Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.81
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Literatus Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Social Science FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies Law Development Journal Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Media Bina Ilmiah MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Nasution, Abdul Hayy
Universitas Pamulang
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA, KEKERASAN KEMANUSIAAN Munalar, Sri Siti; Nasution, Abdul Hayy
Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 3 No 3 (2022): Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/al-jpkm.v3i3.24858

Abstract

Pada umumnya orang berpendapat bahwa Kekerasan Dalam rumah Tangga (KDRT) adalah urusan intern keluarga dan rumah tangga. Sekian banyak KDRT, istri notabene pendidik awal dari generasi manusia adalah korban. Padahal istri garda depan yang mewujudkan model manusia yang bagaimana di masa mendatang. Kondisi sehat lahir bathin atau sebaliknya sakit istri menentukan bentuk masyarakat manusia. Pengabdian kali ini Kelurahan Rawa Mekar Jaya, Kecamatan Serpong, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Jawa Barat, menjadi salah satu tempat pelaksanaan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarkat (PKM) Universitas Pamulang mengusulkan tema KDRT sebagai kekerasan kemanusiaan.. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam kegiatan pengabdian yaitu pendampingan yang dilakukan dengan brainstorming untuk membuka mindset tentang pemahaman terhadap kekerasan dalam rumah tangga bagi warga masyarakat. Penyadaran secara komprehensif agar dapat meningkatkan peran serta masyarakat dalam mengurangi angka kekerasan dalam rumah tangga walau sulit untuk menghapuskannya. Perlindungan hukum dan edukasi korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil kegiatan pengabdian antara lain aspek tingginya tingkat pemahaman dalam penanggulangan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, komunikasi yang komunikatif disadari wajib ada dalam sebuah rumah tangga, sehingga tidak tercipta sumbatan pemikiran yang memicu konflik. Manajemen sosial, terkelolanya manajemen yang berkelanjutan, berupa peran partisipasi aktif anggota keluarga khususnya, masyarakat umumnya.Kata kunci: Kekerasan, RumahTangga, Kemanusiaan
The Digital Transformation of Tafsir and Its Implications for Islamic Legal Derivation in the Contemporary Era Ali Sati; Abdul Halim; Abdul Hayy Nasution; Muhammad Ridwan
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425

Abstract

The digitalization of Qur’anic interpretation has profoundly influenced the methodology of istinbat al-ahkam (deriving Islamic legal rulings), reshaping how scholars and legal institutions engage with classical texts in emerging digital platforms. This article explores the impact of selected tools—such as AI-driven tafsir platforms, semantic databases, and multimedia applications—on formulating Islamic legal reasoning in the digital era. Moving beyond a purely epistemological analysis, the study critically assesses how digital interfaces affect interpretive authority and methodological integrity and the production of contemporary legal responses to real-world issues, including Islamic digital finance, artificial intelligence ethics, and Sharia-based policymaking in digital environments. Utilizing a qualitative literature review combined with thematic content analysis, this research draws on classical sources and contemporary scholarship to investigate the shifting landscape of Islamic legal derivation in the digital age. Particular attention is given to the role of legal actors—such as fatwa councils, religious courts, and legislative bodies—in legitimizing or contesting digital tafsir outputs. The study applies maqasid al-shari’ah as developed by al-Shatibi as a normative framework to evaluate the legal-ethical implications of digital tafsir and its alignment with the objectives of protecting religion (din), intellect (‘aql), and public welfare (maslahah ‘ammah). Findings indicate that while digital tools significantly enhance accessibility, interactivity, and public engagement with Islamic texts, they also present challenges related to standardization, authenticity, and the erosion of traditional scholarly authority. This article offers a typology of digital influence—from functional assistance to epistemological disruption—and proposes practical pathways for integrating digital innovation within a framework of maqasid-oriented legal governance. The study contributes to the theoretical development of Islamic legal thought and the practical design of responsive, accountable, and ethically grounded legal frameworks for the digital era.
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PEMINJAMAN AKUN PINJAM ONLINE (PINJOL) YANG GAGAL BAYAR Abdul Hayy Nasution; Oksidelfa Yanto
Media Bina Ilmiah Vol. 19 No. 02: September 2024
Publisher : LPSDI Bina Patria

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dunia digital mengalami perkembangan yang sangat pesat dan memberikan banyak pengaruh di berbagai sektor, salah satunya kehadiran layanan pinjam meminjam uang berbasis teknologi informasi yaitu Peer to Peer Lending. Namun tidak tertutup kemungkinan bahwa pelaksanaan Peer to Peer Lending beresiko pada suatu permasalahan hukum yakni gagal bayar dari Penerima Pinjaman yang akan merugikan Pemberi Pinjaman yang mendanai pengajuan pinjaman pada platform Penyelenggara. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, maka penelitian ini selanjutnya bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang perlindungan hukum bagi pihak pemberi pinjaman terkait dengan resiko gagal bayar dalam layanan pinjaman berbasis peer to peer lending. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menjelaskan penyelesaian sengketa akibat gagal bayar dalam peer to peer lending. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemberi pinjaman dan Penerima Pinjaman dengan dibentuknya peraturan khusus yang memberikan perlindungan bagi pengguna jasa Peer to Peer Lending yaitu Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 khususnya Pasal 37 dan sanksi seperti denda, penjara, maupun hukuman tambahan lain yang diberikan setelah terjadi sengketa. Penyelesaian sengketa akibat gagal bayar dalam P2PL dapat dilakukan diluar maupun didalam pengadilan sesuai ketentuan Pasal 39 ayat (1) POJK Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013.
Coordination of Fishery PPNS under Article 73(3) with POM AL Investigators under the New Criminal Procedure Code (Article 7) Abdul Hayy Nasution; Abdul Halim; Ali Sati Rangkuti
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.473-494

Abstract

Civil Servant Investigators (Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil / PPNS) under Article 7 paragraph (5) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code stipulates that coordination and supervision as referred to in paragraphs (3) and (4) shall not apply to investigators within the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, the Corruption Eradication Commission, and the Indonesian Navy (Tentara Nasional Indonesia Angkatan Laut / TNI AL) in accordance with statutory provisions. This study analyzes the legal rationale for the exclusion of investigators from the Attorney General’s Office, the Corruption Eradication Commission, and the Indonesian Navy from the coordination and supervisory authority of the primary investigative body, namely the Indonesian National Police (Polri), as regulated under Article 7 paragraphs (3) and (4) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. Furthermore, this study examines the role of Fisheries PPNS and Naval Military Police investigators in conducting investigations into criminal offenses occurring within the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone (Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia / ZEEI). This research employs a normative legal research method. The objective of this study is to examine the legal justification for the exemption of investigators from the Attorney General’s Office, the Corruption Eradication Commission, and the Indonesian Navy from Polri coordination and supervision as stipulated in Article 7 paragraphs (3) and (4) of Law Number 20 of 2025, as well as to analyze the role of Fisheries PPNS and Naval Military Police investigators in investigating criminal offenses within the ZEEI.
Sistem Peradilan Hukum Acara Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Berbasis Sistem Teknologi Informasi Abdul Hayy Nasution
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juli 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i7.6869

Abstract

Recent developments in the reform of Indonesia's criminal procedural law have strengthened the recognition of electronic evidence through its regulation in the new Criminal Procedure Code. Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code explicitly recognizes electronic evidence as one of the admissible forms of evidence in criminal proceedings. This study examines the application of the criminal procedural law system under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code through the Information Technology System, as well as the implementation of the criminal procedural law system under the same law through the Information Technology System. This research employs a normative legal research method. The objectives of this study are to analyze the application of the criminal procedural law system under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code through the Information Technology System and to examine its implementation within the framework of the Information Technology System.
Penerapan Restoratif Justice terhadap Tindak Pidana Adat dalam Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Abdul Hayy Nasution; Nyak Amini
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juli 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i7.6870

Abstract

This study examines the provisions governing restorative justice within Indigenous customary communities, where the living law recognized and practiced by such communities is regulated under Article 2 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP). The provisions concerning restorative justice in criminal proceedings are further regulated under Articles 79–88 of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study seeks to address the following research questions: (1) how are the provisions for the application of restorative justice to customary criminal offenses regulated under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, and (2) how is the implementation of restorative justice for customary criminal offenses carried out under the same law. This research employs a normative legal research method, which is appropriate because the study focuses on examining statutory regulations and legal principles. The objectives of this study are to analyze the legal provisions governing the application of restorative justice to customary criminal offenses under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and to examine its implementation within the Indonesian criminal justice system.
KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 20 TAHUN 2025 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (BARU). Abdul Hayy Nasution
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP Baru) membawa perubahan signifikan dalam sistem penyidikan, termasuk pengaturan kewenangan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan PPNS dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang KUHAP (Lama) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang KUHAP (Baru), serta mengkaji adanya perluasan atau penyempitan kewenangan PPNS dalam regulasi terbaru tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, melalui kajian terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, didukung bahan hukum sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHAP Baru memperluas kewenangan penyidik, termasuk PPNS, khususnya dalam ruang lingkup upaya paksa yang mencakup penetapan tersangka, penyadapan, pemblokiran, serta larangan keluar wilayah Indonesia. Namun demikian, tidak ditemukan adanya penyempitan kewenangan PPNS, karena prinsip koordinasi dan pengawasan oleh penyidik Polri tetap dipertahankan sebagaimana dalam KUHAP Lama. Selain itu, mekanisme pelimpahan berkas perkara dari PPNS kepada Penuntut Umum melalui penyidik Polri juga tidak mengalami perubahan substantif. Dengan demikian, KUHAP Baru cenderung memperkuat posisi dan peran PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana tanpa mengurangi struktur koordinasi yang telah ada.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Abdul Halim Ali Sati Ali Sati Rangkuti Dwi Kusumo Wardhani Edi Setiadi I Gusti Ayu Anita Lakshana Muhammad Ridwan Munalar, Sri Siti Nyak Amini Nyak Amini Oksidelfa Yanto Siti Chadijah Sri Siti Munalar Yeti Sumiati