Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.875
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA DE JURE Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Akta JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Prija Djatmika
Doctor Of Law Study Program, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Implications of Juvenile Sentencing Beyond the Prosecutor's Indictment Gusti Dewi Anggraini Puteri; Prija Djatmika; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1472

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of juvenile sentencing beyond the prosecutor’s indictment in Decision Number 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Bir concerning attempted aggravated theft with violence. The research aims to analyze the judicial reasoning underlying the decision and its juridical consequences within the Indonesian juvenile justice system. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and case approaches, the study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The findings reveal that although the indictment under Article 365(2) of the Criminal Code was not fully proven, the court convicted the child based on an uncharged but related and less severe offense, namely attempted aggravated theft. While such a decision appears inconsistent with the indictment principle under the Criminal Procedure Code, it remains aligned with established jurisprudence permitting conviction for a similar, less serious offense. Nevertheless, the ruling raises concerns regarding legal certainty, due process, and the protection of children's rights, particularly the principle of imprisonment as a measure of last resort.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Ahmad Fauzi Alfon Alfon Alfons Zakaria Alya Dean Putri Andi Pambudi Utomo Bambang Sugiri Billy Adhi Pramarta Chyntia Vindy Rahmani Danang Yudanto Dhia Fadlia Dian Devananda Akbar Endang Sri Kawuryan Entang Nuryanto Faizin Sulistio Fatiha Gourari Gusti Dewi Anggraini Puteri Heru Cahjono I Nyoman Nurjaya Imera Azzahra Alivia Johanes Bornok Butar Butar Julisa Aprilia Kaluku Maria Christina Matius Evan Anggara Milda Istiqomah Neneng Septika Dagis Nurini Aprilianda Rachmad Safa'at Rizky Kurnia Setiawan Nerdajasakti Setiawan Noerdajasakti Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Ummi Khasanah Sitorus Pane Ummu Salamah Yuliati Yuliati Yuliati Yuliati