Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.811
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Jurnal Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ROKANIA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Pustabiblia: Journal of Library and Information Science Nusantara Journal of Information and Library Studies (N-JILS) Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Jurnal Imam Bonjol : Kajian Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan Shaut Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip dan Dokumentasi Info Bibliotheca: Jurnal perpustakaan dan ilmu Informasi Jurnal Pengabdian UNDIKMA YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya ALSYS : Jurnal Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan Education Journal: General and Specific Research Journal of Creative Student Research Journal of Student Research Educaniora: Journal of Education and Humanities Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Al-Ma'arif: Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Islam Pustabiblia: Journal of Library and Information Science Scinary : Science of Information and Library
Ardoni Ardoni
Universitas Negeri Padang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 109 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Student Research

 1 
Implementasi Peraturan Kepala Perpustakaan Nasional RI Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Nasional Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi di UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Bung Hatta Mutiara Atika; Ardoni Ardoni; Gustina Erlianti; Jeihan Nabila
Journal of Student Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Maret: Journal of Student Research
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jsr.v2i2.2836

Abstract

This study aims to describe the following. (1) implementation of collection standards at Bung Hatta University Library (2) implementation of facilities and infrastructure standards at Bung Hatta University Library (3) implementation of service standards at Bung Hatta University Library (4) implementation of library promotion standards at Bung Hatta University Library (5) implementation of library staff standards at Bung Hatta University Library, and (6) implementation of information and communication technology standards at Bung Hatta University Library. The research methodology used is qualitative research with the type of Field Research research and uses a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The informants in this study were one library officer and two people from the library users at the Bung Hatta University Library. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded as follows. First, the implementation of collection standards, consisting of nine sub-indicators, of the nine sub-indicators, there are six sub-indicators that meet standard implementation and three sub-indicators that do not meet standard implementation. Second, the implementation of facilities and infrastructure standards, consisting of five sub-indicators, of the five sub-indicators, there are two sub-indicators that meet the implementation of standards and three sub-indicators that have not met the implementation of standards. Third, the implementation of service standards, consisting of two sub-indicators, of the nine sub-indicators, there is one sub-indicator that meets the implementation of standards and one sub-indicator has not met the implementation of standards. Fourth, the implementation of library promotion standards, this indicator has met the standard implementation. Fifth, the implementation of library staff standards, consisting of three sub-indicators, of the three sub-indicators, there is one sub-indicator that meets the standard implementation and two sub-indicators have not met the standard implementation. Sixth, the implementation of information and communication technology standards, this indicator has not met the implementation of standards. Thus, of the twenty-one sub-indicators assessing the implementation of the Regulation of the Head of the National Library of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2017 concerning National Library Standards at the UPT Library of Bung Hatta University, those that meet the National Standards for Higher Education Libraries based on the Regulation of the Head of the National Library of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2017 concerning National Standards for Higher Education Libraries are 11 sub-indicators and those that have not met the standards are 10 sub-indicators.
Sikap Mahasiswa Terhadap Plagiarisme Di Institut Teknologi Padang Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Ardoni Ardoni
Journal of Student Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Maret: Journal of Student Research
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jsr.v2i2.2837

Abstract

The aim of this research is to describe student attitudes towards plagiarism at the Padang Institute of Technology. This type of research is quantitative with descriptive methods. The population in this study was active even semester students at the Padang Institute of Technology with sampling using the Slovin formula. The number of samples was 95 students. The main instrument used was a research questionnaire which had been tested for validity and reliability. The variable in this research is student attitudes towards plagiarism. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires. Data were analyzed through stages of inspection, tabulation, and Fishbein's multiattribute attitude model. Fishbein's multi-attribute attitude model has two main components, namely beliefs and evaluation. To determine the value of beliefs and evaluation, five indicators of plagiarism are needed, namely knowledge of the act of plagiarism, acceptance of the act of plagiarism, feelings towards the act of plagiarism, direct attitude towards plagiarism (plagiarism by others). ), direct attitude towards plagiarism (plagiarism by oneself). The results of the research are that the first component, beliefs (bi) has a total score of 43.91. This indicates that the score on the beliefs component has a positive value. The second component, namely evaluation (ei) has a total score of 43.52, this indicates that the score on the evaluation component is positive. Students' attitudes towards plagiarism at the Padang Institute of Technology were declared positive, which was the result of the final calculation between the two main components of attitude according to Fishbein's multi-attribute attitude model, namely beliefs (bi) and evaluation (ei) of 136.42.
Evaluasi Layanan Referensi Perpustakaan Universitas Bung Hatta Thomas Yundra Putra; Ardoni Ardoni
Journal of Student Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Maret: Journal of Student Research
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jsr.v2i2.2839

Abstract

The aim of this research is to describe the evaluation of reference services which is then seen from the CIPP Evaluation Model theory. This type of research is quantitative with descriptive methods. The variable in this research is library reference services with sub variables, namely library service evaluation using the CIPP evaluation model. The population in this study is visitors to reference services at the Bung Hatta University Library from January 2023 to November 2023 with sampling using the non-probability silling formula with an accidental sampling technique. The number of samples is 61 users. The main instrument used is a research questionnaire which has been tested for validity and reliability. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires. The data were analyzed through the stages of examination, tabulation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the research are First, in the evaluation of the context, namely the reference service function, there are 3 statements which have an average score of 3.11. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good. Second, in the input evaluation there are 3 sub-indicators, (1) librarian which consists of 4 statements and has an average score of 3.24. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good; (2) a collection consisting of 5 statements and having an average score of 3.24. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good; (3) a catalog consisting of 3 statements and having an average score of 3.09. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good. Third, in the evaluation process there are 2 sub-indicators, (1) library reference services which consist of 5 statements and have an average score of 3.25. This score is on an interval scale of 3.25-4.00 which means very good; (2) information search service which consists of 3 statements and has an average score of 3.16. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good. Fourth, in product evaluation there are 2 sub-indicators, (1) visitor data which consists of 3 statements and has an average score of 3.20. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good; (2) the level of user satisfaction which consists of 3 statements and has an average score of 3.20. This score is on a scale of 2.50-3.24 which means good.
Co-Authors Abelza Gevanda Rahwal Adrian, Nicky Adzkia Rahmadani Afdha, Suchia Agus Suherman Ahmad Ramasya Fuad Aldila, Vaze Aliza, Destia Nur Alwira, Fanny Amril Amril Asyifa, Ilma Atira, Romiza Atmazaki Atmazaki Ayu Febrina Ayu Septi Mulyani Azim, M Aulia Boy Gren Deby Ferina Depi Mardani Desriyeni, Desriyeni Dexa Anugrah Dwiki Adyolga Endang Susilawati Fahrul Rozi Fahrulrozi, M Ikhsan Fandi Ahmad Farel Olva Zuve Faunesya, Faunesya Fitri, Dinni Fitria Ramadhani Frantika, Rezky Gesti, Elga Kamara Gustina Erlianti Habiburrahman Hartini, Dini Herlinda, Trifani Ifdhal Dinilhaq, Muhammad Iryana, Cholila Putri Tri Isramiharti Isramiharti Jeihan Nabila Julia Pratiwi Junira, Mai Dona Larasati Larasati Lisa Linalti Lyana, Vira Makhfira, Puti Reno Malta Nelisa Marlini Marlini Maulina, Arinda Maysuri, Siti Mita Domi Fella Henanggil Mufrizah, Hasnul Mardiah Mutiara Atika Nadia Lutfia Nelsya Neril, Ninda Kurnia Nisa, Firly Oktami Novindra, Farisa Nisa Nurhasanah Nurhasanah Nurniati Sari Oksa Wiradani Pinky, Regina Ullya Pratama, Deni Rahman Pratiwi, Aulya Putri Oktaria PUTRI WAHYUNI Putri, Allya Mardilla Putri, Andhika Dealova Putri, Dini Olifia Putri, Ningsih Ramayana Putri, Salsabila Edevi Putri, Yuni Kartika Rahmat Fuadi Rahmat Ramadhanu Rani Wahyulianti Ratih Irawan Refni, Azizah Raelsa Resty Fitrialny Retniati Retniati Rezki Putri Harida Ridha Hasnul Ulya Rifan Irfandi RINI RINI Riyan Sanjaya Ronaldo Ronaldo Rossalyna, Elsha Rusdawati, Rusdawati Sabda Sabda Sari, Shafira Puspita Sasmoria, Dea Ayu Satria, Siti Raisa Selvi Revila Sherly Irmanella Sistyan Maharani Sitepu, Septyani Emlita Sri Terta Dewi Syafrita, Erdiana Syafrita, Oxza Syuara, Khalid Thomas Yundra Putra Tika, Maria Vicha Handayani Vonny Destia Wari, Nindy Perdana Widya Novita Sari Wilhelmina, Grace yani Marliani Yaseva, Suci Indah Yeri Deslina Yulesti, Fioni Yusfebry Rahmayanti Zonicha, Sonya