Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Otentik's : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Syntax Idea Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Jurnal Impresi Indonesia AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Riset Ilmiah SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Corpus Juris : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Wira Franciska
Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TERHADAP PERSELISIHAN PERJANJIAN PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI TINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM Jemy Ronald Vito; Wira Franciska; Gatut Hendrotriwidodo
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2055

Abstract

In this study, the object of analysis is disputes arising from Shareholders Agreements in Limited Liability Companies (PT). The legal phenomenon examined concerns why disputes continue to occur despite shareholders being bound by a Shareholders Agreement that should, in principle, be adhered to as law by those who create it. This research aims to analyze the types of disputes that emerge from the implementation of Shareholders Agreements within a company, the dispute resolution mechanisms employed, and the application of the principle of legal certainty in the dispute resolution process. The research method used is normative legal research with a normative juridical approach, conducted through the examination of laws and regulations, literature, expert opinions, and relevant legal concepts. The results of the study indicate that disputes frequently arising from Shareholders Agreements are caused by differences in interpretation of the agreement’s provisions, breaches of contractual terms, divergent interests and business strategies, rights to dividend distribution, and dispute settlement issues. Dispute resolution mechanisms may be pursued through litigation in court or non-litigation methods such as arbitration. The most effective mechanism for realizing the principle of legal certainty is arbitration-such as the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and similar institutions-due to its final and binding decisions as well as its ability to ensure confidentiality and maintain good relations among shareholders. From the perspective of the principle of legal certainty, dispute resolution between shareholders should ideally provide protection for the rights of the parties and ensure that the agreement is implemented in accordance with applicable legal provisions
KEPASTIAN HUKUM SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DALAM SENGKETA TERKAIT PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUMOLEH BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL M. Bahrudin; Wira Franciska; Mulyadi Mulyadi
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, April 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v2i1.2480

Abstract

According to Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (known as UUPA), enacted on September 24, 1960, this law serves as the implementation of Article 33, Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. The UUPA lays the foundation for agrarian law reform to provide legal certainty for the public, thereby preventing land disputes. If certain requirements are not met, the National Land Agency will not issue a land ownership certificate. However, Indonesian citizens still have the right to obtain a legitimate land ownership certificate by gathering evidence and witnesses to strengthen their case, thus persuading the BPN to issue the certificate in accordance with the land and property they rightfully own.In practice, however, there are still many issues related to the National Land Agency reluctance to issue certificates due to various problems. The research questions addressed in this study are: What constitutes unauthorized acts by the National Land Agency in issuing certificates? And what is the legal certainty of land ownership certificates concerning court decisions on unauthorized acts by the National Land Agency? The theories used in this research include the theory of dispute resolution by Yahya Harahap and the theory of legal certainty by Jan Michael Otto.  The research method employed is a normative juridical approach, involving legal literature or secondary data, with sources including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research approach used includes legislative, conceptual, analytical, and case study approaches. The technique for collecting legal materials involves identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, literature, books, journals, and other legal sources. The analysis of legal materials is conducted through systematic, grammatical interpretation, and analogical construction.  The results of the research indicate that the resolution of disputes involving unauthorized acts by the National Land Agency, specifically the refusal to issue land ownership certificates, is conducted through litigation by filing a lawsuit against the National Land Agency in the district court. The legal certainty for the original owner of the land ownership certificate, whose request for a new certificate was denied by the National Land Agency, is that they are entitled to a new certificate issuance if there is supporting evidence and witnesses proving the rightful ownership of the certificate. To secure this legal certainty, the original certificate owner must provide concrete evidence and witnesses affirming that the land indeed belongs to them, in accordance with the documents they possess, supporting their legitimate ownership of the land certificate
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Girik yang Telah Diterbitkan Sertifikat oleh Pihak Lain Rizaldi Rizaldi; Wira Franciska; Putra Hutomo
Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/y6keh691

Abstract

Untuk waktu yang lama, masyarakat bergantung pada girik, dokumen tanah kuno yang menunjukkan siapa yang memiliki kedaulatan atas sebidang tanah. Namun, girik kini hanya dianggap sebagai indikasi awal dalam proses pendaftaran tanah pertama kali dan tidak dianggap sebagai bukti hukum yang sah atas kepemilikan properti, menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Tanah, Apartemen, dan Pendaftaran Properti. Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang girik yang tanahnya telah disertifikasi oleh pihak ketiga dan posisi pemegang girik sebagai bukti kendali tanah dalam pendaftaran tanah merupakan isu yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini. Studi ini menggunakan metode konseptual dan hukum untuk sampai pada kesimpulan hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan berasal dari sumber primer dan sekunder dalam bidang hukum, khususnya dari tinjauan literatur undang-undang, yurisprudensi, dan putusan pengadilan. Teori perlindungan hukum dan teori pendaftaran tanah merupakan kerangka teoritis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, girik hanya dapat digunakan dalam proses hukum untuk membuktikan kepemilikan tanah adat, dan tanah ini harus didaftarkan untuk mendapatkan sertifikat tanah paling lambat tanggal 2 Februari 2026. Setelah tanggal tersebut, girik tidak akan lagi memiliki tujuan selain sebagai dokumen tambahan dalam prosedur pendaftaran tanah administratif pendahuluan. Jika pemegang girik dapat memberikan bukti penguasaan fisik tanah secara terus menerus selama 20 tahun, didukung oleh data yang valid dan dokumen lain yang memperkuat kedudukan hukum pemegang girik, pemegang tersebut dapat diberikan perlindungan hukum.
Criminal Liability of Online Gambling Perpetrators in Indonesia According to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Sherly Bantu; Wira Franciska; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v3i9.5414

Abstract

Online gambling has become increasingly prevalent over a long time due to the ease of access and the ability to play from anywhere with an online association. The reason for this consideration is to look at and analyze the legal provisions against online gambling offenders in Indonesia. The research method used in this study can be a normative legal approach supported by experimental law with graphic depiction. In extension, important information is also used as supporting material for additional information. For control checks, legitimate and standardized check strategies are used. From the search results regarding the legal provisions against the perpetrators of online betting violations in Indonesia, it appears that the legal authority against online betting violations is the criminal sanction against online betting based on Article 45 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, but the punishment for the perpetrators is lower than the threat of criminal sanctions in Article 303 of the Criminal Code, so it does not have an inhibiting impact on the perpetrators of online betting violations. Criminal liability for online betting offenses in Indonesia is the responsibility of the perpetrators of online betting offenses indicated by the existence of criminal offense components. In addition, the activity component is one of the most important components in criminal liability, because a person cannot be sentenced if he does not commit an act that is classified as an act rejected by the law.
Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur dari Wanprestasi Debitur atas Utang Jaminan Tanah dan Bangunan tanpa Hak Tanggungan Alim Sako; Wira Franciska; Mardi Candra
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 10 (2024): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v4i10.770

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji akibat hukum dari wanprestasi debitur dalam perjanjian pengakuan utang yang tidak disertai hak tanggungan serta perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam situasi tersebut. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ketiadaan hak tanggungan dalam perjanjian utang-piutang membuat kreditur berada pada posisi yang rentan dan sulit untuk mengeksekusi jaminan. Kreditur harus melalui proses hukum yang panjang dan tidak pasti, yang sering kali berujung pada kerugian finansial. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya hak tanggungan sebagai instrumen hukum untuk memberikan kepastian dan kemanfaatan bagi kreditur dalam menghadapi wanprestasi debitur. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah agar pemasangan hak tanggungan di setiap perjanjian utang diperkuat, dan sosialisasi mengenai pentingnya hak tanggungan bagi kreditur harus ditingkatkan.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DIREKSI DAN DEWAN KOMISARIS PERSEROAN ATAS PEMBERHENTIAN TANPA PEMBERITAHUAN DALAM RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM Elida Marbun; Nur Hakim; Wira Franciska
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/zmvg7z62

Abstract

Article 119 of the Company Law states that the provisions regarding the dismissal of members of the Board of Directors as referred to in Article 105 apply mutatis mutandis to the dismissal of members of the Board of Commissioners. Members of the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners can be dismissed at any time through the GMS by stating the reasons for their dismissal clearly, but there is no more specific regulation regarding notification obligations or procedures that must be followed, so this causes members of the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners to be unable to defend themselves. The formulation in this research is what are the legal consequences of dismissal without notification of the Company's Directors and Board of Commissioners at the General Meeting of Shareholders? And what is the legal protection for the Company's Directors and Board of Commissioners for dismissal without notification at the General Meeting of Shareholders? The theories used in this research are the Legal Protection theory according to Satijipto Rahardjo and the Legal Consequences Theory according to R. Soeroso.The method used in this research is normative juridical research in the form of library legal materials or secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials. The research approach used is statutory, conceptual, analytical and case approaches as well as techniques for collecting legal materials by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, book literature, journals and other sources of legal materials. The analysis technique for legal materials is carried out using systematic, grammatical legal interpretation.The research results show that the legal consequences of dismissal the Company's Directors and Board of Commissioners without notification at the GMS are that it is invalid if members of the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners object to their dismissal. This is because the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners have the right to know the reasons for dismissal and the right to defend themselves at the GMS as regulated in Article 105 paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Company Law. Thus, all matters relating to the consequences of dismissal which are contrary to applicable regulations are deemed to have never existed. Legal protection for the Company's Directors and Board of Commissioners for dismissal without notification at the GMS is in the form of repressive legal protection, in this case the Directors and Board of Commissioners have the right to file a lawsuit at the District Court in accordance with the location of the Limited Liability Company in question and can make legal appeals to High Court and Supreme Court. The lawsuit filed contains unlawful acts as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code because the GMS was held contrary to the provisions of the Company Law. Thus, the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners have the right to obtain compensation for unlawful actions committed by shareholders
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DALAM KONTEKS PEMBATALAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS FINAL AND BINDING Popy Nurjanah; Wira Franciska; Nur Hakim
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2363

Abstract

Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution stipulates that arbitration awards are final and binding. This nature is a manifestation of legal certainty. Final means the last, while binding means that the disputing parties are legally bound from the moment the award is pronounced to implement the arbitration award. However, the same law also regulates the annulment of arbitration awards that are final and binding. Parties who are dissatisfied with an arbitration award use the grounds for setting aside an arbitration award to avoid their obligations under the arbitration award. Such actions will certainly cause legal uncertainty for arbitration awards. The method used in this study is normative legal research conducted as an effort to obtain the data needed in relation to the problem. The primary data used in this study are laws and regulations and court decisions. The secondary legal data used are books/literature and journals. Meanwhile, the tertiary legal data are derived from general dictionaries and legal dictionaries. All data were then analyzed using qualitative legal analysis methods. Since the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 on November 11, 2014, the grounds for annulment of an arbitration award no longer need to be proven by a court decision. Court judges are given the discretion to assess the existence of document forgery, document concealment and/or deception. The legal certainty of arbitration awards, which are final and binding, must be maintained. The annulment of arbitration awards as regulated in Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution must be interpreted as an effort to ensure that arbitration awards remain final and binding. Annulment is not an attempt to avoid obligations that have been decided. The role of the Court is also very important in maintaining the finality of arbitration awards. The Court must be able to issue decisions that have clear legal consequences for arbitration awards.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN DALAM PEMBUATAN SURAT KESEPAKATAN BERSAMA PEMBAYARAN UTANG PIUTANG Sesar Gummara; Wira Franciska; Putra Hutomo
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2380

Abstract

The abuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) is an act that exploits an unbalanced position between parties in an agreement to obtain economic benefits, which can force one party to enter into an agreement with disproportionate performance. This phenomenon often occurs in the creation of joint agreement deeds for debt payments, as seen in several court rulings, where the economically or psychologically stronger party exploits the weaknesses of the other party. This contradicts the principles of freedom of contract and consensualism in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata), thus requiring legal protection for the aggrieved party. This research aims to examine and analyze the legal protection for parties harmed by the abuse of circumstances in the creation of joint agreement deeds for debt payments, as well as to analyze the legal consequences arising from such abuse. This research employs a normative juridical legal research method with approaches encompassing legislation, case studies, analysis, and concepts. Primary legal sources include the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Notary Public Law, and court decisions, while secondary and tertiary sources are derived from library materials such as books, journals, and legal dictionaries. Data collection techniques are conducted through literature studies, and data analysis utilizes descriptive analytic qualitative methods to describe and construct an understanding of the related legal issues. The research results show that the legal consequences of abuse of circumstances are that the agreement can be annulled or void by law, so the agreement is considered never to have existed and can be restored to its original condition, provided that the aggrieved party submits an application for annulment. Legal protection for the aggrieved party can be obtained through the mechanism of applying for annulment of the agreement based on the doctrine of abuse of circumstances as a defect of will, which allows the judge to annul the agreement if it is proven that there is exploitation of a weak position. This research provides theoretical and practical contributions to the development of legal science as well as considerations in making fair agreements
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasangan Hidup yang Terlama Terkait Hibah Wasiat yang Obyeknya Merupakan Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Perdata Namira Nur Azzahra; Wira Franciska; Felicitas Sri Marniati
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/j-ceki.v5i3.15854

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pasangan hidup yang terlama terhadap hibah wasiat dengan objek harta bersama menurut hukum perdata. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif berbasis studi kepustakaan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, analitis, dan konseptual. Bahan hukum meliputi bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan, bahan hukum sekunder berupa literatur ilmiah, serta bahan hukum tersier seperti kamus dan ensiklopedia. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi pustaka, sedangkan analisis menggunakan penafsiran hukum gramatikal dan sistematis serta konstruksi hukum melalui analogi dan penghalusan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam pembagian waris terkait hibah wasiat atas harta bersama, terlebih dahulu harus dipisahkan bagian pasangan hidup terlama sebesar setengah dari keseluruhan harta bersama sebagai haknya, sedangkan sisanya menjadi harta peninggalan yang dibagikan kepada ahli waris sesuai legitime portie apabila terdapat tuntutan legitimaris. Perlindungan hukum bagi pasangan hidup terlama dapat ditempuh melalui gugatan di pengadilan apabila haknya tidak terpenuhi akibat tindakan pihak lain.
Kepastian Hukum Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Tidak Didaftarkan Terkait Gugatan Pasangan dalam Pembagian Harta Karena Perceraian Muhamad Gilang Ramadhan Mandala; Wira Franciska; Felicitas Sri Marniati
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i3.2328

Abstract

A marriage agreement is a legal instrument that enables spouses to regulate the property consequences of marriage. Legal uncertainty may arise when a marriage agreement has been executed in an authentic deed but has not been registered with the competent marriage registration authority and is subsequently invoked in a claim for the division of marital property following divorce. This study examines the legal status and legal certainty of an unregistered marriage agreement deed in disputes over property division following divorce. This research employs a normative juridical method using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, with statutory, case, analytical, and conceptual approaches. The legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using grammatical and systematic interpretation. The analysis is based on Jan Michiel Otto’s Legal Certainty Theory and Subekti’s Consensualism Theory. The findings demonstrate that an unregistered marriage agreement deed remains legally binding between the spouses if it satisfies the requirements for a valid agreement and does not violate applicable law, religion, or morality. The authentic deed provides evidentiary force concerning the property regime agreed upon by the spouses. However, failure to register the agreement affects its enforceability against third parties because registration serves a publicity function. Therefore, legal certainty between the spouses derives from the agreement’s binding force, the evidentiary value of the authentic deed, and judicial enforcement, while legal certainty for third parties requires effective and consistent registration.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Adhi Kurniawan Alim Sako Amelia Nur Widyanti Arief Faturohman Bagas Dika Anggiat Candra, Mardi Daniel Pangidoan Darasati Damarani Sudomo Dhani Rizki Bahari Dhody AR Widjajaatmadja Dhoni Martien Elida Marbun Emilya Tunggal Manuain Erny Kencanawati Felicitas Sri Marniati Felicitas Sri Marniati Gassanova Farah Diba Gatut Hendrotriwidodo Hedwig A. Mau Heri Yuristin Rivano Iis Riantika Intan Aulia Sari Iran Sahril Siregar Jelly Nasseri Jemy Ronald Vito Joko Arisyanto Khoirul Anwar M. Bahrudin Marni Mustafa Muhamad Gilang Ramadhan Mandala Mulyadi Mulyadi Namira Nur Azzahra Nur Hakim Popy Nurjanah Putra Hutomo Rizaldi Rizaldi Ryanto Sirait Sesar Gummara Sherly Bantu Tarida Sondang