Suleman, Nenden Herawaty
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reconsidering Legal Protections for Child Marriage Victims: A Maqasid Shariah Perspective Sarib, Suprijati; Niode, Olha S.; Suleman, Nenden Herawaty; Usup, Djamila
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 5, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v5i1.3477

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of victims of domestic violence (KDRT) that occurs due to underage marriage in North Sulawesi through the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. The research method used is qualitative with a juridical-empirical approach, collecting data through in-depth interviews with victims of domestic violence, law enforcement officials, and religious leaders, as well as document analysis from related institutions. The results of the study show that the implementation of legal protection for victims of domestic violence in child marriage is still weak due to social stigma, lack of training of officials, and low public legal literacy. The Maqasid Sharia approach emphasizes the protection of individual souls, intellect, and honor as the main principles for handling domestic violence cases in child marriage. This study recommends increasing legal awareness, training on gender issues for officials, and strengthening cross-agency collaboration to create a more effective protection system. These findings are expected to enrich the literature and contribute to the development of policies for the protection of victims of domestic violence in Indonesia.
THE LAW OF RECEIVING WAGES FOR TEACHERS OF THE QURAN, THE PERSPECTIVE OF ULAMA SYAFIIYAH AND HANAFIYYAH Rizky, Rizky; Husein, Mohamad Hidayatullah AK; Suleman, Nenden Herawaty
Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justeko.v7i1.15919

Abstract

The Syafiiyah and Hanafiyah scholars' perspectives on the background of their divergent viewpoints on the legality of receiving compensation for teaching the Qur’an are presented in this study. The law governing the payment for teaching the Qur'an, as well as the legal procedures used by Hanafiyah Ulama and Syafiyah Ulama, are the source of the disagreement that leads to the issue. Normative legal research is the kind that it is. This study’s research topic relates to the views and legal strategies held by Syafiiyah and Hanafiyah scholars regarding compensation for Qur’an instruction. The research data are different viewpoints and justifications advanced by both traditional and modern academics. While the data sources are various fiqh references, such as books, papers, and newspapers, both print and electronic, which contain details about the status of receiving compensation for teaching the Qur’an services, as well as fiqh books written by classical and modern scholars regarding wages for doing so.The findings of the study on the opinions of the Ash-Shafi'i scholars suggest that charging for the teaching of the Qur’an is acceptable regardless of whether the pupils are children or adults, even when doing so would otherwise be considered fardhu 'ain. While the Hanafiyah scholars hold that it is forbidden to be paid for work that has religious overtones. argued that since Sahih hadiths were included in the quality of hadiths narrated by Bukhari, these hadiths should be used as support for claims that receiving or accepting compensation for teaching the Qur’an is acceptable.Keywords: Wages, Teacher, Perspective