Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.908
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURTEKSI MANAJEMEN DEWANTARA Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi Journal Equity of Law and Governance Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS) Jurnal Armada Informatika Journal of Nusantara Economic Science Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Acta Law Journal Milthree Law Journal Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences LEX SOCIETAS: Journal of Law and Public Administration Sintek Kuwera
Robert
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Acta Law Journal

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Ditolaknya Pernyataan Pailit Atas Dasar Perlakuan Yang Sama Pada Anak Perusahaan BUMN Siallagan, Agnes Angelina; Robert; Mahmul Siregar
Acta Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/alj.v1i2.12604

Abstract

BUMN in carrying out restructuring carry out the principle of holding companies in maximizing capital. The legal relationship established in the application of the holding company principle between the parent company and its subsidiaries is caused by the takeover of shares by the parent company. BUMN subsidiaries are treated the same as BUMN by fulfilling several conditions as specified in Article 2A paragraph (7) of PP RI Number 72 of 2016. This research is focused on analyzing and analyzing problems related to the legal status of BUMN subsidiaries according to Indonesian law, legal provisions regarding the legal relationship of BUMN holding companies to BUMN subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy, and analysis of the rejection of bankruptcy applications based on equal treatment of BUMN subsidiaries in Decision Number 35/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is a normative research method that is descriptive. Data sources were obtained through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used is a literature study. This normative research is based on qualitative analysis of secondary data in the form of laws and regulations and library materials. To prevent various interpretations regarding the limitation of bankruptcy application authority for BUMN subsidiaries engaged in the public interest sector, it is necessary to have clear arrangements. Currently, the Bankruptcy Law has not explicitly regulated the authority to apply for bankruptcy, especially for state-owned companies that adopt a holding system, so it is necessary to make changes or additions to the regulations. In Decision Number 35/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst the judge did not consider the aspect of share ownership of the bankruptcy respondent and its source of capital that must be owned entirely by the state against BUMN subsidiaries that are treated the same as BUMN engaged in the public interest when referring to Article 2 paragraph (5) of UU KPKPU.
Pemegang Pengalihan Atas Hak Tagih Tertulis (Cessie) Dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU (Analisa Putusan: No.16/Pdt.Sus–PKPU/2017/PN.Niaga/Jkt.Pst) Jan Christian Zherman Saragih, George; Sunarmi; Robert
Acta Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/alj.v2i1.15366

Abstract

The transfer of receivables for written collection rights is called Cessie. The legal arrangements regarding cessie are regulated explicitly in Article 613 of the Civil Code. Generally, the granting of the right to collect is often in debt-receivable disputes. Transfer of rights from the old creditor (cedent) to the new creditor (cessionaris) over the debtor (cessus). Disputes over debts in the business world are commonly experienced by every legal subject including business entities. The problem of debts is a slick and complicated problem to find a solution to these conditions. The intensity of the need for funds in carrying out company operations can bring two things, namely profit and loss. (However, in practice, the transfer of receivables for written collection rights under the cessie scheme is often disputed by legality and validity, or the process that occurs so that the transfer of rights to collect debts that have matured becomes an obstacle in applying for a new Creditor PKPU (cessionaris ) is also hampered and difficult to be able to fulfill his right to repayment of debts of debtors. Legal protection is required to touch not only on the part of the debtor either preventing the collateral property from being insolvented but the legal protection of the creditor.This research was conducted using secondary data obtained from primary legal materials such as analyzing laws and regulations related to the title of this thesis. Secondary legal materials such as books, various magazines, literature and articles.Right to collect receivables in writing with the cessie scheme in its development in the business world often raises questions about the legal protection of creditors after transferring their collection rights to other creditors. The transfer is followed by the condition of levering and official written notice (betekkning) to the debtor that the transfer of the right to collect the right to collect. The application of cessie is then combined in a dispute over debt receivables when there is a PKPU application for the situation of insolvency of the debtor so that it neglects to pay off its debts.
Penyalahgunaan Kedudukan Komisaris Pt. Condato Grup Indonesia Sebagai Tindakan Ultra Vires (Studi Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Jkt.Pst) Tanjung, Muhamamd Dafi; Siregar, Mahmul; Robert
Acta Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract The board of commissioners acts as a supervisor and advisor to the board of  directors. Commissioners who use their position to provide advice to the board of directors so that the commissioners can take action on behalf of the company without any authority constitute an act of abuse of the commissioner's position to take ultra vires actions. As illustrated in the case of PT. Condato Grup Indonesia (PT.CGI) in Decision Number 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst, the commissioners of PT. CGI took action to transfer payments from consumers to their supplier companies and withhold PT. CGI's profits. This study uses a normative legal research method, with a statutory, case and conceptual approach, through a literature study data collection technique that collects data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials as analyzed using a qualitative  analysis approach. Where several legal issues will be studied, namely how ultra vires actions carried out by commissioners can be categorized as abuse of  position, how the judge's considerations in deciding whether the elements of an unlawful act in Decision Number 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst are fulfilled, and how the legal analysis is of the view that the commissioners of PT. CGI have committed ultra vires actions. This study concludes that commissioners who abuse their positions to influence the board of directors are ultra vires actions, as  commissioners of PT. CGI have committed unlawful acts by abusing their authority to divert and withhold the company's profits ultra vires. In this case,  ultra vires actions are the cause of the losses incurred by PT. CGI. Therefore, the  commissioners are obliged to bear all losses, considering that the consequences of ultra vires actions are not binding on the company because they are null and void and trigger the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil. Keywords: Position of Commissioner; Abuse; Ultra Vires.Abstrak Dewan komisaris berkedudukan sebagai pengawas dan pemberi nasihat kepada direksi. Komisaris yang menggunakan kedudukannya dalam pemberian nasihat kepada direksi agar komisaris dapat melakukan tindakan mewakili perseroan tanpa adanya kewenangan merupakan perbuatan penyalahgunaan kedudukan komisaris untuk melakukan tindakan ultra vires. Sebagaimana tergambar di permasalahan PT. Condato Grup Indonesia (PT.CGI) dalam Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst, komisaris PT. CGI melakukan tindakan pengalihan pembayaran dari konsumen ke perusahaan perusahaan supplier miliknya dan menahan keuntungan PT. CGI tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus dan konseptual, melalui teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka yang mengumpulkan data berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier sebagaimana untuk  dianalisa secara pendekatan analisis kualitatif. Dimana akan dikajinya beberapa permasalahan hukum, yaitu bagaimana tindakan ultra vires yang dilakukan oleh komisaris dapat dikategorikan sebagai penyalahgunaan kedudukan, bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan terpenuhinya unsur-unsur perbuatan melawan hukum dalam Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst, serta bagaimana analisa hukum yang berpandangan komisaris PT. CGI telah melakukan tindakan ultra vires. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa komisaris yang menyalahgunakan jabatannya untuk mempengaruhi direksi merupakan tindakan ultra vires, sebagaimana komisaris PT. CGI telah melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dengan menyalahgunakan wewenangnya untuk mengalihkan dan menahan keuntungan perseroan secara ultra vires. Dalam kasus ini, tindakan ultra vires menjadi causa penyebab dari akibat kerugian PT. CGI timbul. Karena itu, komisaris wajib menanggung seluruh kerugian, mengingat akibat tindakan ultra  vires tidak mengikat perseroan karena batal demi hukum dan memicu penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veil. Kata Kunci: Kedudukan Komisaris; penyalahgunaan; Ultra Vires
Co-Authors Ahmad, Muhammad Taufik Habibillah Ibnu Bondan, Vinsensius Burhan Sidabariba CHRISTOFEL L. G. H. M SAMOSIR Christopher Gustikho david Edy Ikhsan Effendy, Dudy Eka Prasetia Hati Baculu, Eka Eva Syahfitri Nasution, Eva Syahfitri Geby Gosal Georgerius Graceallah Heryanto Iwan Supardi Jan Christian Zherman Saragih, George Johanes Terang Kita Perangin Angin Joiverdia Arifiyanto Juvian Khowira, Mario Lubis, Tri Murti Magfira Malik MAHMUL SIREGAR Mahmul Siregar Manurung, Doni Freddi Mhd. Yamin Michelle Lucky Madelene. S Mochtar Indra Efendi Siregar Muh Anzar Muhammad Adli Fahmi Lubis Nasution, Siti Nurahmi Nur Iftita Rini Nur Safitri Obaja Capandi Saut Horas Sinaga Octara Pribadi Patricia, Verent Purba, Hadyan Yunhas Purba, M. Hadyan Yunhas Rahmasari, Puspita Riyanti, Eva Rosnidar Sembiring Saludin Muis Sarpawi Siallagan, Agnes Angelina Siti Dzahra Sri Hera Wati Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi Syahrial Akbar Tanjung, Muhamamd Dafi Utomo, Satriyo William Widjaja Wilson Winda Asry Wong, Leon Yohanes Ari Setiawan