Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.276
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Bulletin of Community Engagement International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) JUSTICES: Journal of Law Recht Studiosum Law Review Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Realism: Law Review
Sutiarnoto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Kajian Hukum Pengalihan Aset Yayasan Menjadi Milik Pribadi Oleh Organ Pengurus (Studi Putusan No. 75/Pdt.G/2014/Pn.Tsm Nasution, Syarah Ermayanti; Sunarmi; Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar; Sutiarnoto
Recht Studiosum Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 2 (November - 2025)
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/rslr.v4i2.23260

Abstract

Aset yayasan tercantum dalam anggaran dasar sebagai hukum positif yang mengikat seluruh organnya dan dikelola oleh pengurus untuk kepentingan yayasan. Akan tetapi hal ini tidak menutupi kemungkinan penyimpangan yang dilakukan pengurus terhadap penggunaan aset yayasan. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan studi putusan No. 75/Pdt.G/ 2014/PN.Tsm dengan permasalahan yang dibahas yakni bagaimana kewenangan organ pengurus yayasan terhadap aset yayasan, bagaimana upaya yang dilakukan untuk menghindari pengalihan aset yang dilakukan Organ Pengurus, serta bagaimana analisis hukum terhadap kasus pengalihan aset Yayasan menjadi milik pribadi oleh organ Pengurus atas Putusan Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Tsm. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan menggunakan teknik studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan alat pengumpulan data yaitu studi dokumen wawancara. Hasil penelitian bahwa Pengurus memiliki kewenangan untuk mengelola aset yayasan, sepanjang pengelolaan tersebut dilaksanakan semata-mata untuk menunjang tercapainya maksud dan tujuan yayasan. Prinsip keterbukaan dan akuntabilitas dalam pengelolaan yayasan perlu ditekankan demi mencegah penyelewengan kewenangan pengurus dalam mengelola aset yayasan. Terhadap putusan No. 75/Pdt.G/ 2014/PN.Tsm atas tindakan para tergugat yang menguasai aset berupa objek sengketa tanah milik yayasan merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum. Konsekuensinya adalah pembatalan perjanjian jual beli hak milik atas tanah karena adanya cacat hukum yang mengakibatkan tujuan perbuatan hukum tersebut menjadi tidak berlaku. Keyword: Yayasan, Aset Yayasan, Pengalihan Aset Yayasan
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jual Beli Atas Tanah Yang Termasuk Harta Perkawinan (Gono-Gini) Yang Dijual Istri Tanpa Persetujuan Suami (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3325/K/Pdt/2020) Elsa Aprilia Rambe; hasim purba; sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 6 (2025): Tema Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i6.2155

Abstract

In marriage, marital property (gono-gini) arising from valid marital bonds requires spousal consent for transfer. This study employs normative juridical methodology with descriptive analytical approach to examine Temporary Land Deed Officials' (PPATS) responsibility in facilitating marital property sales without spousal consent based on Supreme Court Decision Number 3325K/PDT/2020. Research findings demonstrate that PPATS bears administrative and disciplinary accountability, sales agreements are void under Article 1320 Indonesian Civil Code, good-faith buyers retain legal protection, and parties may file deed annulment suits or pursue mediation to ensure legal certainty and justice.
Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Objek Jaminan dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bitung Nomor 70/Pdt.Bth/2015/PN Bit) M. Alfathan; sutiarnoto; Suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2227

Abstract

The legal protection of creditors holding mortgage rights in cases where collateral objects originate from corruption crimes is analyzed through a case study of Bitung District Court Decision Number 70/PDT.BTH/2015/PN.BIT. The findings indicate a hierarchical conflict between criminal law and civil law. Criminal verdicts do not automatically nullify the property rights of good-faith third parties. Mortgage Right Certificates possess executorial power equivalent to court decisions and grant preferential rights to creditors. The court ruled that the seizure was unlawful because the mortgage right had been previously encumbered. Special regulations are needed to protect third-party rights and establish validation mechanisms before seizing collateral objects.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik sebagai Pemilik atas Sengketa Objek Tanah Hasil dari Penjualan Lelang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2125 K/PDT/2020) Muhammad Luthfi Yandi; sutiarnoto; suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2249

Abstract

The sale of auction objects, particularly execution auctions, often triggers disputes between auction buyers and parties claiming rights over the auctioned objects, creating legal uncertainty for good faith buyers. This study analyzes legal protection in disputes over auction object ownership based on Supreme Court Decision Number 2125 K/Pdt/2020 using normative juridical methods with a case study approach. The problem formulation includes procedures land auction sales due to default according to Minister of Finance Regulation Number 93 of 2010, legal protection for good faith buyers after auctions through KPKNL, and analysis of judicial considerations. The study findings indicate that legal protection is guaranteed through recognition of certificates as valid proof of ownership, and judges have applied the principle of legal protection by declaring possession without legal basis as unlawful acts.
Co-Authors Abdul Harris Affila Agusmidah Agusmidah Aidil Hamdi Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi Barus, Adhi Pradana Elsa Aprilia Rambe Galio, Galio Parly Keliat HASIM PURBA Herlinda, Erna Jelly Leviza M. Alfathan Maulia Permata Rizki Pohan Muhammad Luthfi Yandi Nasution, Syarah Ermayanti Purba, Hasim Purba Rambe, Suria Ningsih Rizky, Fajar Khaify Safnul, Dody Saidin Sayyida Faradiba Vahlevi Sinulingga, Tommy Aditia Sirait, Leonny Rachel Aprillia Suhaidi Sunarmi SUPRAYITNO Wanda Jaya Silaen Widya Agnes Hamid Zhein Fajar Rheina