shows the interconnection between ushul al-fiqh and modern sciences, such as legal sociology, legal anthropology, legal philosophy, and modern legal science. This is reflected in a number of laws and regulations in Indonesia that recognize legal entities as legal subjects. Through an interconnective approach, it can be understood that ushul al-fiqh as the epistemological foundation of Islamic law is capable of dialoguing with various modern fields of science in responding to social changes without losing its theological roots.
Reforming Islamic Family Law in Indonesia through Syibhul Iddah for Husbands: State Policy and Penghulu Perspectives Setyawan, Rahmad; Witro, Doli; Iffah Al Walidah; Iim Septiana; Muhamad Agus Soleh; Novia Nurfadila; Rismanuddin
El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.9253

Abstract

The state policy regulating the concept of syibhul iddah for husbands as outlined in Circular Letter Number: P-005/DJ.III/HK.00.7/10/2021 has sparked debate among religious officials in Indonesia. This paper aims to discuss the chronology of the emergence of the concept of syibhul iddah for husbands and analyse the responses or perspectives of the heads of the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) in Indonesia. In addition, it also discusses the relevance of the concept of syibhul iddah to the reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia. Methodologically, this research is a juridical-empirical research. Primary data was obtained through interviews with several religious leaders spread across various regions of Indonesia, while secondary data was obtained from reference materials such as scientific articles, scientific books, etc. The data analysis techniques used were data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study show that the state policy through a circular letter regulating syibhul iddah is based on several reasons. First, the prevalence of covert polygamy in society, which can harm women’s rights. Second, as a legal measure to fill the legal vacuum regarding new marriages for husbands during their wives ‘iddah period. Third, as a legal measure to support the spirit of gender equality between men and women in carrying out responsibilities after divorce. However, in its application within the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA), the circular letter still causes differences of opinion among religious leaders in Indonesia. On the one hand, the majority of religious leaders are very responsive and supportive of the issuance of the circular letter. On the other hand, there are a small number of religious leaders who criticise the circular letter.