Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Objek Jaminan dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bitung Nomor 70/Pdt.Bth/2015/PN Bit) M. Alfathan; sutiarnoto; Suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2227

Abstract

The legal protection of creditors holding mortgage rights in cases where collateral objects originate from corruption crimes is analyzed through a case study of Bitung District Court Decision Number 70/PDT.BTH/2015/PN.BIT. The findings indicate a hierarchical conflict between criminal law and civil law. Criminal verdicts do not automatically nullify the property rights of good-faith third parties. Mortgage Right Certificates possess executorial power equivalent to court decisions and grant preferential rights to creditors. The court ruled that the seizure was unlawful because the mortgage right had been previously encumbered. Special regulations are needed to protect third-party rights and establish validation mechanisms before seizing collateral objects.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik sebagai Pemilik atas Sengketa Objek Tanah Hasil dari Penjualan Lelang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2125 K/PDT/2020) Muhammad Luthfi Yandi; sutiarnoto; suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2249

Abstract

The sale of auction objects, particularly execution auctions, often triggers disputes between auction buyers and parties claiming rights over the auctioned objects, creating legal uncertainty for good faith buyers. This study analyzes legal protection in disputes over auction object ownership based on Supreme Court Decision Number 2125 K/Pdt/2020 using normative juridical methods with a case study approach. The problem formulation includes procedures land auction sales due to default according to Minister of Finance Regulation Number 93 of 2010, legal protection for good faith buyers after auctions through KPKNL, and analysis of judicial considerations. The study findings indicate that legal protection is guaranteed through recognition of certificates as valid proof of ownership, and judges have applied the principle of legal protection by declaring possession without legal basis as unlawful acts.
Geographical Isolation in the Protection of Human Rights for Remote Indigenous Communities (KAT) in Indonesia: Challenges in the Implementation of International Human Rights Law Juvito Solange Damanik; Sutiarnoto; Vita Cita Tarigan
Acta Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/alj.v4i1.23532

Abstract

Indonesia’s extensive forests and mountainous terrain result in significant geographical isolation for parts of its population, particularly Remote Indigenous Communities (Komunitas Adat Terpencil/KAT). This study examines the relationship between geographical isolation and the implementation of international human rights law in protecting the rights of KAT in Indonesia, as well as the normative and practical obstacles faced by the Indonesian government. Employing a normative and descriptive legal research method based on secondary data, this research analyzes international human rights instruments, particularly the UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR, and ICERD, alongside Indonesian legal frameworks. The study finds that geographical isolation substantially hinders the practical realization of human rights for KAT, including the rights to an adequate standard of living, social security, and political participation. Limited accessibility restricts public services, economic development, legal oversight, and democratic processes in remote areas. Normatively, inconsistencies arise from differing national and international conceptions of indigenous peoples, where Indonesian law emphasizes socio-economic vulnerability and empowerment, while international law frames indigenous peoples as vulnerable rights-holders entitled to self-determination. The research concludes that greater harmonization between national law and international human rights standards, combined with policies addressing geographical isolation through environmental protection and equitable economic development, is essential for effective protection of KAT in Indonesia.