Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI HAK PENGEMBANGAN POTENSI PARA WARGA BINAAN DI LAPAS TERBUKA KELAS III RUMBAI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN Junaidy, Junaidy; Ardiansah, Ardiansah; Libra, Robert
ANDREW Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): JUNI 2025
Publisher : ANDREW Law Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61876/alj.v4i1.84

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi hak pengembangan potensi para Warga Binaan di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan, dan untuk menganalisis hambatan dan upaya dalam implementasi hak pengembangan potensi para Warga Binaan di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan.. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan oleh Peneliti adalah penelitian hukum Sosiologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pertama Implementasi hak pengembangan potensi para Warga Binaan di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan sudah terlaksana dibuktikan dengan adanya program manajemen pelatihan kerja dan keterampilan bagi warga binaan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas III Rumbai. Kedua: Penghambat implementasi hak pengembangan potensi para Warga Binaan di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan adalah kurangnya minat warga binaan dalam mengikuti program pembinaan menjadikan kendala dalam pelaksanaan program pembinaan karena warga binaan sebelum mereka masuk ke lingkungan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan mereka telah hidup bebas tanpa mementingkan aturan. Kurangnya sarana penunjang dalam pelaksanaan program pembinaan kemandirian juga menjadi faktor kendala dalam pelaksanaan program implementasi hak pengembangan potensi para Warga Binaan.
The Application of Dwangsom in The Execution of State Administrative Court Decisions in Indonesia From A Justice Perspective Effendi; Ardiansyah; Libra, Robert
Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : PT Mattawang Mediatama Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.daengku4278

Abstract

Article 116 paragraph (4) of Law Number 51 of 2009 stipulates that officials who do not implement decisions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) that have permanent legal force may be subject to coercive measures in the form of forced money (dwangsom) and/or administrative sanctions. This study aims to: first, analyze the legal regulations on dwangsom in the execution of PTUN decisions in Indonesia; second, examine the application of dwangsom by judges in judicial practice; third, examine the implications of the application of dwangsom from a justice perspective. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. Data were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively, with a case study on Decision Number 13/G/2016/PTUN.TPI. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of dwangsom in the execution of PTUN decisions is still partial and not supported by technical regulations. Article 116 paragraph (4) of Law Number 51 of 2009 is not accompanied by detailed guidelines so that its application depends on the judge's initiative and the plaintiff's request, without quantitative or procedural standards. In fact, dwangsom has the potential to be an effective means of pressuring officials to comply with decisions voluntarily and in a timely manner. Weak technical regulations and an unresponsive legal culture have limited its effectiveness. The conclusion of this study confirms that the dwangsom plays a strategic role in ensuring legal certainty and protecting the public's rights from arbitrary government action. Comprehensive technical regulations and the establishment of an independent national enforcement agency are recommended to ensure the practical implementation of PTUN decisions. Thus, dwangsom can function effectively as an instrument for upholding the rule of law and providing justice for those seeking justice.
INTEGRASI KEBIJAKAN DIVERSI BERBASIS PRINSIP KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM HUKUM CUKAI DI INDONESIA Muhardi , Dedi; Fahmi, Fahmi; Libra, Robert
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 10 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v10i3.9770

Abstract

This research discusses the implementation of diversion policies based on restorative justice principles in Indonesia's customs sector, aimed at reducing the burden on the judicial system and restoring the country's economic losses. The research questions in this study focus on how diversion policies can be integrated into the customs legal system in Indonesia and the benefits and challenges faced to improve the effectiveness of law enforcement and economic recovery. The study uses normative legal research methods with library research, analyzing relevant regulations, doctrines, and legal theories. The findings indicate that the implementation of diversion policies can reduce judicial burdens, speed up economic recovery, and create a more efficient and just legal system. However, the main challenges include lack of understanding among law enforcement, unclear implementation regulations, and legal uncertainties. Policy reforms and increased capacity of law enforcement are crucial to ensure the successful implementation of this policy.
Prohibition on Confiscation of State-Owned Immovable Property Against Decisions of the State Administrative Court That Have Already Become Final Oktapani, Silm; Libra, Robert; Noerdin, Zulkarnaen
Rechtsvinding Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.v2i1.394

Abstract

State Administrative Law gives the state the right to resolve administrative disputes at the PTUN. However, this is different when faced with the problem of state property, especially state land, which in Article 50 of Law No. 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury is actually prohibited regarding confiscation of state property including state-owned land. The formulation of this research are: 1) How is the Implementation of the Prohibition of Confiscation of Immovable State Property Against Inkracht State Administrative Court Decisions; and 2) How are the obstacles to the Implementation of the Prohibition of Confiscation of Immovable State Property Against Inkracht State Administrative Court Decisions. The research method used is Normative law. The results and discussion found that the implementation of the PTUN's decision regarding the confiscation of state property is hindered by the provisions of Article 50 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury so that the provisions need to be changed. Then, the obstacle that arises in terms of implementing the decision is the absence of a process that binds state officials or bodies to comply with the PTUN decision in Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. This is in fact very contrary to the principle of legal objectives desired by Gustav Radbruch who mentioned 3 (three) legal objectives, namely legal certainty, legal benefits, and legal justice. Therefore, it is necessary to amend the provisions of Law No. 1 Year 2004 on State Treasury and Law No. 5 Year 1986 on Administrative Court to accommodate the decision of the Administrative Court to execute state property.
Regulatory Reconstruction of the Application of Digital Evidence in Realizing Children's Rights (Study of the Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia) Libra, Robert; Okfalisa, Okfalisa; Aslati, Aslati
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5170

Abstract

The development of technology continues and develops in accordance with the times. The use of technology is also carried out to the context of daily life so that life becomes more practical. Then, this context is also very close to the use of technology in the judicial process through the e-court system. This is what makes Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Examination of Article 43 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage appear and change the paradigm of proof from the determination of children outside marriage can be done by using technology in the form of DNA tests. In this case, electronic evidence or digital evidence can be strong evidence to recognize the father's nasab position over the child. The research method used in this research is Normative Juridical with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results and discussion of this study found that it turns out that the application of digital evidence can realize children's rights when looking at several existing decisions. Of the 10 (ten) decisions and/or court decisions that have been reviewed, all of them use digitized evidence and make the judge's view more objective, resulting in a decision that recognizes the father's lineage to the child. The context of this recognition is the essence that the concept of child recognition makes his rights fulfilled and the father cannot deny that the child is his own child. In addition, DNA evidence, CCTV and photos and videos exist to strengthen the position of the father's lineage to a child whose father previously did not recognize his own child. Regulatory reconstruction in the application of digital evidence to realize children's rights is carried out by changing the provisions of the Religious Courts Law and the Marriage Law in terms of strengthening the position of children's rights.
PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN SISWA SMA BAITUL QUR’AN PEKANBARU TENTANG NILAI PANCASILA DALAM KEHIDUPAN SEHARI-HARI DALAM MENCEGAH KENAKALAN DAN KRIMINALITAS ANAK Noerdin, Zulkarnaen; Libra, Robert; Oktapani, Silm
Jurnal Pengabdian Kompetitif Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Strategi Pengabdian Masyarakat untuk Peningkatan Kreativitas, Literasi, dan Kes
Publisher : Komunitas Manajemen Kompetitif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35446/pengabdian_kompetif.v2i1.1454

Abstract

Analisis situasi pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah Kebutuhan tentang Peningkatan Pemahaman Siswa SMA Baitul Qur’an Pekanbaru tentang Nilai Pancasila dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari dalam Mencegah Kenakalan dan Kriminalitas Anak merupakan hal yang sangat urgent. Judul Pengabdian yang diangkat dalam pengabdian ini adalah dalam rangka mendukung Program Pemerintah Melalui Program BPHN (Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional) Mengasuh dalam Rangka mencegah kenakalan remaja. Maraknya kenakalan terhadap anak Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI minta Pembekalan Hukum dilakukan kepada anak sejak dini yaitu pada masa sekolah. Adapun prosedur kerja untuk mendukung metode yang ditawarkan adalah ceramah dilaksanakan 1 (satu) jam, dan dialog serta diskusi selama 2 jam atau sesuai kebutuhan mitra sepanjang masih dalam jangka waktu pelaksanaan program ini. Kegiatan ini sudah dilaksanakan pada tanggal 08 Juni 2023 di SMA Baitul Quran berupa ceramah, dialog dan diskusi memecahkan masalah-masalah yang dihadapi. Adapun prosedur kerja untuk mendukung metode yang ditawarkan adalah ceramah dilaksanakan 1 (satu) jam, dan dialog serta diskusi selama 2 jam atau sesuai kebutuhan mitra sepanjang masih dalam jangka waktu pelaksanaan program ini. Partisipasi mitra dalam acara pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah menyediakan tempat dan waktu pelaksanaan program serta menghadirkan anggota mitra sebagai audien. Luaran yang akan dihasilkan sesuai rencana kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah bagi mitra tentunya Peningkatan Pemahaman Siswa SMA Baitul Qur’an Pekanbaru tentang Nilai Pancasila dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari dalam Mencegah Kenakalan dan Kriminalitas Anak.. Bagi pengusul luaran yang akan dicapai adalah berupa artikel ilmiah dan tidak terlepas juga dari Tri Darma Perguruan Tinggi.
A Philosophical Review of Justice in Legal Aid after Indonesia's Budget Efficiency Policy Libra, Robert; Muhammad Fauzan
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v52.29209

Abstract

The concept of legal aid in Indonesia has evolved from a voluntary practice of generosity to a constitutional right, reflecting the principles of equality before the law and distributive justice. This transformation aligns with Articles 27 and 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law No. 16 of 2011, obligating the state to remove economic barriers that hinder the poor's access to justice. Legal aid funding through the State Budget affirms the state's moral and legal responsibility to protect human rights, particularly the right to receive legal aid. However, Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 2025, which focuses on expenditure efficiency, threatens to reduce this funding. This study aims to analyze the concept of legal aid from the perspective of justice philosophy and examine the dilemma between efficiency and justice in Indonesia's legal aid system. Employing a normative juridical approach with statutory and conceptual analysis. The research findings indicate that legal aid embodies John Rawls' Difference Principle, advocating a bias toward the disadvantaged. The Presidential Instruction on Efficiency presents a normative dilemma, balancing administrative efficiency with constitutional duties. Excluding legal aid funding under this policy risks undermining fundamental legal values, potentially widening inequality, and violating human dignity. The philosophical evolution of legal aid as a constitutionally guaranteed right faces an ethical dilemma when efficiency measures conflict with the state's responsibility to uphold justice, disproportionately harming vulnerable groups and threatening the welfare state's commitment to equality before the law.