Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jual Beli Atas Tanah Yang Termasuk Harta Perkawinan (Gono-Gini) Yang Dijual Istri Tanpa Persetujuan Suami (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3325/K/Pdt/2020) Elsa Aprilia Rambe; hasim purba; sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 6 (2025): Tema Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i6.2155

Abstract

In marriage, marital property (gono-gini) arising from valid marital bonds requires spousal consent for transfer. This study employs normative juridical methodology with descriptive analytical approach to examine Temporary Land Deed Officials' (PPATS) responsibility in facilitating marital property sales without spousal consent based on Supreme Court Decision Number 3325K/PDT/2020. Research findings demonstrate that PPATS bears administrative and disciplinary accountability, sales agreements are void under Article 1320 Indonesian Civil Code, good-faith buyers retain legal protection, and parties may file deed annulment suits or pursue mediation to ensure legal certainty and justice.
Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Objek Jaminan dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bitung Nomor 70/Pdt.Bth/2015/PN Bit) M. Alfathan; sutiarnoto; Suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2227

Abstract

The legal protection of creditors holding mortgage rights in cases where collateral objects originate from corruption crimes is analyzed through a case study of Bitung District Court Decision Number 70/PDT.BTH/2015/PN.BIT. The findings indicate a hierarchical conflict between criminal law and civil law. Criminal verdicts do not automatically nullify the property rights of good-faith third parties. Mortgage Right Certificates possess executorial power equivalent to court decisions and grant preferential rights to creditors. The court ruled that the seizure was unlawful because the mortgage right had been previously encumbered. Special regulations are needed to protect third-party rights and establish validation mechanisms before seizing collateral objects.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik sebagai Pemilik atas Sengketa Objek Tanah Hasil dari Penjualan Lelang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2125 K/PDT/2020) Muhammad Luthfi Yandi; sutiarnoto; suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2249

Abstract

The sale of auction objects, particularly execution auctions, often triggers disputes between auction buyers and parties claiming rights over the auctioned objects, creating legal uncertainty for good faith buyers. This study analyzes legal protection in disputes over auction object ownership based on Supreme Court Decision Number 2125 K/Pdt/2020 using normative juridical methods with a case study approach. The problem formulation includes procedures land auction sales due to default according to Minister of Finance Regulation Number 93 of 2010, legal protection for good faith buyers after auctions through KPKNL, and analysis of judicial considerations. The study findings indicate that legal protection is guaranteed through recognition of certificates as valid proof of ownership, and judges have applied the principle of legal protection by declaring possession without legal basis as unlawful acts.