Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.266
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum KEADILAN PROGRESIF Jurnal Pranata Hukum International Conference on Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG) International Multidiciplinary Conference on Social Sciences (IMCoSS) JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI WAJAH HUKUM SOL JUSTICIA PALAR (Pakuan Law review) JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI UNTAG Law Review JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Law, Education and Business Journal of Law and Nation
Baharudin Baharudin
Universitas Bandar Lampung
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIONAL DATABASE SYSTEM (CDS) AT CLASS II NARCOTICSPENITENTIARY IN BANDAR LAMPUNG Youdi Adeputra Triawan; Baharudin Baharudin; Lintje Anna Marpaung
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3146

Abstract

The implementation of the Correctional Database System (CDS) based on the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights (Permenkumham) Number 39 of 2016 aims to fulfillment of the rights of prisoners in prison. The purpose of this study are to analize the implementation of the CDS at the Class II Narcotics Penitentiary in Bandar Lampung and inhibiting factors for the implementation of the CDS at the Class II Narcotics Penitentiary in Bandar Lampung?  The research using normative and juridical approach.  The results of this study indicate that implementation of CDS at the Class II Narcotics Prison as an effort to ensure the fulfillment of the rights of prisoners in prisons has been implemented although it has not been maximized because inhibiting factors are still present. Implementation of CDS can help determine decisions such as in granting conditional leave, leave before release, parole, leave to visit family, because the calculation, registration and register f are included in it. These data are integrated between sections in the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung and are connected with other relevant agencies in fulfilling the rights of prisoners. The inhibiting factor for implementing CDS substantially is the sending of data from the Technical Implementing Unit to the Director General of Corrections which is still often illegible. In addition, there are still some prisoners whose files are incomplete from the Police and the Prosecutor's office which makes the remission proposal impossible. The technical obstacle is the unstable internet network so that it becomes an obstacle in providing services to the inmates.Keywords: Implementation of CDS, Rights, Prisoners.
THE COVID-19 VACCINATION AS FULFILLMENT THE RIGHTS PRISONER TO GET HEALTH SERVICES Abdullah Mulyadi Gani; Baharudin Baharudin; Lintje Anna Marpaung
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3147

Abstract

The enforcement of the Circular Letter of the Director General of Corrections Number: PAS-20.PR.01.01 of 2020 concerning progressive steps in controlling the spread of Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) at the Correctional Technical Implementing Unit is a policy taken in the context of implementing the Covid-19 vaccination at the Correctional Institution Class II Narcotics Bandar Lampung. The purpose of this research are to describe the implementation of the Covid-19 vaccination in the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung as a fulfillment of the rights of the inmates to obtain health servicesand the inhibiting factors for the implementation of the Covid-19 vaccination at the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung. The research using n0rmative and juridical appr0ach.  The results 0f this study indicate that the  Covid-19 Vaccination at the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung as a fulfillment of the rights of the inmates to obtain health services has been carried out even though not maximal. The implementation of vaccination was 974 prisoner, consisting of 796 prisoner who had undergone the first vaccination, 795 prisoner had undergone the first and second vaccination, 172 prisoner had undergone the first, second and third vaccination. A total of 6 inmates have not been vaccinated because they suffer from comorbidities (2) The inhibiting factors for the implementation of the Covid-19 Vaccination at the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung consist of barriers to the identity of the inmates, namely the duplication of prisoner data, the presence of inmates who do not have ID cards and there is no access to communication to the family of the inmate to confirm the resident number of the inmate. In addition, there are prisoner who suffer from comorbidities so that vaccination cannot be carried out.Keywords: Covid-19 Vaccination, Correctional Inmates, Health
POLICY OF TRANSFERRING PRISONERS IN THE CATEGORY OF NARCOTICS DEALERS TO SUPERMAXIMUM SECURITY PENITENTIARY Akhmad Muttaqien; Baharudin Baharudin; Lintje Anna Marpaung
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3133

Abstract

The enactment of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 35 of 2018 concerning the Revitalization of Correctional Administration, one of which regulates the transfer of high-risk prisoners to Super maximum security prisons. Narcotics convicts who are at high risk are those who are included as dealers and narcotics controllers from within the prison. The purpose of this research are to analize: (1) Policy of transferring prisoners in the category of narcotics dealers to Supermaximum Security Penitentiary? Inhibiting factors for the policy of transferring prisoners in the category of narcotics dealers to the Supermaximum Security. The research using normative and juridical approach.  The results of this study indicate: (1) The policy of transferring prisoners in the category of narcotics dealers to the Supermaximum Security Penitentiary was implemented by the Class II Narcotics Prison in Bandar Lampung by transferring 19 prisoners to the Class Special Prison. IIA Karanganyar Nusakambangan and Class IIA Nusakambangan Narcotics Prison. The policy has been implemented even though it has not been maximized, because there are still inhibiting factors. (2) The inhibiting factors for the policy of transferring prisoners in the category of narcotics dealers to the Supermaximum Security Penitentiary as an effort to cut off the circulation of narcotics are the risky behavior of prisoners in the category of narcotics dealers that endanger or have a negative impact on themselves, others and the environment and the process of evaluation and reassessment of prisoners who need a relatively long time.Keywords: Transfer Policy, Narcotics, Super Maximum Security
PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KORBAN MENGALAMI LUKA BERAT (Studi Putusan Nomor 584/Pid.B/2023/PN Tjk): Baharudin1, Angga Alfian2, Muhammad Iqbal Rofif3, Baharudin; Alfian, Angga; Muhammad Iqbal Rofif
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 12 No 1 (2024): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v12i1.1055

Abstract

Abstrak Penganiayaan merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan yang umum terjadi di masyarakat, dan dengan berkembangnya teknologi serta intensnya interaksi yang terjadi dengan sifat individu manusia, manusia sebagai makhluk sosial selalu berinteraksi sebagai individu dan saling membutuhkan.Setiap orang mempunyai kepribadian yang unik dan berbeda dengan orang lain, meliputi perbedaan kepribadian, tujuan, dan pandangan hidup.Perbedaan tersebut dalam beberapa hal dapat mempengaruhi proses interaksi, sehingga menimbulkan konflik karena perbedaan kepentingan (conflictissue), dan selanjutnya menimbulkan bentuk-bentuk kekerasan, baik yang bersifat halus berupa pertentangan gagasan (violence)Faktor Penyebab Pelaku Penganiayaan dalam Putusan Nomor 584/Pid.B/2023/PN Tjk yang didapatkan dari hasil wawancara dengan beberapa narasumber ( kepolisian, jaksa penuntut umum, dan hakim ) menyatakan bahwa terdakwa tersebut melakukan penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan korban mengalami luka berat dikarnakan mendapatkan bisikan dari dirinya bahwa kuburan wak terdakkwa digali dengan orang yang terdakwa lihat pada saat dia melintasi kuburan uwaknya yang baru dikubur beberapa hari sebelum si terdakwa melintasi kuburan tersebut.
Legal Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence (Study Decision Number 81/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Liw) Baharudin Baharudin; Yulia Hesti; Fajaruddin Yusuf
Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health Vol 3, No 2 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jetish.v3i2.3461

Abstract

Domestic Violence is defined as any act against an individual, especially women, resulting in physical, sexual, psychological suffering, or neglect, including threats of such acts, coercion, or unlawful deprivation of freedom within the household context. The issues addressed in this research are the obstacles in providing protection for victims of domestic violence based on decision number 81/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Liw, and the efforts to ensure legal protection for these victims according to the same decision. The research methodology utilizes a normative juridical approach, which involves examining applicable laws, and an empirical approach, which includes field observations and interviews to address the research problems. Based on the research findings, the obstacles in enforcing the law to protect victims include limited resources such as personnel and facilities. Additionally, victims often hesitate to report incidents due to a desire to maintain relationships with the perpetrators or due to shame related to family honor. Factors such as anxiety and difficulty in reporting incidents, even when they recur, contribute to the challenge. Issues like embarrassment, fear, and trauma hinder effective protection for victims. Protection efforts include police actions to ensure safety and escort victims to safer locations, coordination by the prosecution with police, witness and victim protection agencies, and health institutions to ensure victims receive protection and recovery support. Courts issue protection orders prohibiting perpetrators from approaching or contacting victims and may order separation of living arrangements as an additional protective measure. Recommendations from the author include: Enhancing cooperation among government agencies such as the police, prosecution, courts, health institutions, and witness and victim protection agencies. Good coordination will ensure victims receive comprehensive protection and support. There is a need to improve resources, including personnel, budgets, and facilities for relevant agencies to provide adequate protection for domestic violence victims. Adequate resources will enable maximal protection and support for victims. Law enforcement should broaden public awareness of domestic violence, challenge societal stigma, and emphasize the importance of reporting perpetrators. Victims require ongoing support, including counseling, rehabilitation, and social assistance. Relevant agencies should ensure victims have access to these services for physical and psychological recovery. Law enforcement should also work to enhance legal protection for domestic violence victims and address existing obstacles.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PENYEBARAN VIDEO CALL SEX SEBAGAI ANCAMAN ATAS PENOLAKAN PINJAMAN UANG(Studi Putusan : Nomor 406/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Tjk) Mulia Wulan Sari; Baharudin Baharudin; Risti Dwi Ramasari
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the occurrence of criminal acts of spreading video call sex as a threat of rejection of a loan and law enforcement against perpetrators of spreading video call sex as a threat of rejection of a loan made on social media based on the decision: number c 406 / Pid.Sus / 2023 / PN.Tjk. The research method used is a normative legal approach by analyzing court decisions and the relevance of applicable positive legal regulations. The results of the study show that there are three factors that influence the occurrence of acts of spreading sexual content, namely; economic factors, trust, and sexual education. And law enforcement related to this case can be seen from the provisions of Article 27 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. That the Defendant was sentenced to 3 (three) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 10,000,000, - (ten million rupiah) with the provision that if the fine cannot be paid, it will be replaced with 3 (three) months in prison.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Bebas Terhadap Warga Binaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Surabaya Sebagai Pengendali 97 Kg Narkotika Jenis Sabu (Studi Putusan Nomor: 13/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tjk) Wawan Prasetiyo; Baharudin Baharudin
Journal of Law, Education and Business Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v4i1.7968

Abstract

Pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim yang berujung pada putusan bebas terutama ditentukan oleh standar pembuktian di persidangan. Majelis menempatkan proses pembuktian sebagai pusat penilaian, bukan semata-mata beratnya perkara narkotika atau besarnya dampak sosial yang ditimbulkan. Dalam konstruksi ini, majelis hanya dapat menilai apa yang diajukan dan diuji secara sah di persidangan, sehingga ketika alat bukti yang secara spesifik mengunci peran terdakwa sebagai “pengendali” tidak dapat dihadirkan bahkan setelah diberi kesempatan/tenggang waktu maka ruang keyakinan yudisial majelis menjadi tidak terbentuk secara memadai untuk menjatuhkan pidana.Dari perspektif teori Markenzi, kualitas pertimbangan hakim menunjukkan pola “judicial reasoning” yang bekerja dalam tiga dimensi (yuridis–filosofis–sosiologis), dengan penekanan dominan pada dimensi yuridis. Secara yuridis, pertimbangan majelis berangkat dari logika pembuktian: kesimpulan hukum dipaksa mengikuti konfigurasi alat bukti yang sah, bukan mengikuti dugaan atau keyakinan yang dibangun di luar sidang. Secara filosofis, majelis menjaga integritas batin hakim dengan menolak mengganti pembuktian dengan intuisi yuridis, walaupun terdapat kesadaran bahwa jika peran pengendali terbukti maka pidana berat layak dijatuhkan. Secara sosiologis, majelis tetap memahami narkotika sebagai kejahatan yang merusak masyarakat, namun nilai perlindungan publik tersebut ditempatkan dalam batas due process; artinya, perlindungan masyarakat tidak boleh ditempuh dengan cara memotong standar pembuktian.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Menggadaikan Mobil Sewaan (Studi Putusan Nomor 1180/Pid.B/2024/PN Tjk) Gusti Made Prawiratama; Baharudin Baharudin
Journal of Law, Education and Business Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v4i1.7988

Abstract

Kejahatan dalam perspektif kriminologis merupakan perbuatan manusia yang melanggar norma-norma dasar yang hidup dan berkembang dalam masyarakat. Sementara itu, kejahatan dalam arti yuridis adalah perbuatan melawan hukum yang secara tegas dirumuskan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pidana. Salah satu bentuk kejahatan tersebut adalah tindak pidana penggelapan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 372 sampai dengan Pasal 377 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Penelitian ini berfokus pada analisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana menggadaikan mobil sewaan, dengan studi pada Putusan Nomor 1180/Pid.B/2024/PN Tjk. Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris. Data penelitian terdiri atas data primer dan data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk memperoleh hasil yang objektif dan sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan telah mempertimbangkan unsur “barang siapa”, unsur kesengajaan dan sifat melawan hukum dalam menguasai barang yang seluruhnya atau sebagian merupakan milik orang lain namun berada dalam penguasaan terdakwa bukan karena kejahatan, serta memperhatikan hal-hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan terdakwa. Selain itu, hakim juga mendasarkan pertimbangannya pada surat dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar masyarakat lebih memahami dan bersikap tegas terhadap tindak pidana menggadaikan mobil sewaan guna mencegah terjadinya perbuatan serupa di kemudian hari.
Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Perspektif Diversi (Studi Putusan Nomor 102/Pid.B/2024/PN.Liw) Rafi Goeston; Baharudin Baharudin
Journal of Law, Education and Business Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v4i1.7989

Abstract

Diversi merupakan pengalihan penyelesaian perkara anak dari proses peradilan pidana ke mekanisme di luar peradilan pidana yang bertujuan untuk melindungi anak dari dampak negatif proses hukum formal, seperti stigmatisasi dan pengasingan sosial, serta mendorong reintegrasi anak ke dalam lingkungan masyarakat. Penelitian ini membahas pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku tindak pidana pencurian sebagaimana tercantum dalam Putusan Nomor 102/Pid.B/2024/PN.Liw. Permasalahan yang dikaji adalah bagaimana bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku tindak pidana pencurian serta pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dan menilai kesesuaian putusan hakim dengan ketentuan hukum pidana yang berlaku. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 102/Pid.B/2024/PN.Liw menyatakan Terdakwa Muhammad Rudi Permana bin Zulkarnain terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dan menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama 8 (delapan) bulan dengan pengurangan masa penahanan yang telah dijalani. Putusan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana diterapkan berdasarkan unsur-unsur tindak pidana yang terpenuhi serta mempertimbangkan aspek keadilan dan kepastian hukum.
Co-Authors . Tantolailam Abdullah Mulyadi Gani Akhmad Muttaqien Andri Mudiansyah Angga Alfian Anggalana Aryana Wisastra Chintia Mutiatra Dewi Dimas Bahtera Setyohadi Erlina B. Fadian Akbar Wisnugraha Fajaruddin Yusuf Gusti Made Prawiratama Indah Satria Indah Satria Indah Satria Iqbal Alin Perdana Lintje Anna Marpaung Luthfiyah Nugraha Muhammad Affandi Muhammad Iqbal Rofif Muhammad Rizki Muhammad Syaifudin Amin Mulia Wulan Sari Okta Anita Ponco Febri Saputra Rafi Goeston Ramanda Ansori Rendi Yusuf Rendi Yusuf Rian Hero Juliansa Rian Hero Juliansa Risti Dwi Ramasari Risti Dwi Ramasari Sopian Efendi Sopiyan Sanjaya Sopiyan Sanjaya Suta Ramadhan T T Valen Nababan Wawan Prasetiyo Youdi Adeputra Triawan Yulia Hesti Zainudin Hasan Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen